Impact of the PPG sampling rate in the pulse rate variability indices evaluating several fiducial points in different pulse waveforms

The main aim of this work is to study the effect of the sampling rate of the photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal for pulse rate variability (PRV) analysis in the time and frequency domains, in stationary conditions. Forehead and finger PPG signals were recorded at 1000 Hz during a rest state, with red and infrared wavelengths, simultaneously with the electrocardiogram (ECG). The PPG sampling rate has been reduced by decimation, obtaining signals at 500 Hz, 250 Hz, 125 Hz, 100 Hz, 50 Hz and 25 Hz. Five fiducial points were computed: apex, up-slope, medium, line-medium and medium interpolate point. The medium point is located in the middle of the up-slope of the pulse. The medium interpolate point is a new proposal as fiducial point that consider the abrupt up-slope of the PPG pulse, so it can be recovered by linear interpolation when the sampling rate is reduced. The error performed in the temporal location of the fiducial points was computed. Pulse period time interval series were obtained from all PPG signals and fiducial points, and compared with the RR intervals obtained from the ECG. Heart rate variability and PRV signals were estimated and classical time and frequency domain indices were computed. The results showed that the medium interpolate point of the PPG pulse was the most accurate fiducial point under different PPG morphologies and sensor locations, when sampling rate was reduced. The error in the temporal location points and in the estimation of time and frequency indices was always lower when medium interpolate point was used for all considered sampling rates and for both signals, finger and forehead. The results also showed that the sampling rate of PPG signal can be reduced up to 100 Hz without causing significant changes in the time and frequency indices, when medium interpolate point was used as fiducial point. Therefore, the use of the medium interpolate point is recommended when working at low sampling rates.

Optimal fiducial points for pulse rate variability analysis from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic signals

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work is to evaluate and compare five fiducial points for the temporal location of each pulse wave from forehead and finger photoplethysmographic (PPG) pulse wave signals to perform pulse rate variability (PRV) analysis as a surrogate for heart rate variability (HRV) analysis.

APPROACH

Forehead and finger PPG signals were recorded during a tilt-table test simultaneously with the electrocardiogram (ECG). Artefacts were detected and removed and five fiducial points were computed: apex, middle-amplitude and foot points of the PPG signal, apex point of the first derivative signal and the intersection point of the tangent to the PPG waveform at the apex of the derivative PPG signal and the tangent to the foot of the PPG pulse, defined as the intersecting tangents method. Pulse period (PP) time interval series were obtained from both PPG signals and compared with the RR intervals obtained from the ECG. HRV and PRV signals were estimated and classical time and frequency domain indices were computed.

MAIN RESULTS

The middle-amplitude point of the PPG signal (n _M ), the apex point of the first derivative ([Formula: see text]), and the tangent intersection point (n _T ) are the most suitable fiducial points for PRV analysis, resulting in the lowest relative errors estimated between PRV and HRV indices and higher correlation coefficients and reliability indices. Statistically significant differences according to the Wilcoxon test between PRV and HRV signals were found for the apex and foot fiducial points of the PPG, as well as the lowest agreement between RR and PP series according to Bland-Altman analysis. Hence, these signals have been considered less accurate for variability analysis. In addition, the relative errors are significantly lower for n _M and [Formula: see text] using Friedman statistics with a Bonferroni multiple-comparison test, and we propose that n _M is the most accurate fiducial point. Based on our results, forehead PPG seems to provide more reliable information for a PRV assessment than finger PPG.

SIGNIFICANCE

The accuracy of the pulse wave detection depends on the morphology of the PPG. There is therefore a need to widely define the most accurate fiducial point for performing a PRV analysis under non-stationary conditions based on different PPG sensor locations and signal acquisition techniques.