Downregulation of the Escherichia coli guaB promoter by FIS

Suppressors of dGTP Starvation in Escherichia coli

dGTP starvation, a newly discovered phenomenon in which Escherichia coli cells are starved specifically for the DNA precursor dGTP, leads to impaired growth and, ultimately, cell death. Phenomenologically, it represents an example of nutritionally induced unbalanced growth: cell mass amplifies normally as dictated by the nutritional status of the medium, but DNA content growth is specifically impaired. The other known example of such a condition, thymineless death (TLD), involves starvation for the DNA precursor dTTP, which has been found to have important chemotherapeutic applications. Experimentally, dGTP starvation is induced by depriving an E. coligpt optA1 strain of its required purine source, hypoxanthine. In our studies of this phenomenon, we noted the emergence of a relatively high frequency of suppressor mutants that proved resistant to the treatment. To study such suppressors, we used next-generation sequencing on a collection of independently obtained mutants. A significant fraction was found to carry a defect in the PurR transcriptional repressor, controlling de novo purine biosynthesis, or in its downstream purEK operon. Thus, upregulation of de novo purine biosynthesis appears to be a major mode of overcoming the lethal effects of dGTP starvation. In addition, another large fraction of the suppressors contained a large tandem duplication of a 250- to 300-kb genomic region that included the purEK operon as well as the acrAB-encoded multidrug efflux system. Thus, the suppressive effects of the duplications could potentially involve beneficial effects of a number of genes/operons within the amplified regions.IMPORTANCE Concentrations of the four precursors for DNA synthesis (2'-deoxynucleoside-5'-triphosphates [dNTPs]) are critical for both the speed of DNA replication and its accuracy. Previously, we investigated consequences of dGTP starvation, where the DNA precursor dGTP was specifically reduced to a low level. Under this condition, E. coli cells continued cell growth but eventually developed a DNA replication defect, leading to cell death due to formation of unresolvable DNA structures. Nevertheless, dGTP-starved cultures eventually resumed growth due to the appearance of resistant mutants. Here, we used whole-genome DNA sequencing to identify the responsible suppressor mutations. We show that the majority of suppressors can circumvent death by upregulating purine de novo biosynthesis, leading to restoration of dGTP to acceptable levels.

The Nucleoid: an Overview

This review provides a brief review of the current understanding of the structure-function relationship of the Escherichia coli nucleoid developed after the overview by Pettijohn focusing on the physical properties of nucleoids. Isolation of nucleoids requires suppression of DNA expansion by various procedures. The ability to control the expansion of nucleoids in vitro has led to purification of nucleoids for chemical and physical analyses and for high-resolution imaging. Isolated E. coli genomes display a number of individually intertwined supercoiled loops emanating from a central core. Metabolic processes of the DNA double helix lead to three types of topological constraints that all cells must resolve to survive: linking number, catenates, and knots. The major species of nucleoid core protein share functional properties with eukaryotic histones forming chromatin; even the structures are different from histones. Eukaryotic histones play dynamic roles in the remodeling of eukaryotic chromatin, thereby controlling the access of RNA polymerase and transcription factors to promoters. The E. coli genome is tightly packed into the nucleoid, but, at each cell division, the genome must be faithfully replicated, divided, and segregated. Nucleoid activities such as transcription, replication, recombination, and repair are all affected by the structural properties and the special conformations of nucleoid. While it is apparent that much has been learned about the nucleoid, it is also evident that the fundamental interactions organizing the structure of DNA in the nucleoid still need to be clearly defined.

Genome-wide analysis of the salmonella Fis regulon and its regulatory mechanism on pathogenicity islands

Fis, one of the most important nucleoid-associated proteins, functions as a global regulator of transcription in bacteria that has been comprehensively studied in Escherichia coli K12. Fis also influences the virulence of Salmonella enterica and pathogenic E. coli by regulating their virulence genes, however, the relevant mechanism is unclear. In this report, using combined RNA-seq and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq technologies, we first identified 1646 Fis-regulated genes and 885 Fis-binding targets in the S. enterica serovar Typhimurium, and found a Fis regulon different from that in E. coli. Fis has been reported to contribute to the invasion ability of S. enterica. By using cell infection assays, we found it also enhances the intracellular replication ability of S. enterica within macrophage cell, which is of central importance for the pathogenesis of infections. Salmonella pathogenicity islands (SPI)-1 and SPI-2 are crucial for the invasion and survival of S. enterica in host cells. Using mutation and overexpression experiments, real-time PCR analysis, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we demonstrated that Fis regulates 63 of the 94 Salmonella pathogenicity island (SPI)-1 and SPI-2 genes, by three regulatory modes: i) binds to SPI regulators in the gene body or in upstream regions; ii) binds to SPI genes directly to mediate transcriptional activation of themselves and downstream genes; iii) binds to gene encoding OmpR which affects SPI gene expression by controlling SPI regulators SsrA and HilD. Our results provide new insights into the impact of Fis on SPI genes and the pathogenicity of S. enterica.

Silencing of toxic gene expression by Fis

Bacteria and bacteriophages have evolved DNA modification as a strategy to protect their genomes. Mom protein of bacteriophage Mu modifies the phage DNA, rendering it refractile to numerous restriction enzymes and in turn enabling the phage to successfully invade a variety of hosts. A strong fortification, a combined activity of the phage and host factors, prevents untimely expression of mom and associated toxic effects. Here, we identify the bacterial chromatin architectural protein Fis as an additional player in this crowded regulatory cascade. Both in vivo and in vitro studies described here indicate that Fis acts as a transcriptional repressor of mom promoter. Further, our data shows that Fis mediates its repressive effect by denying access to RNA polymerase at mom promoter. We propose that a combined repressive effect of Fis and previously characterized negative regulatory factors could be responsible to keep the gene silenced most of the time. We thus present a new facet of Fis function in Mu biology. In addition to bringing about overall downregulation of Mu genome, it also ensures silencing of the advantageous but potentially lethal mom gene.

Helicobacter pylori relies primarily on the purine salvage pathway for purine nucleotide biosynthesis

Helicobacter pylori is a chronic colonizer of the gastric epithelium and plays a major role in the development of gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric cancer. In its coevolution with humans, the streamlining of the H. pylori genome has resulted in a significant reduction in metabolic pathways, one being purine nucleotide biosynthesis. Bioinformatic analysis has revealed that H. pylori lacks the enzymatic machinery for de novo production of IMP, the first purine nucleotide formed during GTP and ATP biosynthesis. This suggests that H. pylori must rely heavily on salvage of purines from the environment. In this study, we deleted several genes putatively involved in purine salvage and processing. The growth and survival of these mutants were analyzed in both nutrient-rich and minimal media, and the results confirmed the presence of a robust purine salvage pathway in H. pylori. Of the two phosphoribosyltransferase genes found in the H. pylori genome, only gpt appears to be essential, and an Δapt mutant strain was still capable of growth on adenine, suggesting that adenine processing via Apt is not essential. Deletion of the putative nucleoside phosphorylase gene deoD resulted in an inability of H. pylori to grow on purine nucleosides or the purine base adenine. Our results suggest a purine requirement for growth of H. pylori in standard media, indicating that H. pylori possesses the ability to utilize purines and nucleosides from the environment in the absence of a de novo purine nucleotide biosynthesis pathway.

Downregulation of the Escherichia coli guaB promoter by upstream-bound cyclic AMP receptor protein

The Escherichia coli guaB promoter (P(guaB)) is responsible for directing transcription of the guaB and guaA genes, which specify the biosynthesis of the nucleotide GMP. P(guaB) is subject to growth rate-dependent control (GRDC) and possesses an UP element that is required for this regulation. In addition, P(guaB) contains a discriminator, three binding sites for the nucleoid-associated protein FIS, and putative binding sites for the regulatory proteins DnaA, PurR, and cyclic AMP receptor protein (CRP). Here we show that the CRP-cyclic AMP (cAMP) complex binds to a site located over 100 bp upstream of the guaB transcription start site, where it serves to downregulate P(guaB). The CRP-mediated repression of P(guaB) activity increases in media that support lower growth rates. Inactivation of the crp or cyaA gene or ablation/translocation of the CRP site relieves repression by CRP and results in a loss of GRDC of P(guaB). Thus, GRDC of P(guaB) involves a progressive increase in CRP-mediated repression of the promoter as the growth rate decreases. Our results also suggest that the CRP-cAMP complex does not direct GRDC at P(guaB) and that at least one other regulatory factor is required for conferring GRDC on this promoter. However, PurR and DnaA are not required for this regulatory mechanism.