Increased survival of children with solid tumours: how did we get there and how to keep the success going?

Cumulative radiation doses due to nuclear medicine examinations: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the published data regarding the cumulative exposure to radiation in selected cohorts of adults or paediatric patients due to diagnostic nuclear medicine examinations.

METHODS

We conducted PubMed/Medline searches of peer-reviewed papers on cumulated effective dose (CED) from diagnostic nuclear medicine procedures published between 01 January 2010 until 31 January 2021. Studies were considered eligible if the contribution of nuclear medicine examinations to total CED was >10%. Studies reporting cumulative doses in a single episode of care or in a limited time (≤1 year) were excluded. The main outcomes for which data were sought were the CED accrued by patients, the period in which the CED was accrued, the percentage of patients with CED > 100 mSv and the percentage contribution due to nuclear medicine procedures to the overall CED.

RESULTS

The studies included in the synthesis were 18 which enrolled a total of 1,76,371 patients. Eleven (1,757 patients), three (1,74,079 patients) and four (535 patients) were related to oncological, cardiologic and transplanted patients, respectively. All the studies were retrospective; some of the source materials referred to small number of patients and some of the patients were followed for a short time. Not many studies accurately quantified the contribution of nuclear medicine procedures to the overall radiation exposure due to medical imaging. Finally, most of the studies covered an observation period which extended mainly in the 2000-2010 decade.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need of prospective, multicentric studies enrolling a greater number of patients, followed for longer period in selected groups of patients to fully capture the cumulative exposure to radiation in these settings.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This systematic review allows to identify selected group of patients with a specific health status in which the cumulated exposure to radiation may be of concern and where the contribution of nuclear medicine procedures to the total CED is significant.

Comparison of effective radiation doses from X-ray, CT, and PET/CT in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma using a dose monitoring program

PURPOSE

We aimed to evaluate the use of a dose monitoring program for calculating and comparing the diagnostic radiation doses in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed diagnostic and therapeutic imaging studies performed on pediatric patients with neuroblastoma from 2003 to 2014. We calculated the mean effective dose per exam for X-ray, conventional computed tomography (CT), and CT of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) from the data collected using a dose monitoring program (DoseTrack group) since October 2012. Using the data, we estimated the cumulative dose per person and the relative dose from each modality in all patients (Total group). The effective dose from PET was manually calculated for all patients.

RESULTS

We included 63 patients with a mean age of 3.2±3.5 years; 28 had a history of radiation therapy, with a mean irradiated dose of 31.9±23.2 Gy. The mean effective dose per exam was 0.04±0.19 mSv for X-ray, 1.09±1.11 mSv for CT, and 8.35±7.45 mSv for CT of PET/CT in 31 patients of the DoseTrack group. The mean estimated cumulative dose per patient in the Total group was 3.43±2.86 mSv from X-ray (8.5%), 7.66±6.09 mSv from CT (19.1%), 18.35±13.52 mSv from CT of PET/CT (45.7%), and 10.71±10.05 mSv from PET (26.7%).

CONCLUSION

CT of PET/CT contributed nearly half of the total cumulative dose in pediatric patients with neuroblastoma. The radiation dose from X-ray was not negligible because of the large number of X-ray images. A dose monitoring program can be useful for calculating radiation doses in patients with cancer.

What predicts the risk of recurrent lung metastases?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine what factors predict recurrent lung metastatic disease in pediatric oncology patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent resection of lung nodules that were positive for metastatic disease from 1998 to 2011 was performed. Risk factors for recurrence were determined by multi-variable logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Fifty pediatric oncology patients underwent resection of discrete lung nodules seen on CT scans during work-up for metastasis or for routine surveillance. Out of this patient cohort, 23 (46%) patients had recurrent disease. The only significant factors that influenced risk of recurrence were original PET positive study (p<0.05) and patients with osteosarcoma (p<0.002). The type of surgical procedure, margins of original resection, race, age, gender, size, or the number of original nodules was not found to be significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients with osteosarcoma and PET positive disease at original presentation appear to be at the highest risk of recurrent pulmonary metastatic disease. New pulmonary lesions in these patients should undergo biopsy to confirm metastatic disease.

Comparison of L1 expression and secretion in glioblastoma and neuroblastoma cells

The expression of cell adhesion molecule L1 has been identified in a vast spectrum of tumors; however, its expression pattern with regard to tumor type is rarely discussed. In the present study, we studied L1 levels in human glioblastomas and neuroblastomas, and compared the expression and secretion of L1 in human glioblastoma U87-MG and neuroblastoma SK-N-SH cells. Immunofluorescence staining revealed different grades of L1 staining in human glioblastoma and neuroblastoma samples. In U87-MG cells, full-length L1 was weakly detected in cell lysates (CLs), while greater levels of abundant soluble L1 were confined in conditioned culture medium (CCM). In contrast, higher levels of full-length L1 were confined in SK-N-SH CLs, while almost no soluble forms of L1 were detected in CCM. Our data indicates various expression patterns of L1 in U87-MG and SK-N-SH cells, which may underlie the different malignancies of the two neural tumor types and further stress the importance of soluble L1-mediated signaling pathways in cell malignancy.

Molecular therapies for tuberous sclerosis and neurofibromatosis

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) are autosomal-dominant genetic disorders that result from dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway. NF1 is caused by mutations in the NF1 gene on chromosome 17q11.2. Its protein product, neurofibromin, functions as a tumor suppressor and ultimately produces constitutive upregulation of mTOR. TSC is caused by mutations in either the TSC1 (chromosome 9q34) or TSC2 (chromosome 16p.13.3) genes. Their protein products, hamartin and tuberin, respectively, form a dimer that acts via the GAP protein Rheb (Ras homolog enhanced in brain) to directly inhibit mTOR, again resulting in upregulation. Specific inhibitors of mTOR are in clinical use, including sirolimus, everolimus, temsirolimus, and deforolimus. Everolimus has been shown to reduce the volume and appearance of subependymal giant cell astrocytomas (SEGA), facial angiofibromas, and renal angiomyolipomas associated with TSC, with a recent FDA approval for SEGA not suitable for surgical resection. This article reviews the use of mTOR inhibitors in these diseases, which have the potential to be a disease-modifying therapy in these and other conditions.