Patients' perspective of a dedicated biologic clinic for inflammatory arthritis

Candidacy 2.0 (CC) - an enhanced theory of access to healthcare for chronic conditions: lessons from a critical interpretive synthesis on access to rheumatoid arthritis care

BACKGROUND

The Dixon-Woods et al. Candidacy Framework, a valuable tool since its 2006 introduction, has been widely utilized to analyze access to various services in diverse contexts, including healthcare. This social constructionist approach examines micro, meso, and macro influences on access, offering concrete explanations for access challenges rooted in socially patterned influences. This study employed the Candidacy Framework to explore the experiences of individuals living with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and their formal care providers. The investigation extended to assessing supports and innovations in RA diagnosis and management, particularly in primary care.

METHODS

This systematic review is a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) of qualitative and mixed methods literature. The CIS aimed to generate theory from identified constructs across the reviewed literature. The study found alignment between the seven dimensions of the Candidacy Framework and key themes emerging from the data. Notably absent from the framework was an eighth dimension, identified as the "embodied relational self." This dimension, central to the model, prompted the proposal of a revised framework specific to healthcare for chronic conditions.

RESULTS

The CIS revealed that the eight dimensions, including the embodied relational self, provided a comprehensive understanding of the experiences and perspectives of individuals with RA and their care providers. The proposed Candidacy 2.0 (Chronic Condition (CC)) model demonstrated how integrating approaches like Intersectionality, concordance, and recursivity enhanced the framework when the embodied self was central.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that while the original Candidacy Framework serves as a robust foundation, a revised version, Candidacy 2.0 (CC), is warranted for chronic conditions. The addition of the embodied relational self dimension enriches the model, accommodating the complexities of accessing healthcare for chronic conditions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study did not involve a health care intervention on human participants, and as such, trial registration is not applicable. However, our review is registered with the Open Science Framework at https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/ASX5C .

An investigation of transitional care pathways for young people following traumatic dental injuries

Introduction Traumatic dental injuries (TDIs) can cause severe and complex dento-alveolar problems. Management of TDIs frequently extends into adulthood; therefore, a clear transitional care pathway (TCP) is important. Failure of this can prevent engagement in adult dental services and negatively influence treatment outcomes.Aims To assess the availability of TCPs from paediatric and adult specialist care for young people with TDIs.Materials and methods An anonymous, postal survey was designed and administered to all UK specialists in paediatric dentistry registered with the General Dental Council. Quantitative and qualitative data were gathered.Results The response rate was 58% (n = 130). Fifty-five percent (n = 72) stated that there was a dental trauma clinic for children within their locality, while only 22% (n = 29) stated that there was a dental trauma clinic for adults. Sixty-nine percent (n = 90) stated that there was no clear TCP within their locality and 41% (n = 37) of these highlighted a need for a TCP. Thematic analysis of opinions with regards to need for a TCP identified three main themes: pathway availability, access to resources and clinician experience. Following a course of treatment for a patient aged 12 years or above, 24% (n = 31) refer to specialist adult services, with 43% (n = 95) continuing to provide follow-up within paediatric dentistry.Conclusion Follow-up arrangements for young people with TDIs differ across the UK, with inconsistent availability of TCPs. Informal pathways involving referral to multidisciplinary teams may be utilised for follow-up care. Development of a TCP may aid in developing a consistent approach to long-term management of TDIs.