1
|
Stavreva DA, Garcia DA, Fettweis G, Gudla PR, Zaki GF, Soni V, McGowan A, Williams G, Huynh A, Palangat M, Schiltz RL, Johnson TA, Presman DM, Ferguson ML, Pegoraro G, Upadhyaya A, Hager GL. Transcriptional Bursting and Co-bursting Regulation by Steroid Hormone Release Pattern and Transcription Factor Mobility. Mol Cell 2019; 75:1161-1177.e11. [PMID: 31421980 PMCID: PMC6754282 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.06.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Genes are transcribed in a discontinuous pattern referred to as RNA bursting, but the mechanisms regulating this process are unclear. Although many physiological signals, including glucocorticoid hormones, are pulsatile, the effects of transient stimulation on bursting are unknown. Here we characterize RNA synthesis from single-copy glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-regulated transcription sites (TSs) under pulsed (ultradian) and constant hormone stimulation. In contrast to constant stimulation, pulsed stimulation induces restricted bursting centered around the hormonal pulse. Moreover, we demonstrate that transcription factor (TF) nuclear mobility determines burst duration, whereas its bound fraction determines burst frequency. Using 3D tracking of TSs, we directly correlate TF binding and RNA synthesis at a specific promoter. Finally, we uncover a striking co-bursting pattern between TSs located at proximal and distal positions in the nucleus. Together, our data reveal a dynamic interplay between TF mobility and RNA bursting that is responsive to stimuli strength, type, modality, and duration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana A Stavreva
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA.
| | - David A Garcia
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA; Department of Physics and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Gregory Fettweis
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Prabhakar R Gudla
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - George F Zaki
- High Performance Computing Group, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA
| | - Vikas Soni
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Andrew McGowan
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Geneva Williams
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Anh Huynh
- Department of Physics and Graduate Program in Biomolecular Science, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Murali Palangat
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - R Louis Schiltz
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Thomas A Johnson
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Diego M Presman
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Matthew L Ferguson
- Department of Physics and Graduate Program in Biomolecular Science, Boise State University, Boise, ID 83725, USA
| | - Gianluca Pegoraro
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | - Arpita Upadhyaya
- Department of Physics and Institute for Physical Science and Technology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
| | - Gordon L Hager
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, 41 Library Drive, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kim JM, Kim K, Punj V, Liang G, Ulmer TS, Lu W, An W. Linker histone H1.2 establishes chromatin compaction and gene silencing through recognition of H3K27me3. Sci Rep 2015; 5:16714. [PMID: 26581166 PMCID: PMC4652225 DOI: 10.1038/srep16714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2015] [Accepted: 10/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Linker histone H1 is a protein component of chromatin and has been linked to higher-order chromatin compaction and global gene silencing. However, a growing body of evidence suggests that H1 plays a gene-specific role, regulating a relatively small number of genes. Here we show that H1.2, one of the H1 subtypes, is overexpressed in cancer cells and contributes to gene silencing. H1.2 gets recruited to distinct chromatin regions in a manner dependent on EZH2-mediated H3K27me3, and inhibits transcription of multiple growth suppressive genes via modulation of chromatin architecture. The C-terminal tail of H1.2 is critical for the observed effects, because mutations of three H1.2-specific amino acids in this domain abrogate the ability of H1.2 to bind H3K27me3 nucleosomes and inactivate target genes. Collectively, these results provide a molecular explanation for H1.2 functions in the regulation of chromatin folding and indicate that H3K27me3 is a key mechanism governing the recruitment and activity of H1.2 at target loci.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Man Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Kyunghwan Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Department of Biology, College of Natural Sciences, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Chungbuk 361-763, Republic of Korea
| | - Vasu Punj
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Department of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Gangning Liang
- Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Tobias S Ulmer
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Wange Lu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Eli and Edythe Broad Center for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| | - Woojin An
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kim K, Lee B, Kim J, Choi J, Kim JM, Xiong Y, Roeder RG, An W. Linker Histone H1.2 cooperates with Cul4A and PAF1 to drive H4K31 ubiquitylation-mediated transactivation. Cell Rep 2013; 5:1690-703. [PMID: 24360965 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2013] [Revised: 10/18/2013] [Accepted: 11/21/2013] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing evidence suggests that linker histone H1 can influence distinct cellular processes by acting as a gene-specific regulator. However, the mechanistic basis underlying such H1 specificity and whether H1 acts in concert with other chromatin-altering activities remain unclear. Here, we show that one of the H1 subtypes, H1.2, stably interacts with Cul4A E3 ubiquitin ligase and PAF1 elongation complexes and that such interaction potentiates target gene transcription via induction of H4K31 ubiquitylation, H3K4me3, and H3K79me2. H1.2, Cul4A, and PAF1 are functionally cooperative because their individual knockdown results in the loss of the corresponding histone marks and the deficiency of target gene transcription. H1.2 interacts with the serine 2-phosphorylated form of RNAPII, and we argue that it recruits the Cul4A and PAF1 complexes to target genes by bridging the interaction between the Cul4A and PAF1 complexes. These data define an expanded role for H1 in regulating gene transcription and illustrate its dependence on the elongation competence of RNAPII.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyunghwan Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Bomi Lee
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Jaehoon Kim
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jongkyu Choi
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Jin-Man Kim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - Yue Xiong
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Robert G Roeder
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Woojin An
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lalmansingh AS, Arora K, Demarco RA, Hager GL, Nagaich AK. High-throughput RNA FISH analysis by imaging flow cytometry reveals that pioneer factor Foxa1 reduces transcriptional stochasticity. PLoS One 2013; 8:e76043. [PMID: 24073287 PMCID: PMC3779185 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2012] [Accepted: 08/23/2013] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Genes are regulated at the single-cell level. Here, we performed RNA FISH of thousands of cells by flow cytometry (flow-RNA FISH) to gain insight into transcriptional variability between individual cells. These experiments utilized the murine adenocarcinoma 3134 cell line with 200 copies of the MMTV-Ras reporter integrated at a single genomic locus. The MMTV array contains approximately 800-1200 binding sites for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and 600 binding sites for the pioneer factor Foxa1. Hormone activation of endogenous GR by dexamethasone treatment resulted in highly variable changes in the RNA FISH intensity (25-300 pixel intensity units) and size (1.25-15 µm), indicative of probabilistic or stochastic mechanisms governing GR and cofactor activation of the MMTV promoter. Exogenous expression of the pioneer factor Foxa1 increased the FISH signal intensity and size as expected for a chromatin remodeler that enhances transcriptional competence through increased chromatin accessibility. In addition, specific analysis of Foxa1-enriched cell sub-populations showed that low and high Foxa1 levels substantially lowered the cell-to-cell variability in the FISH intensity as determined by a noise calculation termed the % coefficient of variation. These results suggest that an additional function of the pioneer factor Foxa1 may be to decrease transcriptional noise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avin S Lalmansingh
- Office of Biotechnology Products, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Packing of about two meters of the human genome DNA into chromatin occupying a several micron-sized cell nucleus requires a high degree of compaction in a manner that allows the information encoded on DNA to remain easily accessible. This packing is mediated by repeated coiling of DNA double helix around histones to form nucleosome arrays that are further folded into higher-order structures. Relatively straight DNA linkers separate the nucleosomes and the spacing between consecutive nucleosome varies between different cells and between different chromosomal loci. In a recent work1 our group used a biochemically defined in vitro reconstituted system to explore how do various DNA linkers mediate nucleosome array packing into higher-order chromatin structures. For long nucleosome linkers (about 60 bp) we observed a more open chromatin structure and no effect of small linker length alterations (±2−4 bp) on chromatin folding. In striking contrast, for shorter linkers (20−32 bp) we found more compact packing with strong periodical dependence upon the linker DNA lengths. Our data together with high-resolution nucleosome position mapping provide evidence for the natural nucleosome repeats to support a chromatin architecture that, by default, restricts spontaneous folding of nucleosome arrays into compact chromatin fibers. We suggest that incomplete folding of the nucleosome arrays may promote global inter-array interactions that lead to chromatin condensation in metaphase chromosomes and heterochromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei A Grigoryev
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology; Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Steroid hormone receptors regulate gene transcription in a highly tissue-specific manner. The local chromatin structure underlying promoters and hormone response elements is a major component involved in controlling these highly restricted expression patterns. Chromatin remodeling complexes, as well as histone and DNA modifying enzymes, are directed to gene-specific regions and create permissive or repressive chromatin environments. These structures further enable proper communication between transcription factors, co-regulators and basic transcription machinery. The regulatory elements active at target genes can be either constitutively accessible to receptors or subject to rapid receptor-dependent modification. The chromatin states responsible for these processes are in turn determined during development and differentiation. Thus access of regulatory factors to elements in chromatin provides a major level of cell selective regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata Wiench
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ishihara S, Varma R, Schwartz RH. A new fractionation assay, based on the size of formaldehyde-crosslinked, mildly sheared chromatin, delineates the chromatin structure at promoter regions. Nucleic Acids Res 2010; 38:e124. [PMID: 20371521 PMCID: PMC2887976 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkq203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
To explore the higher order structure of transcribable chromatin in vivo, its local configuration was assessed through the accessibility of the chromatin to crosslinking with formaldehyde. The application of crosslinked and mildly sheared chromatin to sedimentation velocity centrifugation followed by size-fractionation of the DNA enabled us to biochemically distinguish between chromatin with heavily versus sparsely crosslinkable structures. The separated fractions showed a good correlation with gene expression profiles. Genes with poor crosslinking around the promoter region were actively transcribed, while transcripts were hardly detected from genes with extensive crosslinking in their promoter regions. For the inducible gene, Il2, the distribution of the promoter shifted in the gradient following T-cell receptor stimulation, consistent with a change in structure at this locus during activation. The kinetics of this switch preceded the chromatin change observed in a DNase I accessibility assay. Thus, this new chromatin fractionation technique has revealed a change in chromatin structure that has not been previously characterized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoru Ishihara
- Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barr FD, Krohmer LJ, Hamilton JW, Sheldon LA. Disruption of histone modification and CARM1 recruitment by arsenic represses transcription at glucocorticoid receptor-regulated promoters. PLoS One 2009; 4:e6766. [PMID: 19707557 PMCID: PMC2727952 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2009] [Accepted: 07/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Chronic exposure to inorganic arsenic (iAs) found in the environment is one of the most significant and widespread environmental health risks in the U.S. and throughout the world. It is associated with a broad range of health effects from cancer to diabetes as well as reproductive and developmental anomalies. This diversity of diseases can also result from disruption of metabolic and other cellular processes regulated by steroid hormone receptors via aberrant transcriptional regulation. Significantly, exposure to iAs inhibits steroid hormone-mediated gene activation. iAs exposure is associated with disease, but is also used therapeutically to treat specific cancers complicating an understanding of iAs action. Transcriptional activation by steroid hormone receptors is accompanied by changes in histone and non-histone protein post-translational modification (PTM) that result from the enzymatic activity of coactivator and corepressor proteins such as GRIP1 and CARM1. This study addresses how iAs represses steroid receptor-regulated gene transcription. PTMs on histones H3 and H4 at the glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-activated mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter were identified by chromatin immunoprecipitation analysis following exposure to steroid hormone±iAs. Histone H3K18 and H3R17 amino acid residues had significantly different patterns of PTMs after treatment with iAs. Promoter interaction of the coactivator CARM1 was disrupted, but the interaction of GRIP1, a p160 coactivator through which CARM1 interacts with a promoter, was intact. Over-expression of CARM1 was able to fully restore and GRIP1 partially restored iAs-repressed transcription indicating that these coactivators are functionally associated with iAs-mediated transcriptional repression. Both are essential for robust transcription at steroid hormone regulated genes and both are associated with disease when inappropriately expressed. We postulate that iAs effects on CARM1 and GRIP1 may underlie some of its therapeutic effects and as well be associated with its toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona D. Barr
- Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Lori J. Krohmer
- Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Joshua W. Hamilton
- Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
- Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - Lynn A. Sheldon
- Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
- Center for Environmental Health Sciences, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, New Hampshire
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Baker AM, Fu Q, Hayward W, Lindsay SM, Fletcher TM. The Myb/SANT domain of the telomere-binding protein TRF2 alters chromatin structure. Nucleic Acids Res 2009; 37:5019-31. [PMID: 19531742 PMCID: PMC2731900 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkp515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2009] [Revised: 05/29/2009] [Accepted: 05/29/2009] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic DNA is packaged into chromatin, which regulates genome activities such as telomere maintenance. This study focuses on the interactions of a myb/SANT DNA-binding domain from the telomere-binding protein, TRF2, with reconstituted telomeric nucleosomal array fibers. Biophysical characteristics of the factor-bound nucleosomal arrays were determined by analytical agarose gel electrophoresis (AAGE) and single molecules were visualized by atomic force microscopy (AFM). The TRF2 DNA-binding domain (TRF2 DBD) neutralized more negative charge on the surface of nucleosomal arrays than histone-free DNA. Binding of TRF2 DBD at lower concentrations increased the radius and conformational flexibility, suggesting a distortion of the fiber structure. Additional loading of TRF2 DBD onto the nucleosomal arrays reduced the flexibility and strongly blocked access of micrococcal nuclease as contour lengths shortened, consistent with formation of a unique, more compact higher-order structure. Mirroring the structural results, TRF2 DBD stimulated a strand invasion-like reaction, associated with telomeric t-loops, at lower concentrations while inhibiting the reaction at higher concentrations. Full-length TRF2 was even more effective at stimulating this reaction. The TRF2 DBD had less effect on histone-free DNA structure and did not stimulate the t-loop reaction with this substrate, highlighting the influence of chromatin structure on the activities of DNA-binding proteins.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asmaa M. Baker
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101-6129 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Qiang Fu
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101-6129 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - William Hayward
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101-6129 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Stuart M. Lindsay
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101-6129 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| | - Terace M. Fletcher
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33101-6129 and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Astrand C, Belikov S, Wrange O. Histone acetylation characterizes chromatin presetting by NF1 and Oct1 and enhances glucocorticoid receptor binding to the MMTV promoter. Exp Cell Res 2009; 315:2604-15. [PMID: 19463811 DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2009.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2009] [Revised: 04/29/2009] [Accepted: 05/15/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Transcription from the mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter is induced by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). This switch was reconstituted in Xenopus oocytes. Previously, we showed that Nuclear Factor 1 (NF1) and Octamer Transcription Factor 1 (Oct1) bind constitutively to the MMTV promoter and thereby induce translational nucleosome positioning representing an intermediary, i.e. preset, state of nucleosome organization. Here we further characterize this NF1 and Oct1 induced preset chromatin in relation to the inactive and the hormone-activated state. The preset chromatin exhibits increased histone acetylation but does not cause dissociation of histone H1 as oppose to the hormone-activated state. Furthermore, upon hormone induction the preset MMTV chromatin displays an enhanced and prolonged GR binding capacity and transcription during an intrinsic and time-dependent silencing of the injected template. The silencing process correlates with a reduced histone acetylation. However, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA), does not counteract silencing in spite of its distinct stimulation of GR-DNA binding. The latter indicates the importance of histone acetylation to maintain DNA access for inducible factor binding. We discuss how constitutively bound factors such as NF1 and Oct1 may participate in the maintenance of tissue specificity of hormone responsive genes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolina Astrand
- Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
The glucocorticoid receptor regulates the expression of a large number of genes in mammalian cells. The interaction of this receptor with regulatory elements has been discovered to be highly dynamic, with occupancy states measured in seconds, rather than minutes or hours. This finding has led to a paradigm shift in our understanding of receptor function throughout the genome. The mechanisms involved in these rapid exchange events, as well as the implications for receptor function, are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon C Biddie
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Voss TC, Schiltz RL, Sung MH, Johnson TA, John S, Hager GL. Combinatorial probabilistic chromatin interactions produce transcriptional heterogeneity. J Cell Sci 2009; 122:345-56. [PMID: 19126674 DOI: 10.1242/jcs.035865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Gene regulation often appears deterministic in the average cell population, but transcription is a probabilistic process at the single-cell level. Although many mechanisms are invoked to account for this behavior, it is difficult to determine how cell-to-cell variation in the interactions of transcription factors with target chromatin impact transcriptional output. Here, we use cells that contain a 200-copy tandem array of promoter or reporter gene units to simultaneously visualize transient interaction, equilibrium or steady-state binding of fluorescent-protein-labeled glucocorticoid receptor with its DNA response elements, the recruitment of diverse coregulators, and transcriptional output at the single-cell level. These regulatory proteins associate with target chromatin via a probabilistic mechanism that produces cell-to-cell variability in binding. The multiple steps of this process are partially independent and differ between individual regulators. The association level of each regulator influences the transcriptional output in individual cells, but this does not account for all transcriptional heterogeneity. Additionally, specific combinatorial interactions of the glucocorticoid receptor and coregulators with response elements regulate transcription at the single-cell level. Like many endogenous genes, the average array transcriptional activity evolves over time. This apparently deterministic average temporal promoter progression involves changes in the probability that specific combinatorial glucocorticoid receptor and coregulator interactions will occur on the response elements in single cells. These data support the emerging ;return-to-template' transcription model, which mechanistically unifies the observed extremely transient interactions between the transcription factor and response elements, cell-to-cell variability in steady-state association of factors with chromatin, and the resulting heterogeneous gene expression between individual cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ty C Voss
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Trotter KW, Archer TK. The BRG1 transcriptional coregulator. NUCLEAR RECEPTOR SIGNALING 2008; 6:e004. [PMID: 18301784 PMCID: PMC2254329 DOI: 10.1621/nrs.06004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2007] [Accepted: 01/23/2008] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
The packaging of genomic DNA into chromatin, often viewed as an impediment to the transcription process, plays a fundamental role in the regulation of gene expression. Chromatin remodeling proteins have been shown to alter local chromatin structure and facilitate recruitment of essential factors required for transcription. Brahma-related gene-1 (BRG1), the central catalytic subunit of numerous chromatin-modifying enzymatic complexes, uses the energy derived from ATP-hydrolysis to disrupt the chromatin architecture of target promoters. In this review, we examine BRG1 as a major coregulator of transcription. BRG1 has been implicated in the activation and repression of gene expression through the modulation of chromatin in various tissues and physiological conditions. Outstanding examples are studies demonstrating that BRG1 is a necessary component for nuclear receptor-mediated transcriptional activation. The remodeling protein is also associated with transcriptional corepressor complexes which recruit remodeling activity to target promoters for gene silencing. Taken together, BRG1 appears to be a critical modulator of transcriptional regulation in cellular processes including transcriptional regulation, replication, DNA repair and recombination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin W Trotter
- Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences/National Institutes of Health, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Adkins NL, Hall JA, Georgel PT. The use of Quantitative Agarose Gel Electrophoresis for rapid analysis of the integrity of protein–DNA complexes. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 70:721-6. [PMID: 17604110 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2007.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2006] [Revised: 03/05/2007] [Accepted: 03/12/2007] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent biochemical studies evaluated the affinity of histones to DNA in the context of nucleosome core particle (NCP). These have indicated a concentration-dependence for nucleosome stability. However, when studying chromatin the preferred templates are nucleosome arrays (NA) and not the NCP. Biochemical methods are poorly suited for structural analysis of chromatin. To overcome that technical hindrance, and investigate the effect of concentration on stability of the histone-DNA interactions, we have applied the multigel Quantitative Agarose Gel Electrophoresis (QAGE) method to in vitro-assembled nucleosomal arrays. The results demonstrated the method to be extremely valuable for the evaluation of the effect of low concentration on NA. However, QAGE is a fairly time-demanding and complex method. To maximize the efficiency of use of this technology, we devised a protocol that allowed for multiple sets of templates to be analyzed simultaneously. Briefly, samples can be loaded at regular intervals and analyzed individually for their molecular composition. The technique presented in this study describes the calibration steps and proof of concept necessary to validate the use of multiple loading of multigel to evaluate the composition of nucleosomal arrays as a function of concentration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Adkins
- Marshall University, Department of Biological Sciences Byrd Biotechnzology Science Center, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25755, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Belikov S, Astrand C, Wrange O. Mechanism of histone H1-stimulated glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding in vivo. Mol Cell Biol 2007; 27:2398-410. [PMID: 17210632 PMCID: PMC1820493 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.01509-06] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Xenopus oocytes lack somatic linker histone H1 but contain an oocyte-specific variant, B4. The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) inducible mouse mammary tumor virus (MMTV) promoter was reconstituted in Xenopus oocytes to address the effects of histone H1. The expression of Xenopus H1o [corrected] (H1) via cytoplasmic mRNA injection resulted in H1 incorporation into in vivo assembled chromatin based on (i) the appearance of a chromatosome stop, (ii) the increased nucleosome repeat length (NRL), and (iii) H1-DNA binding assayed by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). The H1 effect on the NRL was saturable and hence represents H1-binding to a specific site. A subsaturating level of H1 enhanced the hormone-dependent binding of GR to the glucocorticoid response elements (GREs) and the hormone-dependent MMTV transcription while it reduced the access to DNA as revealed by micrococcal nuclease (MNase) analysis. These H1 effects were lost at higher levels of H1. ChIP and MNase analysis revealed a hormone-dependent dissociation of H1 from the activated chromatin domain. The proposed mechanism of H1-induced GR binding is based on two effects: (i) a GR-induced asymmetric distribution of H1 in favor of inactive chromatin and (ii) an H1-induced reduction in DNA access. These effects results in increased concentration of free GR and, hence, in increased GR-GRE binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Belikov
- Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Karolinska Institutet, SE-17177 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Qiu Y, Zhao Y, Becker M, John S, Parekh BS, Huang S, Hendarwanto A, Martinez ED, Chen Y, Lu H, Adkins NL, Stavreva DA, Wiench M, Georgel PT, Schiltz RL, Hager GL. HDAC1 acetylation is linked to progressive modulation of steroid receptor-induced gene transcription. Mol Cell 2006; 22:669-79. [PMID: 16762839 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2006.04.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2005] [Revised: 02/06/2006] [Accepted: 04/14/2006] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Although histone deacetylases (HDACs) are generally viewed as corepressors, we show that HDAC1 serves as a coactivator for the glucocorticoid receptor (GR). Furthermore, a subfraction of cellular HDAC1 is acetylated after association with the GR, and this acetylation event correlates with a decrease in promoter activity. HDAC1 in repressed chromatin is highly acetylated, while the deacetylase found on transcriptionally active chromatin manifests a low level of acetylation. Acetylation of purified HDAC1 inactivates its deacetylase activity, and mutation of the critical acetylation sites abrogates HDAC1 function in vivo. We propose that hormone activation of the receptor leads to progressive acetylation of HDAC1 in vivo, which in turn inhibits the deacetylase activity of the enzyme and prevents a deacetylation event that is required for promoter activation. These findings indicate that HDAC1 is required for the induction of some genes by the GR, and this activator function is dynamically modulated by acetylation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Qiu
- Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Building 41, B602, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Adkins NL, Johnson CN, Georgel PT. Characterization of chromatin samples in the presence of Drosophila embryo extract by quantitative agarose gel electrophoresis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2006; 67:141-50. [PMID: 16580731 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbbm.2006.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2005] [Revised: 01/31/2006] [Accepted: 02/09/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Recent studies have focused attention on chromatin as both a negative and positive regulator of specific nuclear events. The vast majority of this research has been centered on chromatin remodeling and histone post-translational modifications over the regulatory regions of specific genes. However, due the technical difficulties of such studies, the contribution of the higher-order structure of chromatin on the regulation of gene expression has not been as thoroughly investigated and the majority of the initial studies have used biophysical methods or microscopy. Until recent technical developments, the main hindrance for these biophysical investigations of chromatin has been an almost absolute requirement for large amounts of highly purified material. The development of an agarose gel electrophoresis method (quantitative agarose gel electrophoresis), initially designed for the analysis of the three-dimensional structure of purified and in vivo-assembled chromatin over a promoter region, has been expanded to include studies of chromatin in the presence of a Drosophila crude extract. The technique presented in the study reported here will help in paving the way for subsequent analyses of structural modifications of chromatin that are linked with the recruitment of various chromatin-associated factors present in the provided extract(s).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Adkins
- Marshall University, Department of Biological Sciences, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25755, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Woodcock CL. Chromatin architecture. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2006; 16:213-20. [PMID: 16540311 DOI: 10.1016/j.sbi.2006.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 97] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2005] [Revised: 02/24/2006] [Accepted: 02/28/2006] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
A complete understanding of the structure-function relationships of chromatin requires extending primarily one dimensional information, obtained from molecular genetic techniques and based on the underlying linear DNA sequence, to the three dimensional conformation. Recent progress in this endeavor has included the examination of fully defined nucleosomes and nucleosomal arrays assembled in vitro using X-ray diffraction, NMR spectroscopy, electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. These studies have provided valuable insights into the structural roles of histone variants, the impact of histone mutations and the compaction of nucleosomal arrays. In addition, the diverse structural consequences of the binding of specific chromatin 'architectural' proteins are becoming apparent. These approaches provide an essential basis for understanding the conformation of the 'epigenome'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher L Woodcock
- Department of Biology and Program in Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Horowitz-Scherer RA, Woodcock CL. Organization of interphase chromatin. Chromosoma 2005; 115:1-14. [PMID: 16362820 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-005-0035-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2005] [Revised: 11/01/2005] [Accepted: 11/03/2005] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The organization of interphase chromatin spans many topics, ranging in scale from the molecular level to the whole nucleus, and its study requires a concomitant range of experimental approaches. In this review, we examine these approaches, the results they have generated, and the interfaces between them. The greatest challenge appears to be the integration of information on whole nuclei obtained by light microscopy with data on nucleosome-nucleosome interactions and chromatin higher-order structures, obtained in vitro using biophysical characterization, atomic force microscopy, and electron microscopy. We consider strategies that may assist in the integration process, and we review emerging technologies that promise to reduce the "resolution gap."
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel A Horowitz-Scherer
- Biology Department and Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Massachusetts at Amherst, 01003, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Johnson CN, Adkins NL, Georgel P. Chromatin remodeling complexes: ATP-dependent machines in action. Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 83:405-17. [PMID: 16094444 DOI: 10.1139/o05-115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Since the initial characterization of chromatin remodeling as an ATP-dependent process, many studies have given us insight into how nucleosome-remodeling complexes can affect various nuclear functions. However, the multistep DNA-histone remodeling process has not been completely elucidated. Although new studies are published on a nearly weekly basis, the nature and roles of interactions of the individual SWI/SNF- and ISWI-based remodeling complexes and DNA, core histones, and other chromatin-associated proteins are not fully understood. In addition, the potential changes associated with ATP recruitment and its subsequent hydrolysis have not been fully characterized. This review explores possible mechanisms by which chromatin-remodeling complexes are recruited to specific loci, use ATP hydrolysis to achieve actual remodeling through disruption of DNA-histone interactions, and are released from their chromatin template. We propose possible roles for ATP hydrolysis in a chromatin-release/target-scanning process that offer an alternative to or complement the often overlooked function of delivering the energy required for sliding or dislodging specific subsets of core histones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cotteka N Johnson
- Division of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, WV 25755, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Mellor J. The dynamics of chromatin remodeling at promoters. Mol Cell 2005; 19:147-57. [PMID: 16039585 DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2004] [Revised: 04/01/2005] [Accepted: 06/13/2005] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The nucleosome, the structural unit of chromatin, is known to play a central role in regulating gene transcription from promoters. The last seven years have spawned a vast amount of data on the enzymes that remodel and modify nucleosomes and the rules governing how transcription factors interact with the epigenetic code on histones. Yet despite this effort, there has yet to emerge a unifying mechanism by which nucleosomes are remodeled during gene regulation. Recent advances have allowed nucleosome dynamics on promoters to be studied in real time, dramatically changing how we think about gene regulation on chromatin templates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane Mellor
- Division of Molecular Genetics, Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Martins RP, Krawetz SA. Towards understanding the epigenetics of transcription by chromatin structure and the nuclear matrix. GENE THERAPY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2005; 9:229-246. [PMID: 21243045 PMCID: PMC3021472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
The eukaryotic nucleus houses a significant amount of information that is carefully ordered to ensure that genes can be transcribed as needed throughout development and differentiation. The genome is partitioned into regions containing functional transcription units, providing the means for the cell to selectively activate some, while keeping other regions of the genome silent. Over the last quarter of a century the structure of chromatin and how it is influenced by epigenetics has come into the forefront of modern biology. However, it has thus far failed to identify the mechanism by which individual genes or domains are selected for expression. Through covalent and structural modification of the DNA and chromatin proteins, epigenetics maintains both active and silent chromatin states. This is the "other" genetic code, often superseding that dictated by the nucleotide sequence. The nuclear matrix is rich in many of the factors that govern nuclear processes. It includes a host of unknown factors that may provide our first insight into the structural mechanism responsible for the genetic selectivity of a differentiating cell. This review will consider the nuclear matrix as an integral component of the epigenetic mechanism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Pires Martins
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201
| | - Stephen A. Krawetz
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute for Scientific Computing, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI 48201
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Martins RP, Ostermeier GC, Krawetz SA. Nuclear Matrix Interactions at the Human Protamine Domain. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:51862-8. [PMID: 15452126 DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m409415200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
The compact eukaryotic genome must be selectively opened to grant trans-factor access to cis-regulatory elements to overcome the primary barrier to gene transcription. The mechanism that governs the selective opening of chromatin domains (i.e. potentiation) remains poorly understood. In the absence of a well defined locus control region, the nuclear matrix is considered the primary candidate regulating the opening of the multigenic PRM1 --> PRM2 --> TNP2 human protamine domain. To directly examine its role, four lines of transgenic mice with different configurations of flanking nuclear matrix attachment regions (MARs) encompassing the protamine domain were created. We show that upon removal of the MARs, the locus becomes subject to position effects. The 3' MAR alone may be sufficient to protect against silencing. In concert, the MARs bounding this domain likely synergize to regulate the expression of the various members of this gene cluster. Interestingly, the MARs may convey a selective reproductive advantage, such that constructs bearing both 5' and 3' MARs are passed to their offspring with greater frequency. Thus, the MARs bounding the PRM1 --> PRM2 --> TNP2 protamine domain have many and varied functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Pires Martins
- Center for Molecular Medicine and Genetics, Wayne State University, School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 4820, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Flavin M, Cappabianca L, Kress C, Thomassin H, Grange T. Nature of the accessible chromatin at a glucocorticoid-responsive enhancer. Mol Cell Biol 2004; 24:7891-901. [PMID: 15340052 PMCID: PMC515051 DOI: 10.1128/mcb.24.18.7891-7901.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
To gain a better understanding of the nature of active chromatin in mammals, we have characterized in living cells the various chromatin modification events triggered by the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) at the rat tyrosine aminotransferase gene. GR promotes a local remodeling at a glucocorticoid-responsive unit (GRU) located 2.5 kb upstream of the transcription start site, creating nuclease hypersensitivity that encompasses 450 bp of DNA. Nucleosomes at the GRU occupy multiple frames that are remodeled without nucleosome repositioning, showing that nucleosome positioning is not the key determinant of chromatin accessibility at this locus. Remodeling affects nucleosomes and adjacent linker sequences, enhancing accessibility at both regions. This is associated with decreased interaction of both the linker histone H1 and the core histone H3 with DNA. Thus, our results indicate that nucleosome and linker histone removal rather than nucleosome repositioning is associated with GR-triggered accessibility. Interestingly, GR induces hyperacetylation of histones H3 and H4, but this is not sufficient either for remodeling or for transcriptional activation. Finally, our data favor the coexistence of several chromatin states within the population, which may account for the previously encountered difficulties in characterizing unambiguously the active chromatin structure in living cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle Flavin
- Institut Jacques Monod du CNRS, Universités Paris 6-7, Tour 43, 2 Place Jussieu, 75251 Paris Cedex 05, France
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Adkins NL, Watts M, Georgel PT. To the 30-nm chromatin fiber and beyond. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2004; 1677:12-23. [PMID: 15020041 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbaexp.2003.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2003] [Revised: 09/25/2003] [Accepted: 09/25/2003] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Chromatin fibers are intrinsically dynamic macromolecular complexes whose biological functions are intimately linked with their structure and interactions with chromatin-associated proteins (CAPs). Three-dimensional architectural transitions between or within the two co-existing chromatin types referred to as euchromatin and heterochromatin have been associated with activation or repression of nuclear functions. The presence of specific subsets of chromosomal proteins co-existing with the different chromatin conformations suggests a functional significance for their co-localization. The major points of emphasis of this review will assess the structure, function and recently documented exchanges amongst various members of the CAP family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas L Adkins
- Department of Biological Sciences, College of Science, Marshall University, 1 John Marshall Drive, Huntington, WV 25701, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Georgel PT, Hansen JC. Biophysical Analysis of Specific Genomic Loci Assembled as Chromatin In Vivo. Methods Enzymol 2003; 376:17-29. [PMID: 14975296 DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(03)76002-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe T Georgel
- Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|