1
|
Morton EA, Hall AN, Cuperus JT, Queitsch C. Substantial rDNA copy number reductions alter timing of development and produce variable tissue-specific phenotypes in C. elegans. Genetics 2023; 224:iyad039. [PMID: 36919976 PMCID: PMC10474940 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
The genes that encode ribosomal RNAs are present in several hundred copies in most eukaryotes. These vast arrays of repetitive ribosomal DNA (rDNA) have been implicated not just in ribosome biogenesis, but also aging, cancer, genome stability, and global gene expression. rDNA copy number is highly variable among and within species; this variability is thought to associate with traits relevant to human health and disease. Here we investigate the phenotypic consequences of multicellular life at the lower bounds of rDNA copy number. We use the model Caenorhabditis elegans, which has previously been found to complete embryogenesis using only maternally provided ribosomes. We find that individuals with rDNA copy number reduced to ∼5% of wild type are capable of further development with variable penetrance. Such individuals are sterile and exhibit severe morphological defects, particularly in post-embryonically dividing tissues such as germline and vulva. Developmental completion and fertility are supported by an rDNA copy number ∼10% of wild type, with substantially delayed development. Worms with rDNA copy number reduced to ∼33% of wild type display a subtle developmental timing defect that was absent in worms with higher copy numbers. Our results support the hypothesis that rDNA requirements vary across tissues and indicate that the minimum rDNA copy number for fertile adulthood is substantially less than the lowest naturally observed total copy number. The phenotype of individuals with severely reduced rDNA copy number is highly variable in penetrance and presentation, highlighting the need for continued investigation into the biological consequences of rDNA copy number variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashley N Hall
- Wisconsin Energy Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53726, USA
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Josh T Cuperus
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Christine Queitsch
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Translin facilitates RNA polymerase II dissociation and suppresses genome instability during RNase H2- and Dicer-deficiency. PLoS Genet 2022; 18:e1010267. [PMID: 35714159 PMCID: PMC9246224 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The conserved nucleic acid binding protein Translin contributes to numerous facets of mammalian biology and genetic diseases. It was first identified as a binder of cancer-associated chromosomal translocation breakpoint junctions leading to the suggestion that it was involved in genetic recombination. With a paralogous partner protein, Trax, Translin has subsequently been found to form a hetero-octomeric RNase complex that drives some of its functions, including passenger strand removal in RNA interference (RNAi). The Translin-Trax complex also degrades the precursors to tumour suppressing microRNAs in cancers deficient for the RNase III Dicer. This oncogenic activity has resulted in the Translin-Trax complex being explored as a therapeutic target. Additionally, Translin and Trax have been implicated in a wider range of biological functions ranging from sleep regulation to telomere transcript control. Here we reveal a Trax- and RNAi-independent function for Translin in dissociating RNA polymerase II from its genomic template, with loss of Translin function resulting in increased transcription-associated recombination and elevated genome instability. This provides genetic insight into the longstanding question of how Translin might influence chromosomal rearrangements in human genetic diseases and provides important functional understanding of an oncological therapeutic target. Human genetic diseases, including cancers, are frequently driven by substantial changes to chromosomes, including translocations, where one arm of a chromosome is exchanged for another. The human nucleic acid binding protein Translin was first identified by its ability to bind to the chromosomal sites at which some of these translocations occur. This resulted in Translin being implicated in the mechanism that generated the translocation and thus the associated disease state. However, since its discovery there has been little evidence to directly indicate Translin does contribute to this process. It is, however, known to contribute to a number of biological functions including, amongst others, neurological regulation, sleep control, vascular stiffening, cancer immunomodulation and it has been recently identified as a potential therapeutic target in some cancers. Here we demonstrate that Translin has conserved function in genome stability maintenance when other primary pathways are defective, a function independent of a key binding partner protein, Trax. Specifically, we demonstrate that Translin contributes to minimizing the deleterious genome destabilizing effects of retaining gene expression machineries on chromosomes. This offers the first evidence for how Translin might contribute to genetic disease-causing chromosomal changes and offers insight to inform therapeutic design.
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu J, Hu X, Bao K, Kim JK, Zhang C, Jia S, Qiao F. The cooperative assembly of shelterin bridge provides a kinetic gateway that controls telomere length homeostasis. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:8110-8119. [PMID: 34255844 PMCID: PMC8373121 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Shelterin is a six-protein complex that coats chromosome ends to ensure their proper protection and maintenance. Similar to the human shelterin, fission yeast shelterin is composed of telomeric double- and single-stranded DNA-binding proteins, Taz1 and Pot1, respectively, bridged by Rap1, Poz1 and Tpz1. The assembly of the proteinaceous Tpz1-Poz1-Rap1 complex occurs cooperatively and disruption of this shelterin bridge leads to unregulated telomere elongation. However, how this biophysical property of bridge assembly is integrated into shelterin function is not known. Here, utilizing synthetic bridges with a range of binding properties, we find that synthetic shelterin bridge lacking cooperativity requires a linker pair that matches the native bridge in complex lifespan but has dramatically higher affinity. We find that cooperative assembly confers kinetic properties on the shelterin bridge allowing disassembly to function as a molecular timer, regulating the duration of the telomere open state, and consequently telomere lengthening to achieve a defined species-specific length range.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinqiang Liu
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| | - Xichan Hu
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| | - Kehan Bao
- Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York City, NY 92697-4560, USA
| | - Jin-Kwang Kim
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| | - Catherine Zhang
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| | - Songtao Jia
- Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University, New York City, NY 92697-4560, USA
| | - Feng Qiao
- Department of Biological Chemistry, School of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697-1700, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Apte MS, Masuda H, Wheeler DL, Cooper JP. RNAi and Ino80 complex control rate limiting translocation step that moves rDNA to eroding telomeres. Nucleic Acids Res 2021; 49:8161-8176. [PMID: 34244792 PMCID: PMC8373062 DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkab586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of HAATIrDNA, a telomerase-negative survival mode in which canonical telomeres are replaced with ribosomal DNA (rDNA) repeats that acquire chromosome end-protection capability, raised crucial questions as to how rDNA tracts 'jump' to eroding chromosome ends. Here, we show that HAATIrDNA formation is initiated and limited by a single translocation that juxtaposes rDNA from Chromosome (Chr) III onto subtelomeric elements (STE) on Chr I or II; this rare reaction requires RNAi and the Ino80 nucleosome remodeling complex (Ino80C), thus defining an unforeseen relationship between these two machineries. The unique STE-rDNA junction created by this initial translocation is efficiently copied to the remaining STE chromosome ends, independently of RNAi or Ino80C. Intriguingly, both RNAi and Ino80C machineries contain a component that plays dual roles in HAATI subtype choice. Dcr1 of the RNAi pathway and Iec1 of Ino80C both promote HAATIrDNA formation as part of their respective canonical machineries, but both also inhibit formation of the exceedingly rare HAATISTE (where STE sequences mobilize throughout the genome and assume chromosome end protection capacity) in non-canonical, pathway-independent manners. This work provides a glimpse into a previously unrecognized crosstalk between RNAi and Ino80C in controlling unusual translocation reactions that establish telomere-free linear chromosome ends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manasi S Apte
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Hirohisa Masuda
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| | - David Lee Wheeler
- Laboratory of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Julia Promisel Cooper
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bonnell E, Pasquier E, Wellinger RJ. Telomere Replication: Solving Multiple End Replication Problems. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021; 9:668171. [PMID: 33869233 PMCID: PMC8047117 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.668171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Eukaryotic genomes are highly complex and divided into linear chromosomes that require end protection from unwarranted fusions, recombination, and degradation in order to maintain genomic stability. This is accomplished through the conserved specialized nucleoprotein structure of telomeres. Due to the repetitive nature of telomeric DNA, and the unusual terminal structure, namely a protruding single stranded 3' DNA end, completing telomeric DNA replication in a timely and efficient manner is a challenge. For example, the end replication problem causes a progressive shortening of telomeric DNA at each round of DNA replication, thus telomeres eventually lose their protective capacity. This phenomenon is counteracted by the recruitment and the activation at telomeres of the specialized reverse transcriptase telomerase. Despite the importance of telomerase in providing a mechanism for complete replication of telomeric ends, the majority of telomere replication is in fact carried out by the conventional DNA replication machinery. There is significant evidence demonstrating that progression of replication forks is hampered at chromosomal ends due to telomeric sequences prone to form secondary structures, tightly DNA-bound proteins, and the heterochromatic nature of telomeres. The telomeric loop (t-loop) formed by invasion of the 3'-end into telomeric duplex sequences may also impede the passage of replication fork. Replication fork stalling can lead to fork collapse and DNA breaks, a major cause of genomic instability triggered notably by unwanted repair events. Moreover, at chromosomal ends, unreplicated DNA distal to a stalled fork cannot be rescued by a fork coming from the opposite direction. This highlights the importance of the multiple mechanisms involved in overcoming fork progression obstacles at telomeres. Consequently, numerous factors participate in efficient telomeric DNA duplication by preventing replication fork stalling or promoting the restart of a stalled replication fork at telomeres. In this review, we will discuss difficulties associated with the passage of the replication fork through telomeres in both fission and budding yeasts as well as mammals, highlighting conserved mechanisms implicated in maintaining telomere integrity during replication, thus preserving a stable genome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Raymund J. Wellinger
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Cancer Research Pavilion, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cacchione S, Cenci G, Raffa GD. Silence at the End: How Drosophila Regulates Expression and Transposition of Telomeric Retroelements. J Mol Biol 2020; 432:4305-4321. [PMID: 32512004 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2020.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
The maintenance of chromosome ends in Drosophila is an exceptional phenomenon because it relies on the transposition of specialized retrotransposons rather than on the activity of the enzyme telomerase that maintains telomeres in almost every other eukaryotic species. Sequential transpositions of Het-A, TART, and TAHRE (HTT) onto chromosome ends produce long head-to-tail arrays that are reminiscent to the long arrays of short repeats produced by telomerase in other organisms. Coordinating the activation and silencing of the HTT array with the recruitment of telomere capping proteins favors proper telomere function. However, how this coordination is achieved is not well understood. Like other Drosophila retrotransposons, telomeric elements are regulated by the piRNA pathway. Remarkably, HTT arrays are both source of piRNA and targets of gene silencing thus making the regulation of Drosophila telomeric transposons a unique event among eukaryotes. Herein we will review the genetic and molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of HTT transcription and transposition and will discuss the possibility of a crosstalk between piRNA-mediated regulation, telomeric chromatin establishment, and telomere protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Cacchione
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy.
| | - Giovanni Cenci
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy; Fondazione Cenci Bolognetti, Istituto Pasteur, Rome, Italy.
| | - Grazia Daniela Raffa
- Department of Biology and Biotechnology, Sapienza University of Rome, P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Xu Z, Teixeira MT. The many types of heterogeneity in replicative senescence. Yeast 2019; 36:637-648. [PMID: 31306505 PMCID: PMC6900063 DOI: 10.1002/yea.3433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Replicative senescence, which is induced by telomere shortening, underlies the loss of regeneration capacity of organs and is ultimately detrimental to the organism. At the same time, it is required to protect organisms from unlimited cell proliferation that may arise from numerous stimuli or deregulations. One important feature of replicative senescence is its high level of heterogeneity and asynchrony, which promote genome instability and senescence escape. Characterizing this heterogeneity and investigating its sources are thus critical to understanding the robustness of replicative senescence. Here we review the different aspects of senescence driven by telomere attrition that are subject to variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the current understanding of the molecular processes at play, and the consequences of heterogeneity in replicative senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhou Xu
- CNRS, UMR7238, Institut de Biologie Paris‐Seine, Laboratory of Computational and Quantitative BiologySorbonne UniversitéParisFrance
| | - Maria Teresa Teixeira
- CNRS, UMR8226, Institut de Biologie Physico‐Chimique, Laboratory of Molecular and Cell Biology of EukaryotesSorbonne Université, PSL Research UniversityParisFrance
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
van Emden TS, Forn M, Forné I, Sarkadi Z, Capella M, Martín Caballero L, Fischer-Burkart S, Brönner C, Simonetta M, Toczyski D, Halic M, Imhof A, Braun S. Shelterin and subtelomeric DNA sequences control nucleosome maintenance and genome stability. EMBO Rep 2018; 20:embr.201847181. [PMID: 30420521 DOI: 10.15252/embr.201847181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Telomeres and the shelterin complex cap and protect the ends of chromosomes. Telomeres are flanked by the subtelomeric sequences that have also been implicated in telomere regulation, although their role is not well defined. Here, we show that, in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the telomere-associated sequences (TAS) present on most subtelomeres are hyper-recombinogenic, have metastable nucleosomes, and unusual low levels of H3K9 methylation. Ccq1, a subunit of shelterin, protects TAS from nucleosome loss by recruiting the heterochromatic repressor complexes CLRC and SHREC, thereby linking nucleosome stability to gene silencing. Nucleosome instability at TAS is independent of telomeric repeats and can be transmitted to an intrachromosomal locus containing an ectopic TAS fragment, indicating that this is an intrinsic property of the underlying DNA sequence. When telomerase recruitment is compromised in cells lacking Ccq1, DNA sequences present in the TAS promote recombination between chromosomal ends, independent of nucleosome abundance, implying an active function of these sequences in telomere maintenance. We propose that Ccq1 and fragile subtelomeres co-evolved to regulate telomere plasticity by controlling nucleosome occupancy and genome stability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S van Emden
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany.,International Max Planck Research School for Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Marta Forn
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Ignasi Forné
- Protein Analysis Unit (ZfP), BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Zsuzsa Sarkadi
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Matías Capella
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Lucía Martín Caballero
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany.,International Max Planck Research School for Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sabine Fischer-Burkart
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Cornelia Brönner
- Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marco Simonetta
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Toczyski
- Department of Biophysics and Biochemistry, University of California San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mario Halic
- Department of Biochemistry, Gene Center, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Axel Imhof
- Protein Analysis Unit (ZfP), BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany
| | - Sigurd Braun
- Department of Physiological Chemistry, BioMedical Center (BMC), Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Martinsried, Germany .,International Max Planck Research School for Molecular and Cellular Life Sciences, Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|