1
|
Stoks J, Bear LR, Vijgen J, Dendale P, Peeters R, Volders PGA, Cluitmans MJM. Understanding repolarization in the intracardiac unipolar electrogram: A long-lasting controversy revisited. Front Physiol 2023; 14:1158003. [PMID: 37089414 PMCID: PMC10119409 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1158003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The optimal way to determine repolarization time (RT) from the intracardiac unipolar electrogram (UEG) has been a topic of debate for decades. RT is typically determined by either the Wyatt method or the "alternative method," which both consider UEG T-wave slope, but differently. Objective: To determine the optimal method to measure RT on the UEG. Methods: Seven pig hearts surrounded by an epicardial sock with 100 electrodes were Langendorff-perfused with selective cannulation of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery and submersed in a torso-shaped tank containing 256 electrodes on the torso surface. Repolarization was prolonged in the non-LAD-regions by infusing dofetilide and shortened in the LAD-region using pinacidil. RT was determined by the Wyatt (tWyatt) and alternative (tAlt) methods, in both invasive (recorded with epicardial electrodes) and in non-invasive UEGs (reconstructed with electrocardiographic imaging). tWyatt and tAlt were compared to local effective refractory period (ERP). Results: With contact mapping, mean absolute error (MAE) of tWyatt and tAlt vs. ERP were 21 ms and 71 ms, respectively. Positive T-waves typically had an earlier ERP than negative T-waves, in line with theory. tWyatt -but not tAlt-shortened by local infusion of pinacidil. Similar results were found for the non-invasive UEGs (MAE of tWyatt and tAlt vs. ERP were 30 ms and 92 ms, respectively). Conclusion: The Wyatt method is the most accurate to determine RT from (non) invasive UEGs, based on novel and historical analyses. Using it to determine RT could unify and facilitate repolarization assessment and amplify its role in cardiac electrophysiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Job Stoks
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Laura R. Bear
- IHU Liryc, Electrophysiology and Heart Modeling Institute, Fondation Bordeaux Université, Bordeaux, France
| | - Johan Vijgen
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Paul Dendale
- Biomedical Research Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Ralf Peeters
- Department of Advanced Computing Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Paul G. A. Volders
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs J. M. Cluitmans
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Matthijs J. M. Cluitmans,
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aronis KN, Prakosa A, Bergamaschi T, Berger RD, Boyle PM, Chrispin J, Ju S, Marine JE, Sinha S, Tandri H, Ashikaga H, Trayanova NA. Characterization of the Electrophysiologic Remodeling of Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy by Clinical Measurements and Computer Simulations Coupled With Machine Learning. Front Physiol 2021; 12:684149. [PMID: 34335294 PMCID: PMC8317643 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.684149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale Patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICMP) are at high risk for malignant arrhythmias, largely due to electrophysiological remodeling of the non-infarcted myocardium. The electrophysiological properties of the non-infarcted myocardium of patients with ICMP remain largely unknown. Objectives To assess the pro-arrhythmic behavior of non-infarcted myocardium in ICMP patients and couple computational simulations with machine learning to establish a methodology for the development of disease-specific action potential models based on clinically measured action potential duration restitution (APDR) data. Methods and Results We enrolled 22 patients undergoing left-sided ablation (10 ICMP) and compared APDRs between ICMP and structurally normal left ventricles (SNLVs). APDRs were clinically assessed with a decremental pacing protocol. Using genetic algorithms (GAs), we constructed populations of action potential models that incorporate the cohort-specific APDRs. The variability in the populations of ICMP and SNLV models was captured by clustering models based on their similarity using unsupervised machine learning. The pro-arrhythmic potential of ICMP and SNLV models was assessed in cell- and tissue-level simulations. Clinical measurements established that ICMP patients have a steeper APDR slope compared to SNLV (by 38%, p < 0.01). In cell-level simulations, APD alternans were induced in ICMP models at a longer cycle length compared to SNLV models (385–400 vs 355 ms). In tissue-level simulations, ICMP models were more susceptible for sustained functional re-entry compared to SNLV models. Conclusion Myocardial remodeling in ICMP patients is manifested as a steeper APDR compared to SNLV, which underlies the greater arrhythmogenic propensity in these patients, as demonstrated by cell- and tissue-level simulations using action potential models developed by GAs from clinical measurements. The methodology presented here captures the uncertainty inherent to GAs model development and provides a blueprint for use in future studies aimed at evaluating electrophysiological remodeling resulting from other cardiac diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos N Aronis
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Adityo Prakosa
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Teya Bergamaschi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Ronald D Berger
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Patrick M Boyle
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Jonathan Chrispin
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Suyeon Ju
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Joseph E Marine
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Sunil Sinha
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Harikrishna Tandri
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Hiroshi Ashikaga
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States
| | - Natalia A Trayanova
- Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, United States.,Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Institute for Computational Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Orini M, Taggart P, Srinivasan N, Hayward M, Lambiase PD. Interactions between Activation and Repolarization Restitution Properties in the Intact Human Heart: In-Vivo Whole-Heart Data and Mathematical Description. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0161765. [PMID: 27588688 PMCID: PMC5010207 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The restitution of the action potential duration (APDR) and conduction velocity (CVR) are mechanisms whereby cardiac excitation and repolarization adapt to changes in heart rate. They modulate the vulnerability to dangerous arrhythmia, but the mechanistic link between restitution and arrhythmogenesis remains only partially understood. METHODS This paper provides an experimental and theoretical study of repolarization and excitation restitution properties and their interactions in the intact human epicardium. The interdependence between excitation and repolarization dynamic is studied in 8 patients (14 restitution protocols, 1722 restitution curves) undergoing global epicardial mapping with multi-electrode socks before open heart surgery. A mathematical description of the contribution of both repolarization and conduction dynamics to the steepness of the APDR slope is proposed. RESULTS This study demonstrates that the APDR slope is a function of both activation and repolarization dynamics. At short cycle length, conduction delay significantly increases the APDR slope by interacting with the diastolic interval. As predicted by the proposed mathematical formulation, the APDR slope was more sensitive to activation time prolongation than to the simultaneous shortening of repolarization time. A steep APDR slope was frequently identified, with 61% of all cardiac sites exhibiting an APDR slope > 1, suggesting that a slope > 1 may not necessarily promote electrical instability in the human epicardium. APDR slope did not change for different activation or repolarization times, and it was not a function of local baseline APD. However, it was affected by the spatial organization of electrical excitation, suggesting that in tissue APDR is not a unique function of local electrophysiological properties. Spatial heterogeneity in both activation and repolarization restitution contributed to the increase in the modulated dispersion of repolarization, which for short cycle length was as high as 250 ms. Heterogeneity in conduction velocity restitution can translate into both activation and repolarization dispersion and increase cardiac instability. The proposed mathematical formulation shows an excellent agreement with the experimental data (correlation coefficient r = 0.94) and provides a useful tool for the understanding of the complex interactions between activation and repolarization restitution properties as well as between their measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Orini
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Taggart
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Neil Srinivasan
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Martin Hayward
- The Heart Hospital, University College London Hospitals, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pier D. Lambiase
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomews Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Srinivasan NT, Orini M, Simon RB, Providência R, Khan FZ, Segal OR, Babu GG, Bradley R, Rowland E, Ahsan S, Chow AW, Lowe MD, Taggart P, Lambiase PD. Ventricular stimulus site influences dynamic dispersion of repolarization in the intact human heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2016; 311:H545-54. [PMID: 27371682 PMCID: PMC5142177 DOI: 10.1152/ajpheart.00159.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2016] [Accepted: 06/29/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Spatial variation of restitution in relation to varying stimulus site is poorly defined in the intact human heart. Repolarization gradients were shown to be dependent on site of activation with epicardial stimulation promoting significant transmural gradients. Steep restitution slopes were predominant in the normal ventricle. The spatial variation in restitution properties in relation to varying stimulus site is poorly defined. This study aimed to investigate the effect of varying stimulus site on apicobasal and transmural activation time (AT), action potential duration (APD) and repolarization time (RT) during restitution studies in the intact human heart. Ten patients with structurally normal hearts, undergoing clinical electrophysiology studies, were enrolled. Decapolar catheters were placed apex to base in the endocardial right ventricle (RVendo) and left ventricle (LVendo), and an LV branch of the coronary sinus (LVepi) for transmural recording. S1–S2 restitution protocols were performed pacing RVendo apex, LVendo base, and LVepi base. Overall, 725 restitution curves were analyzed, 74% of slopes had a maximum slope of activation recovery interval (ARI) restitution (Smax) > 1 (P < 0.001); mean Smax = 1.76. APD was shorter in the LVepi compared with LVendo, regardless of pacing site (30-ms difference during RVendo pacing, 25-ms during LVendo, and 48-ms during LVepi; 50th quantile, P < 0.01). Basal LVepi pacing resulted in a significant transmural gradient of RT (77 ms, 50th quantile: P < 0.01), due to loss of negative transmural AT-APD coupling (mean slope 0.63 ± 0.3). No significant transmural gradient in RT was demonstrated during endocardial RV or LV pacing, with preserved negative transmural AT-APD coupling (mean slope −1.36 ± 1.9 and −0.71 ± 0.4, respectively). Steep ARI restitution slopes predominate in the normal ventricle and dynamic ARI; RT gradients exist that are modulated by the site of activation. Epicardial stimulation to initiate ventricular activation promotes significant transmural gradients of repolarization that could be proarrhythmic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neil T Srinivasan
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michele Orini
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ron B Simon
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Rui Providência
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Fakhar Z Khan
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Oliver R Segal
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Girish G Babu
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Richard Bradley
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Edward Rowland
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Syed Ahsan
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Anthony W Chow
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Martin D Lowe
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Peter Taggart
- Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pier D Lambiase
- Department of Cardiac Electrophysiology, The Barts Heart Center, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom; and Institute of Cardiovascular Science, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|