1
|
Orr N, Abbott R, Bethel A, Paviour S, Whear R, Garside R, Coon JT. What are the effects of animals on the health and wellbeing of residents in care homes? A systematic review of the qualitative and quantitative evidence. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:170. [PMID: 36964508 PMCID: PMC10038779 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-03834-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is some evidence to suggest that animal-assisted interventions can have beneficial impact for residents in long-term care, but the focus of the evidence has largely been on behavioural and psychosocial measured outcomes. Animals, either as companion animals or in the form of pet/animal-assisted therapy, may provide benefits in the form of social contact, as well as opportunities for sensory experiences and meaningful engagement not picked up by outcome tools. This review aimed to create a state-of-knowledge synthesis, bringing together qualitative and quantitative findings, on the impact of animal-human interaction on care home residents and care home staff. METHODS Fourteen databases were searched from inception to July 2020. Forward and backward citation chasing of included articles was conducted. Screening was undertaken independently by a team of reviewers. Thematic synthesis and meta-analysis were used to synthesise the qualitative and quantitative data. RESULTS Thirty-four studies, published in 40 articles (20 qualitative and 20 quantitative) were included. Five themes relating to resident wellbeing were identified in the qualitative evidence synthesis. These were animals as 'living beings', reminiscence and storytelling, caring (as 'doing' and 'feeling'), respite (from loneliness, institutionalisation, and illness), and sensory engagement. A sixth theme related to staff perceptions and wellbeing, and a seventh to animal health and wellbeing. Maintaining identity was identified as an overarching theme. The majority of randomised trials had small sample sizes and were rated as low quality, mostly showing no evidence of beneficial effect. There was, however, limited evidence of a positive effect of pet/animal interaction on outcomes of loneliness, anxiety and depression, supporting the themes of respite and sensory engagement. CONCLUSIONS The presence of animals can significantly impact the health and wellbeing of some care home residents. Residents had meaningful relationships with animals and derived pleasure and comfort from them. Interacting with animals offered residents a way to maintain a sense of self in the care homes, and with support, residents with dementia could also express their identities. Facilitating residents to interact with animals as part of person-centred care may also help residents to feel 'at home' in the care home. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO registration no: CRD42017058201.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noreen Orr
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK.
| | - Rebecca Abbott
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| | - Alison Bethel
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| | - Sarah Paviour
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Rebecca Whear
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| | - Ruth Garside
- European Centre for Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Knowledge Spa, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3HD, UK
| | - Joanna Thompson Coon
- NIHR ARC South West Peninsula (PenARC), College of Medicine & Health, Evidence Synthesis Team, University of Exeter, South Cloisters, St. Luke's Campus, Exeter, EX1 2LU, Devon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
‘It gives you more to life, it's something new every day’: an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of wellbeing in older care home residents who keep a personal pet. AGEING & SOCIETY 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/s0144686x19001880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThere is a substantial amount of literature that suggests that animals, and specifically animals kept as pets, can have a positive effect on wellbeing. Research exploring the impact of animals on wellbeing in care homes mainly concerns visiting animals as well as shared communal pets. In light of the lack of research regarding personal pets in care homes, the aim of this study was to explore what the experience of keeping a personal pet in a care home means for residents’ sense of wellbeing. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with seven care home residents who were currently living with their pet in a care home. Interviews were analysed using Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA). Analysis revealed four master themes deemed to be relevant to participants’ wellbeing. these were: ‘sense of self and identity’, ‘responsibility and ownership’, ‘motivation and desire to live’ and ‘feeling content in the care home’. The analysis indicated that living with a personal pet in a care home has the potential to enhance residents’ wellbeing. At the same time, it also found that the benefits of keeping a personal pet may be dependent on specific circumstances, such as the attitudes of staff and fellow residents at the care home. This study indicates that it may be advisable for more care homes to accept personal pets.
Collapse
|
3
|
Fox M, Ray M. No pets allowed? Companion animals, older people and residential care. MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2019; 45:211-222. [PMID: 31289222 DOI: 10.1136/medhum-2019-011651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/10/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
This article is concerned with a particular site of inter-species relationships. Using the lens of liminality, it examines forced separation of older people from their companion animals when they move to a residential or nursing home in the UK. Such residential spaces frequently either exclude companion animals or fail to make adequate provision for them to accompany their human caretakers. We see such separation as a major bereavement for an older person at a stage of life when they experience significant other losses, and suggest it is often experienced as akin to the loss of a family member. We deploy vulnerability theory to argue that exclusion of companion animals from care spaces exemplifies a failure to understand the relational vulnerabilities of older age and the significance of animal companionship in mitigating those vulnerabilities. Equally, such separation fails to recognise the implications for excluded animals who can end up in unsuitable homes, being signed over to already over-stretched animal rescues or euthanised. Vulnerability theory highlights how companion species are always already vulnerable, given their liminal position between person and property, while older people are rendered particularly vulnerable in the 'liminal zone' of the care home, denied the ability to shape their environment, control their private space or form/sustain relationships of their own choosing. This article explores the potential of law to respond to and mitigate these shared vulnerabilities, suggesting that human rights arguments grounded in shared vulnerability may be invoked to argue for a re-definition of the family to recognise the significance of the human-animal relationship. We draw on the reasoning in a recent Court of Protection case which hints at law's ability to recognise the value of interspecies relations and their role in sustaining health and well-being, and the ability to live well in old age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Fox
- School of Law and Social Justice, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Mo Ray
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, UK
| |
Collapse
|