DNA trajectory in the Gal repressosome

A chromosomal loop anchor mediates bacterial genome organization

Nucleoprotein complexes play an integral role in genome organization of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Apart from their role in locally structuring and compacting DNA, several complexes are known to influence global organization by mediating long-range anchored chromosomal loop formation leading to spatial segregation of large sections of DNA. Such megabase-range interactions are ubiquitous in eukaryotes, but have not been demonstrated in prokaryotes. Here, using a genome-wide sedimentation-based approach, we found that a transcription factor, Rok, forms large nucleoprotein complexes in the bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Using chromosome conformation capture and live-imaging of DNA loci, we show that these complexes robustly interact with each other over large distances. Importantly, these Rok-dependent long-range interactions lead to anchored chromosomal loop formation, thereby spatially isolating large sections of DNA, as previously observed for insulator proteins in eukaryotes.

Nucleoid-associated proteins shape chromatin structure and transcriptional regulation across the bacterial kingdom

Genome architecture has proven to be critical in determining gene regulation across almost all domains of life. While many of the key components and mechanisms of eukaryotic genome organization have been described, the interplay between bacterial DNA organization and gene regulation is only now being fully appreciated. An increasing pool of evidence has demonstrated that the bacterial chromosome can reasonably be thought of as chromatin, and that bacterial chromosomes contain transcriptionally silent and transcriptionally active regions analogous to heterochromatin and euchromatin, respectively. The roles played by histones in eukaryotic systems appear to be shared across a range of nucleoid-associated proteins (NAPs) in bacteria, which function to compact, structure, and regulate large portions of bacterial chromosomes. The broad range of extant NAPs, and the extent to which they differ from species to species, has raised additional challenges in identifying and characterizing their roles in all but a handful of model bacteria. Here we review the regulatory roles played by NAPs in several well-studied bacteria and use the resulting state of knowledge to provide a working definition for NAPs, based on their function, binding pattern, and expression levels. We present a screening procedure which can be applied to any species for which transcriptomic data are available. Finally, we note that NAPs tend to play two major regulatory roles - xenogeneic silencers and developmental regulators - and that many unrecognized potential NAPs exist in each bacterial species examined.

Figure 1 Theory Meets Figure 2 Experiments in the Study of Gene Expression

It is tempting to believe that we now own the genome. The ability to read and rewrite it at will has ushered in a stunning period in the history of science. Nonetheless, there is an Achilles' heel exposed by all of the genomic data that has accrued: We still do not know how to interpret them. Many genes are subject to sophisticated programs of transcriptional regulation, mediated by DNA sequences that harbor binding sites for transcription factors, which can up- or down-regulate gene expression depending upon environmental conditions. This gives rise to an input-output function describing how the level of expression depends upon the parameters of the regulated gene-for instance, on the number and type of binding sites in its regulatory sequence. In recent years, the ability to make precision measurements of expression, coupled with the ability to make increasingly sophisticated theoretical predictions, has enabled an explicit dialogue between theory and experiment that holds the promise of covering this genomic Achilles' heel. The goal is to reach a predictive understanding of transcriptional regulation that makes it possible to calculate gene expression levels from DNA regulatory sequence. This review focuses on the canonical simple repression motif to ask how well the models that have been used to characterize it actually work. We consider a hierarchy of increasingly sophisticated experiments in which the minimal parameter set learned at one level is applied to make quantitative predictions at the next. We show that these careful quantitative dissections provide a template for a predictive understanding of the many more complex regulatory arrangements found across all domains of life.

Metal-responsive promoter DNA compaction by the ferric uptake regulator

Short-range DNA looping has been proposed to affect promoter activity in many bacterial species and operator configurations, but only few examples have been experimentally investigated in molecular detail. Here we present evidence for a metal-responsive DNA condensation mechanism controlled by the Helicobacter pylori ferric uptake regulator (Fur), an orthologue of the widespread Fur family of prokaryotic metal-dependent regulators. H. pylori Fur represses the transcription of the essential arsRS acid acclimation operon through iron-responsive oligomerization and DNA compaction, encasing the arsR transcriptional start site in a repressive macromolecular complex. A second metal-dependent regulator NikR functions as nickel-dependent anti-repressor at this promoter, antagonizing the binding of Fur to the operator elements responsible for the DNA condensation. The results allow unifying H. pylori metal ion homeostasis and acid acclimation in a mechanistically coherent model, and demonstrate, for the first time, the existence of a selective metal-responsive DNA compaction mechanism controlling bacterial transcriptional regulation.

The Fur protein regulates transcription of bacterial genes in response to metal ions. Here, the authors show that the Fur protein from Helicobacter pylori represses transcription by iron-responsive oligomerization and DNA compaction, encasing the transcriptional start site in a macromolecular complex.

Data on publications, structural analyses, and queries used to build and utilize the AlloRep database

The AlloRep database (www.AlloRep.org) (Sousa et al., 2016) [1] compiles extensive sequence, mutagenesis, and structural information for the LacI/GalR family of transcription regulators. Sequence alignments are presented for >3000 proteins in 45 paralog subfamilies and as a subsampled alignment of the whole family. Phenotypic and biochemical data on almost 6000 mutants have been compiled from an exhaustive search of the literature; citations for these data are included herein. These data include information about oligomerization state, stability, DNA binding and allosteric regulation. Protein structural data for 65 proteins are presented as easily-accessible, residue-contact networks. Finally, this article includes example queries to enable the use of the AlloRep database. See the related article, “AlloRep: a repository of sequence, structural and mutagenesis data for the LacI/GalR transcription regulators” (Sousa et al., 2016) [1].

Supercoiling biases the formation of loops involved in gene regulation

The function of DNA as a repository of genetic information is well-known. The post-genomic effort is to understand how this information-containing filament is chaperoned to manage its compaction and topological states. Indeed, the activities of enzymes that transcribe, replicate, or repair DNA are regulated to a large degree by access. Proteins that act at a distance along the filament by binding at one site and contacting another site, perhaps as part of a bigger complex, create loops that constitute topological domains and influence regulation. DNA loops and plectonemes are not necessarily spontaneous, especially large loops under tension for which high energy is required to bring their ends together, or small loops that require accessory proteins to facilitate DNA bending. However, the torsion in stiff filaments such as DNA dramatically modulates the topology, driving it from extended and genetically accessible to more looped and compact, genetically secured forms. Furthermore, there are accessory factors that bias the response of the DNA filament to supercoiling. For example, small molecules like polyamines, which neutralize the negative charge repulsions along the phosphate backbone, enhance flexibility and promote writhe over twist in response to torsion. Such increased flexibility likely pushes the topological equilibrium from twist toward writhe at tensions thought to exist in vivo. A predictable corollary is that stiffening DNA antagonizes looping and bending. Certain sequences are known to be more or less flexible or to exhibit curvature, and this may affect interactions with binding proteins. In vivo all of these factors operate simultaneously on DNA that is generally negatively supercoiled to some degree. Therefore, in order to better understand gene regulation that involves protein-mediated DNA loops, it is critical to understand the thermodynamics and kinetics of looping in DNA that is under tension, negatively supercoiled, and perhaps exposed to molecules that alter elasticity. Recent experiments quantitatively reveal how much negatively supercoiling DNA lowers the free energy of looping, possibly biasing the operation of genetic switches.

The transcriptional regulator GalR self-assembles to form highly regular tubular structures

The Gal repressor regulates transport and metabolism of D-galactose in Escherichia coli and can mediate DNA loop formation by forming a bridge between adjacent or distant sites. GalR forms insoluble aggregates at lower salt concentrations in vitro, which can be solubilized at higher salt concentrations. Here, we investigate the assembly and disassembly of GalR aggregates. We find that a sharp transition from aggregates to soluble species occurs between 200 and 400 mM NaCl, incompatible with a simple salting-in effect. The aggregates are highly ordered rod-like structures, highlighting a remarkable ability for organized self-assembly. Mutant studies reveal that aggregation is dependent on two separate interfaces of GalR. The highly ordered structures dissociate to smaller aggregates in the presence of D-galactose. We propose that these self-assembled structures may constitute galactose-tolerant polymers for chromosome compaction in stationary phase cells, in effect linking self-assembly with regulatory function.

Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at gal Promoters and their Multi-Level Regulation by GalR, CRP and DNA Loop

Studying the regulation of transcription of the gal operon that encodes the amphibolic pathway of d-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli discerned a plethora of principles that operate in prokaryotic gene regulatory processes. In this chapter, we have reviewed some of the more recent findings in gal that continues to reveal unexpected but important mechanistic details. Since the operon is transcribed from two overlapping promoters, P1 and P2, regulated by common regulatory factors, each genetic or biochemical experiment allowed simultaneous discernment of two promoters. Recent studies range from genetic, biochemical through biophysical experiments providing explanations at physiological, mechanistic and single molecule levels. The salient observations highlighted here are: the axiom of determining transcription start points, discovery of a new promoter element different from the known ones that influences promoter strength, occurrence of an intrinsic DNA sequence element that overrides the transcription elongation pause created by a DNA-bound protein roadblock, first observation of a DNA loop and determination its trajectory, and piggybacking proteins and delivering to their DNA target.

The Nucleoid: an Overview

This review provides a brief review of the current understanding of the structure-function relationship of the Escherichia coli nucleoid developed after the overview by Pettijohn focusing on the physical properties of nucleoids. Isolation of nucleoids requires suppression of DNA expansion by various procedures. The ability to control the expansion of nucleoids in vitro has led to purification of nucleoids for chemical and physical analyses and for high-resolution imaging. Isolated E. coli genomes display a number of individually intertwined supercoiled loops emanating from a central core. Metabolic processes of the DNA double helix lead to three types of topological constraints that all cells must resolve to survive: linking number, catenates, and knots. The major species of nucleoid core protein share functional properties with eukaryotic histones forming chromatin; even the structures are different from histones. Eukaryotic histones play dynamic roles in the remodeling of eukaryotic chromatin, thereby controlling the access of RNA polymerase and transcription factors to promoters. The E. coli genome is tightly packed into the nucleoid, but, at each cell division, the genome must be faithfully replicated, divided, and segregated. Nucleoid activities such as transcription, replication, recombination, and repair are all affected by the structural properties and the special conformations of nucleoid. While it is apparent that much has been learned about the nucleoid, it is also evident that the fundamental interactions organizing the structure of DNA in the nucleoid still need to be clearly defined.

Mutations in transcriptional regulators allow selective engineering of signal integration logic

Bacterial cells monitor their environment by sensing a set of signals. Typically, these environmental signals affect promoter activities by altering the activity of transcription regulatory proteins. Promoters are often regulated by more than one regulatory protein, and in these cases the relevant signals are integrated by certain logic. In this work, we study how single amino acid substitutions in a regulatory protein (GalR) affect transcriptional regulation and signal integration logic at a set of engineered promoters. Our results suggest that point mutations in regulatory genes allow independent evolution of regulatory logic at different promoters.

IMPORTANCE

Gene regulatory networks are built from simple building blocks, such as promoters, transcription regulatory proteins, and their binding sites on DNA. Many promoters are regulated by more than one regulatory input. In these cases, the inputs are integrated and allow transcription only in certain combinations of input signals. Gene regulatory networks can be easily rewired, because the function of cis-regulatory elements and promoters can be altered by point mutations. In this work, we tested how point mutations in transcription regulatory proteins can affect signal integration logic. We found that such mutations allow context-dependent engineering of signal integration logic at promoters, further contributing to the plasticity of gene regulatory networks.

The precarious prokaryotic chromosome

Evolutionary selection for optimal genome preservation, replication, and expression should yield similar chromosome organizations in any type of cells. And yet, the chromosome organization is surprisingly different between eukaryotes and prokaryotes. The nuclear versus cytoplasmic accommodation of genetic material accounts for the distinct eukaryotic and prokaryotic modes of genome evolution, but it falls short of explaining the differences in the chromosome organization. I propose that the two distinct ways to organize chromosomes are driven by the differences between the global-consecutive chromosome cycle of eukaryotes and the local-concurrent chromosome cycle of prokaryotes. Specifically, progressive chromosome segregation in prokaryotes demands a single duplicon per chromosome, while other "precarious" features of the prokaryotic chromosomes can be viewed as compensations for this severe restriction.

DNA looping in prokaryotes: experimental and theoretical approaches

Transcriptional regulation is at the heart of biological functions such as adaptation to a changing environment or to new carbon sources. One of the mechanisms which has been found to modulate transcription, either positively (activation) or negatively (repression), involves the formation of DNA loops. A DNA loop occurs when a protein or a complex of proteins simultaneously binds to two different sites on DNA with looping out of the intervening DNA. This simple mechanism is central to the regulation of several operons in the genome of the bacterium Escherichia coli, like the lac operon, one of the paradigms of genetic regulation. The aim of this review is to gather and discuss concepts and ideas from experimental biology and theoretical physics concerning DNA looping in genetic regulation. We first describe experimental techniques designed to show the formation of a DNA loop. We then present the benefits that can or could be derived from a mechanism involving DNA looping. Some of these are already experimentally proven, but others are theoretical predictions and merit experimental investigation. Then, we try to identify other genetic systems that could be regulated by a DNA looping mechanism in the genome of Escherichia coli. We found many operons that, according to our set of criteria, have a good chance to be regulated with a DNA loop. Finally, we discuss the proposition recently made by both biologists and physicists that this mechanism could also act at the genomic scale and play a crucial role in the spatial organization of genomes.

Specific contacts of the -35 region of the galP1 promoter by RNA polymerase inhibit GalR-mediated DNA looping repression

The P1 promoter of the galactose operon in Escherichia coli is one of the best studied examples of ‘extended −10’ promoters. Recognition of the P1 promoter does not require specific contacts between RNA polymerase and its poor −35 element. To investigate whether specific recognition of the −35 element would affect the regulation of P1 by GalR, we mutagenized the −35 element of P1, isolated variants of the −35 element and studied the regulation of the mutant promoters by in vitro transcription assays and by mathematical modeling. The results show that the GalR-mediated DNA loop is less efficient in repressing P1 transcription when RNA polymerase binds to the −10 and −35 elements concomitantly. Our results suggest that promoters that lack specific −35 element recognition allow decoupling of local chromosome structure from transcription initiation.

Building enhancers from the ground up: a synthetic biology approach

A challenge of the synthetic biology approach is to use our understanding of a system to recreate a biological function with specific properties. We have applied this framework to bacterial enhancers, combining a driver, transcription factor binding sites, and a poised polymerase to create synthetic modular enhancers. Our findings suggest that enhancer-based transcriptional control depends critically and quantitatively on DNA looping, leading to complex regulatory effects when the enhancer cassettes contain additional transcription factor binding sites for TetR, a bacterial transcription factor. We show through a systematic interplay of experiment and thermodynamic modeling that the level of gene expression can be modulated to convert a variable inducer concentration input into discrete or step-like output expression levels. Finally, using a different DNA-binding protein (TraR), we show that the regulatory output is not a particular feature of the specific DNA-binding protein used for the enhancer but a general property of synthetic bacterial enhancers.

Nucleoid-associated protein HU controls three regulons that coordinate virulence, response to stress and general physiology in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

The role of the HU nucleoid-associated proteins in gene regulation was examined in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. The dimeric HU protein consists of different combinations of its α and β subunits. Transcriptomic analysis was performed with cultures growing at 37 °C at 1, 4 and 6 h after inoculation with mutants that lack combinations of HU α and HU β. Distinct but overlapping patterns of gene expression were detected at each time point for each of the three mutants, revealing not one but three regulons of genes controlled by the HU proteins. Mutations in the hup genes altered the expression of regulatory and structural genes in both the SPI1 and SPI2 pathogenicity islands. The hupA hupB double mutant was defective in invasion of epithelial cell lines and in its ability to survive in macrophages. The double mutant also had defective swarming activity and a competitive fitness disadvantage compared with the wild-type. In contrast, inactivation of just the hupB gene resulted in increased fitness and correlated with the upregulation of members of the RpoS regulon in exponential-phase cultures. Our data show that HU coordinates the expression of genes involved in central metabolism and virulence and contributes to the success of S. enterica as a pathogen.

Genetic flexibility of regulatory networks

Gene regulatory networks are based on simple building blocks such as promoters, transcription factors (TFs) and their binding sites on DNA. But how diverse are the functions that can be obtained by different arrangements of promoters and TF binding sites? In this work we constructed synthetic regulatory regions using promoter elements and binding sites of two noninteracting TFs, each sensing a single environmental input signal. We show that simply by combining these three kinds of elements, we can obtain 11 of the 16 Boolean logic gates that integrate two environmental signals in vivo. Further, we demonstrate how combination of logic gates can result in new logic functions. Our results suggest that simple elements of transcription regulation form a highly flexible toolbox that can generate diverse functions under natural selection.

Regulation of galactose metabolism through the HisK:GalR two-component system in Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis

Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis could utilize galactose as a carbon source via the enzymes encoded by a novel gal operon, whose regulation mechanism has yet to be elucidated. We propose here that the gal operon in T. tengcongensis is regulated through a HisK:GalR two-component system. By using radioactive isotope assay and genetic analysis, we found that the kinase of this system, HisK, is phosphorylated by ATP, and the regulator, GalR, accepts a phosphoryl group during phosphorelay, in which the phosphoryl group at HisK-His-259 is transferred to GalR-Asp-56. Two-dimensional electrophoresis, followed by Western blotting, revealed that phosphorylation status of GalR is uniquely dependent on the galactose stimulus in vivo. Furthermore, DNA pulldown assays demonstrated that the phosphorylated GalR prefers binding to the operator DNA O(2), whereas the unphosphorylated GalR to O(1). A model of HisK:GalR is proposed to explain how galactose mediates the expression of the gal operon in T. tengcongensis.

Single-molecule approaches to probe the structure, kinetics, and thermodynamics of nucleoprotein complexes that regulate transcription

Single-molecule experimentation has contributed significantly to our understanding of the mechanics of nucleoprotein complexes that regulate epigenetic switches. In this minireview, we will discuss the application of the tethered-particle motion technique, magnetic tweezers, and atomic force microscopy to (i) directly visualize and thermodynamically characterize DNA loops induced by the lac, gal, and lambda repressors and (ii) understand the mechanistic role of DNA-supercoiling and DNA-bending cofactors in both prokaryotic and eukaryotic systems.

Relation of intracellular signal levels and promoter activities in the gal regulon of Escherichia coli

Transcription of many genes is regulated by combinations of multiple signals. In Escherichia coli, combinatorial control is typical in the case of operons related to utilization of different sugars in the absence of glucose. To understand regulation of the transport and metabolic pathways in the galactose system, we measured activities of the six gal regulon promoters simultaneously, using an in vitro transcription system containing purified components. Input functions were computed on the basis of the experimental measurements. We observed four different shapes of input functions. From the results, we can conclude that the structure of the regulatory network is insufficient for the determination of signal integration. It is the actual structure of the promoter and regulatory region, the mechanism of transcription regulation, and the interplay between transcription factors that shape the input function to be suitable for adaptation.

Concentration and length dependence of DNA looping in transcriptional regulation

In many cases, transcriptional regulation involves the binding of transcription factors at sites on the DNA that are not immediately adjacent to the promoter of interest. This action at a distance is often mediated by the formation of DNA loops: Binding at two or more sites on the DNA results in the formation of a loop, which can bring the transcription factor into the immediate neighborhood of the relevant promoter. These processes are important in settings ranging from the historic bacterial examples (bacterial metabolism and the lytic-lysogeny decision in bacteriophage), to the modern concept of gene regulation to regulatory processes central to pattern formation during development of multicellular organisms. Though there have been a variety of insights into the combinatorial aspects of transcriptional control, the mechanism of DNA looping as an agent of combinatorial control in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes remains unclear. We use single-molecule techniques to dissect DNA looping in the lac operon. In particular, we measure the propensity for DNA looping by the Lac repressor as a function of the concentration of repressor protein and as a function of the distance between repressor binding sites. As with earlier single-molecule studies, we find (at least) two distinct looped states and demonstrate that the presence of these two states depends both upon the concentration of repressor protein and the distance between the two repressor binding sites. We find that loops form even at interoperator spacings considerably shorter than the DNA persistence length, without the intervention of any other proteins to prebend the DNA. The concentration measurements also permit us to use a simple statistical mechanical model of DNA loop formation to determine the free energy of DNA looping, or equivalently, the for looping.

Systematic characterization of a novel gal operon in Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis

On the basis of the Thermoanaerobacter tengcongensis genome, a novel type of gal operon was deduced. The gene expression and biochemical properties of this operon were further characterized. RT-PCR analysis of the intergenic regions suggested that the transcription of the gal operon was continuous. With gene cloning and enzyme activity assays, TTE1929, TTE1928 and TTE1927 were identified to be GalT, GalK and GalE, respectively. Results elicited from polarimetry assays revealed that TTE1925, a hypothetical protein, was a novel mutarotase, termed MR-Tt. TTE1926 was identified as a regulator that could bind to two operators in the operon promoter. The transcriptional start sites were mapped, and this suggested that there are two promoters in this operon. Expression of the gal genes was significantly induced by galactose, whereas only MR-Tt expression was detected in glucose-cultured T. tengcongensis at both the mRNA and the protein level. In addition, the abundance of gal proteins was examined at different temperatures. At temperatures ranging from 60 to 80 degrees C, the level of MR-Tt protein was relatively stable, but that of the other gal proteins was dramatically decreased. The operator-binding complexes were isolated and identified by electrophoretic mobility shift assay-liquid chromatography (EMSA-LC) MS-MS, which suggested that several regulatory proteins, such as GalR and a sensory histidine kinase, participate in the regulation of the gal operon.

Interconvertible lac repressor-DNA loops revealed by single-molecule experiments

At many promoters, transcription is regulated by simultaneous binding of a protein to multiple sites on DNA, but the structures and dynamics of such transcription factor-mediated DNA loops are poorly understood. We directly examined in vitro loop formation mediated by Escherichia coli lactose repressor using single-molecule structural and kinetics methods. Small (∼150 bp) loops form quickly and stably, even with out-of-phase operator spacings. Unexpectedly, repeated spontaneous transitions between two distinct loop structures were observed in individual protein–DNA complexes. The results imply a dynamic equilibrium between a novel loop structure with the repressor in its crystallographic “V” conformation and a second structure with a more extended linear repressor conformation that substantially lessens the DNA bending strain. The ability to switch between different loop structures may help to explain how robust transcription regulation is maintained even though the mechanical work required to form a loop may change substantially with metabolic conditions.

Some proteins that regulate DNA transcription do so by binding simultaneously to two separated sites on the DNA molecule, forming a DNA loop. Although such loops are common, many of their features are poorly characterized. Of particular interest is the question of how some proteins accommodate the formation of loops of different sizes, particularly when the loops are small and thus require strong bending (and, in some cases, twisting) of the DNA to form. We observed the shape and behavior of individual DNA molecules bent into tight loops by Lac repressor, a transcription-regulating protein from the bacterium Escherichia coli. Loops were formed in DNA molecules with repressor-binding sites on opposite faces of the DNA double helix almost as readily as in those with sites on the same side, suggesting that the repressor is highly flexible. The DNA can switch back and forth between a tighter and a looser loop structure “on the fly” during the lifetime of a single loop, further evidence that Lac repressor is capable of adopting different shapes that may serve to minimize DNA bending or twisting in loops. The ability of the repressor to readily switch between different loop shapes may allow it to maintain effective control of transcription across situations in which the difficulty of bending or twisting DNA changes substantially.

A large-scale conformational change in a transcription factor protein allows DNA loops to dynamically switch between alternative conformations that may contribute to robust transcription regulation.

The antiparallel loops in gal DNA

Interactions between proteins bound to distant sites along a DNA molecule require bending and twisting deformations in the intervening DNA. In certain systems, the sterically allowed protein–DNA and protein–protein interactions are hypothesized to produce loops with distinct geometries that may also be thermodynamically and biologically distinct. For example, theoretical models of Gal repressor/HU-mediated DNA-looping suggest that the antiparallel DNA loops, A1 and A2, are thermodynamically quite different. They are also biologically different, since in experiments using DNA molecules engineered to form only one of the two loops, the A2 loop failed to repress in vitro transcription. Surprisingly, single molecule measurements show that both loop trajectories form and that they appear to be quite similar energetically and kinetically.

Signal integration in the galactose network of Escherichia coli

The gal regulon of Escherichia coli contains genes involved in galactose transport and metabolism. Transcription of the gal regulon genes is regulated in different ways by two iso-regulatory proteins, Gal repressor (GalR) and Gal isorepressor (GalS), which recognize the same binding sites in the absence of d-galactose. DNA binding by both GalR and GalS is inhibited in the presence of d-galactose. Many of the gal regulon genes are activated in the presence of the adenosine cyclic-3',5'-monophosphate (cAMP)-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) complex. We studied transcriptional regulation of the gal regulon promoters simultaneously in a purified system and attempted to integrate the two small molecule signals, d-galactose and cAMP, that modulate the isoregulators and CRP respectively, at each promoter, using Boolean logic. Results show that similarly organized promoters can have different input functions. We also found that in some cases the activity of the promoter and the cognate gene can be described by different logic gates. We combined the transcriptional network of the galactose regulon, obtained from our experiments, with literature data to construct an integrated map of the galactose network. Structural analysis of the network shows that at the interface of the genetic and metabolic network, feedback loops are by far the most common motif.

Direct Observation of Essential DNA Dynamics: Melting and Reformation of the DNA Minor Groove

The dynamics of bound water and ions present in the minor groove of a dodecamer DNA has been decoupled from that of the long-range twisting/bending of the DNA backbone, using the minor groove binder Hoechst 33258 as a fluorescence reporter in the picosecond-resolved time window. The bound water and ions are essential structural components of the minor groove and are destroyed with the destruction of the minor groove when the dodecamer melts at high temperatures and reforms on subsequent cooling of the melted DNA. The melting and rehybridization of the DNA has been monitored by the changes in secondary structure using circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. The change in the relaxation dynamics of the DNA has been studied with picosecond resolution at different temperatures, following the temperature-dependent melting and rehybridization profile of the dodecamer, using time-resolved emission spectra (TRES). At room temperature, the relaxation dynamics of DNA is governed by a 40 ps (30%) and a 12.3 ns (70%) component. The dynamics of bound water and ions present in the minor groove is characterized by the 40 ps component in the relaxation dynamics of the probe bound in the minor groove of the dodecamer DNA. Analyses of the TRES taken at different temperatures show that the contribution of this component decreases and ultimately vanishes with the destruction of the minor groove and reappears again with the reformation of the groove. The dynamical behavior of bound water molecules and ions of a genomic DNA (from salmon testes) at different temperatures is also found to be consistent with that of the dodecamer. The longer component of approximately 10 ns in the DNA dynamics is found to be associated with the long-range bending/twisting of the DNA backbone and the associated counterions. The transition from bound water to free water at the DNA surface, indicative of the change in the hydration number associated with each base pair, has also been ascertained in the case of the genomic DNA at different temperatures by employing densimetric and acoustic techniques.

Three-stage Regulation of the Amphibolic gal Operon: From Repressosome to GalR-free DNA

The gal operon of Escherichia coli is negatively regulated by the Gal repressosome, a higher order nucleoprotein complex containing a DNA loop that encompasses two gal promoters. In the repressosome structure, Gal repressor (GalR) dimers are bound to the two operator sites, flanking the promoter region, thus generating a DNA loop. The DNA loop is stabilized by binding of the architectural HU protein to the apex of the loop, and negative supercoiling. The gal promoters are also regulated in opposite directions by GalR without DNA looping. The repressosome-mediated as well as looping-independent transcription regulation of the two promoters is lifted in the presence of the inducer D-galactose. We tested the effect of D-galactose on various DNA-protein and protein-protein interactions of different regulatory complexes and on transcription repression in vitro. We found that the inducer breaks up the repressosome with clear intermediates in a concentration-dependent manner. The sequential disassembly generates different stages of regulation of the gal operon. The D-galactose-dependent switch from one stage of regulation to another satisfies the amphibolic requirement of the gal operon.

Multipartite regulation of rctB, the replication initiator gene of Vibrio cholerae chromosome II

Replication initiator proteins in bacteria not only allow DNA replication but also often regulate the rate of replication initiation as well. The regulation is mediated by limiting the synthesis or availability of initiator proteins. The applicability of this principle is demonstrated here for RctB, the replication initiator for the smaller of the two chromosomes of Vibrio cholerae. A strong promoter for the rctB gene named rctBp was identified and found to be autoregulated in Escherichia coli. Promoter activity was lower in V. cholerae than in E. coli, and a part of this reduction is likely to be due to autorepression. Sequences upstream of rctBp, implicated earlier in replication control, enhanced the repression. The action of the upstream sequences required that they be present in cis, implying long-range interactions in the control of the promoter activity. A second gene specific for chromosome II replication, rctA, reduced rctB translation, most likely by antisense RNA control. Finally, optimal rctBp activity was found to be dependent on Dam. Increasing RctB in trans increased the copy number of a miniplasmid carrying oriCII(VC), implying that RctB can be rate limiting for chromosome II replication. The multiple modes of control on RctB are expected to reduce fluctuations in the initiator concentration and thereby help maintain chromosome copy number homeostasis.

A gamut of loops: meandering DNA

Nucleoprotein complexes comprising short DNA loops (150 base pairs or less) are involved in a wide variety of DNA transactions (e.g. transcription regulation, replication and recombination) in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, and also can be useful in designing nanostructures. In these higher-order nucleoprotein complexes, proteins bound to spatially separated sites on a DNA interact with each other by looping out the relatively stiff intervening DNA. Recent technological developments have enabled determination of DNA trajectories in a few DNA-loop-containing regulatory complexes. Results show that, in a given system, a specific DNA trajectory is preferred over others.

Archaeal transcriptional regulation – variation on a bacterial theme?

There is now an increasing body of data available on the DNA-binding properties of several putative transcriptional regulators in the Archaeal domain of life. The evidence points to simple models of promoter occlusion or facilitated recruitment of basal machinery for repressors and activators, respectively. However, little is known about the co-factor requirements, in vivo mechanisms and targets of many of these regulators. It is anticipated that the application of post-genomic technologies will begin to shed light on this fascinating area.

Statistics of loop formation along double helix DNAs

We compute relative position distributions of distant sites along discretized semiflexible polymers, focusing on encounter statistics for pairs of sites along a double-stranded DNA molecule (dsDNA), using a transfer-matrix approach. We generalize the usual semiflexible polymer, considering nonlinear elasticity effects arising from inhomogeneities which either appear at any position via thermal fluctuation, or which occur at specific "quenched" locations. We apply our theory to two problems associated with dsDNA looping. First, we discuss how local flexible defects in double-helix structure facilitate cyclization of short dsDNA molecules. Flexible defects greatly enhance cyclization rate, and strongly modify its dependence on the closure orientational boundary condition. This effect is relevant to free-solution cyclization experiments, and to loop formation in vivo. Second, we present calculations of force dependence of the probability of formation of loops along single dsDNAs which show how the probability of loop formation is suppressed by tension.

DNA twisting flexibility and the formation of sharply looped protein-DNA complexes

Gene-regulatory complexes often require that pairs of DNA-bound proteins interact by looping-out short (often approximately 100-bp) stretches of DNA. The loops can vary in detailed length and sequence and, thus, in total helical twist, which radically alters their geometry. How this variability is accommodated structurally is not known. Here we show that the inherent twistability of 89- to 105-bp DNA circles exceeds theoretical expectation by up to 400-fold. These results can be explained only by greatly enhanced DNA flexibility, not by permanent bends. They invalidate the use of classic theories of flexibility for understanding sharp DNA looping but support predictions of two recent theories. Our findings imply an active role for DNA flexibility in loop formation and suggest that variability in the detailed helical twist of regulatory loops is accommodated naturally by the inherent twistability of the DNA.

Multiple homeostatic mechanisms in the control of P1 plasmid replication

Many organisms control initiation of DNA replication by limiting supply or activity of initiator proteins. In plasmids, such as P1, initiators are limited primarily by transcription and dimerization. However, the relevance of initiator limitation to plasmid copy number control has appeared doubtful, because initiator oversupply increases the copy number only marginally. Copy number control instead has been attributed to initiator-mediated plasmid pairing ("handcuffing"), because initiator mutations to handcuffing deficiency elevates the copy number significantly. Here, we present genetic evidence of a role for initiator limitation in plasmid copy number control by showing that autorepression-defective initiator mutants also can elevate the plasmid copy number. We further show, by quantitative modeling, that initiator dimerization is a homeostatic mechanism that dampens active monomer increase when the protein is oversupplied. This finding implies that oversupplied initiator proteins are largely dimeric, partly accounting for their limited ability to increase copy number. A combination of autorepression, dimerization, and handcuffing appears to account fully for control of P1 plasmid copy number.