1
|
Sulosaari V, Dodlek N, Brandl A, De Munter J, Eriksen JG, McInally W, O'Higgins N, Benstead K, Díez de Los Ríos de la Serna C. Interprofessional education in cancer care - a scoping review. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2024; 24:767. [PMID: 39014422 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-024-05669-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Comprehensive cancer care requires effective collaboration by interprofessional healthcare teams. The need to develop educational initiatives to improve interprofessional collaboration is increasingly recognised. However, there is no agreement regarding the interprofessional competencies required for effective cancer care leading to much variation on the focus of research, planning and managing change. A scoping review was conducted to identify the current status of IPE in cancer care and to summarise the results of previous research in order to guide the development of interprofessional education in cancer care. METHODS The JBI Scoping Review guidelines were used to guide the process of the review. A search of the available literature was conducted in CINAHL, MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, PsycInfo, Scopus databases from January 2012 to March 2023 to investigate IPE for health professional clinicians working in cancer care. RESULTS Of the 825 initial references and 153 studies imported for screening, a total of 28 studies were included in the final review. From those studies, seven focused on the need for IPE and interprofessional competence for oncology healthcare professionals, four reviewed existing IPE programs and 17 described the development and evaluation of interprofessional education. Findings show variation and lack of concept definitions underpinning research in IPE in cancer care settings. Variation also exists in the range of research activities in IPE, most notably related to communication, teamwork and the development of interprofessional practice. The evaluation of impact of IPE is mainly focused on health care professionals' self-evaluation and general feedback. Impact on patient care was only evaluated in one study. CONCLUSIONS Based on the results, interprofessional education research in the field of cancer care is limited in Europe. Thus, there is a significant increase in publications in the last five years. A more systematic focus on the theoretical framework and definition of concepts would be of value. Research and programme development should be based on a shared understanding on what constitutes the interprofessional competences and IPE. Programmes to develop interprofessional practice should be developed and implemented systematically with inclusion of validated assessment methods, and evaluated and improved regularly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Virpi Sulosaari
- Turku University of Applied Sciences, Joukahaisenkatu 3, 20520, Turku, Finland.
| | - Nikolina Dodlek
- Cyprus University of Technology, Archiepiskopou Kyprianou 30, Limassol, Cyprus
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Jesper Grau Eriksen
- Dept of Experimental Clinical Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Niall O'Higgins
- School of Medicine, University College, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland
| | - Kim Benstead
- Dept of Oncology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, College Rd, GL53 7AN, Cheltenham, RN, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rajeswaran T, Dawdy K, Bishop M, Amiel G, Heneghan K, Khader J, de Vries J, Silva FS, Wiljer D, Szumacher E. An Exploration of the Pillars of Leadership in Cancer Education. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2024; 39:288-296. [PMID: 38421568 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-024-02409-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
Leadership plays a key role in cancer education (CE) and the success of its practices. Leaders in CE must effectively use their leadership skills to be able to communicate, collaborate, and educate their team members. There is a lack of formalized and standardized curriculums for institutions in developing leadership programs, including what themes to focus on in CE. In this article, the authors describe key pillars of leadership in CE that have presented themselves throughout their experience and within the literature. A search was conducted using the Ovid MEDLINE® database and articles were reviewed for eligibility. In this review, thirty articles were selected for their relevance to CE. With this literature search and the authors' reflections, four pillars of leadership in CE were identified: (1) leadership development, (2) collaboration, (3) diversity and equity, and (4) implementation. Within these themes, key areas of importance were discussed further, and barriers to CE leadership were identified. By reflecting upon pillars of leadership in CE, this article may be helpful for developing future leadership programs within CE. It is vital that initiatives continue to be held and barriers are addressed to increase leadership effectiveness within CE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thenugaa Rajeswaran
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Krista Dawdy
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Maria Bishop
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - Gilad Amiel
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Kathleen Heneghan
- Surgical Patient Education, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jamal Khader
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - Jakob de Vries
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Filipe Santos Silva
- i3S-Institute for Research and Innovation in Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - David Wiljer
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- University of Toronto, Department of Radiation Oncology, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nobrega S, Zhang Y. Let's Learn Together! A Mixed-Methods Study to Assess Readiness for Interprofessional Education on Total Worker Health® Practice. Workplace Health Saf 2024; 72:223-233. [PMID: 38217437 PMCID: PMC11132934 DOI: 10.1177/21650799231217320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Occupational safety and health (OSH) professionals increasingly need interdisciplinary collaborative practice competencies to respond to complex worker safety, health, and well-being risks. Effective collaboration with non-OSH-trained professionals (e.g., health promotion, human resources) is critical for planning integrated interventions that address work and non-work risks, consistent with a "Total Worker Health" (TWH) approach. Interprofessional education (IPE) pedagogy offers skill-building for interdisciplinary collaboration, but little attention has been given to IPE in OSH education and training literature. The goal of this study was to assess OSH professionals' perceptions about IPE to guide application in postgraduate TWH education. METHODS The mixed-methods study involved 210 U.S. professionals in safety (31%), industrial hygiene (16%), occupational nursing (12%) and medicine (11%), and related disciplines (30%). Participants completed a 12-item Readiness for Interprofessional Education Scale (RIPLS) adapted for TWH. Nineteen survey-takers also participated in virtual focus groups to share opinions about IPE benefits, barriers, and desirable course features. FINDINGS Occupational safety and health professionals reported high overall readiness for IPE (RIPLS, 4.45 ± 0.47), endorsing IPE for interdisciplinary skill-building. Salient IPE motivators were learning new perspectives from diverse disciplines and industries; gaining new subject expertise; developing common ground across disciplines; and learning TWH best practices. Participants recommended case studies to practice interdisciplinary problem-solving through group work. CONCLUSIONS/APPLICATION TO PRACTICE Interprofessional education is a promising pedagogy for OSH continuing education to promote interdisciplinary collaboration skills needed for TWH practice in the workplace. Occupational safety and health educators need to build competency in IPE pedagogical theory and practice to ensure effective training design and evaluation.
Collapse
|
4
|
Yackel HD, Montano ARL. Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Teams in a Regional Cancer Institute: A Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Semin Oncol Nurs 2023; 39:151468. [PMID: 37385871 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Oncology is a rapidly changing clinical setting. Research has shown improved patient outcomes and staff satisfaction following interprofessional collaborative education, but there has been limited research on perceptions of interprofessional collaboration among oncology health care professionals. The aims of this study were to: 1) assess attitudes of health care professionals toward interprofessional teams in oncology care, and 2) assess for differences in attitudes across various demographic and workplace groups. DATA SOURCES The research design was an electronic cross-sectional survey. The main instrument utilized was the Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Health Care Teams (ATIHCT) survey. A total of 187 oncology health care professionals from a regional New England cancer institute completed the survey. The ATIHCT mean score was high (M = 4.07, SD = 0.51). Analysis revealed statistically significant differences in mean score among participant age groups (P = .03). Significant differences (P = .01) were also noted between different professional groups and their time constraints sub-scale score on the ATIHCT scale. A higher mean score occurred in participants who had a current certification (M = 4.13, SD = 0.50) compared to those without (M = 4.05, SD = 0.46). CONCLUSION High overall scores in attitudes toward health care teams suggest that cancer care settings are primed for interprofessional care model implementation. Future studies should examine strategies to improve attitudes among specific groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Nurses are in a position to lead interprofessional teamwork in the clinical setting. Further research is necessary to examine best collaborative models in health care to support interprofessional teamwork.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Dunnack Yackel
- Clinical Research Nurse and Scientist, Hartford HealthCare Cancer Institute, Hartford, Connecticut, USA.
| | - Anna-Rae L Montano
- Program Director of Inpatient Geriatric Services, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Warsi A, Dawdy K, Bishop M, Khader J, Amiel G, Heneghan K, Wiljer D, Szumacher E. Leadership, Leading, and Influencing Change in Cancer Education: Development and Assessment of a Pilot Leadership Workshop in Cancer Education for Interdisciplinary Healthcare Staff. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2023; 38:697-712. [PMID: 35635720 PMCID: PMC9148944 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-022-02179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Effective leaders in healthcare settings create a motivating work environment, initiate changes in practice, and facilitate interdisciplinary collaboration to advance patient-centered care. Health professionals in cancer education need leadership development to meet the continued rise in cancer cases and to keep up with the rapid biomedical and technological advances in global cancer care. In addition, leadership development in cancer education supports interprofessional collaboration, optimizes patient engagement, and provides mentorship opportunities necessary for career advancement and skill development. The identified benefits from leadership development in cancer education led to the creation of an interactive pilot leadership workshop titled "Essential Skills in Cancer Education: Leadership, Leading, and Influencing Change in Cancer Education," held at the International Cancer Education Conference in October 2020. The workshop was led by global leaders in cancer education and utilized lectures, mentorship opportunities, interactive case studies, and individual learning projects to develop leadership skills in multidisciplinary oncology professionals. Fifteen attendees from diverse educational backgrounds and levels of experience participated in the virtual leadership workshop and mentorship program. Following the workshop, participants reported an increase in knowledge regarding how to use different leadership styles, initiate changes in practice, and apply leadership skills in their career development and at their institutions. The feedback received from participants through post-workshop evaluations was overall positive and demonstrated an interest for more leadership development opportunities in cancer education. This pilot workshop shows that leadership is a valuable and teachable skill that will benefit both healthcare professionals and patients in the field of cancer education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Warsi
- Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - K Dawdy
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - M Bishop
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Arizona Cancer Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - J Khader
- Department of Radiation Oncology, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan
| | - G Amiel
- Department of Urology, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - K Heneghan
- Surgical Patient Education, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - D Wiljer
- Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ewa Szumacher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, ON, M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kurniasih DAA, Setiawati EP, Pradipta IS, Subarnas A. Interprofessional collaboration in the breast cancer unit: how do healthcare workers see it? BMC Womens Health 2022; 22:227. [PMID: 35698115 PMCID: PMC9195208 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01818-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Interprofessional collaboration has an important role in health care for breast cancer patients who are undergoing treatment at the hospital. Interprofessional collaboration has been reported to provide significant benefits for patients. However, qualitative research on interprofessional collaboration in the breast cancer department is rarely done, therefore, a study was conducted to determine the perception of health practitioners about interprofessional collaboration in the breast care unit at a referral centre hospital in West Java, Indonesia. METHODS A qualitative study was carried out using in-depth interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs) with 15 healthcare personnel using total sampling. Participants were chosen among healthcare professionals who treat and in charge for outpatient breast cancer, but were not resident physicians. The FGD approach was used for nurses and pharmacists, and interviews were used for oncologists. The audio recordings of all interviews and FGDs were transcribed verbatim and evaluated using thematic analysis. RESULT The findings were categorized into two categories to obtain health care workers' perspectives on interprofessional collaboration: (1) impediment factors: personality, lack of leadership, seniority, healthcare workers with double positions, the need for a clinical meeting, hospital bureaucracy, national health insurance implementation, issues with patients, hospital infrastructure, and evaluation and synchronisation; (2) existing supportive elements: effective cooperation, effective communication, clear job description, interpersonal relationships, Standard Operational Procedure (SOP) for cancer therapy, legality for inter-discipline cancer team, professional responsibility, integrated clinical pathway, patient centred care, and comprehensive health services. CONCLUSIONS Interprofessional collaboration was seen positively by the respondents. However, there are several hurdles that must be overcome to apply interprofessional collaboration works effectively. The findings of this study can be used to build interprofessional collaborations targeted at enhancing quality health care in breast cancer units.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dea Anita Ariani Kurniasih
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Raya Bandung Sumedang Km. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor, Kabupaten Sumedang, 45363, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.,Doctoral Program of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia.,Pharmacy Study Program, Akademi Farmasi YPF, Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Elsa Pudji Setiawati
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
| | - Ivan Surya Pradipta
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Raya Bandung Sumedang Km. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor, Kabupaten Sumedang, 45363, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.,Drug Utilization and Pharmacoepidemiology Research Group, Center of Excellence in Higher Education for Pharmaceutical Care Innovation, Universitas Padjadjaran, Sumedang, Indonesia
| | - Anas Subarnas
- Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran, Raya Bandung Sumedang Km. 21, Hegarmanah, Jatinangor, Kabupaten Sumedang, 45363, Jawa Barat, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|