Lange L, Vaeggemose A, Kidmose P, Mikkelsen E, Uldbjerg N, Johansen P. Velocity and directionality of the electrohysterographic signal propagation.
PLoS One 2014;
9:e86775. [PMID:
24466235 PMCID:
PMC3897754 DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0086775]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 12/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
The initiation of treatment for women with threatening preterm labor requires effective distinction between true and false labor. The electrohysterogram (EHG) has shown great promise in estimating and classifying uterine activity. However, key issues remain unresolved and no clinically usable method has yet been presented using EHG. Recent studies have focused on the propagation velocity of the EHG signals as a potential discriminator between true and false labor. These studies have estimated the propagation velocity of individual spikes of the EHG signals. We therefore focus on estimating the propagation velocity of the entire EHG burst recorded during a contraction in two dimensions.
STUDY DESIGN
EHG measurements were performed on six women in active labor at term, and a total of 35 contractions were used for the estimation of propagation velocity. The measurements were performed using a 16-channel two-dimensional electrode grid. The estimates were calculated with a maximum-likelihood approach.
RESULTS
The estimated average propagation velocity was 2.18 (±0.68) cm/s. No single preferred direction of propagation was found.
CONCLUSION
The propagation velocities estimated in this study are similar to those reported in other studies but with a smaller intra- and inter-patient variation. Thus a potential tool has been established for further studies on true and false labor contractions.
Collapse