Longitudinal effects on self-determination in the RCT “Continuum of care for frail elderly people”

Clinical outcomes of nurse-coordinated interventions for frail older adults discharged from hospital: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To determine the effects of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions, cumulative hospital stay, mortality, functional ability and quality of life for frail older adults discharged from hospital.

DESIGN

Systematic review with meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic search using key search terms of 'frailty', 'geriatric', 'hospital' and 'nurse'. Covidence was used to screen individual studies. Studies were included that addressed frail older adults, incorporated a significant nursing role in the intervention and were implemented during hospital admission with a focus on transition from hospital to home.

DATA SOURCES

This review searched MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCO), PubMed (EBSCO), Scopus, Embase (Ovid) and Cochrane library for studies published between 2000 and September 2023.

RESULTS

Of 7945 abstracts screened, a total 16 randomised controlled trials were identified. The 16 randomised controlled trials had a total of 8795 participants, included in analysis. Due to the heterogeneity of the outcome measures used meta-analysis could only be completed on readmission (n = 13) and mortality (n = 9). All other remaining outcome measures were reported through narrative synthesis. A total of 59 different outcome measure assessments and tools were used between studies. Meta-analysis found statistically significant intervention effect at 1-month readmission only. No other statistically significant effects were found on any other time point or outcome.

CONCLUSION

Nurse-coordinated interventions have a significant effect on 1-month readmissions for frail older adults discharged from hospital. The positive effect of interventions on other health outcomes within studies were mixed and indistinct, this is attributed to the large heterogeneity between studies and outcome measures.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review should inform policy around transitional care recommendations at local, national and international levels. Nurses, who constitute half of the global health workforce, are ideally situated to provide transitional care interventions. Nurse-coordinated models of care, which identify patient needs and facilitate the continuation of care into the community improve patient outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

Review findings will be useful for key stakeholders, clinicians and researchers to learn more about the essential elements of nurse-coordinated transitional care interventions that are best targeted to meet the needs of frail older adults.

IMPACT

When frail older adults experience transitions in care, for example discharging from hospital to home, there is an increased risk of adverse events, such as institutionalisation, hospitalisation, disability and death. Nurse-coordinated transitional care models have shown to be a potential solution to support adults with specific chronic diseases, but there is more to be known about the effectiveness of interventions in frail older adults. This review demonstrated the positive impact of nurse-coordinated interventions in improving readmissions for up to 1 month post-discharge, helping to inform future transitional care interventions to better support the needs of frail older adults.

REPORTING METHOD

This systematic review was reported in accordance with the Referred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No Patient or Public Contribution.

Rehabilitation delivery models to foster healthy ageing-a scoping review

Introduction

Rehabilitation is essential to foster healthy ageing. Older adults have unique rehabilitation needs due to a higher prevalence of non-communicable diseases, higher susceptibility to infectious diseases, injuries, and mental health conditions. However, there is limited understanding of how rehabilitation is delivered to older adults. To address this gap, we conducted a scoping review to describe rehabilitation delivery models used to optimise older adults' functioning/functional ability and foster healthy ageing.

Methods

We searched Medline and Embase (January 2015 to May 2022) for primary studies published in English describing approaches to provide rehabilitation to older adults. Three authors screened records for eligibility and extracted data independently and in duplicate. Data synthesis included descriptive quantitative analysis of study and rehabilitation provision characteristics, and qualitative analysis to identify rehabilitation delivery models.

Results

Out of 6,933 identified records, 585 articles were assessed for eligibility, and 283 studies with 69,257 participants were included. We identified six rehabilitation delivery models: outpatient (24%), telerehabilitation (22%), home (18.5%), community (16.3%), inpatient (14.6%), and eldercare (4.7%). These models often involved multidisciplinary teams (31.5%) and follow integrated care principles (30.4%). Most studies used a disease-centred approach (59.0%), while studies addressing multimorbidity (6.0%) and prevalent health problems of older adults, such as pain, low hearing, and vision, or incontinence were scarce. The most frequently provided interventions were therapeutic exercises (54.1%), self-management education (40.1%), and assessment of person-centred goals (40%). Other interventions, such as assistive technology (8.1%) and environmental adaptations (7.4%) were infrequent.

Conclusions

Focusing on primary studies, this scoping review provides an overview of rehabilitation delivery models that are used to foster healthy ageing and highlights research gaps that require further attention, including a lack of systematic assessment of functioning/functional ability, a predominance of disease-centred rehabilitation, and a scarcity of programmes addressing prevalent issues like pain, hearing/vision loss, fall prevention, incontinence, and sexual dysfunctions. Our research can facilitate evidence-based decision-making and inspire further research and innovation in rehabilitation and healthy ageing. Limitations of our study include reliance on published research to infer practice and not assessing model effectiveness. Future research in the field is needed to expand and validate our findings.

The meaning of continuity of care from the perspective of older people with complex care needs-A scoping review

People aged 65 years or older with complex care needs are at risk of fragmented care. This may jeopardise patient safety. Complex care needs are defined as care needs that require the performance of time-consuming processes such as reviewing medical history, providing counselling, and prescribing medications. A scoping review was conducted with the aim of mapping the literature regarding continuity of care from the perspective of older people with complex care needs. Search results from seven databases (PubMed, Cinahl, PsycInfo, ASSIA, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Scopus, DOAJ), grey literature (BASE), and a hand-search search of key journals were used. A deductive analysis based on aspects of continuity of care was performed. The search resulted in 5704 records. After a title and abstract screening, 93 records remained. In total, 18 articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the scoping review. Older people´s sense of continuity of care increases when fewer healthcare workers are involved in their care but help from skilled professionals is more important than meeting the same person. It is vital for older people's feeling of continuity of care that discharge planning involves them, their families, and care providers in an organised way.

Case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings

BACKGROUND

Ageing populations globally have contributed to increasing numbers of people living with frailty, which has significant implications for use of health and care services and costs. The British Geriatrics Society defines frailty as "a distinctive health state related to the ageing process in which multiple body systems gradually lose their inbuilt reserves". This leads to an increased susceptibility to adverse outcomes, such as reduced physical function, poorer quality of life, hospital admissions, and mortality. Case management interventions delivered in community settings are led by a health or social care professional, supported by a multidisciplinary team, and focus on the planning, provision, and co-ordination of care to meet the needs of the individual. Case management is one model of integrated care that has gained traction with policymakers to improve outcomes for populations at high risk of decline in health and well-being. These populations include older people living with frailty, who commonly have complex healthcare and social care needs but can experience poorly co-ordinated care due to fragmented care systems.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of case management for integrated care of older people living with frailty compared with usual care.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Health Systems Evidence, and PDQ Evidence and databases from inception to 23 September 2022. We also searched clinical registries and relevant grey literature databases, checked references of included trials and relevant systematic reviews, conducted citation searching of included trials, and contacted topic experts.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared case management with standard care in community-dwelling people aged 65 years and older living with frailty.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We followed standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 20 trials (11,860 participants), all of which took place in high-income countries. Case management interventions in the included trials varied in terms of organisation, delivery, setting, and care providers involved. Most trials included a variety of healthcare and social care professionals, including nurse practitioners, allied healthcare professionals, social workers, geriatricians, physicians, psychologists, and clinical pharmacists. In nine trials, the case management intervention was delivered by nurses only. Follow-up ranged from three to 36 months. We judged most trials at unclear risk of selection and performance bias; this consideration, together with indirectness, justified downgrading the certainty of the evidence to low or moderate. Case management compared to standard care may result in little or no difference in the following outcomes. • Mortality at 12 months' follow-up (7.0% in the intervention group versus 7.5% in the control group; risk ratio (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.15; I2 = 11%; 14 trials, 9924 participants; low-certainty evidence) • Change in place of residence to a nursing home at 12 months' follow-up (9.9% in the intervention group versus 13.4% in the control group; RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.01; I2 = 0%; 4 trials, 1108 participants; low-certainty evidence) • Quality of life at three to 24 months' follow-up (results not pooled; mean differences (MDs) ranged from -6.32 points (95% CI -11.04 to -1.59) to 6.1 points (95% CI -3.92 to 16.12) when reported; 11 trials, 9284 participants; low-certainty evidence) • Serious adverse effects at 12 to 24 months' follow-up (results not pooled; 2 trials, 592 participants; low-certainty evidence) • Change in physical function at three to 24 months' follow-up (results not pooled; MDs ranged from -0.12 points (95% CI -0.93 to 0.68) to 3.4 points (95% CI -2.35 to 9.15) when reported; 16 trials, 10,652 participants; low-certainty evidence) Case management compared to standard care probably results in little or no difference in the following outcomes. • Healthcare utilisation in terms of hospital admission at 12 months' follow-up (32.7% in the intervention group versus 36.0% in the control group; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.05; I2 = 43%; 6 trials, 2424 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) • Change in costs at six to 36 months' follow-up (results not pooled; 14 trials, 8486 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), which usually included healthcare service costs, intervention costs, and other costs such as informal care.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found uncertain evidence regarding whether case management for integrated care of older people with frailty in community settings, compared to standard care, improved patient and service outcomes or reduced costs. There is a need for further research to develop a clear taxonomy of intervention components, to determine the active ingredients that work in case management interventions, and identify how such interventions benefit some people and not others.

Barriers for Inter-Organisational Collaboration: What Matters for an Integrated Care Programme?

Introduction

Inter-organisational collaboration is challenging but essential in managing the complex and comprehensive needs of frail older people. Therefore, there is a need to investigate the influence of different barriers to inter-organisational collaboration when implementing an integrated care programme. The aim of this study was to investigate both inpatient and outpatient staff views on the factors they deemed to be influential to inter-organisational collaboration for an integrated care programme.

Methods

The study was a cross-sectional study and included staff from hospitals, primary care and municipal health and social care.

Results

There were no significant differences between staff from inpatient and outpatient care in measuring factors that may cause difficulties for inter-organisational collaboration. Staff views diverged significantly on all factors, such as educational level at long physical distances, laws and regulations, knowledge of each others work settings, experience from inter-organisational collaboration, different professions, variations in professional status and power, psychosocial factors such as positive work environment and interpersonal chemistry.

Discussion

A multidisciplinary team culture and avenues for inter-organisational collaboration need to be developed for improved care continuity.

Conclusion

The staffs' educational level influenced what was perceived as barriers to inter-organisational collaboration, and may guide future development of integrated care programmes.

Transitional care from hospital to home for frail older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Frail older adults are vulnerable to hospitalization and transitional care is needed to maintain care continuity; however, there exists no review regarding transitional care focusing on frailty. This study aimed to investigate transitional care for frail older adults and its effectiveness. Search terms were (P) frail older adults; (I) transitional care initiated before discharge; (C) usual care; (O) all health outcomes. Fourteen trials were identified. The most measured outcome was readmission (n = 13), followed by mortality (n = 9), function (n = 7), quality of life (n = 5), and self-rated health (n = 5). Statistical significance effects were reported in the followings: n = 6, readmission; n = 0, mortality; n = 3, function; n = 2, quality of life; and n = 4, self-rated health. The meta-analysis demonstrated that transitional care reduced readmission at six months but not other time points nor mortality or quality of life. The intervention effectiveness was inconclusive; therefore, an evidence-based yet novel approach is necessary to establish an adequate transitional care intervention for frail older adults.

Effect of a care process programme on frail older people's life satisfaction

AIM

The aim of this study was to analyse the effects of a full-scale implementation of a care process programme on life satisfaction among frail older people, as compared with those receiving usual care.

DESIGN

The study includes participants from a full-scale care process programme (N = 77) and participants from a historical control group (N = 66). The care process programme establishes a comprehensive continuum of care through components including case management, interprofessional teamwork and care-planning meetings in the older people's own homes.

METHODS

Questionnaires were used and data were collected at baseline, with follow-ups at three, six and 12 months.

RESULTS

The implementation of the full-scale care process programme had a positive effect on life satisfaction among frail older people. From 6-month-12-month follow-ups, a higher proportion of participants in the care process programme had positive life satisfaction outcomes, as compared with the historical control group.