2
|
Vujadinovic M, Wunderlich K, Callendret B, Koning M, Vermeulen M, Sanders B, van der Helm E, Gecgel A, Spek D, de Boer K, Stalknecht M, Serroyen J, Grazia Pau M, Schuitemaker H, Zahn R, Custers J, Vellinga J. Adenoviral Type 35 and 26 Vectors with a Bidirectional Expression Cassette in the E1 Region Show an Improved Genetic Stability Profile and Potent Transgene-Specific Immune Response. Hum Gene Ther 2017; 29:337-351. [PMID: 28816084 DOI: 10.1089/hum.2017.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Genetic vaccines based on replication-incompetent adenoviral (AdV) vectors are currently in clinical development. Monovalent AdV vectors express one antigen from an expression cassette placed in most cases in the E1 region. For many vaccines, inclusion of several antigens is necessary in order to raise protective immunity and/or target more than one pathogen or pathogen strain. On the basis of the current technology, a mix of several monovalent vectors can be employed. However, a mix of the standard monovalent AdV vectors may not be optimal with respect to manufacturing costs and the final dose per vector in humans. Alternatively, a variety of bivalent recombinant AdV vector approaches is described in the literature. It remains unclear whether all strategies are equally suitable for clinical development while preserving all the beneficial properties of the monovalent AdV (e.g., immunogenic potency). Therefore, a thorough assessment of different bivalent AdV strategies was performed in a head-to-head fashion compared with the monovalent benchmark. The vectors were tested for rescue efficiency, genetic stability, transgene expression, and potency to induce transgene-specific immune responses. We report that the vector expressing multiple antigens from a bidirectional expression cassette in E1 shows a better genetic stability profile and a potent transgene-specific immune response compared with the other tested bivalent vectors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marija Vujadinovic
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Kerstin Wunderlich
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Benoit Callendret
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marina Koning
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Mark Vermeulen
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Sanders
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esmeralda van der Helm
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Adile Gecgel
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk Spek
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Karin de Boer
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Masha Stalknecht
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Serroyen
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Maria Grazia Pau
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hanneke Schuitemaker
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Roland Zahn
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jerome Custers
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jort Vellinga
- Janssen Vaccines and Prevention, Janssen Pharmaceutical Companies of Johnson & Johnson , Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Development of Novel Adenoviral Vectors to Overcome Challenges Observed With HAdV-5-based Constructs. Mol Ther 2015; 24:6-16. [PMID: 26478249 PMCID: PMC4754553 DOI: 10.1038/mt.2015.194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2015] [Accepted: 10/07/2015] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Recombinant vectors based on human adenovirus serotype 5 (HAdV-5) have been extensively studied in preclinical models and clinical trials over the past two decades. However, the thorough understanding of the HAdV-5 interaction with human subjects has uncovered major concerns about its product applicability. High vector-associated toxicity and widespread preexisting immunity have been shown to significantly impede the effectiveness of HAdV-5–mediated gene transfer. It is therefore that the in-depth knowledge attained working on HAdV-5 is currently being used to develop alternative vectors. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of data obtained in recent years disqualifying the HAdV-5 vector for systemic gene delivery as well as novel strategies being pursued to overcome the limitations observed with particular emphasis on the ongoing vectorization efforts to obtain vectors based on alternative serotypes.
Collapse
|
4
|
Vellinga J, Smith JP, Lipiec A, Majhen D, Lemckert A, van Ooij M, Ives P, Yallop C, Custers J, Havenga M. Challenges in Manufacturing Adenoviral Vectors for Global Vaccine Product Deployment. Hum Gene Ther 2014; 25:318-27. [DOI: 10.1089/hum.2014.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Paul Ives
- Crucell Holland BV, 2333CN Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Menzo Havenga
- Batavia Bioservices BV, 2333CK Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schuldt NJ, Aldhamen YA, Godbehere-Roosa S, Seregin SS, Kousa YA, Amalfitano A. Immunogenicity when utilizing adenovirus serotype 4 and 5 vaccines expressing circumsporozoite protein in naïve and adenovirus (Ad5) immune mice. Malar J 2012; 11:209. [PMID: 22720732 PMCID: PMC3472263 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-11-209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2012] [Accepted: 05/16/2012] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Induction of potent long lasting effector T cell responses against liver stage malaria antigens strongly correlates with protection from malaria. While Adenovirus serotype 5 (Ad5) based malaria vaccine platforms have the ability to induce potent effector T cell responses against transgenes, high rates of pre-existing Ad5 immunity in malaria endemic regions has prompted study of alternative Ad serotype based malaria vaccines as replacements for Ad5 based malaria vaccines. The research described in this article examines the utility of alternative serotype adenovirus serotype 4 (Ad4) expressing a sporozoite surface protein (circumsporozoite protein (CSP)) (Ad4-CSP) to induce immune responses against CSP. The immunogenicity of Ad4-CSP was also tested in homologous and heterologous prime boost vaccinations in both Ad5 naïve and Ad5 immune backgrounds as compared to use of Ad5-CSP. Results In Ad5 naïve animals, use of Ad4-CSP priming vaccinations followed by boosting with Ad5-CSP (Ad4-CSP/Ad5-CSP) maximally increased the numbers of CSP specific cytokine secreting cytotoxic T cells relative to repeated use of Ad5-CSP. The Ad4-CSP/Ad5-CSP regimen also induced equivalent levels of CSP specific cell killing as did homologous prime-boost vaccinations with Ad5-CSP, despite stimulating lower numbers of CSP specific cytotoxic T cells. Priming with Ad4-CSP followed by a homologous boost resulted in significantly less CSP specific humoral responses than any other vaccination regimen tested in Ad naïve animals. In Ad5 immune animals, addition of Ad4-CSP in homologous or heterologous prime boost resulted in inductions of higher CSP specific responses than animals repeatedly vaccinated with Ad5-CSP alone. However, the observed responses were well below those observed in similarly treated Ad naïve mice. Conclusions While the Ad4-CSP/Ad5-CSP and Ad5-CSP/Ad5-CSP vaccination regimens resulted in equivalent CSP specific killing in Ad naïve animals, Ad4-CSP/Ad5-CSP achieved this result with a lower percentage of CSP specific CD8+ T cells and a higher number of IFNγ secreting cells, suggesting that the Ad4-CSP/Ad5-CSP vaccination regimen elicits more efficient cytotoxic T cells. In Ad5 immune animals use of Ad4-CSP improved CSP specific immune responses as compared to repeated use of Ad5-CSP, but could not achieve the levels of immunogenicity observed when the same vaccine regimens were used in Ad naïve animals. These data indicate the existence of some level of immunological cross-reactivity between these two adenovirus subgroups. Based on these results, it is suggested that future studies should undertake similarly stringent analyses of alternative Ad serotypes to establish their effectiveness as replacements for Ad5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel J Schuldt
- Genetics Program, Michigan State University, 2240 E Biomedical and Physical Sciences Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) and Ad35 vaccine vectors bypass immunity to Ad5 and protect nonhuman primates against ebolavirus challenge. J Virol 2011; 85:4222-33. [PMID: 21325402 DOI: 10.1128/jvi.02407-10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 149] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of adenoviruses (Ad) as vaccine vectors against a variety of pathogens has demonstrated their capacity to elicit strong antibody and cell-mediated immune responses. Adenovirus serotype C vectors, such as Ad serotype 5 (Ad5), expressing Ebolavirus (EBOV) glycoprotein (GP), protect completely after a single inoculation at a dose of 10(10) viral particles. However, the clinical application of a vaccine based on Ad5 vectors may be hampered, since impairment of Ad5 vaccine efficacy has been demonstrated for humans and nonhuman primates with high levels of preexisting immunity to the vector. Ad26 and Ad35 segregate genetically from Ad5 and exhibit lower seroprevalence in humans, making them attractive vaccine vector alternatives. In the series of studies presented, we show that Ad26 and Ad35 vectors generate robust antigen-specific cell-mediated and humoral immune responses against EBOV GP and that Ad5 immune status does not affect the generation of GP-specific immune responses by these vaccines. We demonstrate partial protection against EBOV by a single-shot Ad26 vaccine and complete protection when this vaccine is boosted by Ad35 1 month later. Increases in efficacy are paralleled by substantial increases in T- and B-cell responses to EBOV GP. These results suggest that Ad26 and Ad35 vectors warrant further development as candidate vaccines for EBOV.
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Malaria remains one of the most devastating infectious diseases that threaten humankind. Human malaria is caused by five different species of Plasmodium parasites, each transmitted by the bite of female Anopheles mosquitoes. Plasmodia are eukaryotic protozoans with more than 5000 genes and a complex life cycle that takes place in the mosquito vector and the human host. The life cycle can be divided into pre-erythrocytic stages, erythrocytic stages and mosquito stages. Malaria vaccine research and development faces formidable obstacles because many vaccine candidates will probably only be effective in a specific species at a specific stage. In addition, Plasmodium actively subverts and escapes immune responses, possibly foiling vaccine-induced immunity. Although early successful vaccinations with irradiated, live-attenuated malaria parasites suggested that a vaccine is possible, until recently, most efforts have focused on subunit vaccine approaches. Blood-stage vaccines remain a primary research focus, but real progress is evident in the development of a partially efficacious recombinant pre-erythrocytic subunit vaccine and a live-attenuated sporozoite vaccine. It is unlikely that partially effective vaccines will eliminate malaria; however, they might prove useful in combination with existing control strategies. Elimination of malaria will probably ultimately depend on the development of highly effective vaccines.
Collapse
|
8
|
Lindholm L, Henning P, Magnusson MK. Novel strategies in tailoring human adenoviruses into therapeutic cancer gene therapy vectors. Future Virol 2008. [DOI: 10.2217/17460794.3.1.45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Gene therapy is a novel approach for the treatment of cancer that has so far not been realized. The scope of this review is to try to define the remaining barriers to the successful use of adenovirus vectors for gene and viral therapy of human tumors and to suggest solutions whereby these barriers can be bypassed. It is the conviction of the authors that too many studies have been performed in animal models that are not sufficiently comprehensive to allow conclusions to be drawn for application in humans. For example, in the case of the murine experimental model, in which most studies have been performed, mice are devoid of circulating antibodies to adenovirus type 5 and adenovirus cannot replicate in mouse cells. While the problems are real enough, as witnessed by the quite limited success in human trials, some of the solutions that will be suggested here are hypothetical and have not as yet been tried, even in animals. The review has no ambition to be exhaustive but is intended as a contribution in order to forward the field of gene therapy vectors for systemic clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leif Lindholm
- University of Goteborg, Institute for Biomedicine, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, PO Box 435, SE 40530 Goteborg, Sweden, and, Got-A-Gene AB, Östra Kyviksvägen 18, SE 42930 Kullavik, Sweden
| | - Petra Henning
- University of Goteborg, Institute for Biomedicine, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, PO Box 435, SE 40530 Goteborg, Sweden, and, Got-A-Gene AB, Östra Kyviksvägen 18, SE 42930 Kullavik, Sweden
| | - Maria K Magnusson
- University of Goteborg, Institute for Biomedicine, Department of Microbiology & Immunology, PO Box 435, SE 40530 Goteborg, Sweden, and, Got-A-Gene AB, Östra Kyviksvägen 18, SE 42930 Kullavik, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|