Cardiac fibrillation risks with TASER conducted electrical weapons

New conducted electrical weapons: Electrical safety relative to relevant standards

INTRODUCTION

We have previously published about TASER^® conducted electrical weapons (CEW) compliance with international standards. CEWs deliver electrical pulses that can inhibit a person's neuromuscular control or temporarily incapacitate. An eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW and the X2 CEW are new 2-shot electrical weapon models designed to target a precise amount of delivered charge per pulse. They both can deploy 1 or 2 dart pairs, delivered by 2 separate cartridges. Additionally, the XRF controls delivery of incapacitating pulses over 4 field vectors, in a rotating sequence. As in our previous study, we were motivated by the need to understand the cardiac safety profile of these new CEWs. The goal of this paper is to analyze the nominal electrical outputs of TASER XRF and X2 CEWs in reference to provisions of all relevant international standards that specify safety requirements for electrical medical devices and electrical fences. Although these standards do not specifically mention CEWs, they are the closest electrical safety standards and hence give very relevant guidance.

METHODS

The outputs of several TASER XRF and X2 CEWs were measured under normal operating conditions. The measurements were compared against manufacturer specifications. CEWs electrical output parameters were reviewed against relevant safety requirements of UL 69, IEC 60335-2-76 Ed 2.1, IEC 60479-1, IEC 60479-2, AS/NZS 60479.1, AS/NZS 60479.2, IEC 60601-1 and BS EN 60601-1.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our study confirmed that the nominal electrical outputs of TASER XRF and X2 CEWs lie within safety bounds specified by relevant standards.

New conducted electrical weapons: Finite element modeling of safety margins

Introduction-We have previously published on the ventricular fibrillation (VF) risk with TASER^® X26 conducted electrical weapon (CEW). Our risk model accounted for realistic body mass index distributions, modeled the effects of partial or oblique dart penetration, and used epidemiological CEW statistics. As new CEWs have become available to law enforcement, their cardiac safety profile was not quantified. Therefore, we applied our VF probability model to evaluate their cardiac risk. Methods and Results-An eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW and the X2 CEW are new 2-shot electrical weapon models designed to target a precise amount of delivered charge per pulse, 64 μC and 62 μC, respectively. They can deploy 1 or 2 probe pairs, delivered by 2 separate cartridges. New Smart Probes (SP), which carry 11.5 mm long CEW darts, can be used with XRF and X2 CEWs. Finite element modeling (FEM) was used to approximate the current and charge densities produced by XRF and X2 CEWs in tissues located in the vicinity of darts, including accounting for the effects of fat, anisotropic skeletal muscles, sternum, ribs, and lungs. Using our previous cardiac risk probabilistic model, the new XRF and X2 CEWs operated with 11.5 mm SPs, had an estimated overall theoretical VF risk of less than 1 in 1 300 000 and 1 in 1 490 000 cases, respectively. We also found that the XRF and X2 CEWs had increased cardiac safety margins with respect to those previously reported for the X26 CEWs when all three CEW models were operated with 9 mm CEW darts. Lastly, the cardiac risk of these new CEWs (<; 0.76 ppm) was found to be much lower than reported levels of CEW non-cardiac fatal injuries (e.g. falls and burns, > 7.2 ppm). Conclusions-While not risk-free, the new TASER XRF and X2 CEWs offer increased cardiac safety margins and extremely low cardiac risk profiles.

New conducted electrical weapons: Thoracic cage shielding effects

INTRODUCTION

The TASER^® conducted electrical weapon (CEW) delivers electrical pulses that can temporarily incapacitate subjects. For existing CEW models, we have previously presented the distribution of currents in tissues posterior to the sternum and their likelihood of triggering cardiac arrhythmias. New models, the eXperimental Rotating-Field (XRF) waveform CEW (in development) and the X2 CEW (released) have not been investigated. Both the XRF and X2 CEWs target a precise amount of delivered charge per pulse, 64 μC and 62 μC, respectively. The goal of this study was to numerically model the thoracic cage attenuation of currents and electric fields delivered by the new CEWs and to find whether the heart is shielded from the induction of any dangerous arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Finite element modeling (FEM) was used to approximate the current density and electric field strength in tissues around the thoracic cage. FEM boundary conditions were set to correspond to output waveforms of the new CEWs, the XRF and the X2. We analyzed a CEW dart deployment scenario that had both darts located over the anterior aspect of the sternum. We found that the sternum and thoracic cage provided significant attenuation of currents and electrical fields.

CONCLUSION

The sternum and the thoracic cage significantly attenuated currents and electric fields delivered by XRF and X2 CEWs. These tissues `shielded' the heart against potentially dangerous cardiac arrhythmias. The shorter durations and reduced amount of charged delivered by the XRF and the X2 CEWs resulted in increased cardiac safety margins.

Validity of the small swine model for human electrical safety risks

Small swine are the most common model now used for electrical safety studies. Because of the significant anatomical and electrophysiological differences and the effect of animal size on the ventricular fibrillation (VF) threshold, there are concerns that these differences may exaggerate the risks of electrical devices to humans. We chose, as an illustrative and relevant example, swine studies of the TASER® conducted electrical weapon (CEW) as it has numerous published VF studies. We reviewed the published electrical swine safety studies for CEWs and compared them to finite element modeling studies, electrical safety standards, and epidemiological experience from field usage. We also compared the body weights of the swine to those of law enforcement arrest-related deaths. Studies of small swine exaggerate the risks of CEWs to humans. This conclusion may be extrapolated to suggest that the use of small swine for electrical safety studies should be questioned in general.