Three sites of contact between the Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigmaF and its antisigma factor SpoIIAB

Alternative Sigma Factor of Staphylococcus aureus Interacts with the Cognate Antisigma Factor Primarily Using Its Domain 3

σ^B, an alternative sigma factor, is usually employed to tackle the general stress response in Staphylococcus aureus and other Gram-positive bacteria. This protein, involved in S. aureus-mediated pathogenesis, is typically blocked by RsbW, an antisigma factor having serine kinase activity. σ^B, a σ⁷⁰-like sigma factor, harbors three conserved domains designated σ^B2, σ^B3, and σ^B4. To better understand the interaction between RsbW and σ^B or its domains, we have studied their recombinant forms, rRsbW, rσ^B, rσ^B2, rσ^B3, and rσ^B4, using different probes. The results show that none of the rσ^B domains, unlike rσ^B, showed binding to a cognate DNA in the presence of a core RNA polymerase. However, both rσ^B2 and rσ^B3, like rσ^B, interacted with rRsbW, and the order of their rRsbW binding affinity looks like rσ^B > rσ^B3 > rσ^B2. Furthermore, the reaction between rRsbW and rσ^B or rσ^B3 was exothermic and occurred spontaneously. rRsbW and rσ^B3 also associate with each other at a stoichiometry of 2:1, and different types of noncovalent bonds might be responsible for their interaction. A structural model of the RsbW-σ^B3 complex that has supported our experimental results indicated the binding of rσ^B3 at the putative dimeric interface of RsbW. A genetic study shows that the tentative dimer-forming region of RsbW is crucial for preserving its rσ^B binding ability, serine kinase activity, and dimerization ability. Additionally, a urea-induced equilibrium unfolding study indicated a notable thermodynamic stabilization of σ^B3 in the presence of RsbW. Possible implications of the stabilization data in drug discovery were discussed at length.

A novel RNA polymerase-binding protein that interacts with a sigma-factor docking site

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a cascade of alternative RNA polymerase sigma factors. We previously identified a small protein Fin that is produced under the control of the sporulation sigma factor σF to create a negative feedback loop that inhibits σF -directed gene transcription. Cells deleted for fin are defective for spore formation and exhibit increased levels of σF -directed gene transcription. Based on pull-down experiments, chemical crosslinking, bacterial two-hybrid experiments and nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shift analysis, we now report that Fin binds to RNA polymerase and specifically to the coiled-coil region of the β' subunit. The coiled-coil is a docking site for sigma factors on RNA polymerase, and evidence is presented that the binding of Fin and σF to RNA polymerase is mutually exclusive. We propose that Fin functions by a mechanism distinct from that of classic sigma factor antagonists (anti-σ factors), which bind directly to a target sigma factor to prevent its association with RNA polymerase, and instead functions to inhibit σF by competing for binding to the β' coiled-coil.

A negative feedback loop that limits the ectopic activation of a cell type-specific sporulation sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis

Two highly similar RNA polymerase sigma subunits, σ^F and σ^G, govern the early and late phases of forespore-specific gene expression during spore differentiation in Bacillus subtilis. σ^F drives synthesis of σ^G but the latter only becomes active once engulfment of the forespore by the mother cell is completed, its levels rising quickly due to a positive feedback loop. The mechanisms that prevent premature or ectopic activation of σ^G while discriminating between σ^F and σ^G in the forespore are not fully comprehended. Here, we report that the substitution of an asparagine by a glutamic acid at position 45 of σ^G (N45E) strongly reduced binding by a previously characterized anti-sigma factor, CsfB (also known as Gin), in vitro, and increased the activity of σ^G in vivo. The N45E mutation caused the appearance of a sub-population of pre-divisional cells with strong activity of σ^G. CsfB is normally produced in the forespore, under σ^F control, but sigGN45E mutant cells also expressed csfB and did so in a σ^G-dependent manner, autonomously from σ^F. Thus, a negative feedback loop involving CsfB counteracts the positive feedback loop resulting from ectopic σ^G activity. N45 is invariant in the homologous position of σ^G orthologues, whereas its functional equivalent in σ^F proteins, E39, is highly conserved. While CsfB does not bind to wild-type σ^F, a E39N substitution in σ^F resulted in efficient binding of CsfB to σ^F. Moreover, under certain conditions, the E39N alteration strongly restrains the activity of σ^F in vivo, in a csfB-dependent manner, and the efficiency of sporulation. Therefore, a single amino residue, N45/E39, is sufficient for the ability of CsfB to discriminate between the two forespore-specific sigma factors in B. subtilis.

Positive auto-regulation of a transcriptional activator during cell differentiation or development often allows the rapid and robust deployment of cell- and stage-specific genes and the routing of the differentiating cell down a specific path. Positive auto-regulation however, raises the potential for inappropriate activity of the transcription factor. Here we unravel the role of a previously characterized anti-sigma factor, CsfB, in a negative feedback loop that prevents ectopic expression of the sporulation-specific sigma factor σ^G of Bacillus subtilis. σ^G is activated in the forespore, one of the two chambers of the developing cell, at an intermediate stage in spore development. Once active, a positive feedback loop allows the rapid accumulation of σ^G. Synthesis of both σ^G and CsfB is under the control of the early forespore regulator σ^F, and CsfB may help prevent the premature activity of σ^G in the forespore. However, CsfB is also produced under σ^G control in non-sporulating cells, setting a negative feedback loop that we show limits its ectopic activation. We further show that an asparagine residue conserved among σ^G orthologues is critical for binding and inhibition by CsfB, whereas the exclusion of asparagine from the homologous position in σ^F confers immunity to CsfB.

Genomic characterization of methanomicrobiales reveals three classes of methanogens

Background

Methanomicrobiales is the least studied order of methanogens. While these organisms appear to be more closely related to the Methanosarcinales in ribosomal-based phylogenetic analyses, they are metabolically more similar to Class I methanogens.

Methodology/Principal Findings

In order to improve our understanding of this lineage, we have completely sequenced the genomes of two members of this order, Methanocorpusculum labreanum Z and Methanoculleus marisnigri JR1, and compared them with the genome of a third, Methanospirillum hungatei JF-1. Similar to Class I methanogens, Methanomicrobiales use a partial reductive citric acid cycle for 2-oxoglutarate biosynthesis, and they have the Eha energy-converting hydrogenase. In common with Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales possess the Ech hydrogenase and at least some of them may couple formylmethanofuran formation and heterodisulfide reduction to transmembrane ion gradients. Uniquely, M. labreanum and M. hungatei contain hydrogenases similar to the Pyrococcus furiosus Mbh hydrogenase, and all three Methanomicrobiales have anti-sigma factor and anti-anti-sigma factor regulatory proteins not found in other methanogens. Phylogenetic analysis based on seven core proteins of methanogenesis and cofactor biosynthesis places the Methanomicrobiales equidistant from Class I methanogens and Methanosarcinales.

Conclusions/Significance

Our results indicate that Methanomicrobiales, rather than being similar to Class I methanogens or Methanomicrobiales, share some features of both and have some unique properties. We find that there are three distinct classes of methanogens: the Class I methanogens, the Methanomicrobiales (Class II), and the Methanosarcinales (Class III).

Genetic dissection of an inhibitor of the sporulation sigma factor sigma(G)

Sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is controlled by a cascade of four sigma factors that are held into inactive form until the proper stage of development. The Gin protein, encoded by csfB, is able to strongly inhibit the activity of one of these factors, sigma(G), in vivo. The csfB gene is present in a large number of endospore formers, but the various Gin orthologues show little conservation, in striking contrast to their sigma(G) counterparts. We have carried out a mutagenesis analysis of the Gin protein in order to understand its inhibitory properties. By measuring sigma(G) inhibition in the presence of Gin in vivo, assessing Gin ability to bind sigma(G) in a yeast two-hybrid assay, and quantifying Gin-sigma(G) interaction in B. subtilis, we have identified specific residues that play an essential role in binding sigma(G) or in preventing sigma(G) transcriptional activity. Two cysteine pairs, conserved in all Gin orthologues, are essential for Gin activity. Mutations in the first pair are partially complemented by mutations in the second pair, suggesting that Gin exists in oligomeric form, at least as a dimer. Dimerisation is consistent with our in vitro analysis of a purified Gin recombinant protein, which shows that Gin contains 0.5 zinc atom per monomer. Altogether, these results indicate that the conserved cysteines play a structural role, whereas another less conserved region of the protein is involved in interacting with sigma(G). Interestingly, some mutants have kept most of their ability to bind sigma(G) but are completely unable to inhibit sigma(G) transcriptional activity, raising the possibility that Gin might act by a mechanism more complex than just sequestration of sigma(G).

Inhibition of ref-1 stimulates the production of reactive oxygen species and induces differentiation in adult cardiac stem cells

Redox effector protein-1 (Ref-1) plays an essential role in DNA repair and redox regulation of several transcription factors. In the present study, we examined the role of Ref-1 in maintaining the redox status and survivability of adult cardiac stem cells challenged with a subtoxic level of H2O2 under inhibition of Ref-1 by RNA interference. Treatment of cardiac stem cells with a low concentration of H2O2 induced Ref-1-mediated survival signaling through phosphorylation of Akt. However, Ref-1 inhibition followed by H2O2 treatment extensively induced the level of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) through activation of the components of NADPH oxidase, like p22( phox ), p47( phox ), and Nox4. Cardiac differentiation markers (Nkx2.5, MEF2C, and GATA4), and cell death by apoptosis were significantly elevated in Ref-1 siRNA followed by H2O2-treated stem cells. Further, inhibition of Ref-1 increased the level of p53 but decreased the phosphorylation of Akt, a molecule involved in survival signaling. Treatment with ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine attenuated Ref-1 siRNA-mediated activation of NADPH oxidase and cardiac differentiation. Taken together, these results indicate that Ref-1 plays an important role in maintaining the redox status of cardiac stem cells and protects them from oxidative injury-mediated cell death and differentiation.

A possible extended family of regulators of sigma factor activity in Streptomyces coelicolor

SCO4677 is one of a large number of similar genes in Streptomyces coelicolor that encode proteins with an HATPase_c domain resembling that of anti-sigma factors such as SpoIIAB of Bacillus subtilis. However, SCO4677 is not located close to genes likely to encode a cognate sigma or anti-anti-sigma factor. SCO4677 was found to regulate antibiotic production and morphological differentiation, both of which were significantly enhanced by the deletion of SCO4677. Through protein-protein interaction screening of candidate sigma factor partners using the yeast two-hybrid system, SCO4677 protein was found to interact with the developmentally specific sigma(F), suggesting that it is an antagonistic regulator of sigma(F). Two other proteins, encoded by SCO0781 and SCO0869, were found to interact with the SCO4677 anti-sigma(F) during a subsequent global yeast two-hybrid screen, and the SCO0869-SCO4677 protein-protein interaction was confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. The SCO0781 and SCO0869 proteins resemble well-known anti-anti-sigma factors such as SpoIIAA of B. subtilis. It appears that streptomycetes may possess an extraordinary abundance of anti-sigma factors, some of which may influence diverse processes through interactions with multiple partners: a novel feature for such regulatory proteins.

Regulation of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factor activity: a structural perspective

In bacteria, sigma factors are essential for the promoter DNA-binding specificity of RNA polymerase. The sigma factors themselves are regulated by anti-sigma factors that bind and inhibit their cognate sigma factor, and 'appropriators' that deploy a particular sigma-associated RNA polymerase to a specific promoter class. Adding to the complexity is the regulation of anti-sigma factors by both anti-anti-sigma factors, which turn on sigma factor activity, and co-anti-sigma factors that act in concert with their partner anti-sigma factor to inhibit or redirect sigma activity. While sigma factor structure and function are highly conserved, recent results highlight the diversity of structures and mechanisms that bacteria use to regulate sigma factor activity, reflecting the diversity of environmental cues that the bacterial transcription system has evolved to respond.

Differential mechanisms of binding of anti-sigma factors Escherichia coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA to E. coli RNA polymerase lead to diverse physiological consequences

Anti-sigma factors Escherichia coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA bind to the essential housekeeping sigma factor, sigma(70), of E. coli. Though both factors are known to interact with the C-terminal region of sigma(70), the physiological consequences of these interactions are very different. This study was undertaken for the purpose of deciphering the mechanisms by which E. coli Rsd and bacteriophage T4 AsiA inhibit or modulate the activity of E. coli RNA polymerase, which leads to the inhibition of E. coli cell growth to different amounts. It was found that AsiA is the more potent inhibitor of in vivo transcription and thus causes higher inhibition of E. coli cell growth. Measurements of affinity constants by surface plasmon resonance experiments showed that Rsd and AsiA bind to sigma(70) with similar affinity. Data obtained from in vivo and in vitro binding experiments clearly demonstrated that the major difference between AsiA and Rsd is the ability of AsiA to form a stable ternary complex with RNA polymerase. The binding patterns of AsiA and Rsd with sigma(70) studied by using the yeast two-hybrid system revealed that region 4 of sigma(70) is involved in binding to both of these anti-sigma factors; however, Rsd interacts with other regions of sigma(70) as well. Taken together, these results suggest that the higher inhibition of E. coli growth by AsiA expression is probably due to the ability of the AsiA protein to trap the holoenzyme RNA polymerase rather than its higher binding affinity to sigma(70).

Clostridium difficile toxin expression is inhibited by the novel regulator TcdC

Clostridium difficile, an emerging nosocomial pathogen of increasing clinical significance, produces two large protein toxins that are responsible for the cellular damage associated with the disease. The precise mechanisms by which toxin synthesis is regulated in response to environmental change have yet to be discovered. The toxin genes (tcdA and tcdB) are located in a pathogenicity locus (PaLoc), along with tcdR and tcdC. TcdR is an alternative RNA polymerase sigma factor that directly activates toxin gene expression, while the inverse relationship between expression of tcdR, tcdA and tcdB genes on the one hand and tcdC on the other has led to the suggestion that TcdC somehow interferes with toxin gene expression. This idea is further supported by the finding that many recent C. difficile epidemic strains in which toxin production is increased carry a common tcdC deletion mutation. In this report we demonstrate that TcdC negatively regulates toxin synthesis both in vivo and in vitro. TcdC destabilizes the TcdR-containing holoenzyme before open complex formation, apparently by interaction with TcdR or TcdR-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme or both. In addition, we show that the hypertoxigenicity phenotype of C. difficile epidemic strains is not due to their common 18 bp in-frame deletion in tcdC.

Signalling network with a bistable hysteretic switch controls developmental activation of the sigma transcription factor in Bacillus subtilis

The sporulation process of the bacterium Bacillus subtilis unfolds by means of separate but co-ordinated programmes of gene expression within two unequal cell compartments, the mother cell and the smaller forespore. sigmaF is the first compartment-specific transcription factor activated during this process, and it is controlled at the post-translational level by a partner-switching mechanism that restricts sigmaF activity to the forespore. The crux of this mechanism lies in the ability of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB (AB) to form alternative complexes either with sigmaF, holding it in an inactive form, or with the anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA (AA) and a nucleotide, either ATP or ADP. In the complex with AB and ATP, AA is phosphorylated on a serine residue and released, making AB available to capture sigmaF in an inactive complex. Subsequent activation of sigmaF requires the intervention of the SpoIIE serine phosphatase to dephosphorylate AA, which can then attack the AB-sigmaF complex to induce the release of sigmaF. By incorporating biochemical, biophysical and genetic data from the literature we have constructed an integrative mathematical model of this partner-switching network. The model predicts that the self-enhancing formation of a long-lived complex of AA, AB and ADP transforms the network into an essentially irreversible hysteretic switch, thereby explaining the sharp, robust and irreversible activation of sigmaF in the forespore compartment. The model also clarifies the contributions of the partly redundant mechanisms that ensure correct spatial and temporal activation of sigmaF, reproduces the behaviour of various mutants and makes strong, testable predictions.

Both regions 4.1 and 4.2 of E. coli sigma(70) are together required for binding to bacteriophage T4 AsiA in vivo

The T4 AsiA is an anti-sigma factor encoded by one of the early genes of Bacteriophage T4. It has been shown that AsiA inhibits transcription from promoters containing -10 and -35 consensus sequence by binding to sigma(70) of E. coli. Binding of AsiA to sigma(70) in vivo, in E. coli, leads to inhibition of transcription of essential genes resulting in killing of the organism. By using various in vitro methods, the region of sigma(70) binding to AsiA have been mapped to domain 4.2. Additionally, mutational analysis of sigma(70) has also identified amino acid residues in domain 4.1 which are critical for interaction with AsiA. Based on NMR studies it has been suggested that either of these regions can bind to AsiA, a conclusion which was supported by high degree of amino acid homology between domain 4.1 and 4.2. However, it is not clear whether under in vivo conditions, AsiA exerts its transcription inhibitory effect by binding to one of these regions or both the regions together. In order to understand the mechanism of AsiA mediated inhibition of E. coli transcription in vivo, in terms of specific binding requirements to region 4.1 and/or 4.2, we have studied the interaction of these sub-domains with AsiA by Yeast two hybrid system as well as by co-expressing and affinity purification of the interacting partners in vivo in E. coli. It was observed that minimum fragment of sigma(70) showing observable binding to AsiA, must possess sub-domains 4.1 and 4.2 together. No binding could be detected in sigma(70) fragments lacking a part of either domain 4.1 or 4.2, in any of the assays. This data was also supported by in vitro binding studies wherein only sigma(70) fragments carrying both region 4.1 and 4.2 showed binding to AsiA. Co-expression of region 4.1 and 4.2 fragments together also did not show any interaction with AsiA. The results presented here suggest that binding of AsiA to sigma(70), in vivo, requires the presence of both sub-domains of region 4 of sigma(70).

RshA mimetic peptides inhibiting the transcription driven by a Mycobacterium tuberculosis sigma factor SigH

SigH, an alternative sigma factor in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, is a central regulator in responses to the oxidative and heat stress. This SigH activity is specifically controlled by an anti-sigma factor RshA during expression of stress-related genes. Thus, the specific interaction (k(on)=1.15x10(5) (M(-1) s(-1)), k(off)=1.7x10(-3) (s(-1)), KD=15 nM, determined in this study) between SigH and RshA is crucial for the survival and pathogenesis of M. tuberculosis. Using phage-display peptide library, we defined three specific regions on RshA responsible for SigH binding. Three RshA mimetic peptides (DAHADHD, AEVWTLL, and CTPETRE) specifically inhibited the transcription initiated by SigH in vitro. One of them (DAHADHD) diminished the extent of binding of RshA to SigH in a dose-dependent manner. The binding affinity (KD) of this peptide to SigH was about 1.2 microM. These findings might provide some insights into the development of new peptide-based drugs for TB.

Genome sequence and gene expression of Bacillus anthracis bacteriophage Fah

Fah, a lytic bacteriophage of Bacillus anthracis, is used widely in the former Soviet Union to identify anthrax bacteria. Here, we present the analysis of a 37,974 bp sequence of the Fah genome and examine gene expression of the phage in a model host, Bacillus cereus. Half of the Fah genome contains genes coding for structural proteins and host lysis functions in an arrangement typical of Syphoviridae. The other half of the genome contains genes coding for enzymes of viral genome replication and for numerous predicted transcription factors that are likely to regulate viral gene expression. Primer extension, in vitro transcription assays, and gene array analysis identified temporal classes of Fah genes and allowed location of viral promoters. Fah does not execute host transcription shut-off and relies on host RNA polymerase (RNAP) sigma(A) holoenzyme for transcription of its early and late genes. In addition, Fah encodes a sigma factor, sigma(Fah), a close relative of Bacillus sporulation factor sigma(F) that directs bacterial RNAP to at least one late viral promoter. sigma(Fah) is negatively regulated by host SpoIIAB, an anti-sigma factor that controls sporulation. Thus, sigma(Fah) may link phage gene expression to sporulation of the host.

Where asymmetry in gene expression originates

A general problem in developmental biology concerns the process by which cells of one type divide to give dissimilar daughter cells. Even though these daughter cells may be genetically identical, they can differ morphologically and physiologically and have different fates. As one of the simplest differentiation processes, Bacillus subtilis sporulation represents an excellent model system for studying cell differentiation. Several decades of study of this process have provided insight into cell cycle regulation and development. This review summarizes important advances in our understanding of asymmetric gene expression during spore formation with an emphasis on developmental stages that lead to asymmetric septum formation and especially to activation of the first compartment-specific sigma factor -sigma(F).

Crystal structures of the ADP and ATP bound forms of the Bacillus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in complex with the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA

Cell type-specific transcription during Bacillus sporulation is established by sigma(F), the activity of which is controlled by a regulatory circuit involving the anti-sigma factor and serine kinase SpoIIAB, and the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. When ATP is present in the nucleotide-binding site of SpoIIAB, SpoIIAA is phosphorylated, followed by dissociation. The nucleotide-binding site of SpoIIAB is left bound to ADP. SpoIIAB(ADP) can bind an unphosphorylated molecule of SpoIIAA as a stable binding partner. Thus, in this circuit, SpoIIAA plays a dual role as a substrate of the SpoIIAB kinase activity, as well as a tight binding inhibitor. Crystal structures of both the pre-phosphorylation complex and the inhibitory complex, SpoIIAB(ATP) and SpoIIAB(ADP) bound to SpoIIAA, respectively, have been determined. The structural differences between the two forms are subtle and confined to interactions with the phosphoryl groups of the nucleotides. The structures reveal details of the SpoIIAA:SpoIIAB interactions and how phosphorylated SpoIIAA dissociates from SpoIIAB(ADP). Finally, the results confirm and expand upon the docking model for SpoIIAA function as an anti-anti-sigma in releasing sigma(F) from SpoIIAB.

Insulation of the sigmaF regulatory system in Bacillus subtilis

The transcription factors sigmaF and sigmaB are related RNA polymerase sigma factors that govern dissimilar networks of adaptation to stress conditions in Bacillus subtilis. The two factors are controlled by closely related regulatory pathways, involving protein kinases and phosphatases. We report that insulation of the sigmaF pathway from the sigmaB pathway involves the integrated action of both the cognate kinase and the cognate phosphatase.

Role of the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB in regulation of sigmaG during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F) initiates the prespore-specific program of gene expression during Bacillus subtilis sporulation. sigma(F) governs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late prespore-specific regulator sigma(G). However, transcription of spoIIIG is delayed relative to other genes under the control of sigma(F), and after synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form. Activation of sigma(G) requires the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell and expression of the spoIIIA and spoIIIJ loci. We screened for random mutations in spoIIIG that bypassed the requirement for spoIIIA for the activation of sigma(G). We found a mutation (spoIIIGE156K) that resulted in an amino acid substitution at position 156, which is adjacent to the position of a mutation (E155K) previously shown to prevent interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). Comparative modelling techniques and in vivo studies suggested that the spoIIIGE156K mutation interferes with the interaction of SpoIIAB with sigma(G). The sigma(GE156K) isoform restored sigma(G)-directed gene expression to spoIIIA mutant cells. However, expression of sspE-lacZ in the spoIIIA spoIIIGE156K double mutant was delayed relative to completion of the engulfment process and was not confined to the prespore. Rather, beta-galactosidase accumulated throughout the entire cell at late times in development. This suggests that the activity of sigma(GE156K) is still regulated in the prespore of a spoIIIA mutant, but not by SpoIIAB. In agreement with this suggestion, we also found that expression of spoIIIGE156K from the promoter for the early prespore-specific gene spoIIQ still resulted in sspE-lacZ induction at the normal time during sporulation, coincidently with completion of the engulfment process. In contrast, transcription of spoIIIGE156K, but not of the wild-type spoIIIG gene, from the mother cell-specific spoIID promoter permitted the rapid induction of sspE-lacZ expression. Together, the results suggest that SpoIIAB is either redundant or has no role in the regulation of sigma(G) in the prespore.

Expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for activation of sigma G and for sporulation in Bacillus subtilis

During sporulation in Bacillus subtilis, the prespore-specific developmental program is initiated soon after asymmetric division of the sporangium by the compartment-specific activation of RNA polymerase sigma factor sigma(F). sigma(F) directs transcription of spoIIIG, encoding the late forespore-specific regulator sigma(G). Following synthesis, sigma(G) is initially kept in an inactive form, presumably because it is bound to the SpoIIAB anti-sigma factor. Activation of sigma(G) occurs only after the complete engulfment of the prespore by the mother cell. Mutations in spoIIIJ arrest sporulation soon after conclusion of the engulfment process and prevent activation of sigma(G). Here we show that sigma(G) accumulates but is mostly inactive in a spoIIIJ mutant. We also show that expression of the spoIIIGE155K allele, encoding a form of sigma(G) that is not efficiently bound by SpoIIAB in vitro, restores sigma(G)-directed gene expression to a spoIIIJ mutant. Expression of spoIIIJ occurs during vegetative growth. However, we show that expression of spoIIIJ in the prespore is sufficient for sigma(G) activation and for sporulation. Mutations in the mother cell-specific spoIIIA locus are known to arrest sporulation just after completion of the engulfment process. Previous work has also shown that sigma(G) accumulates in an inactive form in spoIIIA mutants and that the need for spoIIIA expression for sigma(G) activation can be circumvented by the spoIIIGE155K allele. However, in contrast to the case for spoIIIJ, we show that expression of spoIIIA in the prespore does not support efficient sporulation. The results suggest that the activation of sigma(G) at the end of the engulfment process involves the action of spoIIIA from the mother cell and of spoIIIJ from the prespore.

Evidence in support of a docking model for the release of the transcription factor sigma F from the antisigma factor SpoIIAB in Bacillus subtilis

Cell-specific activation of the transcription factor sigmaF during the process of sporulation in Bacillus subtilis is governed by an antisigma factor SpoIIAB and an anti-antisigma factor SpoIIAA. SpoIIAB, which exists as a dimer, binds to sigmaF in a complex of stoichiometry sigmaF.SpoIIAB2. Escape from the complex is mediated by SpoIIAA, which reacts with the complex to cause the release of free sigmaF. Previous evidence indicated that Arg-20 in SpoIIAB is a contact site for both sigmaF and SpoIIAA and that contact with sigmaF is mediated by Arg-20 on only one of the two subunits in the sigmaF.SpoIIAB2 complex. Here we report the construction of heterodimers of SpoIIAB in which one subunit is wild type and the other subunit is a mutant for Arg-20. We show that the dissociation constant for the binding of sigmaF to the heterodimer was similar to that for the wild type, a finding consistent with the idea that sigmaF contacts Arg-20 on only one of the two subunits. Although SpoIIAA was highly effective in causing the release of sigmaF from the wild type homodimer, the anti-antisigma factor had little effect on the release of sigmaF from the heterodimer. This finding is consistent with a model in which SpoIIAA docks on the sigmaF.SpoIIAB2 complex, making contact with the subunit in which Arg-20 is not in contact with sigmaF. SpoIIAB is both an anti-sigmaF factor and a protein kinase that phosphorylates and thereby inactivates SpoIIAA. We show that SpoIIAA effectively displaces sigmaF from a complex of sigmaF with a mutant (SpoIIABR105A) that is impaired in the kinase function of SpoIIAB. This result shows that SpoIIAA-mediated displacement of sigmaF from SpoIIAB does not require concomitant phosphorylation of SpoIIAA.

Region 4 of sigma as a target for transcription regulation

Bacterial sigma factors play a key role in promoter recognition, making direct contact with conserved promoter elements. Most sigma factors belong to the sigma70 family, named for the primary sigma factor in Escherichia coli. Members of the sigma70 family typically share four conserved regions and, here, we focus on region 4, which is directly involved in promoter recognition and serves as a target for a variety of regulators of transcription initiation. We review recent advances in the understanding of the mechanism of action of regulators that target region 4 of sigma.

Post-transcriptional regulation of the Streptomyces coelicolor stress responsive sigma factor, SigH, involves translational control, proteolytic processing, and an anti-sigma factor homolog

The sigH gene encodes a sigma factor whose transcription is controlled by stress regulatory systems and the developmental program in Streptomyces coelicolor. Here, we describe developmentally regulated post-transcriptional control systems for SigH. sigH is expressed as three primary translation products, SigH-sigma(37), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(52). In vitro, SigH-sigma(52) was comparable to SigH-sigma(37) in its ability to associate with RNA polymerase core enzyme and specifically initiate transcription in vitro. While SigH-sigma(51/52) were the primary gene products observed throughout early phases of growth, their abundance decreased during later stages in liquid or solid phase cultures while levels of shorter, C-terminally encoded products increased. These included SigH-sigma(37), a product of the downstream translational initiation site, as well as two proteolytic derivatives of SigH-sigma(51/52) (34kDa and 38kDa). Accumulation of SigH-sigma(37) and processing of SigH-sigma(51/52) into these stable 34kDa and 38kDa derivatives correlated with morphological changes on solid medium and physiological maturation in liquid medium. SigH-sigma(51/52) processing did not occur on medium non-permissive for aerial mycelium formation or in one particular developmental mutant (brgA). The proteolytic activity could be detected in vitro using crude extracts of stationary phase cultures, but was absent from exponential phase cultures. prsH, the gene upstream of sigH having sequence similarity to known anti-sigma factors, was able to bind to, and thus presumably inactivate SigH-sigma(52), SigH-sigma(51), and SigH-sigma(37). We have shown elsewhere that prsH was conditionally required for colonial development. Thus, while at least one transcriptional regulator is known to bring about the accumulation of sigH mRNA at different times and different locations in colonies, the post-transcriptional processes described here regulate the activity of different SigH isoforms and program their temporal accumulation pattern, i.e. the elimination of SigH-sigma(51/52) and accumulation of SigH-sigma(37)-like proteins, as a function of development.

Identification and structure of the anti-sigma factor-binding domain of the disulphide-stress regulated sigma factor sigma(R) from Streptomyces coelicolor

The extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factor sigma(R) is a global regulator of redox homeostasis in the antibiotic-producing bacterium Streptomyces coelicolor, with a similar role in other actinomycetes such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Normally maintained in an inactive state by its bound anti-sigma factor RsrA, sigma(R) dissociates in response to intracellular disulphide-stress to direct core RNA polymerase to transcribe genes, such as trxBA and trxC that encode the enzymes of the thioredoxin disulphide reductase pathway, that re-establish redox homeostasis. Little is known about where RsrA binds on sigma(R) or how it suppresses sigma(R)-dependent transcriptional activity. Using a combination of proteolysis, surface-enhanced laser desorption ionisation mass spectrometry and pull-down assays we identify an N-terminal, approximately 10kDa domain (sigma(RN)) that encompasses region 2 of sigma(R) that represents the major RsrA binding site. We show that sigma(RN) inhibits transcription by an unrelated sigma factor and that this inhibition is relieved by RsrA binding, reaffirming that region 2 is involved in binding to core RNA polymerase but also demonstrating that the likely mechanism by which RsrA inhibits sigma(R) activity is by blocking this association. We also report the 2.4A resolution crystal structure of sigma(RN) that reveals extensive structural conservation with the equivalent region of sigma(70) from Escherichia coli as well as with the cyclin-box, a domain-fold found in the eukaryotic proteins TFIIB and cyclin A. sigma(RN) has a propensity to aggregate, due to steric complementarity of oppositely charged surfaces on the domain, but this is inhibited by RsrA, an observation that suggests a possible mode of action for RsrA which we compare to other well-studied sigma factor-anti-sigma factor systems.

Crystal structure of the Bacillus stearothermophilus anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB with the sporulation sigma factor sigmaF

Cell type-specific transcription during Bacillus sporulation is established by sigmaF. SpoIIAB is an anti-sigma that binds and negatively regulates sigmaF, as well as a serine kinase that phosphorylates and inactivates the anti-anti-sigma SpoIIAA. The crystal structure of sigmaF bound to the SpoIIAB dimer in the low-affinity, ADP form has been determined at 2.9 A resolution. SpoIIAB adopts the GHKL superfamily fold of ATPases and histidine kinases. A domain of sigmaF contacts both SpoIIAB monomers, while 80% of the sigma factor is disordered. The interaction occludes an RNA polymerase binding surface of sigmaF, explaining the SpoIIAB anti-sigma activity. The structure also explains the specificity of SpoIIAB for its target sigma factors and, in combination with genetic and biochemical data, provides insight into the mechanism of SpoIIAA anti-anti-sigma activity.

Conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 of sigma(70) constitute the recognition sites for the anti-sigma factor AsiA, and AsiA is a dimer free in solution

The association of the bacteriophage T4-encoded AsiA protein with the final sigma(70) subunit of the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is one of the principal events governing transcription of the T4 genome. Analytical ultracentrifugation and NMR studies indicate that free AsiA is a symmetric dimer and the dimers can exchange subunits. Using NMR, the mutual recognition sites on AsiA and final sigma(70) have been elucidated. Residues throughout the N-terminal half of AsiA are involved either directly or indirectly in binding to final sigma(70) whereas the two highly conserved C-terminal regions of final sigma(70), denoted 4.1 and 4.2, constitute the entire AsiA binding domain. Peptides corresponding to these regions bind tightly to AsiA individually and simultaneously. Simultaneous binding promotes structural changes in AsiA that mimic interaction with the complete AsiA binding determinant of final sigma(70). Moreover, the results suggest that a significant rearrangement of the dimer accompanies peptide binding. Thus, both conserved regions 4.1 and 4.2 are intimately involved in recognition of AsiA by final sigma(70). The interaction of AsiA with 4.1 provides a potential explanation of the differential abilities of DNA and AsiA to bind to free final sigma(70) and a mechanistic alternative to models of AsiA function that rely on binding to a single site on final sigma(70).

Self-reinforcing activation of a cell-specific transcription factor by proteolysis of an anti-sigma factor in B. subtilis

The transcription factor sigma(F), which is activated in a cell-specific manner during sporulation in B. subtilis, is initially held in an inactive complex by the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB. The anti-anti-sigma factor SpoIIAA reacts with SpoIIAB.sigma(F) to induce the release of free sigma(F) and free SpoIIAB. We now report that free SpoIIAB is subject to proteolysis and that it is protected from degradation by sigma(F) in the SpoIIAB.sigma(F) complex and by SpoIIAA in an alternative complex. Proteolysis requires residues located near the extreme C terminus of SpoIIAB and is dependent upon the ClpCP protease. The reaction of SpoIIAA with SpoIIAB.sigma(F) and the resulting degradation of newly released SpoIIAB could set up a self-reinforcing cycle that locks on the activation of sigma(F).

Identification of the Helicobacter pylori anti-sigma28 factor

Flagellar motility is essential for colonization of the human gastric mucosa by Helicobacter pylori. The flagellar filament is composed of two subunits, FlaA and FlaB. Transcription of the genes encoding these proteins is controlled by the sigma28 and sigma54 factors of RNA polymerase respectively. The expression of flagellar genes is regulated, but no sigma28-specific effector was identified. It was also unclear whether H. pylori possessed a checkpoint for flagellar synthesis, and no gene encoding an anti-sigma28 factor, FlgM, could be identified by sequence similarity searches. To investigate the sigma28-dependent regulation, a new approach based on genomic data was used. Two-hybrid screening with the H. pylori proteins identified a protein of unknown function (HP1122) interacting with the sigma28 factor and defined the C-terminal part of HP1122 (residues 48-76) as the interaction domain. HP1122 interacts with region 4 of sigma28 and prevents its association with the beta-region of H. pylori RNA polymerase. Thus, HP1122 presented the characteristics of an anti-sigma28 factor. This was confirmed in H. pylori by RNA dot-blot hybridization and electron microscopy. The level of sigma28-dependent flaA transcription was higher in a HP1122-deficient strain and was decreased by the overproduction of HP1122. The overproduction of HP1122 also resulted in H. pylori cells with highly truncated flagella. These results demonstrate that HP1122 is the H. pylori anti-sigma28 factor, FlgM, a major regulator of flagellum assembly. Potential anti-sigma28 factors were identified in Campylobacter jejuni, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Thermotoga maritima by sequence homology with the C-terminal region of HP1122.

A multipartite interaction between Salmonella transcription factor sigma28 and its anti-sigma factor FlgM: implications for sigma28 holoenzyme destabilization through stepwise binding

Transcription of the late (Class 3) flagellar promoters in Salmonella typhimurium is dependent upon the flagellar specific sigma factor, sigma28, encoded by the fliA gene. sigma28-dependent transcription is inhibited by an anti-sigma factor, FlgM, through a direct interaction. FlgM can bind both to free sigma28 to prevent it from forming a complex with core RNA polymerase, and to sigma28 holoenzyme to destabilize the complex. A collection of fliA mutants defective for negative regulation by FlgM (fliA* mutants) were isolated. This collection included 27 substitution mutations that conferred insensitivity to FlgM in vivo. The distribution of mutations defined three potential FlgM binding domains in conserved sigma factor regions 2.1, 3.1 and 4 of sigma28. A subset of mutants from each region was assayed for FlgM binding and transcriptional activity in vitro. The results strongly support a multipartite interaction between sigma28 and FlgM. Region 4 mutations, but not region 2.1 or 3.1 mutations, interfered with the ability of FlgM to destabilize sigma28 from core RNA polymerase. We present refined models for FlgM inhibition of sigma28, and for FlgM destabilization of sigma28 holoenzyme.

Coupling of flagellar gene expression to flagellar assembly in Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium and Escherichia coli

How do organisms assess the degree of completion of a large structure, especially an extracellular structure such as a flagellum? Bacteria can do this. Mutants that lack key components needed early in assembly fail to express proteins that would normally be added at later assembly stages. In some cases, the regulatory circuitry is able to sense completion of structures beyond the cell surface, such as completion of the external hook structure. In Salmonella and Escherichia coli, regulation occurs at both transcriptional and posttranscriptional levels. One transcriptional regulatory mechanism involves a regulatory protein, FlgM, that escapes from the cell (and thus can no longer act) through a complete flagellum and is held inside when the structure has not reached a later stage of completion. FlgM prevents late flagellar gene transcription by binding the flagellum-specific transcription factor sigma(28). FlgM is itself regulated in response to the assembly of an incomplete flagellum known as the hook-basal body intermediate structure. Upon completion of the hook-basal body structure, FlgM is exported through this structure out of the cell. Inhibition of sigma(28)-dependent transcription is relieved, and genes required for the later assembly stages are expressed, allowing completion of the flagellar organelle. Distinct posttranscriptional regulatory mechanisms occur in response to assembly of the flagellar type III secretion apparatus and of ring structures in the peptidoglycan and lipopolysaccharide layers. The entire flagellar regulatory pathway is regulated in response to environmental cues. Cell cycle control and flagellar development are codependent. We discuss how all these levels of regulation ensure efficient assembly of the flagellum in response to environmental stimuli.

Study of the bldG locus suggests that an anti-anti-sigma factor and an anti-sigma factor may be involved in Streptomyces coelicolor antibiotic production and sporulation

A cloned 2.5 kb DNA fragment that can restore antibiotic production and sporulation to a bldG mutant encodes a 113 aa protein showing similarity to a family of anti-anti-sigma factors from Bacillus and Staphylococcus; and the deduced product of a closely spaced downstream ORF, designated ORF3, shows similarity to cognate anti-sigma factors. The homologues in Bacillus regulate the activity of sporulation- and stress-response-specific sigma factors. However, there is no sigma factor gene near bldG and ORF3. bldG is transcribed both as a monocistronic and a polycistronic mRNA, the latter including the downstream ORF3 gene. The two transcripts were present at all time points during growth and both were upregulated when aerial mycelium and pigmented antibiotics were seen. At all time points, the monocistronic bldG transcript was two- to threefold more abundant than the polycistronic transcript. Mapping of the mRNA 5' ends indicated that bldG transcription is initiated from two transcription start sites located 82 and 123 bp upstream of the bldG translation start. A constructed bldG null mutant had the same phenotype as previously isolated bldG point mutations, some of which were shown to have potentially significant base changes within bldG. When compared to the wild-type strain, the null mutant showed no differences in the levels of transcription from the two bldG promoters. These results suggest that bldG is not involved in autoregulation.

The anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB forms a 2:1 complex with sigma(F), contacting multiple conserved regions of the sigma factor

The developmental regulatory protein sigma(F) of Bacillus subtilis, a member of the sigma(70)-family of bacterial RNA polymerase sigma factors, is negatively regulated by the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB, which binds to sigma(F), sequestering it in an inactive complex. SpoIIAB binding to sigma(F) is strongly stimulated by ATP. Here, we use a combination of gel filtration chromatography, dynamic light-scattering, analytical ultracentrifugation, limited proteolysis with N-terminal sequencing and electrospray mass spectrometry, and deletion analysis to probe the SpoIIAB-sigma(F) complex. The studies were facilitated by investigating the homologs from Bacillus stearothermophilus as well as co-expression of the proteins in Escherichia coli, allowing purification of large quantities of the in vivo assembled complex. We determined the stoichiometry of the complex to be SpoIIAB(2):sigma(F)(1). Alone, sigma(F) is rapidly degraded by the protease trypsin. In the complex with SpoIIAB, however, sigma(F) is remarkably resistant to proteolysis. Analysis of the protease cleavage data indicates the anti-sigma binds sigma(F) through contacts with mutliple conserved regions of the sigma factor, supporting previous findings based on genetic data.

The interface of sigma with core RNA polymerase is extensive, conserved, and functionally specialized

The sigma subunit of eubacterial RNA polymerase is required throughout initiation, but how it communicates with core polymerase (alpha(2)betabeta') is poorly understood. The present work addresses the location and function of the interface of sigma with core. Our studies suggest that this interface is extensive as mutations in six conserved regions of sigma(70) hinder the ability of sigma to bind core. Direct binding of one of these regions to core can be demonstrated using a peptide-based approach. The same regions, and even equivalent residues, in sigma(32) and sigma(70) alter core interaction, suggesting that sigma(70) family members use homologous residues, at least in part, to interact with core. Finally, the regions of sigma that we identify perform specialized functions, suggesting that different portions of the interface perform discrete roles during transcription initiation.

Purification of Mlc and analysis of its effects on the pts expression in Escherichia coli

Products of the pts operon of Escherichia coli have multiple physiological roles such as sugar transport, and the operon is controlled by two promoters, P0 and P1. Expression of the pts P0 promoter that is increased during growth in the presence of glucose is also activated by cAMP receptor protein.cAMP. Based on the existence of a sequence that has a high similarity with the known Mlc binding site in the promoter, the effects of the Mlc protein on the pts P0 promoter expression were studied. In vivo transcription assays using wild type and mlc-negative E. coli strains grown in the presence and absence of glucose indicate that Mlc negatively regulates expression of the P0 promoter, and Mlc-dependent repression is relieved by glucose in the growth medium. In vitro transcription assay using purified recombinant Mlc showed that Mlc repressed transcription from the P0 but did not affect the activity of the P1. DNase I footprinting experiments revealed that a Mlc binding site was located around +1 to +25 of the promoter and that Mlc inhibited the binding of RNA polymerase to the P0 promoter. Cells overexpressing Mlc showed a very slow fermentation rate compared with the wild type when grown in the presence of various phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system sugars but few differences in the presence of non-phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system sugars except maltose. These results suggest that the pts operon is one of major targets for the negative regulation by Mlc, and thus Mlc regulates the utilization of various sugars as well as glucose in E. coli. The possibility that the inducer of Mlc may not be sugar or its derivative but an unknown factor is proposed to explain the Mlc induction mechanism by various sugars.

A region of sigmaK involved in promoter activation by GerE in Bacillus subtilis

During endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis, the DNA binding protein GerE stimulates transcription from several promoters that are used by RNA polymerase containing sigmaK. GerE binds to a site on one of these promoters, cotX, that overlaps its -35 region. We tested the model that GerE interacts with sigmaK at the cotX promoter by seeking amino acid substitutions in sigmaK that interfered with GerE-dependent activation of the cotX promoter but which did not affect utilization of the sigmaK-dependent, GerE-independent promoter gerE. We identified two amino acid substitutions in sigmaK, E216K and H225Y, that decrease cotX promoter utilization but do not affect gerE promoter activity. Alanine substitutions at these positions had similar effects. We also examined the effects of the E216A and H225Y substitutions in sigmaK on transcription in vitro. We found that these substitutions specifically reduced utilization of the cotX promoter. These and other results suggest that the amino acid residues at positions 216 and 225 are required for GerE-dependent cotX promoter activity, that the histidine at position 225 of sigmaK may interact with GerE at the cotX promoter, and that this interaction may facilitate the initial binding of sigmaK RNA polymerase to the cotX promoter. We also found that the alanine substitutions at positions 216 and 225 of sigmaK had no effect on utilization of the GerE-dependent promoter cotD, which contains GerE binding sites that do not overlap with its -35 region.

Genotype, phenotype, and protein structure in a regulator of sporulation: effects of mutations in the spoIIAA gene of Bacillus subtilis

SpoIIAA, a phosphorylatable protein, is essential to the regulation of sigmaF, the first sporulation-specific transcription factor of Bacillus subtilis. The solution structure of SpoIIAA has recently been published. Here we examine four mutant SpoIIAA proteins and correlate their properties with the phenotypes of the corresponding B. subtilis mutant strains. Two of the mutations severely disrupted the structure of the protein, a third greatly diminished the rate of its phosphorylation and abolished dephosphorylation, and the fourth left phosphorylation unaffected but reduced the rate of dephosphorylation about 10-fold.

The Staphylococcus aureus rsbW (orf159) gene encodes an anti-sigma factor of SigB

SigB, a newly discovered alternative sigma factor of Staphylococcus aureus, has been shown to play an important role in stress responses and the regulation of virulence factors. The rsbW (orf159) gene is immediately upstream of sigB. Its gene product is homologous to Bacillus subtilis RsbW which under appropriate conditions binds to B. subtilis SigB and functions as an anti-sigma factor or negative posttranslational regulator. To define the function of S. aureus RsbW, both the S. aureus SigB and RsbW proteins were expressed in Escherichia coli and purified. Cross-linking experiments with these purified proteins revealed that RsbW was capable of specific binding to SigB. In an in vitro transcription runoff assay, RsbW prevented SigB-directed transcription from the sar P3 promoter, a known SigB-dependent promoter, and the inhibitory activity of RsbW was found to be concentration dependent. We also identified SigB promoter consensus sequences upstream of the genes encoding alkaline shock protein 23 and coagulase and have demonstrated SigB and RsbW dependence for the promoters in vitro. These results show that RsbW is a protein sequestering anti-sigma factor of S. aureus SigB and suggest that SigB activity in S. aureus is regulated posttranslationally.

Overproduction and characterization of the Bacillus subtilis anti-sigma factor FlgM

FlgM is an anti-sigma factor of the flagellar-specific sigma (sigma) subunit of RNA polymerase in Bacillus subtilis, and it is responsible of the coupling of late flagellar gene expression to the completion of the hook-basal body structure. We have overproduced the protein in soluble form and characterized it. FlgM forms dimers as shown by gel exclusion chromatography and native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and interacts in vitro with the cognate sigmaD factor. The FlgM.sigmaD complex is a stable heterodimer as demonstrated by gel exclusion chromatography, chemical cross-linking, native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and isoelectric focusing. sigmaD belongs to the group of sigma factors able to bind to the promoter sequence even in the absence of core RNA polymerase. The FlgM.sigmaD complex gave a shift in a DNA mobility shift assay with a probe containing a sigmaD-dependent promoter sequence. Limited proteolysis studies indicate the presence of two structural motifs, corresponding to the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively.

Anti-sigma factors

Anti-sigma factors modulate the expression of numerous regulons controlled by alternative sigma factors. Anti-sigma factors are themselves regulated by either secretion from the cell (i.e. FlgM export through the hook-basal body), sequestration by an anti-anti-sigma (i.e. phosphorylation regulated partner-switching modules), or interaction with extracytoplasmic proteins or small molecule effectors (i.e. transmembrane regulators of extracytoplasmic function sigma factors). Recent highlights include the genetic description of the opposed sigma/anti-sigma binding surfaces; the unexpected role of FlgM in holoenzyme destabilization and the finding that folding of FlgM is coupled to sigma28 binding; the first structure determination for an anti-sigma antagonist; and the detailed dissection of two complex partner-switching modules in Bacillus subtilis.

Control of sigma factor activity during Bacillus subtilis sporulation

When starved, Bacillus subtilis undergoes asymmetric division to produce two cell types with different fates. The larger mother cell engulfs the smaller forespore, then nurtures it and, eventually, lyses to release a dormant, environmentally resistant spore. Driving these changes is a programme of transcriptional gene regulation. At the heart of the programme are sigma factors, which become active at different times, some only in one cell type or the other, and each directing RNA polymerase to transcribe a different set of genes. The activity of each sigma factor in the cascade is carefully regulated by multiple mechanisms. In some cases, novel proteins control both sigma factor activity and morphogenesis, co-ordinating the programme of gene expression with morphological change. These bifunctional proteins, as well as other proteins involved in sigma factor activation, and even precursors of sigma factors themselves, are targeted to critical locations, allowing the mother cell and forespore to communicate with each other and to co-ordinate their programmes of gene expression. This signalling can result in proteolytic sigma factor activation. Other mechanisms, such as an anti-sigma factor and, perhaps, proteolytic degradation, prevent sigma factors from becoming active in the wrong cell type. Accessory transcription factors modulate RNA polymerase activity at specific promoters. Negative feedback loops limit sigma factor production and facilitate the transition from one sigma factor to the next. Together, the mechanisms controlling sigma factor activity ensure that genes are expressed at the proper time and level in each cell type.

The anti-sigma factors

A mechanism for regulating gene expression at the level of transcription utilizes an antagonist of the sigma transcription factor known as the anti-sigma (anti-sigma) factor. The cytoplasmic class of anti-sigma factors has been well characterized. The class includes AsiA form bacteriophage T4, which inhibits Escherichia coli sigma 70; FlgM, present in both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, which inhibits the flagella sigma factor sigma 28; SpoIIAB, which inhibits the sporulation-specific sigma factor, sigma F and sigma G, of Bacillus subtilis; RbsW of B. subtilis, which inhibits stress response sigma factor sigma B; and DnaK, a general regulator of the heat shock response, which in bacteria inhibits the heat shock sigma factor sigma 32. In addition to this class of well-characterized cytoplasmic anti-sigma factors, a new class of homologous, inner-membrane-bound anti-sigma factors has recently been discovered in a variety of eubacteria. This new class of anti-sigma factors regulates the expression of so-called extracytoplasmic functions, and hence is known as the ECF subfamily of anti-sigma factors. The range of cell processes regulated by anti-sigma factors is highly varied and includes bacteriophage phage growth, sporulation, stress response, flagellar biosynthesis, pigment production, ion transport, and virulence.

Evidence for common sites of contact between the antisigma factor SpoIIAB and its partners SpoIIAA and the developmental transcription factor sigmaF in Bacillus subtilis

The activity of the developmental transcription factor sigmaF in Bacillus subtilis is governed by a switch involving the dual function protein SpoIIAB. SpoIIAB is an antisigma factor that forms complexes with sigmaF and with an alternative partner protein SpoIIAA. SpoIIAB is also a protein kinase that can inactivate SpoIIAA by phosphorylating it on a serine residue. We sought to identify amino acids in SpoIIAB that are involved in the formation of the SpoIIAB-SpoIIAA complex by screening for mutants that were defective in the activation of sigmaF. This genetic screen, in combination with biochemical analysis and the construction of loss-of-side-chain (alanine substitution) mutants, led to the identification of amino acid side-chains in the N-terminal region of SpoIIAB that could contact SpoIIAA. Unexpectedly, the same amino acid side-chains (R20 and N50) that appear to touch SpoIIAA are required for binding to, and may represent sites of contact with, sigmaF. We propose that the N-terminal region of SpoIIAB forms a binding surface that is responsible for the formation of both the SpoIIAB-SpoIIAA and the SpoIIAB-sigmaF complexes, and that in some cases the same amino acid side-chains contact both partner proteins. N50 is also the defining residue of a region of amino acid sequence homology known as the N-box that is shared by SpoIIAB and related serine protein kinases, as well as by members of a mechanistically dissimilar family of protein kinases that undergo autophosphorylation at a histidine residue. We discuss the implications of this finding for the mechanism of histidine autophosphorylation.

The flagellar anti-sigma factor FlgM actively dissociates Salmonella typhimurium sigma28 RNA polymerase holoenzyme

The anti-sigma factor FlgM of Salmonella typhimurium inhibits transcription of class 3 flagellar genes through a direct interaction with the flagellar-specific sigma factor, sigma28. FlgM is believed to prevent RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme formation by sequestering free sigma28. We have analyzed FlgM-mediated inhibition of sigma28 activity in vitro. FlgM is able to inhibit sigma28 activity even when sigma28 is first allowed to associate with core RNAP. Surface plasmon resonance (SPR) was used to evaluate the interaction between FlgM and both sigma28 and sigma28 holoenzyme (Esigma28). The Kd of the sigma28-FlgM complex is approximately 2 x 10(-10) M; missense mutations in FlgM that cause a defect in sigma28 inhibition in vivo increase the Kd of this interaction by 4- to 10-fold. SPR measurements of Esigma28 dissociation in the presence of FlgM indicate that FlgM destabilizes Esigma28, presumably via an interaction with the sigma subunit. Our data provide the first direct evidence of an interaction between FlgM and Esigma28. We propose that this secondary activity of FlgM, which we term holoenzyme destabilization, enhances the sensitivity of the cell to changes in FlgM levels during flagellar biogenesis.

Inhibition of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase by bacteriophage T4 AsiA

The 10 kDa bacteriophage T4 antisigma protein AsiA binds the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase promoter specificity subunit, sigma 70, with high affinity and inhibits its transcription activity. AsiA binds to sigma 70 primarily through an interaction with sigma 70 conserved region 4.2, which has also been implicated in sequence-specific recognition of the -35 consensus promoter element. Here we show that AsiA forms a stable ternary complex with core RNA polymerase (RNAP) and sigma 70 and thus does not inhibit sigma 70 activity by preventing its binding to core RNAP. We investigated the effect of AsiA on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation at two -10/-35 type promoters and two "extended -10" promoters. Our results indicate that the binding of AsiA to sigma 70 and the interaction of sigma 70 region 4.2 with the -35 consensus promoter element of -10/-35 promoters is mutually exclusive. In contrast, AsiA has much less effect on open promoter complex formation and abortive initiation from extended -10 promoters, which lack a -35 consensus element and do not require sigma 70 conserved region 4.2. From these results we conclude that T4 AsiA inhibits E. coli RNAP sigma 70 holoenzyme transcription at -10/-35 promoters by interfering with the required interaction between sigma 70 conserved region 4.2 and the -35 consensus promoter element.

Multiple regions on the Escherichia coli heat shock transcription factor sigma32 determine core RNA polymerase binding specificity

We have analyzed the core RNA polymerase (RNAP) binding activity of the purified products of nine defective alleles of the rpoH gene, which encodes sigma32 in Escherichia coli. All mutations studied here lie outside of the putative core RNAP binding regions 2.1 and 2.2. Based on the estimated K(s)s for the mutant sigma and core RNAP interaction determined by in vitro transcription and by glycerol gradient sedimentation, we have divided the mutants into three classes. The class III mutants showed greatly decreased affinity for core RNAP, whereas the class II mutants' effect on core RNAP interaction was only clearly seen in the presence of sigma70 competitor. The class I mutant behaved nearly identically to the wild type in core RNAP binding. Two point mutations in class III altered residues that were distant from one another. One was found in conserved region 4.2, and the other was in a region conserved only among heat shock sigma factors. These data suggest that there is more than one core RNAP binding region in sigma32 and that differences in contact sites probably exist among sigma factors.

Mechanisms of latency in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Mycobacterium tuberculosis can persist within the human host for years without causing disease, in a syndrome known as latent tuberculosis (TB). As one-third of the world population has latent TB, placing them at risk for active TB, the mechanisms by which M. tuberculosis establishes a latent metabolic state, eludes immune surveillance and responds to triggers that stimulate reactivation are a high priority for the future control of TB.

Sequencing and phylogenetic analysis of the spoIIA operon from diverse Bacillus and Paenibacillus species

In order to clone the spoIIA operon from three different Bacillus and Paenibacillus species, we designed two sets of PCR primers based on three previously published Bacillus spoIIA sequences. One set of primers corresponded to the C-terminal region of SpoIIAB and a region near the middle of SpoIIAC. These primers were used to amplify the corresponding region of spoIIA from Bacillus stearothermophilus and Paenibacillus polymyxa (previously called Bacillus polymyxa [see Ash, C., Priest, F.G., Collins, M.D., 1993. Molecular identification of ribosomal-RNA group 3 bacilli using a PCR probe test - proposal for the creation of a new genus Paenibacillus. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Int. J. Gen. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 253-260]. The other set of primers, corresponding to an N-terminal and a C-terminal region of SpoIIAC, was used for B. sphaericus. The PCR products were used as probes for Southern blotting of homologous chromosomal DNA. DNA corresponding to spoIIA from the three organisms was identified by screening chromosomal DNA libraries, and cloned. Sequence analysis showed that all spoIIA sequences were conserved, but conservation was strongest in SpoIIAC and least strong in SpoIIAA. In the promoter the -35 region was conserved well but the -10 region rather poorly. Within the proteins, certain regions were particularly strongly conserved, suggesting that they are essential to the function of the protein. Phylogenetic analysis of spoIIA suggested that B. stearothermophilus is close to B. subtilis and B. licheniformis, but that P. polymyxa and B. sphaericus are remote from B. subtilis.