Growth and epinasty of marigold plants maintained from emergence on horizontal clinostats

Short-term and long-term clinostat and vibration-induced biochemical changes in dwarf marigold stems

Stems of 21-day dwarf Marigold plants cultivated on the clinostat were compared with plants cultivated on vertical axis rotators ("vibrational controls") and stationary controls for long-term changes in cell wall composition. Stems of 21-day plants grown under stationary conditions and subsequently exposed to the clinostat for 24 hours were also analyzed. Among the long-tern markers, calciun, lignin, and protein-bound hemicellulose (possibly cell wall glycoprotein) clearly differentiated the effects of vibration from those of the clinostat. Short-term differential responses included rate of ethylene production, nastic movement and peroxidase activity of the cell wall, but not of the protoplast.

Gravitropism in Higher Plant Shoots: I. A ROLE FOR ETHYLENE

It has long been known that applied ethylene can redirect the gravitropic response, but only occasionally has it been suggested that ethylene normally plays a role in gravitropism. Two inhibitors of ethylene synthesis [Co(2+) and aminoethoxyvinylglycine (AVG)] and two inhibitors of ethylene action (Ag(+) and CO(2)) were shown to delay the gravitropic response of cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), and castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) stems. Gentle shaking on a mechanical shaker does not inhibit the gravitropic response, but vigorous hand shaking for 120 seconds delays the response somewhat. AVG and Ag(+) further delay the response of mechanically stimulated plants. AVG delays the response of defoliated and of decapitated plants. Plants laid on their side and restricted so that they cannot bend upward store both bending energy and gravitropic stimulus; they bend immediately when released from restriction (stored energy) and continue to bend for some hours after (stored stimulus). AVG retards the storage of bending energy but not of stimulus. In gravitropism, graviperception may first stimulate ethylene evolution, which may then influence bending directly, or responses involving ethylene could be more indirect.

Interpreting Plant Responses to Clinostating: I. MECHANICAL STRESSES AND ETHYLENE

The severe epinasty and other symptoms developed by clinostated leafy plants could be responses to gravity compensation and/or the mechanical stresses of leaf flopping. Epinasty in cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), and castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) is delayed by inhibitors of ethylene synthesis and action (aminoethoxyvinylglycine and Ag(+)), confirming the role of ethylene in clinostat epinasty. To test the possibility that clinostat mechanical stresses (leaf flopping) cause ethylene production and, thus, epinasty, vertical plants were stressed with constant, gentle, horizontal, or vertical shaking or with a quick, back-and-forth rotation (twisting). Clinostat leaf flopping was closely approximated but with a minimum of gravity compensation, by turning plants so their stems were horizontal, rotating them quickly about the stem axis, and then returning them to the vertical, repeating the treatment every four minutes (clinostat rotation time). None of these mechanical stresses produced significant epinasties, but vigorous hand-shaking (120 seconds per day) generated minor epinasties, as did Ag(+) applied daily (concentrations high enough to cause leaf browning). Plants gently inverted every 20 minutes developed epinasty at about the same rate and to about the same extent as clinostated plants, but plants inverted every 20 minutes and immediately returned to the upright position did not become epinastic. It is concluded that clinostat epinasty is probably caused by disturbances in the gravity perception mechanism, rather than by leaf flopping.

Gravitropism in Plant Stems May Require Ethylene

Two inhibitors of ethylene synthesis in plants (cobaltous ion and aminoethoxyvinylglycine) and two inhibitors of ethylene action (silver ion and carbon dioxide) significantly delay the gravitropic response (upward bending) of mature dicot stems laid on their sides. This evidence suggests that ethylene may be required in the gravitropic response of shoots.

Gravity Functions of Circumnutation by Hypocotyls of Helianthus annuus in Simulated Hypogravity

For more than a decade research on the botanical mechanism responsible for circumnutation has centered on whether or not these nearly ubiquitous oscillations can be attributed to a hunting process whereby the plant organ continuously responds to the gravity force and, by overshooting each stimulus, initiates a sustained oscillation or, driven by a not yet defined autogenic mechanism, performs oscillatory activities that require no external reinforcement to maintain the observed rhythms of differential growth.We explore here the effects of altered gravity force on parameters of circumnutation. Following our earlier publication on circumnutation in hypergravity we report here an exploration of circumnutation in hypogravity.Parameters of circumnutation are recorded as functions of the axially imposed gravity force. The same method was used (two-axes clinostat rotation) to produce sustained gravity forces referred to as hypergravity (1 < g), hypogravity (0 [unk] g < 1), and negative gravity (-1 < g < 0). In these three regions of the g-parameter nutational frequency and nutational amplitude were influenced in different ways.The results of our tests describe the gravity dependence of circumnutation over the full range of real or simulated gravity levels that are available in an earth laboratory. Our results demonstrated that nutational parameters are indeed gravity-dependent but are not inconsistent with the postulate that circumnutation can proceed in the absence of a significant gravity force.