An anatomically detailed and personalizable head injury model: Significance of brain and white matter tract morphological variability on strain

Regional Strain Response of an Anatomically Accurate Human Finite Element Head Model Under Frontal Versus Lateral Loading

INTRODUCTION

Because brain regions are responsible for specific functions, regional damage may cause specific, predictable symptoms. However, the existing brain injury criteria focus on whole brain response. This study developed and validated a detailed human brain computational model with sufficient fidelity to include regional components and demonstrate its feasibility to obtain region-specific brain strains under selected loading.

METHODS

Model development used the Simulated Injury Monitor (SIMon) model as a baseline. Each SIMon solid element was split into 8, with each shell element split into 4. Anatomical regions were identified from FreeSurfer fsaverage neuroimaging template. Material properties were obtained from literature. The model was validated against experimental intracranial pressure, brain-skull displacement, and brain strain data. Model simulations used data from laboratory experiments with a rigid arm pendulum striking a helmeted head-neck system. Data from impact tests (6 m/s) at 2 helmet sites (front and left) were used.

RESULTS

Model validation showed good agreement with intracranial pressure response, fair to good agreement with brain-skull displacement, and good agreement for brain strain. CORrelation Analysis scores were between 0.72 and 0.93 for both maximum principal strain (MPS) and shear strain. For frontal impacts, regional MPS was between 0.14 and 0.36 (average of left and right hemispheres). For lateral impacts, MPS was between 0.20 and 0.48 (left hemisphere) and between 0.22 and 0.51 (right hemisphere). For frontal impacts, regional cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM20) was between 0.01 and 0.87. For lateral impacts, CSDM20 was between 0.36 and 0.99 (left hemisphere) and between 0.09 and 0.93 (right hemisphere).

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing that neural functions are related to anatomical structures and most model-based injury metrics focus on whole brain response, this study developed an anatomically accurate human brain model to capture regional responses. Model validation was comparable with current models. The model provided sufficient anatomical detail to describe brain regional responses under different impact conditions.

A Morphologically Individualized Deep Learning Brain Injury Model

The brain injury modeling community has recommended improving model subject specificity and simulation efficiency. Here, we extend an instantaneous (< 1 sec) convolutional neural network (CNN) brain model based on the anisotropic Worcester Head Injury Model (WHIM) V1.0 to account for strain differences due to individual morphological variations. Linear scaling factors relative to the generic WHIM along the three anatomical axes are used as additional CNN inputs. To generate training samples, the WHIM is randomly scaled to pair with augmented head impacts randomly generated from real-world data for simulation. An estimation of voxelized peak maximum principal strain of the whole-brain is said to be successful when the linear regression slope and Pearson's correlation coefficient relative to directly simulated do not deviate from 1.0 (when identical) by more than 0.1. Despite a modest training dataset (N = 1363 vs. ∼5.7 k previously), the individualized CNN achieves a success rate of 86.2% in cross-validation for scaled model responses, and 92.1% for independent generic model testing for impacts considered as complete capture of kinematic events. Using 11 scaled subject-specific models (with scaling factors determined from pre-established regression models based on head dimensions and sex and age information, and notably, without neuroimages), the morphologically individualized CNN remains accurate for impacts that also yield successful estimations for the generic WHIM. The individualized CNN instantly estimates subject-specific and spatially detailed peak strains of the entire brain and thus, supersedes others that report a scalar peak strain value incapable of informing the location of occurrence. This tool could be especially useful for youths and females due to their anticipated greater morphological differences relative to the generic model, even without the need for individual neuroimages. It has potential for a wide range of applications for injury mitigation purposes and the design of head protective gears. The voxelized strains also allow for convenient data sharing and promote collaboration among research groups.

American Football Helmet Effectiveness Against a Strain-Based Concussion Mechanism

Brain strain is increasingly being used in helmet design and safety performance evaluation as it is generally considered as the primary mechanism of concussion. In this study, we investigate whether different helmet designs can meaningfully alter brain strains using two commonly used metrics, peak maximum principal strain (MPS) of the whole brain and cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM). A convolutional neural network (CNN) that instantly produces detailed brain strains is first tested for accuracy for helmeted head impacts. Based on N = 144 impacts in 12 impact conditions from three random and representative helmet models, we conclude that the CNN is sufficiently accurate for helmet testing applications, for elementwise MPS (success rate of 98.6%), whole-brain peak MPS and CSDM (coefficient of determination of 0.977 and 0.980, with root mean squared error of 0.015 and 0.029, respectively). We then apply the technique to 23 football helmet models (N = 1104 impacts) to reproduce elementwise MPS. Assuming a concussion would occur when peak MPS or CSDM exceeds a threshold, we sweep their thresholds across the value ranges to evaluate the number of predicted hypothetical concussions that different helmets sustain across the impact conditions. Relative to the 12 impact conditions tested, we find that the "best" and "worst" helmets differ by an average of 22.5% in terms of predicted concussions, ranging from 0 to 42% (the latter achieved at the threshold value of 0.28 for peak MPS and 0.4 for CSDM, respectively). Such a large variation among helmets in strain-based concussion predictions demonstrate that helmet designs can still be optimized in a clinically meaningful way. The robustness and accuracy of the CNN tool also suggest its potential for routine use for helmet design and safety performance evaluation in the future. The CNN is freely available online at https://github.com/Jilab-biomechanics/CNN-brain-strains .

Displacement voxelization to resolve mesh-image mismatch: Application in deriving dense white matter fiber strains

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

It is common to combine biomechanical modeling and medical images for multimodal analyses. However, mesh-image mismatch may occur that prevents direct information exchange. To eliminate mesh-image mismatch, we develop a simple but elegant displacement voxelization technique based on image voxel corner nodes to achieve voxel-wise strain. We then apply the technique to derive dense white matter fiber strains along whole-brain tractography (∼35 k fiber tracts consisting of ∼3.3 million sampling points) resulting from head impact.

METHODS

Displacements at image voxel corner nodes are first obtained from model simulation via scattered interpolation. Each voxel is then scaled linearly to form a unit hexahedral element. This allows convenient and efficient voxel-wise strain tensor calculation and displacement interpolation at arbitrary fiber sampling points via shape functions. Fiber strains from displacement interpolation are then compared with those from the commonly used strain tensor projection using either voxel- or element-wise strain tensors.

RESULTS

Based on a synthetic displacement field, fiber strains interpolated from voxelized displacement are considerably more accurate than those from strain tensor projection relative to the prescribed ground-truth (determinant of coefficient (R²) of 1.00 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.01 vs. 0.87 and 0.10, respectively). For a set of real-world reconstructed head impacts (N = 53), the strain tensor projection method performs similarly poorly (R² of 0.80-0.90 and RMSE of 0.03-0.07), with overestimation strongly correlated with strain magnitude (Pearson correlation coefficient >0.9). Up to ∼15% of the fiber strains are overestimated by more than the lower bound of a conservative injury threshold of 0.09. The percentage increases to ∼37% when halving the threshold. Voxel interpolation is also significantly more efficient (15 s vs. 40 s for element strain tensor projection, without parallelization).

CONCLUSIONS

Voxelized displacement interpolation is considerably more accurate and efficient in deriving dense white matter fiber strains than strain tensor projection. The latter generally overestimates with overestimation magnitude strongly correlating with fiber strain magnitude. Displacement voxelization is an effective technique to eliminate mesh-image mismatch and generates a convenient image representation of tissue deformation. This technique can be generalized to broadly facilitate a diverse range of image-related biomechanical problems for multimodal analyses. The convenient image format may also promote and facilitate biomechanical data sharing in the future.

Instantaneous Brain Strain Estimation for Automotive Head Impacts via Deep Learning

Efficient brain strain estimation is critical for routine application of a head injury model. Lately, a convolutional neural network (CNN) has been successfully developed to estimate spatially detailed brain strains instantly and accurately in contact sports. Here, we extend its application to automotive head impacts, where impact profiles are typically more complex with longer durations. Head impact kinematics (N=458) from two public databases were used to generate augmented impacts (N=2694). They were simulated using the anisotropic Worcester Head Injury Model (WHIM) V1.0, which provided baseline elementwise peak maximum principal strain (MPS). For each augmented impact, rotational velocity (v_rot) and the corresponding rotational acceleration (a_rot) profiles were concatenated as static images to serve as CNN input. Three training strategies were evaluated: 1) "baseline", using random initial weights; 2) "transfer learning", using weight transfer from a previous CNN model trained on head impacts drawn from contact sports; and 3) "combined training", combining previous training data from contact sports (N=5661) for training. The combined training achieved the best performances. For peak MPS, the CNN achieved a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.932 and root mean squared error (RMSE) of 0.031 for the real-world testing dataset. It also achieved a success rate of 60.5% and 94.8% for elementwise MPS, where the linear regression slope, k, and correlation coefficient, r, between estimated and simulated MPS did not deviate from 1.0 (when identical) by more than 0.1 and 0.2, respectively. Cumulative strain damage measure (CSDM) from the CNN estimation was also highly accurate compared to those from direct simulation across a range of thresholds (R² of 0.899-0.943 with RMSE of 0.054-0.069). Finally, the CNN achieved an average k and r of 0.98±0.12 and 0.90±0.07, respectively, for six reconstructed car crash impacts drawn from two other sources independent of the training dataset. Importantly, the CNN is able to efficiently estimate elementwise MPS with sufficient accuracy while conventional kinematic injury metrics cannot. Therefore, the CNN has the potential to supersede current kinematic injury metrics that can only approximate a global peak MPS or CSDM. The CNN technique developed here may offer enhanced utility in the design and development of head protective countermeasures, including in the automotive industry. This is the first study aimed at instantly estimating spatially detailed brain strains for automotive head impacts, which employs >8.8 thousand impact simulations generated from ~1.5 years of nonstop computations on a high-performance computing platform.

Integrating material properties from magnetic resonance elastography into subject-specific computational models for the human brain

Advances in brain imaging and computational methods have facilitated the creation of subject-specific computational brain models that aid researchers in investigating brain trauma using simulated impacts. The emergence of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) as a non-invasive mechanical neuroimaging tool has enabled in vivo estimation of material properties at low-strain, harmonic loading. An open question in the field has been how this data can be integrated into computational models. The goals of this study were to use a novel MRI dataset acquired in human volunteers to generate models with subject-specific anatomy and material properties, and then to compare simulated brain deformations to subject-specific brain deformation data under non-injurious loading. Models of five subjects were simulated with linear viscoelastic (LVE) material properties estimated directly from MRE data. Model predictions were compared to experimental brain deformation acquired in the same subjects using tagged MRI. Outcomes from the models matched the spatial distribution and magnitude of the measured peak strain components as well as the 95^th percentile in-plane peak strains within 0.005 mm/mm and maximum principal strain within 0.012 mm/mm. Sensitivity to material heterogeneity was also investigated. Simulated brain deformations from a model with homogenous brain properties and a model with brain properties discretized with up to ten regions were very similar (a mean absolute difference less than 0.0015 mm/mm in peak strains). Incorporating material properties directly from MRE into a biofidelic subject-specific model is an important step toward future investigations of higher-order model features and simulations under more severe loading conditions.

A Review of Validation Methods for the Intracranial Response of FEHM to Blunt Impacts

The following is a review of the processes currently employed when validating the intracranial response of Finite Element Head Models (FEHM) against blunt impacts. The authors aim to collate existing validation tools, their applications and findings on their effectiveness to aid researchers in the validation of future FEHM and potential efforts in improving procedures. In this vain, publications providing experimental data on the intracranial pressure, relative brain displacement and brain strain responses to impacts in human subjects are surveyed and key data are summarised. This includes cases that have previously been used in FEHM validation and alternatives with similar potential uses. The processes employed to replicate impact conditions and the resulting head motion are reviewed, as are the analytical techniques used to judge the validity of the models. Finally, publications exploring the validation process and factors affecting it are critically discussed. Reviewing FEHM validation in this way highlights the lack of a single best practice, or an obvious solution to create one using the tools currently available. There is clear scope to improve the validation process of FEHM, and the data available to achieve this. By collecting information from existing publications, it is hoped this review can help guide such developments and provide a point of reference for researchers looking to validate or investigate FEHM in the future, enabling them to make informed choices about the simulation of impacts, how they are generated numerically and the factors considered during output assessment, whilst being aware of potential limitations in the process.

Validation and Comparison of Instrumented Mouthguards for Measuring Head Kinematics and Assessing Brain Deformation in Football Impacts

Because of the rigid coupling between the upper dentition and the skull, instrumented mouthguards have been shown to be a viable way of measuring head impact kinematics for assisting in understanding the underlying biomechanics of concussions. This has led various companies and institutions to further develop instrumented mouthguards. However, their use as a research tool for understanding concussive impacts makes quantification of their accuracy critical, especially given the conflicting results from various recent studies. Here we present a study that uses a pneumatic impactor to deliver impacts characteristic to football to a Hybrid III headform, in order to validate and compare five of the most commonly used instrumented mouthguards. We found that all tested mouthguards gave accurate measurements for the peak angular acceleration, the peak angular velocity, brain injury criteria values (mean average errors < 13, 8, 13%, respectively), and the mouthguards with long enough sampling time windows are suitable for a convolutional neural network-based brain model to calculate the brain strain (mean average errors < 9%). Finally, we found that the accuracy of the measurement varies with the impact locations yet is not sensitive to the impact velocity for the most part.