1
|
Sivakanthan S, Candiotti JL, Sundaram AS, Duvall JA, Sergeant JJG, Cooper R, Satpute S, Turner RL, Cooper RA. Mini-review: Robotic wheelchair taxonomy and readiness. Neurosci Lett 2022; 772:136482. [PMID: 35104618 PMCID: PMC8887066 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2022.136482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Robotic wheelchair research and development is a growing sector. This article introduces a robotic wheelchair taxonomy, and a readiness model supported by a mini-review. The taxonomy is constructed by power wheelchair and, mobile robot standards, the ICF and, PHAATE models. The mini-review of 2797 articles spanning 7 databases produced 205 articles and 4 review articles that matched inclusion/exclusion criteria. The review and analysis illuminate how innovations in robotic wheelchair research progressed and have been slow to translate into the marketplace.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sivashankar Sivakanthan
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jorge L Candiotti
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea S Sundaram
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jonathan A Duvall
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | | - Rosemarie Cooper
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shantanu Satpute
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rose L Turner
- Health Science Library System, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Rory A Cooper
- Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jain S, Argall B. Probabilistic Human Intent Recognition for Shared Autonomy in Assistive Robotics. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION 2020; 9. [PMID: 32426695 DOI: 10.1145/3359614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Effective human-robot collaboration in shared autonomy requires reasoning about the intentions of the human partner. To provide meaningful assistance, the autonomy has to first correctly predict, or infer, the intended goal of the human collaborator. In this work, we present a mathematical formulation for intent inference during assistive teleoperation under shared autonomy. Our recursive Bayesian filtering approach models and fuses multiple non-verbal observations to probabilistically reason about the intended goal of the user without explicit communication. In addition to contextual observations, we model and incorporate the human agent's behavior as goal-directed actions with adjustable rationality to inform intent recognition. Furthermore, we introduce a user-customized optimization of this adjustable rationality to achieve user personalization. We validate our approach with a human subjects study that evaluates intent inference performance under a variety of goal scenarios and tasks. Importantly, the studies are performed using multiple control interfaces that are typically available to users in the assistive domain, which differ in the continuity and dimensionality of the issued control signals. The implications of the control interface limitations on intent inference are analyzed. The study results show that our approach in many scenarios outperforms existing solutions for intent inference in assistive teleoperation, and otherwise performs comparably. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of probabilistic modeling and the incorporation of human agent behavior as goal-directed actions where the adjustable rationality model is user customized. Results further show that the underlying intent inference approach directly affects shared autonomy performance, as do control interface limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddarth Jain
- Northwestern University, USA and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, USA
| | - Brenna Argall
- Northwestern University, USA and Shirley Ryan AbilityLab, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alonso V, de la Puente P. System Transparency in Shared Autonomy: A Mini Review. Front Neurorobot 2018; 12:83. [PMID: 30555317 PMCID: PMC6284032 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2018.00083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
What does transparency mean in a shared autonomy framework? Different ways of understanding system transparency in human-robot interaction can be found in the state of the art. In one of the most common interpretations of the term, transparency is the observability and predictability of the system behavior, the understanding of what the system is doing, why, and what it will do next. Since the main methods to improve this kind of transparency are based on interface design and training, transparency is usually considered a property of such interfaces, while natural language explanations are a popular way to achieve transparent interfaces. Mechanical transparency is the robot capacity to follow human movements without human-perceptible resistive forces. Transparency improves system performance, helping reduce human errors, and builds trust in the system. One of the principles of user-centered design is to keep the user aware of the state of the system: a transparent design is a user-centered design. This article presents a review of the definitions and methods to improve transparency for applications with different interaction requirements and autonomy degrees, in order to clarify the role of transparency in shared autonomy, as well as to identify research gaps and potential future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Alonso
- ETSI Aeronáutica y del Espacio, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Paloma de la Puente
- ETSI Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Centre for Automation and Robotics, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeestraten MJA, Havoutis I, Calinon S. Programming by Demonstration for Shared Control With an Application in Teleoperation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2018. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2805105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
5
|
Argall BD. Autonomy in Rehabilitation Robotics: An Intersection. ANNUAL REVIEW OF CONTROL, ROBOTICS, AND AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS 2018; 1:441-463. [PMID: 34316543 PMCID: PMC8313033 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-control-061417-041727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Within the field of human rehabilitation, robotic machines are used both to rehabilitate the body and to perform functional tasks. Robotics autonomy able to perceive the external world and reason about high-level control decisions, however, seldom is present in these machines. For functional tasks in particular, autonomy could help to decrease the operational burden on the human and perhaps even to increase access-and this potential only grows as human motor impairments become more severe. There are however serious, and often subtle, considerations to introducing clinically-feasible robotics autonomy to rehabilitation robots and machines. Today the fields of robotics autonomy and rehabilitation robotics are largely separate. The topic of this article is at the intersection of these fields: the introduction of clinically-feasible autonomy solutions to rehabilitation robots, and opportunities for autonomy within the rehabilitation domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brenna D Argall
- McCormick School of Engineering and Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA, 60208
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (formerly the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago), Chicago, IL, USA, 60611
| |
Collapse
|