Wavelet analysis of corneal endothelial electrical potential difference reveals cyclic operation of the secretory mechanism

Epithelial Fluid Transport is Due to Electro-osmosis (80%), Plus Osmosis (20%)

Epithelial fluid transport, an important physiological process shrouded in a long-standing enigma, may finally be moving closer to a solution. We propose that, for the corneal endothelium, relative proportions for the driving forces for fluid transport are 80% of paracellular electro-osmosis, and 20% classical transcellular osmosis. These operate in a cyclical process with a period of 9.2 s, which is dictated by the decrease and exhaustion of cellular Na⁺. Paracellular electro-osmosis is sketched here, and partially discussed as much as the subject still allows; transcellular osmosis is presented at length.

Net Fluorescein Flux Across Corneal Endothelium Strongly Suggests Fluid Transport is due to Electro-osmosis

We have presented prior evidence suggesting that fluid transport results from electro-osmosis at the intercellular junctions of the corneal endothelium. Such phenomenon ought to drag other extracellular solutes. We have investigated this using fluorescein-Na₂ as an extracellular marker. We measured unidirectional fluxes across layers of cultured human corneal endothelial (HCE) cells. SV-40-transformed HCE layers were grown to confluence on permeable membrane inserts. The medium was DMEM with high glucose and no phenol red. Fluorescein-labeled medium was placed either on the basolateral or the apical side of the inserts; the other side carried unlabeled medium. The inserts were held in a CO₂ incubator for 1 h (at 37 °C), after which the entire volume of the unlabeled side was collected. After that, label was placed on the opposite side, and the corresponding paired sample was collected after another hour. Fluorescein counts were determined with a (Photon Technology) DeltaScan fluorometer (excitation 380 nm; emission 550 nm; 2 nm bwth). Samples were read for 60 s. The cells utilized are known to transport fluid from the basolateral to the apical side, just as they do in vivo in several species. We used 4 inserts for influx and efflux (total: 20 1-h periods). We found a net flux of fluorescein from the basolateral to the apical side. The flux ratio was 1.104 ± 0.056. That difference was statistically significant (p = 0.00006, t test, paired samples). The endothelium has a definite restriction at the junctions. Hence, an asymmetry in unidirectional fluxes cannot arise from osmosis, and can only point instead to paracellular solvent drag. We suggest, once more, that such drag is due to electro-osmotic coupling at the paracellular junctions.

Water channels and their roles in some ocular tissues

Water is a major component of the eye, and water channels (aquaporins) are ubiquitous in ocular tissues, and quite abundant at their different locations. AQP1 is expressed in corneal endothelium, lens epithelium, ciliary epithelium, and retinal pigment epithelium. AQP3 is expressed in corneal epithelium, and in conjunctival epithelium. AQP4 is expressed in ciliary epithelium and retinal Muller cells. AQP5 is expressed in corneal epithelium, and conjunctival epithelium. AQP0 is expressed in lens fiber cells. It is known that five ocular tissues transport fluid, namely: (1) Corneal endothelium; (2) Conjunctival epithelium; (3) Lens epithelium; (4) Ciliary epithelium; (5) Retinal pigment epithelium. For the corneal endothelium, aquaporins are not the main route for trans-tissue water movement, which is paracellular. Instead, we propose that aquaporins allow fast osmotic equilibration of the cell, which is necessary to maintain optimal rates of fluid movement since the cyclic paracellular water transfer mechanism operates separately and tends to create periodic osmotic imbalances (τ∼5 s).