Asf1 facilitates dephosphorylation of Rad53 after DNA double-strand break repair

The Mms22-Rtt107 axis dampens the DNA damage checkpoint by reducing the stability of the Rad9 checkpoint mediator

The DNA damage checkpoint is a highly conserved signaling pathway induced by genotoxin exposure or endogenous genome stress. It alters many cellular processes such as arresting the cell cycle progression and increasing DNA repair capacities. However, cells can downregulate the checkpoint after prolonged stress exposure to allow continued growth and alternative repair. Strategies that can dampen the DNA damage checkpoint are not well understood. Here, we report that budding yeast employs a pathway composed of the scaffold protein Rtt107, its binding partner Mms22, and an Mms22-associated ubiquitin ligase complex to downregulate the DNA damage checkpoint. Mechanistically, this pathway promotes the proteasomal degradation of a key checkpoint factor, Rad9. Furthermore, Rtt107 binding to Mms22 helps to enrich the ubiquitin ligase complex on chromatin and target the chromatin-bound form of Rad9. Finally, we provide evidence that the Rtt107-Mms22 axis operates in parallel with the Rtt107-Slx4 axis, which displaces Rad9 from chromatin. We thus propose that Rtt107 enables a bifurcated "anti-Rad9" strategy to optimally downregulate the DNA damage checkpoint.

Functional analysis of chromatin-associated proteins in Sordaria macrospora reveals similar roles for RTT109 and ASF1 in development and DNA damage response

We performed a functional analysis of two potential partners of ASF1, a highly conserved histone chaperone that plays a crucial role in the sexual development and DNA damage resistance in the ascomycete Sordaria macrospora. ASF1 is known to be involved in nucleosome assembly and disassembly, binding histones H3 and H4 during transcription, replication and DNA repair and has direct and indirect roles in histone recycling and modification as well as DNA methylation, acting as a chromatin modifier hub for a large network of chromatin-associated proteins. Here, we functionally characterized two of these proteins, RTT109 and CHK2. RTT109 is a fungal-specific histone acetyltransferase, while CHK2 is an ortholog to PRD-4, a checkpoint kinase of Neurospora crassa that performs similar cell cycle checkpoint functions as yeast RAD53. Through the generation and characterization of deletion mutants, we discovered striking similarities between RTT109 and ASF1 in terms of their contributions to sexual development, histone acetylation, and protection against DNA damage. Phenotypic observations revealed a developmental arrest at the same stage in Δrtt109 and Δasf1 strains, accompanied by a loss of H3K56 acetylation, as detected by western blot analysis. Deletion mutants of rtt109 and asf1 are sensitive to the DNA damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, but not hydroxyurea. In contrast, chk2 mutants are fertile and resistant to methyl methanesulfonate, but not hydroxyurea. Our findings suggest a close functional association between ASF1 and RTT109 in the context of development, histone modification, and DNA damage response, while indicating a role for CHK2 in separate pathways of the DNA damage response.

Histone binding of ASF1 is required for fruiting body development but not for genome stability in the filamentous fungus Sordaria macrospora

IMPORTANCE

Histone chaperones are proteins that are involved in nucleosome assembly and disassembly and can therefore influence all DNA-dependent processes including transcription, DNA replication, and repair. ASF1 is a histone chaperone that is conserved throughout eukaryotes. In contrast to most other multicellular organisms, a deletion mutant of asf1 in the fungus Sordaria macrospora is viable; however, the mutant is sterile. In this study, we could show that the histone-binding ability of ASF1 is required for fertility in S. macrospora, whereas the function of ASF1 in maintenance of genome stability does not require histone binding. We also showed that the histone modifications H3K27me3 and H3K56ac are misregulated in the Δasf1 mutant. Furthermore, we identified a large duplication on chromosome 2 of the mutant strain that is genetically linked to the Δasf1 allele present on chromosome 6, suggesting that viability of the mutant might depend on the presence of the duplicated region.

The Role of Chromatin Assembly Factors in Induced Mutagenesis at Low Levels of DNA Damage

The problem of low-dose irradiation has been discussed in the scientific literature for several decades, but it is impossible to come to a generally accepted conclusion about the presence of any specific features of low-dose irradiation in contrast to acute irradiation. We were interested in the effect of low doses of UV radiation on the physiological processes, including repair processes in cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, in contrast to high doses of radiation. Cells utilize excision repair and DNA damage tolerance pathways without significant delay of the cell cycle to address low levels of DNA damage (such as spontaneous base lesions). For genotoxic agents, there is a dose threshold below which checkpoint activation is minimal despite the measurable activity of the DNA repair pathways. Here we report that at ultra-low levels of DNA damage, the role of the error-free branch of post-replicative repair in protection against induced mutagenesis is key. However, with an increase in the levels of DNA damage, the role of the error-free repair branch is rapidly decreasing. We demonstrate that with an increase in the amount of DNA damage from ultra-small to high, asf1Δ-specific mutagenesis decreases catastrophically. A similar dependence is observed for mutants of gene-encoding subunits of the NuB4 complex. Elevated levels of dNTPs caused by the inactivation of the SML1 gene are responsible for high spontaneous reparative mutagenesis. The Rad53 kinase plays a key role in reparative UV mutagenesis at high doses, as well as in spontaneous repair mutagenesis at ultra-low DNA damage levels.

Genetic requirements for repair of lesions caused by single genomic ribonucleotides in S phase

Single ribonucleoside monophosphates (rNMPs) are transiently present in eukaryotic genomes. The RNase H2-dependent ribonucleotide excision repair (RER) pathway ensures error-free rNMP removal. In some pathological conditions, rNMP removal is impaired. If these rNMPs hydrolyze during, or prior to, S phase, toxic single-ended double-strand breaks (seDSBs) can occur upon an encounter with replication forks. How such rNMP-derived seDSB lesions are repaired is unclear. We expressed a cell cycle phase restricted allele of RNase H2 to nick at rNMPs in S phase and study their repair. Although Top1 is dispensable, the RAD52 epistasis group and Rtt101^Mms1-Mms22 dependent ubiquitylation of histone H3 become essential for rNMP-derived lesion tolerance. Consistently, loss of Rtt101^Mms1-Mms22 combined with RNase H2 dysfunction leads to compromised cellular fitness. We refer to this repair pathway as nick lesion repair (NLR). The NLR genetic network may have important implications in the context of human pathologies.

Histone acetylation dynamics in repair of DNA double-strand breaks

Packaging of eukaryotic genome into chromatin is a major obstacle to cells encountering DNA damage caused by external or internal agents. For maintaining genomic integrity, the double-strand breaks (DSB) must be efficiently repaired, as these are the most deleterious type of DNA damage. The DNA breaks have to be detected in chromatin context, the DNA damage response (DDR) pathways have to be activated to repair breaks either by non‐ homologous end joining and homologous recombination repair. It is becoming clearer now that chromatin is not a mere hindrance to DDR, it plays active role in sensing, detection and repair of DNA damage. The repair of DSB is governed by the reorganization of the pre-existing chromatin, leading to recruitment of specific machineries, chromatin remodelling complexes, histone modifiers to bring about dynamic alterations in histone composition, nucleosome positioning, histone modifications. In response to DNA break, modulation of chromatin occurs via various mechanisms including post-translational modification of histones. DNA breaks induce many types of histone modifications, such as phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation and ubiquitylation on specific histone residues which are signal and context dependent. DNA break induced histone modifications have been reported to function in sensing the breaks, activating processing of breaks by specific pathways, and repairing damaged DNA to ensure integrity of the genome. Favourable environment for DSB repair is created by generating open and relaxed chromatin structure. Histone acetylation mediate de-condensation of chromatin and recruitment of DSB repair proteins to their site of action at the DSB to facilitate repair. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding on the critical role of histone acetylation in inducing changes both in chromatin organization and promoting recruitment of DSB repair proteins to sites of DNA damage. It consists of an overview of function and regulation of the deacetylase enzymes which remove these marks and the function of histone acetylation and regulators of acetylation in genome surveillance.

Histone and Chromatin Dynamics Facilitating DNA repair

Our nuclear genomes are complexed with histone proteins to form nucleosomes, the repeating units of chromatin which function to package and limit unscheduled access to the genome. In response to helix-distorting DNA lesions and DNA double-strand breaks, chromatin is disassembled around the DNA lesion to facilitate DNA repair and it is reassembled after repair is complete to reestablish the epigenetic landscape and regulating access to the genome. DNA damage also triggers decondensation of the local chromatin structure, incorporation of histone variants and dramatic transient increases in chromatin mobility to facilitate the homology search during homologous recombination. Here we review the current state of knowledge of these changes in histone and chromatin dynamics in response to DNA damage, the molecular mechanisms mediating these dynamics, as well as their functional contributions to the maintenance of genome integrity to prevent human diseases including cancer.

Replication stress inhibits synthesis of histone mRNAs in yeast by removing Spt10p and Spt21p from the histone promoters

Proliferating cells coordinate histone and DNA synthesis to maintain correct stoichiometry for chromatin assembly. Histone mRNA levels must be repressed when DNA replication is inhibited to prevent toxicity and genome instability due to free non-chromatinized histone proteins. In mammalian cells, replication stress triggers degradation of histone mRNAs, but it is unclear if this mechanism is conserved from other species. The aim of this study was to identify the histone mRNA decay pathway in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae and determine the mechanism by which DNA replication stress represses histone mRNAs. Using reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and chromatin immunoprecipitation–quantitative PCR, we show here that histone mRNAs can be degraded by both 5′ → 3′ and 3′ → 5′ pathways; however, replication stress does not trigger decay of histone mRNA in yeast. Rather, replication stress inhibits transcription of histone genes by removing the histone gene–specific transcription factors Spt10p and Spt21p from histone promoters, leading to disassembly of the preinitiation complexes and eviction of RNA Pol II from histone genes by a mechanism facilitated by checkpoint kinase Rad53p and histone chaperone Asf1p. In contrast, replication stress does not remove SCB-binding factor transcription complex, another activator of histone genes, from the histone promoters, suggesting that Spt10p and Spt21p have unique roles in the transcriptional downregulation of histone genes during replication stress. Together, our data show that, unlike in mammalian cells, replication stress in yeast does not trigger decay of histone mRNAs but inhibits histone transcription.

Novel insights into the mechanism of cell cycle kinases Mec1(ATR) and Tel1(ATM)

DNA replication is a highly precise process which usually functions in a perfect rhythm with cell cycle progression. However, cells are constantly faced with various kinds of obstacles such as blocks in DNA replication, lack of availability of precursors and improper chromosome alignment. When these problems are not addressed, they may lead to chromosome instability and the accumulation of mutations, and even cell death. Therefore, the cell has developed response mechanisms to keep most of these situations under control. Of the many factors that participate in this DNA damage response, members of the family of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related protein kinases (PIKKs) orchestrate the response landscape. Our understanding of two members of the PIKK family, human ATR (yeast Mec1) and ATM (yeast Tel1), and their associated partner proteins, has shown substantial progress through recent biochemical and structural studies. Emerging structural information of these unique kinases show common features that reveal the mechanism of kinase activity.

The Amazing Acrobat: Yeast's Histone H3K56 Juggles Several Important Roles While Maintaining Perfect Balance

Acetylation on lysine 56 of histone H3 of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been implicated in many cellular processes that affect genome stability. Despite being the object of much research, the complete scope of the roles played by K56 acetylation is not fully understood even today. The acetylation is put in place at the S-phase of the cell cycle, in order to flag newly synthesized histones that are incorporated during DNA replication. The signal is removed by two redundant deacetylases, Hst3 and Hst4, at the entry to G2/M phase. Its crucial location, at the entry and exit points of the DNA into and out of the nucleosome, makes this a central modification, and dictates that if acetylation and deacetylation are not well concerted and executed in a timely fashion, severe genomic instability arises. In this review, we explore the wealth of information available on the many roles played by H3K56 acetylation and the deacetylases Hst3 and Hst4 in DNA replication and repair.

Damage-induced chromatome dynamics link Ubiquitin ligase and proteasome recruitment to histone loss and efficient DNA repair

Eukaryotic cells package their genomes around histone octamers. In response to DNA damage, checkpoint activation in yeast induces core histone degradation resulting in 20%-40% reduction in nucleosome occupancy. To gain insight into this process, we developed a new approach to analyze the chromatin-associated proteome comprehensively before and after damage. This revealed extensive changes in protein composition after Zeocin-induced damage. First, core histones and the H1 homolog Hho1 were partially lost from chromatin along with replication, transcription, and chromatin remodeling machineries, while ubiquitin ligases and the proteasome were recruited. We found that the checkpoint- and INO80C-dependent recruitment of five ubiquitin-conjugating factors (Rad6, Bre1, Pep5, Ufd4, and Rsp5) contributes to core and linker histone depletion, reducing chromatin compaction and enhancing DNA locus mobility. Importantly, loss of Rad6/Bre1, Ufd4/TRIP12, and Pep5/VPS11 compromise DNA strand invasion kinetics during homology-driven repair. Thus we provide a comprehensive overview of a functionally relevant genome-wide chromatin response to DNA damage.

Mec1ATR Autophosphorylation and Ddc2ATRIP Phosphorylation Regulates DNA Damage Checkpoint Signaling

In budding yeast, a single DNA double-strand break (DSB) triggers the activation of Mec1^ATR-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. After about 12 h, cells turn off the checkpoint signaling and adapt despite the persistence of the DSB. We report that the adaptation involves the autophosphorylation of Mec1 at site S1964. A non-phosphorylatable mec1-S1964A mutant causes cells to arrest permanently in response to a single DSB without affecting the initial kinase activity of Mec1. Autophosphorylation of S1964 is dependent on Ddc1^Rad9 and Dpb11^TopBP1, and it correlates with the timing of adaptation. We also report that Mec1's binding partner, Ddc2^ATRIP, is an inherently stable protein that is degraded specifically upon DNA damage. Ddc2 is regulated extensively through phosphorylation, which, in turn, regulates the localization of the Mec1-Ddc2 complex to DNA lesions. Taken together, these results suggest that checkpoint response is regulated through the autophosphorylation of Mec1 kinase and through the changes in Ddc2 abundance and phosphorylation.

Anti-silencing factor 1A is associated with genome stability maintenance of mouse preimplantation embryos†

Genome stability is critical for the normal development of preimplantation embryos, as DNA damages may result in mutation and even embryo lethality. Anti-silencing factor 1A (ASF1A) is a histone chaperone and enriched in the MII oocytes as a maternal factor, which may be associated with the maintenance of genome stability. Thus, this study was undertaken to explore the role of ASF1A in maintaining the genome stability of early mouse embryos. The ASF1A expressed in the preimplantation embryos and displayed a dynamic pattern throughout the early embryonic development. Inhibition of ASF1A expression decreased embryonic development and increased DNA damages. Overexpression of ASF1A improved the developmental potential and decreased DNA damages. When 293T cells that had been integrated with RGS-NHEJ were co-transfected with plasmids of pcDNA3.1-ASF1A, gRNA-NHEJ, and hCas9, less cells expressed eGFP, indicating that non-homologous end joining was reduced by ASF1A. When 293T cells were co-transfected with plasmids of HR-donor, gRNA-HR, hCas9, and pcDNA3.1-ASF1A, more cells expressed eGFP, indicating that homologous recombination (HR) was enhanced by ASF1A. These results indicate that ASF1A may be associated with the genome stability maintenance of early mouse embryos and this action may be mediated by promoting DNA damage repair through HR pathway.

ASF1a inhibition induces p53-dependent growth arrest and senescence of cancer cells

Anti-silencing function 1a (ASF1a) is a histone H3-H4 chaperone isoform involved in chromatin assembling and transcription regulation. Recently, ASF1a has been shown to be up-regulated in certain human malignancies and required for the expression of telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT), a factor essential for the immortal phenotype of cancer cells; however, its role in oncogenesis remains poorly defined. In the present study, we determine whether ASF1a is required for the unlimited proliferation of cancer cells, a key cancer hallmark. Elevated ASF1a mRNA expression was observed in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumors. The overexpression of ASF1a was similarly found in 20 cancer types contained in TCGA and GTEx datasets. ASF1a knockdown led to growth arrest and senescence of wild-type (wt) p53-carrying HCC and prostate cancer cells. Cellular senescence mediated by ASF1a inhibition resulted from the robust up-regulation of p53 and p21^cip1 expression, but without detectable changes in TERT expression. p53 inhibition attenuated p21^cip1 induction caused by ASF1a depletion. Mechanistically, ASF1a-knocked down cells displayed widespread DNA damage. The TCGA dataset analysis revealed a negative correlation between ASF1a and p21^cip1 expression in multiple types of primary tumors, including HCC, prostate, gastric, and breast cancer. Higher ASF1a and lower p21^cip1 expression predicted a poor outcome in patients with HCC. Our results reveal that ASF1a overexpression is widespread in human malignancies and is required for the infinite proliferation of cancer cells, whereas its inhibition induces DNA damage and subsequent up-regulation of p53-p21^cip1 expression, thereby triggering cellular senescence. Thus, ASF1a may serve as a potential target in cancer therapy.

Epigenetic Mechanisms Impacting Aging: A Focus on Histone Levels and Telomeres

Aging and age-related diseases pose some of the most significant and difficult challenges to modern society as well as to the scientific and medical communities. Biological aging is a complex, and, under normal circumstances, seemingly irreversible collection of processes that involves numerous underlying mechanisms. Among these, chromatin-based processes have emerged as major regulators of cellular and organismal aging. These include DNA methylation, histone modifications, nucleosome positioning, and telomere regulation, including how these are influenced by environmental factors such as diet. Here we focus on two interconnected categories of chromatin-based mechanisms impacting aging: those involving changes in the levels of histones or in the functions of telomeres.

Dot1 regulates nucleosome dynamics by its inherent histone chaperone activity in yeast

Dot1 (disruptor of telomeric silencing-1, DOT1L in humans) is the only known enzyme responsible for histone H3 lysine 79 methylation (H3K79me) and is evolutionarily conserved in most eukaryotes. Yeast Dot1p lacks a SET domain and does not methylate free histones and thus may have different actions with respect to other histone methyltransferases. Here we show that Dot1p displays histone chaperone activity and regulates nucleosome dynamics via histone exchange in yeast. We show that a methylation-independent function of Dot1p is required for the cryptic transcription within transcribed regions seen following disruption of the Set2-Rpd3S pathway. Dot1p can assemble core histones to nucleosomes and facilitate ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling activity through its nucleosome-binding domain, in vitro. Global analysis indicates that Dot1p appears to be particularly important for histone exchange and chromatin accessibility on the transcribed regions of long-length genes. Our findings collectively suggest that Dot1p-mediated histone chaperone activity controls nucleosome dynamics in transcribed regions.

ASF1a Promotes Non-homologous End Joining Repair by Facilitating Phosphorylation of MDC1 by ATM at Double-Strand Breaks

Double-strand breaks (DSBs) of DNA in eukaryotic cells are predominantly repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The histone chaperone anti-silencing factor 1a (ASF1a) interacts with MDC1 and is recruited to sites of DSBs to facilitate the interaction of phospho-ATM with MDC1 and phosphorylation of MDC1, which are required for the recruitment of RNF8/RNF168 histone ubiquitin ligases. Thus, ASF1a deficiency reduces histone ubiquitination at DSBs, decreasing the recruitment of 53BP1, and decreases NHEJ, rendering cells more sensitive to DSBs. This role of ASF1a in DSB repair cannot be provided by the closely related ASF1b and does not require its histone chaperone activity. Homozygous deletion of ASF1A is seen in 10%-15% of certain cancers, suggesting that loss of NHEJ may be selected in some malignancies and that the deletion can be used as a molecular biomarker for cancers susceptible to radiotherapy or to DSB-inducing chemotherapy.

Delineation of the role of chromatin assembly and the Rtt101Mms1 E3 ubiquitin ligase in DNA damage checkpoint recovery in budding yeast

The DNA damage checkpoint is activated in response to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We had previously shown that chromatin assembly mediated by the histone chaperone Asf1 triggers inactivation of the DNA damage checkpoint in yeast after DSB repair, also called checkpoint recovery. Here we show that chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) also contributes to chromatin reassembly after DSB repair, explaining its role in checkpoint recovery. Towards understanding how chromatin assembly promotes checkpoint recovery, we find persistent presence of the damage sensors Ddc1 and Ddc2 after DSB repair in asf1 mutants. The genes encoding the E3 ubiquitin ligase complex Rtt101^Mms1 are epistatic to ASF1 for survival following induction of a DSB, and Rtt101^Mms1 are required for checkpoint recovery after DSB repair but not for chromatin assembly. By contrast, the Mms22 substrate adaptor that is degraded by Rtt101^Mms1 is required for DSB repair per se. Deletion of MMS22 blocks loading of Rad51 at the DSB, while deletion of ASF1 or RTT101 leads to persistent Rad51 loading. We propose that checkpoint recovery is promoted by Rtt101^Mms1-mediated ubiquitylation of Mms22 in order to halt Mms22-dependent loading of Rad51 onto double-stranded DNA after DSB repair, in concert with the chromatin assembly-mediated displacement of Rad51 and checkpoint sensors from the site of repair.

Re-establishment of nucleosome occupancy during double-strand break repair in budding yeast

Homologous recombination (HR) is an evolutionarily conserved pathway in eukaryotes that repairs a double-strand break (DSB) by copying homologous sequences from a sister chromatid, a homologous chromosome or an ectopic location. Recombination is challenged by the packaging of DNA into nucleosomes, which may impair the process at many steps, from resection of the DSB ends to the re-establishement of nucleosomes after repair. However, nucleosome dynamics during DSB repair have not been well described, primarily because of a lack of well-ordered nucleosomes around a DSB. We designed a system in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae to monitor nucleosome dynamics during repair of an HO endonuclease-induced DSB. Nucleosome occupancy around the break is lost following DSB formation, by 5'-3' resection of the DSB end. Soon after repair is complete, nucleosome occupancy is partially restored in a repair-dependent but cell cycle-independent manner. Full re-establishment of nucleosome protection back to the level prior to DSB induction is achieved when the cell cycle resumes following repair. These findings may have implications to the mechanisms by which cells sense the completion of repair.