1
|
Kremer M, Schulze S, Eisenbruch N, Nagel F, Vogt R, Berndt L, Dörre B, Palm GJ, Hoppen J, Girbardt B, Albrecht D, Sievers S, Delcea M, Baumann U, Schnetz K, Lammers M. Bacteria employ lysine acetylation of transcriptional regulators to adapt gene expression to cellular metabolism. Nat Commun 2024; 15:1674. [PMID: 38395951 PMCID: PMC10891134 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46039-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The Escherichia coli TetR-related transcriptional regulator RutR is involved in the coordination of pyrimidine and purine metabolism. Here we report that lysine acetylation modulates RutR function. Applying the genetic code expansion concept, we produced site-specifically lysine-acetylated RutR proteins. The crystal structure of lysine-acetylated RutR reveals how acetylation switches off RutR-DNA-binding. We apply the genetic code expansion concept in E. coli in vivo revealing the consequences of RutR acetylation on the transcriptional level. We propose a model in which RutR acetylation follows different kinetic profiles either reacting non-enzymatically with acetyl-phosphate or enzymatically catalysed by the lysine acetyltransferases PatZ/YfiQ and YiaC. The NAD+-dependent sirtuin deacetylase CobB reverses enzymatic and non-enzymatic acetylation of RutR playing a dual regulatory and detoxifying role. By detecting cellular acetyl-CoA, NAD+ and acetyl-phosphate, bacteria apply lysine acetylation of transcriptional regulators to sense the cellular metabolic state directly adjusting gene expression to changing environmental conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalena Kremer
- Institute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Straße 47, 50674, Cologne, Germany
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Sabrina Schulze
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Nadja Eisenbruch
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Felix Nagel
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Biophysical Chemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Robert Vogt
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Leona Berndt
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Babett Dörre
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Gottfried J Palm
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Jens Hoppen
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Britta Girbardt
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Dirk Albrecht
- Institute of Microbiology, Department of Microbial Physiology and Molecular Biology, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Susanne Sievers
- Institute of Microbiology, Department of Microbial Physiology and Molecular Biology, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 8, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Mihaela Delcea
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Biophysical Chemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ulrich Baumann
- Institute of Biochemistry, University of Cologne, Zülpicher Straße 47, 50674, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karin Schnetz
- Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne Zülpicher Straße 47a, 50674, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Lammers
- Institute of Biochemistry, Department of Synthetic and Structural Biochemistry, University of Greifswald, Felix-Hausdorff-Str. 4, 17489, Greifswald, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mascher T. Past, Present, and Future of Extracytoplasmic Function σ Factors: Distribution and Regulatory Diversity of the Third Pillar of Bacterial Signal Transduction. Annu Rev Microbiol 2023; 77:625-644. [PMID: 37437215 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-micro-032221-024032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
Responding to environmental cues is a prerequisite for survival in the microbial world. Extracytoplasmic function σ factors (ECFs) represent the third most abundant and by far the most diverse type of bacterial signal transduction. While archetypal ECFs are controlled by cognate anti-σ factors, comprehensive comparative genomics efforts have revealed a much higher abundance and regulatory diversity of ECF regulation than previously appreciated. They have also uncovered a diverse range of anti-σ factor-independent modes of controlling ECF activity, including fused regulatory domains and phosphorylation-dependent mechanisms. While our understanding of ECF diversity is comprehensive for well-represented and heavily studied bacterial phyla-such as Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria (phylum Actinomycetota)-our current knowledge about ECF-dependent signaling in the vast majority of underrepresented phyla is still far from complete. In particular, the dramatic extension of bacterial diversity in the course of metagenomic studies represents both a new challenge and an opportunity in expanding the world of ECF-dependent signal transduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Mascher
- General Microbiology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Demey LM, Gumerov VM, Xing J, Zhulin IB, DiRita VJ. Transmembrane Transcription Regulators Are Widespread in Bacteria and Archaea. Microbiol Spectr 2023; 11:e0026623. [PMID: 37154724 PMCID: PMC10269533 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00266-23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
To adapt and proliferate, bacteria must sense and respond to the ever-changing environment. Transmembrane transcription regulators (TTRs) are a family of one-component transcription regulators that respond to extracellular information and influence gene expression from the cytoplasmic membrane. How TTRs function to modulate expression of their target genes while localized to the cytoplasmic membrane remains poorly understood. In part, this is due to a lack of knowledge regarding the prevalence of TTRs among prokaryotes. Here, we show that TTRs are highly diverse and prevalent throughout bacteria and archaea. Our work demonstrates that TTRs are more common than previously appreciated and are enriched within specific bacterial and archaeal phyla and that many TTRs have unique transmembrane region properties that can facilitate association with detergent-resistant membranes. IMPORTANCE One-component signal transduction systems are the major class of signal transduction systems among bacteria and are commonly cytoplasmic. TTRs are a group of unique one-component signal transduction systems that influence transcription from the cytoplasmic membrane. TTRs have been implicated in a wide array of biological pathways critical for both pathogens and human commensal organisms but were considered to be rare. Here, we demonstrate that TTRs are in fact highly diverse and broadly distributed in bacteria and archaea. Our findings suggest that transcription factors can access the chromosome and influence transcription from the membrane in both archaea and bacteria. This study challenges thus the commonly held notion that signal transduction systems require a cytoplasmic transcription factor and highlights the importance of the cytoplasmic membrane in directly influencing signal transduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucas M. Demey
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Vadim M. Gumerov
- Department of Microbiology and Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Jiawei Xing
- Department of Microbiology and Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Igor B. Zhulin
- Department of Microbiology and Translational Data Analytics Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Victor J. DiRita
- Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mak PHW, Rehman MA, Kiarie EG, Topp E, Diarra MS. Production systems and important antimicrobial resistant-pathogenic bacteria in poultry: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2022; 13:148. [PMID: 36514172 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-022-00786-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Economic losses and market constraints caused by bacterial diseases such as colibacillosis due to avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and necrotic enteritis due to Clostridium perfringens remain major problems for poultry producers, despite substantial efforts in prevention and control. Antibiotics have been used not only for the treatment and prevention of such diseases, but also for growth promotion. Consequently, these practices have been linked to the selection and spread of antimicrobial resistant bacteria which constitute a significant global threat to humans, animals, and the environment. To break down the antimicrobial resistance (AMR), poultry producers are restricting the antimicrobial use (AMU) while adopting the antibiotic-free (ABF) and organic production practices to satisfy consumers' demands. However, it is not well understood how ABF and organic poultry production practices influence AMR profiles in the poultry gut microbiome. Various Gram-negative (Salmonella enterica serovars, Campylobacter jejuni/coli, E. coli) and Gram-positive (Enterococcus spp., Staphylococcus spp. and C. perfringens) bacteria harboring multiple AMR determinants have been reported in poultry including organically- and ABF-raised chickens. In this review, we discussed major poultry production systems (conventional, ABF and organic) and their impacts on AMR in some potential pathogenic Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria which could allow identifying issues and opportunities to develop efficient and safe production practices in controlling pathogens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip H W Mak
- Guelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Guelph, ON, Canada.,Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Muhammad Attiq Rehman
- Guelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Elijah G Kiarie
- Department of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Edward Topp
- London Research and Development Center, AAFC, London, ON, Canada
| | - Moussa S Diarra
- Guelph Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada (AAFC), Guelph, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Antimicrobial tolerance and its role in the development of resistance: Lessons from enterococci. Adv Microb Physiol 2022; 81:25-65. [PMID: 36167442 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ampbs.2022.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Bacteria have developed resistance against every antimicrobial in clinical use at an alarming rate. There is a critical need for more effective use of antimicrobials to both extend their shelf life and prevent resistance from arising. Significantly, antimicrobial tolerance, i.e., the ability to survive but not proliferate during antimicrobial exposure, has been shown to precede the development of bona fide antimicrobial resistance (AMR), sparking a renewed and rapidly increasing interest in this field. As a consequence, problematic infections for the first time are now being investigated for antimicrobial tolerance, with increasing reports demonstrating in-host evolution of antimicrobial tolerance. Tolerance has been identified in a wide array of bacterial species to all bactericidal antimicrobials. Of particular interest are enterococci, which contain the opportunistic bacterial pathogens Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium. Enterococci are one of the leading causes of hospital-acquired infection and possess intrinsic tolerance to a number of antimicrobial classes. Persistence of these infections in the clinic is of growing concern, particularly for the immunocompromised. Here, we review current known mechanisms of antimicrobial tolerance, and include an in-depth analysis of those identified in enterococci with implications for both the development and prevention of AMR.
Collapse
|