1
|
Göksu C, Gregersen F, Scheffler K, Eroğlu HH, Heule R, Siebner HR, Hanson LG, Thielscher A. Volumetric measurements of weak current-induced magnetic fields in the human brain at high resolution. Magn Reson Med 2023; 90:1874-1888. [PMID: 37392412 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) requires accurate knowledge of the injected current distribution in the brain. MR current density imaging (MRCDI) uses measurements of the TES-induced magnetic fields to provide this information. However, sufficient sensitivity and image quality in humans in vivo has only been documented for single-slice imaging. METHODS A recently developed, optimally spoiled, acquisition-weighted, gradient echo-based 2D-MRCDI method has now been advanced for volume coverage with densely or sparsely distributed slices: The 3D rectilinear sampling (3D-DENSE) and simultaneous multislice acquisition (SMS-SPARSE) were optimized and verified by cable-loop experiments and tested with 1-mA TES experiments for two common electrode montages. RESULTS Comparisons between the volumetric methods against the 2D-MRCDI showed that relatively long acquisition times of 3D-DENSE using a single slab with six slices hindered the expected sensitivity improvement in the current-induced field measurements but improved sensitivity by 61% in the Laplacian of the field, on which some MRCDI reconstruction methods rely. Also, SMS-SPARSE acquisition of three slices, with a factor 2 CAIPIRINHA (controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration) acceleration, performed best against the 2D-MRCDI with sensitivity improvements for the∆ B z , c $$ \Delta {B}_{z,c} $$ and Laplacian noise floors of 56% and 78% (baseline without current flow) as well as 43% and 55% (current injection into head). SMS-SPARSE reached a sensitivity of 67 pT for three distant slices at 2 × 2 × 3 mm3 resolution in 10 min of total scan time, and consistently improved image quality. CONCLUSION Volumetric MRCDI measurements with high sensitivity and image quality are well suited to characterize the TES field distribution in the human brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cihan Göksu
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Fróði Gregersen
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
- Sino-Danish Center for Education and Research, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Klaus Scheffler
- High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hasan H Eroğlu
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Rahel Heule
- High-Field Magnetic Resonance Center, Max-Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany
- Department of Biomedical Magnetic Resonance, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hartwig R Siebner
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Institute for Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lars G Hanson
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Axel Thielscher
- Danish Research Centre for Magnetic Resonance, Center for Functional and Diagnostic Imaging and Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Section for Magnetic Resonance, DTU Health Tech, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs Lyngby, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Beheshti M, Foomany FH, Magtibay K, Jaffray DA, Krishnan S, Nanthakumar K, Umapathy K. Noise distribution and denoising of current density images. J Med Imaging (Bellingham) 2015; 2:024005. [PMID: 26158100 PMCID: PMC4478962 DOI: 10.1117/1.jmi.2.2.024005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Accepted: 04/17/2015] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Current density imaging (CDI) is a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique that could be used to study current pathways inside the tissue. The current distribution is measured indirectly as phase changes. The inherent noise in the MR imaging technique degrades the accuracy of phase measurements leading to imprecise current variations. The outcome can be affected significantly, especially at a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We have shown the residual noise distribution of the phase to be Gaussian-like and the noise in CDI images approximated as a Gaussian. This finding matches experimental results. We further investigated this finding by performing comparative analysis with denoising techniques, using two CDI datasets with two different currents (20 and 45 mA). We found that the block-matching and three-dimensional (BM3D) technique outperforms other techniques when applied on current density ([Formula: see text]). The minimum gain in noise power by BM3D applied to [Formula: see text] compared with the next best technique in the analysis was found to be around 2 dB per pixel. We characterize the noise profile in CDI images and provide insights on the performance of different denoising techniques when applied at two different stages of current density reconstruction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammadali Beheshti
- Ryerson University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Farbod H. Foomany
- Ryerson University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Karl Magtibay
- Ryerson University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - David A. Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Hospital, Radiation Physics Department, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2M9, Canada
| | - Sridhar Krishnan
- Ryerson University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Kumaraswamy Nanthakumar
- Toronto General Hospital, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4, Canada
| | - Karthikeyan Umapathy
- Ryerson University, Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, 350 Victoria Street, Toronto, Ontario, M5B 2K3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|