Comparison of two MnIVMnIV-bis-μ-oxo complexes {[MnIV(N4(6-Me-DPEN))]2(μ-O)2}2+ and {[MnIV(N4(6-Me-DPPN))]2(μ-O)2}2

Influence of Thiolate versus Alkoxide Ligands on the Stability of Crystallographically Characterized Mn(III)-Alkylperoxo Complexes

The work described herein demonstrates the exquisite control that the inner coordination sphere of metalloenzymes and transition-metal complexes can have on reactivity. We report one of few crystallographically characterized Mn-peroxo complexes and show that the tight correlations between metrical and spectroscopic parameters, established previously by our group for thiolate-ligated RS-Mn(III)-OOR complexes, can be extended to include an alkoxide-ligated RO-Mn(III)-OOR complex. We show that the alkoxide-ligated RO-Mn(III)-OOR complex is an order of magnitude more stable (t_1/2^298 K = 6730 s, k_obs^298 K = 1.03 × 10^-4 s^-1) than its thiolate-ligated RS-Mn(III)-OOR derivative (t_1/2^293 K = 249 s, k₁^293 K = 2.78 × 10^-3 s^-1). Electronic structure calculations provide insight regarding these differences in stability. The highest occupied orbital of the thiolate-ligated derivative possesses significant sulfur character and π-backdonation from the thiolate competes with π-backdonation from the peroxo π*(O-O). DFT-calculated Mulliken charges show that the Mn ion Lewis acidity of alkoxide-ligated RO-Mn(III)-OOR (+0.451) is greater than that of thiolate-ligated RS-Mn(III)-OOR (+0.306), thereby facilitating π-backdonation from the antibonding peroxo π*(O-O) orbital and increasing its stability. This helps to explain why the photosynthetic oxygen-evolving Mn complex, which catalyzes O-O bond formation as opposed to cleavage, incorporates O- and/or N-ligands as opposed to ^cysS-ligands.