Snoring - An Acoustic Definition

How to objectively measure snoring: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Snoring is the most common symptom of obstructive sleep apnea. Various objective methods of measuring snoring are available, and even if the measurement is performed the same way, communication is difficult because there are no common reference values between the researcher and clinician with regard to intensity and frequency, among other variables. In other words, no consensus regarding objective measurement has been reached. This study aimed to review the literature related to the objective measurement of snoring, such as measurement devices, definitions, and device locations.

METHODS

A literature search based on the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was conducted from the date of inception to April 5, 2023. Twenty-nine articles were included in this study. Articles that mentioned only the equipment used for measurement and did not include individual details were excluded from the study.

RESULTS

Three representative methods for measuring snoring emerged. These include (1) a microphone, which measures snoring sound; (2) piezoelectric sensor, which measures snoring vibration; and (3) nasal transducer, which measures airflow. In addition, recent attempts have been made to measure snoring using smartphones and applications.

CONCLUSION

Numerous studies have investigated both obstructive sleep apnea and snoring. However, the objective methods of measuring snoring and snoring-related concepts vary across studies. Consensus in the academic and clinical communities on how to measure and define snoring is required.

Towards Sleep Study Automation: Detection Evaluation of Respiratory-Related Events

The diagnosis of sleep disordered breathing depends on the detection of several respiratory-related events: apneas, hypopneas, snores, or respiratory event-related arousals from sleep studies. While a number of automatic detection methods have been proposed, reproducibility of these methods has been an issue, in part due to the absence of a generally accepted protocol for evaluating their results. With sleep measurements this is usually treated as a classification problem and the accompanying issue of localization is not treated as similarly critical. To address these problems we present a detection evaluation protocol that is able to qualitatively assess the match between two annotations of respiratory-related events. This protocol relies on measuring the relative temporal overlap between two annotations in order to find an alignment that maximizes their F1-score at the sequence level. This protocol can be used in applications which require a precise estimate of the number of events, total event duration, and a joint estimate of event number and duration. We assess its application using a data set that contains over 10,000 manually annotated snore events from 9 subjects, and show that when using the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Manual standard, two sleep technologists can achieve an F1-score of 0.88 when identifying the presence of snore events. In addition, we drafted rules for marking snore boundaries and showed that one sleep technologist can achieve F1-score of 0.94 at the same tasks. Finally, we compared our protocol against the protocol that is used to evaluate sleep spindle detection and highlighted the differences.