Stochastic Proofreading Mechanism Alleviates Crosstalk in Transcriptional Regulation

Single gene analysis in yeast suggests nonequilibrium regulatory dynamics for transcription

Fluctuations in the initiation rate of transcription, the first step in gene expression, ensue from the stochastic behavior of the molecular process that controls transcription. In steady state, the regulatory process is often assumed to operate reversibly, i.e., in equilibrium. However, reversibility imposes fundamental limits to information processing. For instance, the assumption of equilibrium is difficult to square with the precision with which the regulatory process executes its task in eukaryotes. Here we provide evidence - from microscopic analyses of the transcription dynamics at a single gene copy of yeast - that the regulatory process for transcription is cyclic and irreversible (out of equilibrium). The necessary coupling to reservoirs of free energy occurs via sequence-specific transcriptional activators and the recruitment, in part, of ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers. Our findings may help explain how eukaryotic cells reconcile the dual but opposing requirements for fast regulatory kinetics and high regulatory specificity.

Governing principles of transcriptional logic out of equilibrium

To survive, adapt, and develop, cells respond to external and internal stimuli by tightly regulating transcription. Transcriptional regulation involves the combinatorial binding of a repertoire of transcription factors to DNA, which often results in switch-like binary outputs akin to Boolean logic gates. Recent experimental studies have demonstrated that in eukaryotes, transcription factor binding to DNA often involves energy expenditure, thereby driving the system out of equilibrium. The governing principles of transcriptional logic operations out of equilibrium remain unexplored. Here, we employ a simple two-input, single-locus model of transcription that can accommodate both equilibrium and nonequilibrium mechanisms. Using this model, we find that nonequilibrium regimes can give rise to all the logic operations accessible in equilibrium. Strikingly, energy expenditure alters the regulatory function of the two transcription factors in a mutually exclusive manner. This allows for the emergence of new logic operations that are inaccessible in equilibrium. Overall, our results show that energy expenditure can expand the range of cellular decision-making without the need for more complex promoter architectures.

Reformulating nonequilibrium steady states and generalized Hopfield discrimination

Despite substantial progress in nonequilibrium physics, steady-state (s.s.) probabilities remain intractable to analysis. For a Markov process, s.s. probabilities can be expressed in terms of transition rates using the graph-theoretic matrix-tree theorem (MTT). The MTT reveals that, away from equilibrium, s.s. probabilities become globally dependent on all rates, with expressions growing exponentially in the system size. This overwhelming complexity and lack of thermodynamic interpretation have greatly impeded analysis. Here we show that s.s. probabilities are proportional to the average of exp(-S(P)), where S(P) is the entropy generated along minimal paths P in the graph, and the average is taken over a probability distribution on spanning trees. Assuming Arrhenius rates, this "arboreal" distribution becomes Boltzmann-like, with the energy of a tree being its total edge barrier energy. This reformulation offers a thermodynamic interpretation that smoothly generalizes equilibrium statistical mechanics and reorganizes the expression complexity: the number of distinct minimal-path entropies depends not on graph size but on the entropy production index, a measure of nonequilibrium complexity. We demonstrate the power of this reformulation by extending Hopfield's analysis of discrimination by kinetic proofreading to any graph with index 1. We derive a general formula for the error ratio and use it to show how local energy dissipation can yield optimal discrimination through global synergy.

Eukaryotic gene regulation at equilibrium, or non?

Models of transcriptional regulation that assume equilibrium binding of transcription factors have been less successful at predicting gene expression from sequence in eukaryotes than in bacteria. This could be due to the non-equilibrium nature of eukaryotic regulation. Unfortunately, the space of possible non-equilibrium mechanisms is vast and predominantly uninteresting. The key question is therefore how this space can be navigated efficiently, to focus on mechanisms and models that are biologically relevant. In this review, we advocate for the normative role of theory-theory that prescribes rather than just describes-in providing such a focus. Theory should expand its remit beyond inferring mechanistic models from data, towards identifying non-equilibrium gene regulatory schemes that may have been evolutionarily selected, despite their energy consumption, because they are precise, reliable, fast, or otherwise outperform regulation at equilibrium. We illustrate our reasoning by toy examples for which we provide simulation code.

Nonequilibrium models of optimal enhancer function

Simple biophysical models successfully describe bacterial regulatory code, by predicting gene expression from DNA sequences that bind specialized regulatory proteins. Analogous simple models fail in multicellular organisms, where regulatory proteins bind DNA very transiently, yet, nevertheless, effect precise control over gene expression. To date, the more general, “nonequilibrium” models have proven difficult to analyze and connect to data. Here, we reduce this complexity theoretically, by constructing simple nonequilibrium models which perform optimal gene regulation within known experimental constraints.

In prokaryotes, thermodynamic models of gene regulation provide a highly quantitative mapping from promoter sequences to gene-expression levels that is compatible with in vivo and in vitro biophysical measurements. Such concordance has not been achieved for models of enhancer function in eukaryotes. In equilibrium models, it is difficult to reconcile the reported short transcription factor (TF) residence times on the DNA with the high specificity of regulation. In nonequilibrium models, progress is difficult due to an explosion in the number of parameters. Here, we navigate this complexity by looking for minimal nonequilibrium enhancer models that yield desired regulatory phenotypes: low TF residence time, high specificity, and tunable cooperativity. We find that a single extra parameter, interpretable as the “linking rate,” by which bound TFs interact with Mediator components, enables our models to escape equilibrium bounds and access optimal regulatory phenotypes, while remaining consistent with the reported phenomenology and simple enough to be inferred from upcoming experiments. We further find that high specificity in nonequilibrium models is in a trade-off with gene-expression noise, predicting bursty dynamics—an experimentally observed hallmark of eukaryotic transcription. By drastically reducing the vast parameter space of nonequilibrium enhancer models to a much smaller subspace that optimally realizes biological function, we deliver a rich class of models that could be tractably inferred from data in the near future.

Regulation of Gene Activation by Competitive Cross Talking Pathways

The phenomenon of a gene expression burst has been attributed to random transitions between the active and inactive states of a gene. However, the mechanisms underlying regulation of the activation process in response to environmental changes remain unclear. Here, we model gene activation as a consequence of the competitive cross talk between a weak basal pathway and an inducible signaling pathway and reveal rich expression dynamics along with intricate dependence of noise and Fano factor on mean expression levels. These theoretical results are in good agreement with a large experimental data set in Escherichia coli, yeast, and mammalian cells. Furthermore, both theoretical analyses and supporting biological evidence converge to demonstrate the existence of a tradeoff that governs the sharp up- and downregulation of gene expression, suggesting an ordered scenario that activates a gene under varying conditions. These regulation modes, together with cross talk pathways, may provide new guidance for the analysis and interpretation of genetic data in various applications, ranging from genetic engineering to therapeutic targets of disease.

Unraveling the Complex Interplay of Fis and IHF Through Synthetic Promoter Engineering

Bacterial promoters are usually formed by multiple cis-regulatory elements recognized by a plethora of transcriptional factors (TFs). From those, global regulators are key elements since these TFs are responsible for the regulation of hundreds of genes in the bacterial genome. For instance, Fis and IHF are global regulators that play a major role in gene expression control in Escherichia coli, and usually, multiple cis-regulatory elements for these proteins are present at target promoters. Here, we investigated the relationship between the architecture of the cis-regulatory elements for Fis and IHF in E. coli. For this, we analyze 42 synthetic promoter variants harboring consensus cis-elements for Fis and IHF at different distances from the core -35/-10 region and in various numbers and combinations. We first demonstrated that although Fis preferentially recognizes its consensus cis-element, it can also recognize, to some extent, the consensus-binding site for IHF, and the same was true for IHF, which was also able to recognize Fis binding sites. However, changing the arrangement of the cis-elements (i.e., the position or number of sites) can completely abolish the non-specific binding of both TFs. More remarkably, we demonstrated that combining cis-elements for both TFs could result in Fis and IHF repressed or activated promoters depending on the final architecture of the promoters in an unpredictable way. Taken together, the data presented here demonstrate how small changes in the architecture of bacterial promoters could result in drastic changes in the final regulatory logic of the system, with important implications for the understanding of natural complex promoters in bacteria and their engineering for novel applications.

Energy consumption and cooperation for optimal sensing

The reliable detection of environmental molecules in the presence of noise is an important cellular function, yet the underlying computational mechanisms are not well understood. We introduce a model of two interacting sensors which allows for the principled exploration of signal statistics, cooperation strategies and the role of energy consumption in optimal sensing, quantified through the mutual information between the signal and the sensors. Here we report that in general the optimal sensing strategy depends both on the noise level and the statistics of the signals. For joint, correlated signals, energy consuming (nonequilibrium), asymmetric couplings result in maximum information gain in the low-noise, high-signal-correlation limit. Surprisingly we also find that energy consumption is not always required for optimal sensing. We generalise our model to incorporate time integration of the sensor state by a population of readout molecules, and demonstrate that sensor interaction and energy consumption remain important for optimal sensing.

Cells exhibit exceptional chemical sensitivity, yet we haven’t fully understood how they achieve it. Here the authors consider the mutual information between signals and two coupled sensors as a proxy for sensing performance and show its optimisation depending on noise level and signal statistics.

Stochastic Sequestration Promotes Specificity in Decision Making in Single Cells

Cellular functions are mediated by specific molecular interactions; however, often competing nonspecific interactions can occur instead, for example, in noncoding regions of genes during transcription or in the response of cell receptors to external signals. Various functional roles have been proposed for such interactions. Motivated by these considerations, we study the time-dependent behavior of a class of discrete, stochastic models in which decoy molecules mediate nonspecific reactions that sequester activated molecules. It is shown that such nonspecific interactions can lead to a time delay in the completion of the specific reaction by the activated molecule, thus permitting discrimination between signals of different duration. We study the effect of stochastic fluctuations in a simple model of gene transcription by numerical solution of the Master Equation and find that the distribution of first passage times for the specific reaction shows surprising nonexponential (non-Debye) behavior over a range of time scales. The mathematical mechanism underlying this behavior is explained in terms of the behavior of the eigensystem of the linear operator associated with the time evolution. Our results demonstrate that stochastic sequestration can be used to enhance the specificity achieved by the well-known kinetic proofreading mechanism.

Stochastic dynamics of genetic broadcasting networks

The complex genetic programs of eukaryotic cells are often regulated by key transcription factors occupying or clearing out of a large number of genomic locations. Orchestrating the residence times of these factors is therefore important for the well organized functioning of a large network. The classic models of genetic switches sidestep this timing issue by assuming the binding of transcription factors to be governed entirely by thermodynamic protein-DNA affinities. Here we show that relying on passive thermodynamics and random release times can lead to a "time-scale crisis" for master genes that broadcast their signals to a large number of binding sites. We demonstrate that this time-scale crisis for clearance in a large broadcasting network can be resolved by actively regulating residence times through molecular stripping. We illustrate these ideas by studying a model of the stochastic dynamics of the genetic network of the central eukaryotic master regulator NFκB which broadcasts its signals to many downstream genes that regulate immune response, apoptosis, etc.

Intrinsic limits to gene regulation by global crosstalk

Gene regulation relies on the specificity of transcription factor (TF)–DNA interactions. Limited specificity may lead to crosstalk: a regulatory state in which a gene is either incorrectly activated due to noncognate TF–DNA interactions or remains erroneously inactive. As each TF can have numerous interactions with noncognate cis-regulatory elements, crosstalk is inherently a global problem, yet has previously not been studied as such. We construct a theoretical framework to analyse the effects of global crosstalk on gene regulation. We find that crosstalk presents a significant challenge for organisms with low-specificity TFs, such as metazoans. Crosstalk is not easily mitigated by known regulatory schemes acting at equilibrium, including variants of cooperativity and combinatorial regulation. Our results suggest that crosstalk imposes a previously unexplored global constraint on the functioning and evolution of regulatory networks, which is qualitatively distinct from the known constraints that act at the level of individual gene regulatory elements.

Limited specificity of transcription factor-DNA interactions leads to crosstalk in gene regulation. Here the authors consider global crosstalk in regulatory networks of growing size and complexity, and show that it imposes constraints on gene regulation and on the evolution of regulatory networks.

Dynamics of Transcription Factor Binding Site Evolution

Evolution of gene regulation is crucial for our understanding of the phenotypic differences between species, populations and individuals. Sequence-specific binding of transcription factors to the regulatory regions on the DNA is a key regulatory mechanism that determines gene expression and hence heritable phenotypic variation. We use a biophysical model for directional selection on gene expression to estimate the rates of gain and loss of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) in finite populations under both point and insertion/deletion mutations. Our results show that these rates are typically slow for a single TFBS in an isolated DNA region, unless the selection is extremely strong. These rates decrease drastically with increasing TFBS length or increasingly specific protein-DNA interactions, making the evolution of sites longer than ∼ 10 bp unlikely on typical eukaryotic speciation timescales. Similarly, evolution converges to the stationary distribution of binding sequences very slowly, making the equilibrium assumption questionable. The availability of longer regulatory sequences in which multiple binding sites can evolve simultaneously, the presence of “pre-sites” or partially decayed old sites in the initial sequence, and biophysical cooperativity between transcription factors, can all facilitate gain of TFBS and reconcile theoretical calculations with timescales inferred from comparative genomics.

Evolution has produced a remarkable diversity of living forms that manifests in qualitative differences as well as quantitative traits. An essential factor that underlies this variability is transcription factor binding sites, short pieces of DNA that control gene expression levels. Nevertheless, we lack a thorough theoretical understanding of the evolutionary times required for the appearance and disappearance of these sites. By combining a biophysically realistic model for how cells read out information in transcription factor binding sites with model for DNA sequence evolution, we explore these timescales and ask what factors crucially affect them. We find that the emergence of binding sites from a random sequence is generically slow under point and insertion/deletion mutational mechanisms. Strong selection, sufficient genomic sequence in which the sites can evolve, the existence of partially decayed old binding sites in the sequence, as well as certain biophysical mechanisms such as cooperativity, can accelerate the binding site gain times and make them consistent with the timescales suggested by comparative analyses of genomic data.