1
|
Gholizadeh N, Pundavela J, Nagarajan R, Dona A, Quadrelli S, Biswas T, Greer PB, Ramadan S. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of human body fluids and in vivo magnetic resonance spectroscopy: Potential role in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:150-173. [PMID: 31937423 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common solid organ cancer in men, and the second most common cause of male cancer-related mortality. It has few effective therapies, and is difficult to diagnose accurately. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), which is currently the most effective diagnostic tool available, cannot reliably discriminate between different pathologies, and in fact only around 30% of patients found to have elevated levels of PSA are subsequently confirmed to actually have prostate cancer. As such, there is a desperate need for more reliable diagnostic tools that will allow the early detection of prostate cancer so that the appropriate interventions can be applied. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) are 2 high throughput, noninvasive analytical procedures that have the potential to enable differentiation of prostate cancer from other pathologies using metabolomics, by focusing specifically on certain metabolites which are associated with the development of prostate cancer cells and its progression. The value that this type of approach has for the early detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized treatment of prostate cancer is becoming increasingly apparent. Recent years have seen many promising developments in the fields of NMR spectroscopy and MRS, with improvements having been made to hardware as well as to techniques associated with the acquisition, processing, and analysis of related data. This review focuses firstly on proton NMR spectroscopy of blood serum, urine, and expressed prostatic secretions in vitro, and then on 1- and 2-dimensional proton MRS of the prostate in vivo. Major advances in these fields and methodological principles of data collection, acquisition, processing, and analysis are described along with some discussion of related challenges, before prospects that proton MRS has for future improvements to the clinical management of prostate cancer are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neda Gholizadeh
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Jay Pundavela
- Experimental Hematology and Cancer Biology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Rajakumar Nagarajan
- Human Magnetic Resonance Center, Institute for Applied Life Sciences, University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA, USA
| | - Anthony Dona
- Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
| | - Scott Quadrelli
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Radiology Department, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Tapan Biswas
- Department of Instrumentation and Electronics Engineering, Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India
| | - Peter B Greer
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Radiation Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Saadallah Ramadan
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia; Imaging Centre, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu Z, Zhang J. Comments on "In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis". Tumour Biol 2015; 36:5757-8. [PMID: 25999207 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-3569-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2015] [Accepted: 05/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenyin Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, 9 Jinsui Road, Guangzhou City, 510623, People's Republic of China
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang X, Wang XJ, Song HS, Chen LH. 1H-MRS evaluation of breast lesions by using total choline signal-to-noise ratio as an indicator of malignancy: a meta-analysis. Med Oncol 2015; 32:160. [PMID: 25895597 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-015-0603-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the use of total choline signal-to-noise ratio (tCho SNR) criteria in MRS studies for benign/malignant discrimination of focal breast lesions. We conducted (1) a meta-analysis based on 10 studies including 480 malignant breast lesions and 312 benign breast lesions and (2) a subgroup meta-analysis of tCho SNR ≥ 2 as cutoff for malignancy based on 7 studies including 371 malignant breast lesions and 239 benign breast lesions. (1) The pooled sensitivity and specificity of proton MRS with tCho SNR were 0.74 (95 % CI 0.69-0.77) and 0.76 (95 % CI 0.71-0.81), respectively. The PLR and NLR were 3.67 (95 % CI 2.30-5.83) and 0.25 (95 % CI 0.14-0.42), respectively. From the fitted SROC, the AUC and Q* index were 0.89 and 0.82. Publication bias was present (t = 2.46, P = 0.039). (2) Meta-regression analysis suggested that neither threshold effect nor evaluated covariates including strength of field, pulse sequence, TR and TE were sources of heterogeneity (all P value >0.05). (3) Subgroup meta-analysis: The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.79 and 0.72, respectively. The PLR and NLR were 3.49 and 0.20, respectively. The AUC and Q* index were 0.92 and 0.85. The use of tCho SNR criteria in MRS studies was helpful for differentiation between malignant and benign breast lesions. However, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated due to publication bias. A tCho SNR ≥ 2 as cutoff for malignancy resulted in higher diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu L, Gu S, Feng Q, Liang C, Xin SX. Quantitative study of liver magnetic resonance spectroscopy quality at 3T using body and phased array coils with physical analysis and clinical evaluation. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122999. [PMID: 25881016 PMCID: PMC4400076 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2014] [Accepted: 02/26/2015] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to investigate the quality difference of short echo time (TE) breathhold 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) of the liver at 3.0T using the body and phased array coils, respectively. In total, 20 pairs of single-voxel proton spectra of the liver were acquired at 3.0T using the phased array and body coils as receivers. Consecutive stacks of breathhold spectra were acquired using the point resolved spectroscopy (PRESS) technique at a short TE of 30 ms and a repetition time (TR) of 1500 ms. The first spectroscopy sequence was “copied” for the second acquisition to ensure identical voxel positioning. The MRS prescan adjustments of shimming and water suppression, signal-to noise ratio (SNR), and major liver quantitative information were compared between paired spectra. Theoretical calculation of the SNR and homogeneity of the region of interest (ROI, 2 cm×2 cm×2 cm) using different coils loaded with 3D liver electromagnetic model of real human body was implemented in the theoretical analysis. The theoretical analysis showed that, inside the ROI, the SNR of the phase array coil was 2.8387 times larger than that of body coil and the homogeneity of the phase array coil and body coil was 80.10% and 93.86%, respectively. The experimental results showed excellent correlations between the paired data (all r > 0.86). Compared with the body coil group, the phased array group had slightly worse shimming effect and better SNR (all P values < .01). The discrepancy of the line width because of the different coils was approximately 0.8 Hz (0.00625 ppm). No significant differences of the major liver quantitative information of Cho/Lip2 height, Cho/Lip2 area, and lipid content were observed (all P values >0.05). The theoretical analysis and clinical experiment showed that the phased array coil was superior to the body coil with respect to 3.0T breathhold hepatic proton MRS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Xu
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong Provincial Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital & postdoctoral mobile research station of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shiyong Gu
- Biomedical Engineering School of the Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qianjin Feng
- Biomedical Engineering School of the Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
- * E-mail: (QF); (SXX)
| | - Changhong Liang
- Department of Radiology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
| | - Sherman Xuegang Xin
- Biomedical Engineering School of the Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China
- Bernard and Irene Schwartz Center for Biomedical Imaging, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail: (QF); (SXX)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS evaluation of malignant and benign breast lesions: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 2014; 36:345-52. [PMID: 25260884 DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2635-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2014] [Accepted: 09/12/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the in vivo post-contrast proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) for benign/malignant discrimination of focal breast lesions. Sixteen studies with a total of 661 malignant breast lesions and 388 benign breast lesions were included. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of post-contrast 1H-MRS were 74 % (95 % confidence interval (CI) 70-77 %) and 78 % (95 % CI 73-82 %), respectively. The positive likelihood ratio (PLR) and the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) were 4.00 (95 % CI 2.74-5.84) and 0.25 (95 % CI 0.17-0.37), respectively. From the fitted summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC), the AUC and Q* index were 0.89 and 0.83. Publication bias was present (t = 2.43, P = 0.029). Meta-regression analysis suggested that neither threshold effect nor evaluated covariates including method of choline analysis, strength of field, pulse sequence, repetition time (TR), and time interval were sources of heterogeneity (all P values >0.05). In vivo post-contrast 1H-MRS was useful for differentiation between malignant and benign focal breast lesions. However, pooled diagnostic measures might be overestimated. The standardization of the acquisition protocol as well as the post-processing method for post-contrast proton MRS need to be established for the future study.
Collapse
|