|
1
|
Galldiks N, Kocher M, Ceccon G, Werner JM, Brunn A, Deckert M, Pope WB, Soffietti R, Le Rhun E, Weller M, Tonn JC, Fink GR, Langen KJ. Imaging challenges of immunotherapy and targeted therapy in patients with brain metastases: response, progression, and pseudoprogression. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:17-30. [PMID: 31437274 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapy (TT) has dramatically improved the prognosis of various cancer types. However, following ICI therapy or TT-either alone (especially ICI) or in combination with radiotherapy-imaging findings on anatomical contrast-enhanced MRI can be unpredictable and highly variable, and are often difficult to interpret regarding treatment response and outcome. This review aims at summarizing the imaging challenges related to TT and ICI monotherapy as well as combined with radiotherapy in patients with brain metastases, and to give an overview on advanced imaging techniques which potentially overcome some of these imaging challenges. Currently, major evidence suggests that imaging parameters especially derived from amino acid PET, perfusion-/diffusion-weighted MRI, or MR spectroscopy may provide valuable additional information for the differentiation of treatment-induced changes from brain metastases recurrence and the evaluation of treatment response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Galldiks
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Martin Kocher
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Stereotaxy and Functional Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Garry Ceccon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Michael Werner
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna Brunn
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Martina Deckert
- Institute of Neuropathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Whitney B Pope
- Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Emilie Le Rhun
- Neuro-Oncology, General and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Service, University Hospital Lille, Lille, France.,Breast Cancer Department, Oscar Lambret Center, Lille, France.,Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology & Brain Tumor Center, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jörg C Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium, partner site Munich, Germany
| | - Gereon R Fink
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
| | - Karl-Josef Langen
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Kotecki N, Lefranc F, Devriendt D, Awada A. Therapy of breast cancer brain metastases: challenges, emerging treatments and perspectives. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2018; 10:1758835918780312. [PMID: 29977353 PMCID: PMC6024336 DOI: 10.1177/1758835918780312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Brain metastases are the most common central nervous system tumors in adults, and incidence of brain metastases is increasing due to both improved diagnostic techniques (e.g. magnetic resonance imaging) and increased cancer patient survival through advanced systemic treatments. Outcomes of patients remain disappointing and treatment options are limited, usually involving multimodality approaches. Brain metastases represent an unmet medical need in solid tumor care, especially in breast cancer, where brain metastases are frequent and result in impaired quality of life and death. Challenges in the management of brain metastases have been highlighted in this review. Innovative research and treatment strategies, including prevention approaches and emerging systemic treatment options for brain metastases of breast cancer, are further discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuria Kotecki
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Florence Lefranc
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hopital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Daniel Devriendt
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
| | - Ahmad Awada
- Medical Oncology Clinic, Institut Jules Bordet, 1 rue Heger Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Luker GD, Nguyen HM, Hoff BA, Galbán CJ, Hernando D, Chenevert TL, Talpaz M, Ross BD. A Pilot Study of Quantitative MRI Parametric Response Mapping of Bone Marrow Fat for Treatment Assessment in Myelofibrosis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2016; 2:67-78. [PMID: 27213182 PMCID: PMC4872873 DOI: 10.18383/j.tom.2016.00115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
Myelofibrosis (MF) is a hematologic neoplasm arising as a primary disease or secondary to other myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Both primary and secondary MF are uniquely associated with progressive bone marrow fibrosis, displacing normal hematopoietic cells from the marrow space and disrupting normal production of mature blood cells. Activation of the JAK2 signaling pathway in hematopoietic stem cells commonly causes MF, and ruxolitinib, a drug targeting this pathway, is the treatment of choice for many patients. However, current measures of disease status in MF do not necessarily predict response to treatment with ruxolitinib or other drugs in MF. Bone marrow biopsies are invasive and prone to sampling error, while measurements of spleen volume only indirectly reflect bone marrow status. Toward the goal of developing an imaging biomarker for treatment response in MF, we present preliminary results from a prospective clinical study evaluating parametric response mapping (PRM) of quantitative Dixon MRI bone marrow fat fraction maps in four MF patients treated with ruxolitinib. PRM allows for the voxel-wise identification of significant change in quantitative imaging readouts over time, in this case the bone marrow fat content. We identified heterogeneous response patterns of bone marrow fat among patients and within different bone marrow sites in the same patient. We also observed discordance between changes in bone marrow fat fraction and reductions in spleen volume, the standard imaging metric for treatment efficacy. This study provides initial support for PRM analysis of quantitative MRI of bone marrow fat to monitor response to therapy in MF, setting the stage for larger studies to further develop and validate this method as a complementary imaging biomarker for this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary D Luker
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Huong Marie Nguyen
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Benjamin A Hoff
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Craig J Galbán
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Diego Hernando
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Thomas L Chenevert
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Moshe Talpaz
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Brian D Ross
- Center for Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|