A population survey in Italy based on the ICF classification: recognizing persons with severe disability

ICF framework in cardiac rehabilitation: a real-life implementation in post-cardiac surgery and chronic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) is growing in importance in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) as the number of elderly comorbid patients increases.

AIM

To classify through the ICF framework a group of post-cardiac surgery (CS) and chronic heart failure (CHF) patients undergoing rehabilitation. Then, to compare the two groups and identify possible factors at admission that could affect ICF evaluations at discharge.

DESIGN

Observational retrospective real-life study.

SETTING

Two inpatient CR units.

POPULATION

Consecutive CS and CHF patients admitted for CR (January-December 2019).

METHODS

Clinical, anthropometric data and functional status at admission and discharge were extracted from patient health records. A set of 26 ICF codes regarding body functions (b) and activities (d) was analyzed to identify: 1) the qualifiers attributed (from 0=no impairment to 4=severe impairment) for each code, 2) the percent distribution of qualifiers (0/1/2/3/4) attributed per patient. We then evaluated changes in both (1) and (2 - defined as ICF Delta%) from admission to discharge.

RESULTS

All patients (55% males; mean age 73±12 years) showed an improvement post-rehabilitation in the ICF qualifiers attributed (P<0.0001 for all codes). CS patients (N.=150) were less functionally impaired at admission than CHF (N.=194) (P<0.05 for all codes), and at discharge showed greater Delta% in the qualifiers 0/1/2 attributed than CHF (P<0.0001 for b codes; P<0.05 for d codes). Delta% for qualifiers 3 and 4 was similar in the two groups. No impairment at admission (qualifier 0), CS group, and presence/complexity of comorbidities were identified as possible covariates influencing ICF qualifiers at discharge, impacting the rate of both no/mild impairment (ICF% aggregate 0+1 - adjusted R2=0.627; P<0.0001) and moderate impairment (ICF% qualifier 2 - adjusted R2=0.507; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

CHF patients showed a worse ICF picture at admission and less improvement at discharge than CS. The presence and complexity of comorbidities negatively influenced the ICF classification at discharge, especially in CHF patients.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

This study shows the utility of ICF classification in CR as a means for describing, measuring, and comparing patient functioning across the care continuum.

Effectiveness of ICF-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach with serial assessment and discussion using the ICF rehabilitation set in a convalescent rehabilitation ward

This study was aimed to determine the effectiveness of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach with serial assessment and discussion with the ICF rehabilitation set. This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients admitted to the convalescent rehabilitation ward during the period between 1 August 2017 and 30 September 2018. Serial assessment and discussion with the ICF rehabilitation set every 2 weeks in each patient commenced from 1 April 2018. We analyzed the difference in the Extension Index of the ICF rehabilitation set between the periods before the assessment of the ICF rehabilitation set (prior period) and after that (post-period). The change of the Extension Index of the ICF rehabilitation set was higher in patients of the post-period group (n = 59) compared with those of the prior period group (n = 45) (mean 31.6, SD 18.5 vs. mean 17.3, SD 18.4, respectively; 95% confidence interval for the difference 7.0-21.5). Multiple regression analysis showed that serial assessment by the ICF rehabilitation set was independently associated with the improvement of the Extension Index. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation approach combined with serial assessment and discussion using the ICF rehabilitation set was associated with favorable recovery. Our study highlighted the effectiveness of ICF-based multidisciplinary rehabilitation in a clinical setting.

[The application of the International Classification of functioning, disability and health for the evaluation of the effectiveness of rehabilitation: methodology, practical experience, results]

The article highlights the methodology, tools, conditions and limitations of the application of the International Classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) for the evaluation of the effectiveness of medical rehabilitation. The results of the assessment of the initial level of the patients' functional abilities and their rehabilitation potential are presented with special reference to the selection of interventions and instruments for their realization as envisaged by ICF and allocation of the responsibilities among the professionals taking into consideration the AIM: of the rehabilitative treatment for specific patients. The advantages of the proposed approach are demonstrated on the example of the management of the patients presenting with osteoarthritis. Special attention is given to the information coding techniques and standards for the description of the patients' health conditions at various stages of rehabilitation.

Which environmental factors are associated with lived health when controlling for biological health? - a multilevel analysis

Background

Lived health and biological health are two different perspectives of health introduced by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Since in the concept of lived health the impact of the environment on biological health is inherently included, it seems intuitive that when identifying the environmental determinants of health, lived health is the appropriate outcome. The Multilevel Item Response Theory (MLIRT) model has proven to be a successful method when dealing with the relation between a latent variable and observed variables. The objective of this study was to identify environmental factors associated with lived health when controlling for biological health by using the MLIRT framework.

Methods

We performed a psychometric study using cross-sectional data from the Spanish Survey on Disability, Independence and Dependency Situation. Data were collected from 17,303 adults living in 15,263 dwellings. The MLIRT model was used for each of the two steps of the analysis to: (1) calculate people’s biological health abilities and (2) estimate the association between lived health and environmental factors when controlling for biological health. The hierarchical structure of individuals in dwellings was considered in both models.

Results

Social support, being able to maintain one’s job, the extent to which one’s health needs are addressed and being discriminated against due to one’s health problems were the environmental factors identified as associated with lived health. Biological health also had a strong positive association with lived health.

Conclusions

This study identified environmental factors associated with people’s lived health differences within and between dwellings according to the MLIRT-model approach. This study paves the way for the future implementation of the MLIRT model when analysing ICF-based data.

Validation of the Brazilian version of the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III

Introduction : The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM III) specifically assesses individuals with spinal cord injuries. Objective : To translate and validate the Brazilian version of SCIM III. Method : SCIM III was translated, back-translated and adapted to the Portuguese language. Two interviewers assessed 83 subjects with spinal cord injuries in each one of seven collaborating rehabilitation centers. Functional Independence Measure (FIM™) and ASIA motor and sensory indices were also used. After six months, subjects were re-evaluated with the same instruments. Results : Examiners clearly understood the Brazilian version of SCIM III. Inter-rater intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.918, and test-retest ICC was 0.991. After six months, the variation of gains in the FIM™ positively correlated with gains in SCIM III. Conclusion : The Brazilian version of the SCIM III is easy to understand, has good psychometric properties, and is valid.