Reyneke CJF, Luthi M, Burdin V, Douglas TS, Vetter T, Mutsvangwa TEM. Review of 2-D/3-D Reconstruction Using Statistical Shape and Intensity Models and X-Ray Image Synthesis: Toward a Unified Framework.
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 2018;
12:269-286. [PMID:
30334808 DOI:
10.1109/rbme.2018.2876450]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Patient-specific three-dimensional (3-D) bone models are useful for a number of clinical applications such as surgery planning, postoperative evaluation, as well as implant and prosthesis design. Two-dimensional-to-3-D (2-D/3-D) reconstruction, also known as model-to-modality or atlas-based 2-D/3-D registration, provides a means of obtaining a 3-D model of a patient's bones from their 2-D radiographs when 3-D imaging modalities are not available. The preferred approach for estimating both shape and density information (that would be present in a patient's computed tomography data) for 2-D/3-D reconstruction makes use of digitally reconstructed radiographs and deformable models in an iterative, non-rigid, intensity-based approach. Based on a large number of state-of-the-art 2-D/3-D bone reconstruction methods, a unified mathematical formulation of the problem is proposed in a common conceptual framework, using unambiguous terminology. In addition, shortcomings, recent adaptations, and persisting challenges are discussed along with insights for future research.
Collapse