1
|
Guo H, Chen W, Ye T, Sun W, Han Y, Cai C. Theoretical calculation of n+235U reaction. ANN NUCL ENERGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2021.108248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
2
|
Bacak M, Aïche M, Bélier G, Berthoumieux E, Diakaki M, Dupont E, Gunsing F, Heyse J, Kopecky S, Krtička M, Laurent B, Leeb H, Mathieu L, Schillebeeckx P, Serot O, Taieb J, Valenta S, Vlachoudis V, Aberle O, Andrzejewski J, Audouin L, Balibrea J, Barbagallo M, Bečvář F, Billowes J, Bosnar D, Brown A, Caamaño M, Calviño F, Calviani, Cano-Ott D, Cardella R, Casanovas A, Cerutti F, Chen YH, Chiaveri E, Colonna, Cortés G, Cortés-Giraldo MA, Cosentino L, Damone LA, Domingo-Pardo C, Dressler R, Durán I, Fernández-Domínguez B, Ferrari A, Ferreira P, Finocchiaro P, Furman V, Göbel K, García AR, Gawlik A, Gilardoni S, Glodariu T, Gonçalves IF, González-Romero E, Griesmayer E, Guerrero C, Harada H, Heinitz S, Jenkins DG, Jericha E, Käppeler F, Kadi Y, Kalamara A, Kavrigin P, Kimura A, Kivel N, Knapova I, Kokkoris M, Kurtulgil D, Leal-Cidoncha E, Lederer C, Lerendegui-Marco J, Meo SL, Lonsdale SJ, Macina D, Manna A, Marganiec J, Martínez T, Masi A, Massimi C, Mastinu P, Mastromarco M, Maugeri EA, Mazzone A, Mendoza E, Mengoni A, Milazzo PM, Mingrone F, Musumarra A, Negret A, Nolte R, Oprea A, Patronis N, Pavlik A, Perkowski J, Porras I, Praena J, Quesada JM, Radeck D, Rauscher T, Reifarth R, Rubbia C, Ryan JA, Sabaté-Gilarte M, Saxena A, Schumann D, Sedyshev P, Smith AG, Sosnin NV, Stamatopoulos A, Tagliente G, Tain JL, Tarifeño-Saldivia A, Tassan-Got L, Vannini G, Variale V, Vaz P, Ventura A, Vlastou R, Wallner A, Warren S, Weiss C, Woods PJ, Wright T, Žugec P. Preliminary results on the 233U α-ratio measurement at n_TOF. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202023901043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
233U is the fissile nuclei in the Th-U fuel cycle with a particularily small neutron capture cross setion which is on average about one order of magnitude lower than its fission cross section. Hence, the measurement of the 233U(n, γ) cross section relies on a method to accurately distinguish between capture and fission γ-rays. A measurement of the 233U α-ratio has been performed at the n_TOF facility at CERN using a so-called fission tagging setup, coupling n_TOF 's Total Absorption Calorimeter with a novel fission chamber to tag the fission γ-rays. The experimental setup is described and essential parts of the analysis are discussed. Finally, a preliminary 233U α-ratio is presented.
Collapse
|
3
|
Rimpault G, Noguère G, de Saint Jean C. Trends on major actinides from an integral data assimilation. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2020. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/202023913002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this work is to revisit integral data assimilation for a better prediction of the characteristics of SFR cores.
ICSBEP, IRPhE and MASURCA critical masses, PROFIL irradiation experiments and the FCA-IX experimental programme (critical masses and spectral indices) with well-mastered experimental technique have been used. As calculations are performed without modelling errors (with as-built geometries) and without approximations with the TRIPOLI4 MC code, highly reliable C/E are achieved.
Assimilation results suggest a 2.5% decrease for 238U capture from 3 keV to 60 keV, and a 4-5% decrease for 238U inelastic in the plateau region. For this energy range, uncertainties are respectively reduced to 1-2% and to 2-2.5% for 238U capture and 238U inelastic respectively.
The increase trends on 239Pu capture cross section of around 3% in the [2 keV-100 keV] energy range come from a low PROFIL 240Pu/239Pu ratio C/E. For 240Pu capture cross section, the increase trend of around 4% in the [3 keV-100 keV] energy range goes in the same direction as the recent ENDF/B.VIII evaluation though at a much lower level.
The nuclear data uncertainty associated to SFR ASTRID critical mass is reduced to 470 pcm.
Collapse
|
4
|
Bacak M, Aiche M, Bélier G, Berthoumieux E, Diakaki M, Dupont E, Gunsing F, Heyse J, Kopecky S, Laurent B, Leeb H, Mathieu L, Schillebeeckx P, Serot O, Taieb J, Vlachoudis V, Aberle O, Andrzejewski J, Audouin L, Balibrea J, Barbagallo M, Bečvář F, Billowes J, Bosnar D, Brown A, Caamaño M, Calviño F, Calviani M, Cano-Ott D, Cardella R, Casanovas A, Cerutti F, Chen YH, Chiaveri E, Colonna N, Cortés G, Cortés-Giraldo MA, Cosentino L, Damone LA, Domingo-Pardo C, Dressler R, Durán I, Fernández-Domínguez B, Ferrari A, Ferreira P, Finocchiaro P, Furman V, Göbel K, García AR, Gawlik A, Gilardoni S, Glodariu T, Gonçalves IF, González-Romero E, Griesmayer E, Guerrero C, Harada H, Heinitz S, Jenkins DG, Jericha E, Käppeler F, Kadi Y, Kalamara A, Kavrigin P, Kimura A, Kivel N, Knapova I, Kokkoris M, Krtička M, Kurtulgil D, Leal-Cidoncha E, Lederer C, Lerendegui-Marco J, Meo SL, Lonsdale SJ, Macina D, Manna A, Marganiec J, Martínez T, Masi A, Massimi C, Mastinu P, Mastromarco M, Maugeri EA, Mazzone A, Mendoza E, Mengoni A, Milazzo PM, Mingrone F, Musumarra A, Negret A, Nolte R, Oprea A, Patronis N, Pavlik A, Perkowski J, Porras I, Praena J, Quesada JM, Radeck D, Rauscher T, Reifarth R, Rubbia C, Ryan JA, Sabaté-Gilarte M, Saxena A, Schumann D, Sedyshev P, Smith AG, Sosnin NV, Stamatopoulos A, Tagliente G, Tain JL, Tarifeño-Saldivia A, Tassan-Got L, Valenta S, Vannini G, Variale V, Vaz P, Ventura A, Vlastou R, Wallner A, Warren S, Weiss C, Woods PJ, Wright T, Žugec P. Preliminary results on the 233U capture cross section and alpha ratio measured at n_TOF (CERN) with the fission tagging technique. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201921103007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
233U is of key importance among the fissile nuclei in the Th-U fuel cycle. A particularity of 233U is its small neutron capture cross-section, which is on average about one order of magnitude lower than the fission cross-section. The accuracy in the measurement of the 233U capture cross-section depends crucially on an efficient capture-fission discrimination, thus a combined set-up of fission and γ-detectors is needed. A measurement of the 233U capture cross-section and capture-to-fission ratio was performed at the CERN n_TOF facility. The Total Absorption Calorimeter (TAC) of n_TOF was employed as γ-detector coupled with a novel compact ionization chamber as fission detector. A brief description of the experimental set-up will be given, and essential parts of the analysis procedure as well as the preliminary response of the set-up to capture are presented and discussed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rimpault G, Huy V, Noguère G. Trends on Major Actinides from an Integral Data Assimilation. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201921103001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear data evaluations on major actinides can be improved by integral data assimilation. Appropriate integral measurements with reliable experimental techniques have been selected such as ICSBEP, IRPhE and MASURCA critical masses, PROFIL irradiation experiments and the FCAIX experimental programme (critical masses and spectral indices). Highly reliable analyses are possible with the use of as-built geometries calculated with the TRIPOLI4 Monte Carlo code. The C/E values have been used in an integral data assimilation solving the Bayes equation. The trends on the JEFF3.1.1 235U capture cross section are quite consistent with recent differential measurements. Assimilation results suggest up to a 2.5% decrease for 238U capture from 3 keV to 60 keV, and a 4-5% decrease for 238U inelastic in the plateau region. For this energy range, uncertainties are respectively reduced from 3-4 to 1-2% and from 6-9% to 2-2.5% for 238U capture and 238U inelastic. Results on 239Pu fission cross sections are included in posterior uncertainties. The increase trends on 239Pu capture cross-section is of around 3% in the [2 keV-100 keV] energy range. For 240Pu capture cross section, the increase is of around 4% in the [3 keV-100 keV] energy range and goes in the same direction as a recent evaluation.
Collapse
|
6
|
Capote R, Trkov A. Critical review of CIELO evaluations of n+ 235U, 238U using differential experiments. EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES 2018. [DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Key reactions have been selected to compare JEFF-3.3 (CIELO 2) and IAEA CIELO (CIELO 1) evaluated nuclear data files for neutron induced reactions on 235U and 238U targets. IAEA CIELO evaluation uses reaction models to construct the evaluation prior, but strongly relied on differential data including all reaction cross sections fitted within the IAEA Neutron Standards project. The JEFF-3.3 evaluation relied on a mix of differential and integral data with strong contribution from nuclear reaction modelling. Differences in evaluations are discussed; a better reproduction of differential data for the IAEA CIELO evaluation is shown for key reaction channels.
Collapse
|
7
|
|
8
|
Huy V, Noguère G, Rimpault G. Use of integral data assimilation and differential measurements as a contribution to improve 235U and 238U cross sections evaluations in the fast and epithermal energy range. EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES 2018. [DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Critical mass calculations of various HEU-fueled fast reactors result in large discrepancies in C/E values, depending on the nuclear data library used and the configuration modeled. Thus, it seems relevant to use integral experiments to try to reassess cross sections that might be responsible for such a dispersion in critical mass results. This work makes use of the Generalized Least Square method to solve Bayes equation, as implemented in the CONRAD code. Experimental database used includes ICSBEP Uranium based critical experiments and benefits from recent re-analyses of MASURCA and FCA-IX criticality experiments (with Monte-Carlo calculations) and of PROFIL irradiation experiments. These last ones provide very specific information on 235U and 238U capture cross sections. Due to high experimental uncertainties associated to fission spectra, we chose to consider either fitting these data or set them to JEFF-3.1.1 evaluations. The work focused on JEFF-3.1.1 235U and 238U evaluations and results presented in this paper for 235U capture and 238U capture, and inelastic cross sections are compared to recent differential experiment or recent evaluations. Our integral experiment assimilation work notably suggests a 30% decrease for 235U capture around 1–2.25 keV, a 10% increase in the unresolved resonance range when using JEFF-3.1.1 as “a priori” data. These results are in agreement with recent microscopic measurements from Danon et al. [Nucl. Sci. Eng. 187, 291 (2017)] and Jandel et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 202506 (2012)]. For 238U cross sections, results are highly dependent on fission spectra.
Collapse
|
9
|
Danon Y. Innovative experiments for reduction of nuclear data uncertainty. EPJ NUCLEAR SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGIES 2018. [DOI: 10.1051/epjn/2018017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to the complexity of nuclear reaction models, current nuclear data evaluations must rely on experimental observations to constrain models and provide the accuracy needed for applications. For criticality applications, the accuracy of nuclear data needed is higher than what is currently possible from differential experiments alone, and integral measurements are often used for data adjustment within the uncertainties of differential experiments. This approach does not necessarily result in physically correct cross sections or other adjusted quantities because compensation between different materials is hard to avoid. One of the objectives of the recent CIELO project [M. Chadwick et al., Nucl. Data Sheets 118, 1 (2014)] was simultaneous evaluation of important materials in an attempt to minimize the effects of compensation. Improvement to the evaluation process depends on obtaining new experimental data with high accuracy and lower uncertainty that will help constrain the evaluations for certain important reactions. Improved experiments are accomplished by careful design with the objective of achieving high accuracy and lower uncertainty, and by designing new innovative experiments. New and unconventional experiments do not necessarily provide differential data but instead nuclear data that evaluators will find useful to constrain the evaluation and reduce the uncertainty. This also means that closer information exchange and collaboration between experimentalists and evaluators is important. For conventional experiments such as neutron transmission or capture measurements, it is important to understand the sources of uncertainty and address them in the experiment design. Such a process can also lead to the design of innovative methods. For example, the filtered beam method minimizes uncertainties due to background, and the Quasi-Differential Neutron Scattering method simplifies the experiment and data analysis and results in lower experimental uncertainty. A review of the sources of uncertainty in various experiments and examples of experimental techniques that help reduce experimental and evaluation uncertainty and increase accuracy will be discussed.
Collapse
|
10
|
Ichou R, Leclaire N, Leal L, Haeck W, Morillon B, Romain P, Duarte H. Use of integral experiments for the assessment of a new235U IRSN-CEA evaluation. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714602046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
11
|
Trkov A, Capote R, Pigni MT, Pronyaev VG, Sin M, Soukhovitskii ES. Evaluation of the neutron induced reactions on235U from 2.25 keV up to 30 MeV. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714602029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
12
|
Balibrea-Correa J, Mendoza E, Cano-Ott D, Krtička M, Altstadt S, Andrzejewski J, Audouin L, Bécares V, Barbagallo M, Bečvář F, Belloni F, Berthoumieux E, Billowes J, Boccone V, Bosnar D, Brugger M, Calviño F, Calviani M, Carrapiço C, Cerutti F, Chiaveri E, Chin M, Colonna N, Cortés G, Cortés-Giraldo M, Diakaki M, Domingo-Pardo C, Dressler R, Durán I, Eleftheriadis C, Ferrari A, Fraval K, Furman V, Göbel K, Guerrero C, Gómez-Hornillos M, Ganesan S, García A, Giubrone G, Gonçalves I, González E, Goverdovski A, Griesmayer E, Gunsing F, Heftrich T, Heinitz S, Hernández-Prieto A, Heyse J, Jenkins D, Jericha E, Käppeler F, Kadi Y, Karadimos D, Katabuchi T, Ketlerov V, Khryachkov V, Kivel N, Koehler P, Kokkoris M, Kroll J, Lampoudis C, Langer C, Leal-Cidoncha E, Lederer C, Leeb H, Leong L, Lerendegui-Marco J, Licata M, Losito R, Mallick A, Manousos A, Marganiec J, Martínez T, Massimi C, Mastinu P, Mastromarco M, Mengoni A, Milazzo P, Mingrone F, Mirea M, Mondelaers W, Paradela C, Pavlik A, Perkowski J, Plompen A, Praena J, Quesada J, Rauscher T, Reifarth R, Riego-Perez A, Robles M, Rubbia C, Ryan J, Sabaté-Gilarte M, Sarmento R, Saxena A, Schillebeeckx P, Schmidt S, Schumann D, Sedyshev P, Tagliente G, Tain J, Tarifeño-Saldivia A, Tarrío D, Tassan-Got L, Tsinganis A, Valenta S, Vannini G, Variale V, Vaz P, Ventura A, Vermeulen M, Vlachoudis V, Vlastou R, Wallner A, Ware T, Weigand M, Weiss C, Wright T, Žugec P. Measurement of the neutron capture cross section of the fissile isotope 235U with the CERN n_TOF total absorption calorimeter and a fission tagging based on micromegas detectors. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714611021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
13
|
Leal L, Santos AD, Ivanov E, Ivanova T. Impact of 235U Resonance Parameter Evaluation in the Reactivity Prediction. NUCL SCI ENG 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2017.1301739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Luiz Leal
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-EXP/SNC, Fontenay-aux Roses 92262, France
| | - Adimir Dos Santos
- Cidade Universitaria, Instituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares – IPEN/CNEN-SP, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 2242, Sao Paulo 05508-000, Brazil
| | - Evgeny Ivanov
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire (IRSN), PSN-EXP/SNC, Fontenay-aux Roses 92262, France
| | - Tatiana Ivanova
- OECD Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), 46 Quai Alphonse Le Gallo, Boulogne-Billancourt 92100, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Danon Y, Williams D, Bahran R, Blain E, McDermott B, Barry D, Leinweber G, Block R, Rapp M. Simultaneous Measurement of235U Fission and Capture Cross Sections From 0.01 eV to 3 keV Using a Gamma Multiplicity Detector. NUCL SCI ENG 2017. [DOI: 10.1080/00295639.2017.1312937] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Y. Danon
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Gaerttner LINAC Center, 110 8th St., Troy, New York 12180
| | - D. Williams
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Gaerttner LINAC Center, 110 8th St., Troy, New York 12180
| | - R. Bahran
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Gaerttner LINAC Center, 110 8th St., Troy, New York 12180
| | - E. Blain
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Gaerttner LINAC Center, 110 8th St., Troy, New York 12180
| | - B. McDermott
- Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Gaerttner LINAC Center, 110 8th St., Troy, New York 12180
| | - D. Barry
- Naval Nuclear Laboratory, P.O. Box 1072, Schenectady, New York 12301-1072
| | - G. Leinweber
- Naval Nuclear Laboratory, P.O. Box 1072, Schenectady, New York 12301-1072
| | - R. Block
- Naval Nuclear Laboratory, P.O. Box 1072, Schenectady, New York 12301-1072
| | - M. Rapp
- Naval Nuclear Laboratory, P.O. Box 1072, Schenectady, New York 12301-1072
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Leal L, Noguere G, Paradela C, Durán I, Tassan-Got L, Danon Y, Jandel M. Evaluation of the 235U resonance parameters to fit the standard recommended values. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2017. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201714602021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
|
16
|
Jandel M, Baramsai B, Bredeweg TA, Couture A, Hayes A, Kawano T, Mosby S, Rusev G, Stetcu I, Taddeucci TN, Talou P, Ullmann JL, Walker CL, Wilhelmy JB. Current and Future Research at DANCE. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2015. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20159302019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
17
|
Couture A, Mosby S, Baramsai B, Bredeweg TA, Jandel M, Macon K, O’Donnell JM, Rusev G, Taddeucci TN, Ullmann JL, Walker CL. Enhancing the Detector for Advanced Neutron Capture Experiments. EPJ WEB OF CONFERENCES 2015. [DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/20159307003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
18
|
Wallner A, Belgya T, Bichler M, Buczak K, Dillmann I, Käppeler F, Lederer C, Mengoni A, Quinto F, Steier P, Szentmiklosi L. Novel method to study neutron capture of 235U and 238U simultaneously at keV energies. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 2014; 112:192501. [PMID: 24877933 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.112.192501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
The neutron capture cross sections of the main uranium isotopes, (235)U and (238)U, were measured simultaneously for keV energies, for the first time by combining activation technique and atom counting of the reaction products using accelerator mass spectrometry. New data, with a precision of 3%-5%, were obtained from mg-sized natural uranium samples for neutron energies with an equivalent Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution of kT ∼ 25 keV and for a broad energy distribution peaking at 426 keV. The cross-section ratio of (235)U(n,γ)/(238)U(n,γ) can be deduced in accelerator mass spectrometry directly from the atom ratio of the reaction products (236)U/(239)U, independent of any fluence normalization. Our results confirm the values at the lower band of existing data. They serve as important anchor points to resolve present discrepancies in nuclear data libraries as well as for the normalization of cross-section data used in the nuclear astrophysics community for s-process studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Wallner
- Department of Nuclear Physics, RSPE, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 0200, Australia and Faculty of Physics, VERA, Isotope Research & Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - T Belgya
- Nuclear Analysis and Radiography Department (NARD), Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1525 Budapest, Hungary
| | - M Bichler
- Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
| | - K Buczak
- Faculty of Physics, VERA, Isotope Research & Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria and Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, 1040 Vienna, Austria
| | - I Dillmann
- Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Campus North, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany and TRIUMF, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T2A3, Canada
| | - F Käppeler
- Institut für Kernphysik, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Campus North, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - C Lederer
- Faculty of Physics, VERA, Isotope Research & Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria and Institute for Applied Physics, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60438 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - A Mengoni
- Agenzia nazionale per le nuove tecnologie, l'energia e lo sviluppo economico sostenibile (ENEA), 40129 Bologna, Italy
| | - F Quinto
- Faculty of Physics, VERA, Isotope Research & Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - P Steier
- Faculty of Physics, VERA, Isotope Research & Nuclear Physics, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - L Szentmiklosi
- Nuclear Analysis and Radiography Department (NARD), Centre for Energy Research, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, 1525 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|