Overlap of replication rounds disturbs the progression of replicating forks in a ribonucleotide reductase mutant of Escherichia coli

Chromosomal Replication Complexity: A Novel DNA Metrics and Genome Instability Factor

As the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated to the unreplicated regions in the same chromosome, the definition of chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) appears to leave little room for variation, being either two during S-phase or one otherwise. However, bacteria dividing faster than they replicate their chromosome spike CRC to four and even eight. A recent experimental inquiry about the limits of CRC in Escherichia coli revealed two major reasons to avoid elevating it further: (i) increased chromosomal fragmentation and (ii) complications with subsequent double-strand break repair. Remarkably, examples of stable elevated CRC in eukaryotic chromosomes are well known under various terms like "differential replication," "underreplication," "DNA puffs," "onion-skin replication," or "re-replication" and highlight the phenomenon of static replication fork (sRF). To accurately describe the resulting "amplification by overinitiation," I propose a new term: "replification" (subchromosomal overreplication). In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, replification, via sRF processing, causes double-strand DNA breaks and, with their repair elevating chromosomal rearrangements, represents a novel genome instability factor. I suggest how static replication bubbles could be stabilized and speculate that some tandem duplications represent such persistent static bubbles. Moreover, I propose how static replication bubbles could be transformed into tandem duplications, double minutes, or inverted triplications. Possible experimental tests of these models are discussed.

Static and Dynamic Factors Limit Chromosomal Replication Complexity in Escherichia coli, Avoiding Dangers of Runaway Overreplication

We define chromosomal replication complexity (CRC) as the ratio of the copy number of the most replicated regions to that of unreplicated regions on the same chromosome. Although a typical CRC of eukaryotic or bacterial chromosomes is 2, rapidly growing Escherichia coli cells induce an extra round of replication in their chromosomes (CRC = 4). There are also E. coli mutants with stable CRC∼6. We have investigated the limits and consequences of elevated CRC in E. coli and found three limits: the "natural" CRC limit of ∼8 (cells divide more slowly); the "functional" CRC limit of ∼22 (cells divide extremely slowly); and the "tolerance" CRC limit of ∼64 (cells stop dividing). While the natural limit is likely maintained by the eclipse system spacing replication initiations, the functional limit might reflect the capacity of the chromosome segregation system, rather than dedicated mechanisms, and the tolerance limit may result from titration of limiting replication factors. Whereas recombinational repair is beneficial for cells at the natural and functional CRC limits, we show that it becomes detrimental at the tolerance CRC limit, suggesting recombinational misrepair during the runaway overreplication and giving a rationale for avoidance of the latter.

Tuning the replication fork progression by the initiation frequency

The thermo-resistant period of the thermo-sensitive ribonucleotide reductase RNR101 encoded by the nrdA101 allele in Escherichia coli is prolonged for 50 min at 42°C, enabling an increase in DNA content of about 45%. Assuming that fork progression in the nrdA101 mutant is impaired, the question whether reduced number of ongoing replication rounds altered the thermo-resistant period in this strain was investigated. Decreases in the oriC/terC ratio and in the number of oriC per cell at 30°C were found in the presence of oriC228, oriC229 and oriC239 alleles in strain nrdA101. Correlated with this effect, increased thermo-resistance period of the RNR101 was allowed, and the detrimental effects on cell division, chromosome segregation and cell viability observed in the nrdA101 mutant at 42°C were suppressed. These results indicate that conditions leading to chromosome initiation deficiency at 30°C enhance the replication fork progression in the nrdA101 mutant at 42°C. We propose that coordination between initiation frequency and replication fork progression could be significant for most of the replication systems with important consequences in their cell cycle regulation.