Tanogami T. Reply to "Comment on 'Theoretical analysis of quantum turbulence using the Onsager ideal turbulence theory' ".
Phys Rev E 2022;
105:027102. [PMID:
35291157 DOI:
10.1103/physreve.105.027102]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
We refute the criticism expressed in a Comment by Krstulovic, L'vov, and Nazarenko [Phys. Rev. E 105, 027101 (2022)10.1103/PhysRevE.105.027101] on our paper [Phys. Rev. E 103, 023106 (2021)2470-004510.1103/PhysRevE.103.023106]. We first show that quantization of circulation is not ignored in our analysis. Then, we propose a more sophisticated analysis to avoid a subtle problem with the regularity of the velocity field. We thus defend the main results of our paper, which predicts the double-cascade scenario where the quantum stress cascade follows the Richardson cascade. We also provide a conjecture on the relation between the Kelvin-wave cascade and the quantum stress cascade.
Collapse