Optimal FES parameters based on mechanomyographic efficiency index

A Tool to Select FES Parameters for chronic SCI

Functional electrical stimulation has been used in rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic spinal cord injury. When used correctly it is able to improve the well-being of patients. However, when the stimulus is not adequate it can accelerate the process of fatigue, reducing the time available for training the programmed motor activity. To optimize the configuration of the stimulatory parameters, we developed a tool capable of simulating the muscle strength performance in response to different stimulatory profiles. The tool was able to reproduce the behavior of motoneurons in chronic spinal cord injury and to estimate the muscular strength resulting from the application of different stimuli. We consider that this FES Simulator is a promising tool to design and simulate different profiles of electrical stimulation, optimizing the decision process of the stimulation parameters.

Fatigue in complete spinal cord injury and implications on total delay

The use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) to artificially restore movement in people with complete spinal cord injury (SCI) induces an accelerated process of muscle fatigue. Fatigue increases the time between the beginning of NMES and the onset of muscle force (Delay_TOT ). Understanding how much muscle fatigue affects the Delay_TOT in people with SCI could help in the design of closed-loop neuroprostheses that compensate for this delay, thus making the control system more stable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the extent of fatigue on Delay_TOT and peak force of the lower limbs in people with complete SCI. Fifteen men-young adults with complete SCI (paraplegia and tetraplegia) and stable health-participated in the experiment. Delay_TOT was defined as the time interval between the beginning of NMES application until the onset of muscle force. The electrical intensity of NMES applied was adjusted individually and consisted of the amplitude required to obtain a full extension of the knee (0°), considering the maximum electrically stimulated extension (MESE). Subsequently, 70% of the MESE was applied during the fatigue induction protocol. Significant differences were identified between the moments before and after the fatigue protocol, both for peak force (P ≤ .026) and Delay_TOT (P ≤ .001). The medians and interquartile range of the Delay_TOT were higher in postfatigue (199.0 ms) when compared to the moment before fatigue (146.5 ms). The medians and interquartile range of the peak force were higher in unfatigued lower limbs (0.43 kgf) when compared to the moment postfatigue (0.27 kgf). The results support the hypothesis that muscle fatigue influences the increase in Delay_TOT and decrease in force production in people with SCI. For future applications, the combined evaluation of the delay and force in SCI patients provides valuable feedback for NMES paradigms. The study will provide potentially critical muscle mechanical evidence for the investigation of the evolution of atrophy.