Physiological responses of soybean plants grown in a nitrogen-free or energy limited environment

Current Nitrogen Fixation Is Involved in the Regulation of Nitrogenase Activity in White Clover (Trifolium repens L.)

Previous studies have shown that nitrogenase activity decreases dramatically after defoliation, presumably because of an increase in the O2 diffusion resistance in the infected nodules. It is not known how this O2 diffusion resistance is regulated. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that current N2 fixation (ongoing flux of N2 through nitrogenase) is involved in the regulation of nitrogenase activity in white clover (Trifolium repens L. cv Ladino) nodules. We compared the nitrogenase activity of plants that were prevented from fixing N2 (by continuous exposure of their nodulated root system to an Ar:O2 [80:20] atmosphere) with that of plants allowed to fix N2 (those exposed to N2:O2, 80:20). Nitrogenase activity was determined as the amount of H2 evolved under Ar:O2. An open flow system was used. In experiment I, 6 h after complete defoliation and the continuous prevention of N2 fixation, nitrogenase activity was higher by a factor of 2 compared with that in plants allowed to fix N2 after leaf removal. This higher nitrogenase activity was associated with a lower O2 limitation (measured as the partial pressure of O2 required for highest nitrogenase activity). In experiment II, the nitrogenase activity of plants prevented from fixing N2 for 2 h before leaf removal showed no response to defoliation. The extent to which nitrogenase activity responded to defoliation was different in plants allowed to fix N2 and those that were prevented from doing so in both experiments. This leads to the conclusion that current N2 fixation is directly involved in the regulation of nitrogenase activity. It is suggested that an N feedback mechanism triggers such a response as a result of the loss of the plant's N sink strength after defoliation. This concept offers an alternative to other hypotheses (e.g. interruption of current photosynthesis, carbohydrate deprivation) that have been proposed to explain the immediate decrease in nitrogenase activity after defoliation.

Proline fed to intact soybean plants influences acetylene reducing activity and content and metabolism of proline in bacteroids

Supplying l-proline to the root system of intact soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merr.) plants stimulated acetylene reducing activity to the same extent as did supplying succinate. Feeding l-proline also caused an increase in bacteroid proline dehydrogenase activity that was highly correlated with the increase in acetylene-reducing activity. Twenty-four hours after irrigating with l-proline, endogenous proline content had increased in host cell cytoplasm and bacteroids, about three- and eightfold, respectively. In bacteroids, proline concentration was calculated to be at least 3.5 millimolar. In experiments in which [U-(14)C]l-proline was supplied to uprooted, intact plants incubated in aerated solution, (14)C-labeled products of proline metabolism, as well as [(14)C]proline itself, accumulated in both host cells and bacteroids. When plants were incubated in aerated solutions containing [5-(3)H]l-proline, (3)H-labeled proline was found in host cells and bacteroids. [(3)H] Pyrroline-5-carboxylate was found in bacteroids, but not host cells, after a 2-hour incubation in [5-(3)H]l-proline. When [U-(14)C]l-proline was supplied for 24 hours, a significant amount of [(14)C] pyrroline-5-carboxylate was found in the host cells, in contrast with the results from the shorter incubation in [5-(3)H]proline, although the amount in the host cells was only about half the quantity found in the bacteroids. Taken as a whole, these results indicate that proline crosses both plant and bacterial membranes under the in vivo experimental conditions utilized and are consistent with a significant role for proline as an energy source in support of bacteroid functioning. In spite of the increase in acetylene-reducing activity when proline was supplied to the root system of intact plants, proline application did not rescue stemgirdled plants from loss of acetylene-reducing activity, although succinate application did. This suggests a nonphloem route for succinate, but not proline, from roots to nodules.