One C-to-U RNA Editing Site and Two Independently Evolved Editing Factors: Testing Reciprocal Complementation with DYW-Type PPR Proteins from the Moss Physcomitrium (Physcomitrella) patens and the Flowering Plants Macadamia integrifolia and Arabidopsis

Is RNA editing truly absent in the complex thalloid liverworts (Marchantiopsida)? Evidence of extensive RNA editing from Cyathodium cavernarum

RNA editing is a crucial modification in plants' organellar transcripts that converts cytidine to uridine (C-to-U; and sometimes uridine to cytidine) in RNA molecules. This post-transcriptional process is controlled by the PLS-class protein with a DYW domain, which belongs to the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) protein family. RNA editing is widespread in land plants; however, complex thalloid liverworts (Marchantiopsida) are the only group reported to lack both RNA editing and DYW-PPR protein. The liverwort Cyathodium cavernarum (Marchantiopsida, Cyathodiaceae), typically found in cave habitats, was newly found to have 129 C-to-U RNA editing sites in its chloroplast and 172 sites in its mitochondria. The Cyathodium genus, specifically C. cavernarum, has a large number of PPR editing factor genes, including 251 DYW-type PPR proteins. These DYW-type PPR proteins may be responsible for C-to-U RNA editing in C. cavernarum. Cyathodium cavernarum possesses both PPR DYW proteins and RNA editing. Our analysis suggests that the remarkable RNA editing capability of C. cavernarum may have been acquired alongside the emergence of DYW-type PPR editing factors. These findings provide insight into the evolutionary pattern of RNA editing in land plants.

PlantC2U: deep learning of cross-species sequence landscapes predicts plastid C-to-U RNA editing in plants

In plants, C-to-U RNA editing mainly occurs in plastid and mitochondrial transcripts, which contributes to a complex transcriptional regulatory network. More evidence reveals that RNA editing plays critical roles in plant growth and development. However, accurate detection of RNA editing sites using transcriptome sequencing data alone is still challenging. In the present study, we develop PlantC2U, which is a convolutional neural network, to predict plastid C-to-U RNA editing based on the genomic sequence. PlantC2U achieves >95% sensitivity and 99% specificity, which outperforms the PREPACT tool, random forests, and support vector machines. PlantC2U not only further checks RNA editing sites from transcriptome data to reduce possible false positives, but also assesses the effect of different mutations on C-to-U RNA editing based on the flanking sequences. Moreover, we found the patterns of tissue-specific RNA editing in the mangrove plant Kandelia obovata, and observed reduced C-to-U RNA editing rates in the cold stress response of K. obovata, suggesting their potential regulatory roles in plant stress adaptation. In addition, we present RNAeditDB, available online at https://jasonxu.shinyapps.io/RNAeditDB/. Together, PlantC2U and RNAeditDB will help researchers explore the RNA editing events in plants and thus will be of broad utility for the plant research community.

Conservation of the moss RNA editing factor PPR78 despite the loss of its known cytidine-to-uridine editing sites is explained by a hidden extra target

Cytidine (C)-to-uridine (U) RNA editing in plant organelles relies on specific RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins. In the moss Physcomitrium patens, all such RNA editing factors feature a C-terminal DYW domain that acts as the cytidine deaminase for C-to-U conversion. PPR78 of Physcomitrium targets 2 mitochondrial editing sites, cox1eU755SL and rps14eU137SL. Remarkably, the latter is edited to highly variable degrees in different mosses. Here, we aimed to unravel the coevolution of PPR78 and its 2 target sites in mosses. Heterologous complementation in a Physcomitrium knockout line revealed that the variable editing of rps14eU137SL depends on the PPR arrays of different PPR78 orthologues but not their C-terminal domains. Intriguingly, PPR78 has remained conserved despite the simultaneous loss of editing at both known targets among Hypnales (feather mosses), suggesting it serves an additional function. Using a recently established RNA editing assay in Escherichia coli, we confirmed site-specific RNA editing by PPR78 in the bacterium and identified 4 additional off-targets in the bacterial transcriptome. Based on conservation profiles, we predicted ccmFNeU1465RC as a candidate editing target of PPR78 in moss mitochondrial transcriptomes. We confirmed editing at this site in several mosses and verified that PPR78 targets ccmFNeU1465RC in the bacterial editing system, explaining the conservation and functional adaptation of PPR78 during moss evolution.

Beyond a PPR-RNA recognition code: Many aspects matter for the multi-targeting properties of RNA editing factor PPR56

The mitochondrial C-to-U RNA editing factor PPR56 of the moss Physcomitrium patens is an RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat protein equipped with a terminal DYW-type cytidine deaminase domain. Transferred into Escherichia coli, PPR56 works faithfully on its two native RNA editing targets, nad3eU230SL and nad4eU272SL, and also converts cytidines into uridines at over 100 off-targets in the bacterial transcriptome. Accordingly, PPR56 is attractive for detailed mechanistic studies in the heterologous bacterial setup, allowing for scoring differential RNA editing activities of many target and protein variants in reasonable time. Here, we report (i) on the effects of numerous individual and combined PPR56 protein and target modifications, (ii) on the spectrum of off-target C-to-U editing in the bacterial background transcriptome for PPR56 and two variants engineered for target re-direction and (iii) on combinations of targets in tandem or separately at the 5'- and 3'-ends of large mRNAs. The latter experimentation finds enhancement of RNA editing at weak targets in many cases, including cox3eU290SF as a new candidate mitogenome target. We conclude that C-to-U RNA editing can be much enhanced by transcript features also outside the region ultimately targeted by PPRs of a plant editing factor, possibly facilitated by its enrichment or scanning along transcripts.

Structural insight into the activation of an Arabidopsis organellar C-to-U RNA editing enzyme by active site complementation

RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins catalyze hundreds of cytidine to uridine RNA editing events in plant organelles; these editing events are essential for proper gene expression. More than half of the PPR-type RNA editing factors, however, lack the DYW cytidine deaminase domain. Genetic analyses have suggested that their cytidine deaminase activity arises by association with a family of DYW1-like proteins that contain an N-terminally truncated DYW domain, but their molecular mechanism has been unclear. Here, we report the crystal structure of the Arabidopsis thaliana DYW1 deaminase domain at 1.8 Å resolution. DYW1 has a cytidine deaminase fold lacking the PG box. The internal insertion within the deaminase fold shows an α-helical fold instead of the β-finger reported for the gating domain of the A. thaliana ORGANELLE TRANSCRIPT PROCESSING 86. The substrate-binding pocket is incompletely formed and appears to be complemented in the complex by the E2 domain and the PG box of the interacting PPR protein. In vivo RNA editing assays corroborate the activation model for DYW1 deaminase. Our study demonstrates the common activation mechanism of the DYW1-like proteins by molecular complementation of the DYW domain and reconstitution of the substrate-binding pocket.

Exploring the RNA Editing Events and Their Potential Regulatory Roles in Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis L.)

RNA editing is a post-transcriptional modification process that alters the RNA sequence relative to the genomic blueprint. In plant organelles (namely, mitochondria and chloroplasts), the most common type is C-to-U, and the absence of C-to-U RNA editing results in abnormal plant development, such as etiolation and albino leaves, aborted embryonic development and retarded seedling growth. Here, through PREP, RES-Scanner, PCR and RT-PCR analyses, 38 and 139 RNA editing sites were identified from the chloroplast and mitochondrial genomes of Camellia sinensis, respectively. Analysis of the base preference around the RNA editing sites showed that in the -1 position of the edited C had more frequent occurrences of T whereas rare occurrences of G. Three conserved motifs were identified at 25 bases upstream of the RNA editing site. Structural analyses indicated that the RNA secondary structure of 32 genes, protein secondary structure of 37 genes and the three-dimensional structure of 5 proteins were altered due to RNA editing. The editing level analysis of matK and ndhD in six tea cultivars indicated that matK-701 might be involved in the color change of tea leaves. Furthermore, 218 PLS-CsPPR proteins were predicted to interact with the identified RNA editing sites. In conclusion, this study provides comprehensive insight into RNA editing events, which will facilitate further study of the RNA editing phenomenon of the tea plant.

Emergence of Novel RNA-Editing Sites by Changes in the Binding Affinity of a Conserved PPR Protein

RNA editing converts cytidines to uridines in plant organellar transcripts. Editing typically restores codons for conserved amino acids. During evolution, specific C-to-U editing sites can be lost from some plant lineages by genomic C-to-T mutations. By contrast, the emergence of novel editing sites is less well documented. Editing sites are recognized by pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins with high specificity. RNA recognition by PPR proteins is partially predictable, but prediction is often inadequate for PPRs involved in RNA editing. Here we have characterized evolution and recognition of a recently gained editing site. We demonstrate that changes in the RNA recognition motifs that are not explainable with the current PPR code allow an ancient PPR protein, QED1, to uniquely target the ndhB-291 site in Brassicaceae. When expressed in tobacco, the Arabidopsis QED1 edits 33 high-confident off-target sites in chloroplasts and mitochondria causing a spectrum of mutant phenotypes. By manipulating the relative expression levels of QED1 and ndhB-291, we show that the target specificity of the PPR protein depends on the RNA:protein ratio. Finally, our data suggest that the low expression levels of PPR proteins are necessary to ensure the specificity of editing site selection and prevent deleterious off-target editing.

Plant mitochondrial RNA editing factors can perform targeted C-to-U editing of nuclear transcripts in human cells

RNA editing processes are strikingly different in animals and plants. Up to thousands of specific cytidines are converted into uridines in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria whereas up to millions of adenosines are converted into inosines in animal nucleo-cytosolic RNAs. It is unknown whether these two different RNA editing machineries are mutually incompatible. RNA-binding pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are the key factors of plant organelle cytidine-to-uridine RNA editing. The complete absence of PPR mediated editing of cytosolic RNAs might be due to a yet unknown barrier that prevents its activity in the cytosol. Here, we transferred two plant mitochondrial PPR-type editing factors into human cell lines to explore whether they could operate in the nucleo-cytosolic environment. PPR56 and PPR65 not only faithfully edited their native, co-transcribed targets but also different sets of off-targets in the human background transcriptome. More than 900 of such off-targets with editing efficiencies up to 91%, largely explained by known PPR-RNA binding properties, were identified for PPR56. Engineering two crucial amino acid positions in its PPR array led to predictable shifts in target recognition. We conclude that plant PPR editing factors can operate in the entirely different genetic environment of the human nucleo-cytosol and can be intentionally re-engineered towards new targets.

Engineering the plastid and mitochondrial genomes of flowering plants

Engineering the plastid genome based on homologous recombination is well developed in a few model species. Homologous recombination is also the rule in mitochondria, but transformation of the mitochondrial genome has not been realized in the absence of selective markers. The application of transcription activator-like (TAL) effector-based tools brought about a dramatic change because they can be deployed from nuclear genes and targeted to plastids or mitochondria by an N-terminal targeting sequence. Recognition of the target site in the organellar genomes is ensured by the modular assembly of TALE repeats. In this paper, I review the applications of TAL effector nucleases and TAL effector cytidine deaminases for gene deletion, base editing and mutagenesis in plastids and mitochondria. I also review emerging technologies such as post-transcriptional RNA modification to regulate gene expression, Agrobacterium- and nanoparticle-mediated organellar genome transformation, and self-replicating organellar vectors as production platforms.

DYW deaminase domain has a distinct preference for neighboring nucleotides of the target RNA editing sites

C-to-U RNA editing sites in plant organelles show a strong bias for neighboring nucleotides. The nucleotide upstream of the target cytidine is typically C or U, whereas A and G are less common and rare, respectively. In pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR)-type RNA editing factors, the PPR domain specifically binds to the 5' sequence of target cytidines, whereas the DYW domain catalyzes the C-to-U deamination. We comprehensively analyzed the effects of neighboring nucleotides of the target cytidines using an Escherichia coli orthogonal system. Physcomitrium PPR56 efficiently edited target cytidines when the nucleotide upstream was U or C, whereas it barely edited when the position was G or the nucleotide downstream was C. This preference pattern, which corresponds well with the observed nucleotide bias for neighboring nucleotides in plant organelles, was altered when the DYW domain of OTP86 or DYW1 was adopted. The PPR56 chimeric proteins edited the target sites even when the -1 position was G. Our results suggest that the DYW domain possesses a distinct preference for the neighboring nucleotides of the target sites, thus contributing to target selection in addition to the existing selection determined by the PPR domain.

The Development of Mitochondrial Gene Editing Tools and Their Possible Roles in Crop Improvement for Future Agriculture

We are living in the era of genome editing. Nowadays, targeted editing of the plant nuclear DNA is prevalent in basic biological research and crop improvement since its first establishment a decade ago. However, achieving the same accomplishment for the plant mitochondrial genome has long been deemed impossible. Recently, the pioneer studies on editing plant mitogenome have been done using the mitochondria-targeted transcription activator-like effector nucleases (mitoTALENs) in rice, rapeseed, and Arabidopsis. It is well documented that mitochondria play essential roles in plant development and stress tolerance, particularly, in cytoplasmic male sterility widely used in production of hybrids. The success of mitochondrial genome editing enables studying the fundamentals of mitochondrial genome. Furthermore, mitochondrial RNA editing (mostly by nuclear-encoded pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins) in a sequence-specific manner can simultaneously change the production of translatable mitochondrial mRNA. Moreover, direct editing of the nuclear-encoding mitochondria-targeted factors required for plant mitochondrial genome dynamics and recombination may facilitate genetic manipulation of plant mitochondria. Here, the present state of knowledge on editing the plant mitochondrial genome is reviewed.

Inactivation of mitochondrial complex I stimulates chloroplast ATPase in Physcomitrium patens

Light is the ultimate source of energy for photosynthetic organisms, but respiration is fundamental for supporting metabolism during the night or in heterotrophic tissues. In this work, we isolated Physcomitrella (Physcomitrium patens) plants with altered respiration by inactivating Complex I (CI) of the mitochondrial electron transport chain by independently targeting on two essential subunits. Inactivation of CI caused a strong growth impairment even in fully autotrophic conditions in tissues where all cells are photosynthetically active, demonstrating that respiration is essential for photosynthesis. CI mutants showed alterations in the stoichiometry of respiratory complexes while the composition of photosynthetic apparatus was substantially unaffected. CI mutants showed altered photosynthesis with high activity of both Photosystems I and II, likely the result of high chloroplast ATPase activity that led to smaller ΔpH formation across thylakoid membranes, decreasing photosynthetic control on cytochrome b6f in CI mutants. These results demonstrate that alteration of respiratory activity directly impacts photosynthesis in P. patens and that metabolic interaction between organelles is essential in their ability to use light energy for growth.

GmPGL2, Encoding a Pentatricopeptide Repeat Protein, Is Essential for Chloroplast RNA Editing and Biogenesis in Soybean

Chloroplast biogenesis and development are highly complex processes requiring interactions between plastids and nuclear genomic products. Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins play an essential role in the development of chloroplasts; however, it remains unclear how RNA editing factors influence soybean development. In this study, a Glycine max pale green leaf 2 mutant (Gmpgl2) was identified with decreased chlorophyll contents. Genetic mapping revealed that a single-nucleotide deletion at position 1949 bp in the Glyma.05g132700 gene in the Gmpgl2 mutant, resulting in a truncated GmPGL2 protein. The nuclear-encoded GmPGL2 is a PLS-type PPR protein that localizes to the chloroplasts. The C-to-U editing efficiencies of rps16, rps18, ndhB, ndhD, ndhE, and ndhF were reduced in the Gmpgl2 mutant. RNA electrophoresis mobility shift assay (REMSA) analysis further revealed that GmPGL2 binds to the immediate upstream sequences at RNA editing sites of rps16 and ndhB in vitro, respectively. In addition, GmPGL2 was found to interact with GmMORF8, GmMORF9, and GmORRM6. These results suggest that GmPGL2 participates in C-to-U RNA editing via the formation of a complex RNA editosome in soybean chloroplasts.

Advancing organelle genome transformation and editing for crop improvement

Plant cells contain three organelles that harbor DNA: the nucleus, plastids, and mitochondria. Plastid transformation has emerged as an attractive platform for the generation of transgenic plants, also referred to as transplastomic plants. Plastid genomes have been genetically engineered to improve crop yield, nutritional quality, and resistance to abiotic and biotic stresses, as well as for recombinant protein production. Despite many promising proof-of-concept applications, transplastomic plants have not been commercialized to date. Sequence-specific nuclease technologies are widely used to precisely modify nuclear genomes, but these tools have not been applied to edit organelle genomes because the efficient homologous recombination system in plastids facilitates plastid genome editing. Unlike plastid transformation, successful genetic transformation of higher plant mitochondrial genome transformation was tested in several research group, but not successful to date. However, stepwise progress has been made in modifying mitochondrial genes and their transcripts, thus enabling the study of their functions. Here, we provide an overview of advances in organelle transformation and genome editing for crop improvement, and we discuss the bottlenecks and future development of these technologies.