Li Y, Hansson B, Ghatnekar L, Prentice HC. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism suggest different selective regimes within different parts of the
PgiC1 gene in
Festuca ovina L.
Hereditas 2017;
154:11. [PMID:
28529468 PMCID:
PMC5437402 DOI:
10.1186/s41065-017-0032-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2016] [Accepted: 04/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background
Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI, EC 5.3.1.9) is an essential metabolic enzyme in all eukaryotes. An earlier study of the PgiC1 gene, which encodes cytosolic PGI in the grass Festuca ovina L., revealed a marked difference in the levels of nucleotide polymorphism between the 5’ and 3’ portions of the gene.
Methods
In the present study, we characterized the sequence polymorphism in F. ovina PgiC1 in more detail and examined possible explanations for the non-uniform pattern of nucleotide polymorphism across the gene.
Results
Our study confirms that the two portions of the PgiC1 gene show substantially different levels of DNA polymorphism and also suggests that the peptide encoded by the 3’ portion of PgiC1 is functionally and structurally more important than that encoded by the 5’ portion. Although there was some evidence of purifying selection (dN/dS test) on the 5’ portion of the gene, the signature of purifying selection was considerably stronger on the 3’ portion of the gene (dN/dS and McDonald–Kreitman tests). Several tests support the action of balancing selection within the 5’ portion of the gene. Wall’s B and Q tests were significant only for the 5’ portion of the gene. There were also marked peaks of nucleotide diversity, Tajima’s D and the dN/dS ratio at or around a PgiC1 codon site (within the 5’ portion of the gene) that a previous study had suggested was subject to positive diversifying selection.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that the two portions of the gene have been subject to different selective regimes. Purifying selection appears to have been the main force contributing to the relatively low level of polymorphism within the 3’ portion of the sequence. In contrast, it is possible that balancing selection has contributed to the maintenance of the polymorphism within the 5’ portion of the gene.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41065-017-0032-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse