1
|
Sanderson-Cimino M, Elman JA, Tu XM, Gross AL, Panizzon MS, Gustavson DE, Bondi MW, Edmonds EC, Eppig JS, Franz CE, Jak AJ, Lyons MJ, Thomas KR, Williams ME, Kremen WS. Practice Effects in Mild Cognitive Impairment Increase Reversion Rates and Delay Detection of New Impairments. Front Aging Neurosci 2022; 14:847315. [PMID: 35547623 PMCID: PMC9083463 DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.847315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Cognitive practice effects (PEs) can delay detection of progression from cognitively unimpaired to mild cognitive impairment (MCI). They also reduce diagnostic accuracy as suggested by biomarker positivity data. Even among those who decline, PEs can mask steeper declines by inflating cognitive scores. Within MCI samples, PEs may increase reversion rates and thus impede detection of further impairment. Within an MCI sample at baseline, we evaluated how PEs impact prevalence, reversion rates, and dementia progression after 1 year. Methods We examined 329 baseline Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative MCI participants (mean age = 73.1; SD = 7.4). We identified test-naïve participants who were demographically matched to returnees at their 1-year follow-up. Since the only major difference between groups was that one completed testing once and the other twice, comparison of scores in each group yielded PEs. PEs were subtracted from each test to yield PE-adjusted scores. Biomarkers included cerebrospinal fluid phosphorylated tau and amyloid beta. Cox proportional models predicted time until first dementia diagnosis using PE-unadjusted and PE-adjusted diagnoses. Results Accounting for PEs increased MCI prevalence at follow-up by 9.2% (272 vs. 249 MCI), and reduced reversion to normal by 28.8% (57 vs. 80 reverters). PEs also increased stability of single-domain MCI by 12.0% (164 vs. 147). Compared to PE-unadjusted diagnoses, use of PE-adjusted follow-up diagnoses led to a twofold increase in hazard ratios for incident dementia. We classified individuals as false reverters if they reverted to cognitively unimpaired status based on PE-unadjusted scores, but remained classified as MCI cases after accounting for PEs. When amyloid and tau positivity were examined together, 72.2% of these false reverters were positive for at least one biomarker. Interpretation Even when PEs are small, they can meaningfully change whether some individuals with MCI retain the diagnosis at a 1-year follow-up. Accounting for PEs resulted in increased MCI prevalence and altered stability/reversion rates. This improved diagnostic accuracy also increased the dementia-predicting ability of MCI diagnoses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Sanderson-Cimino
- University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States,Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,*Correspondence: Mark Sanderson-Cimino,
| | - Jeremy A. Elman
- Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Xin M. Tu
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Sam and Rose Stein Institute for Research on Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Alden L. Gross
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MA, United States
| | - Matthew S. Panizzon
- Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Daniel E. Gustavson
- Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Mark W. Bondi
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Psychology Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Emily C. Edmonds
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Joel S. Eppig
- Rehabilitation Institute of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Carol E. Franz
- Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Amy J. Jak
- Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Michael J. Lyons
- Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kelsey R. Thomas
- Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - McKenna E. Williams
- University of California San Diego Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States,Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - William S. Kremen
- Center for Behavior Genetics of Aging, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States,Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|