AIRWAY LABELING USING A HIDDEN MARKOV TREE MODEL

BranchLabelNet: Anatomical Human Airway Labeling Approach using a Dividing-and-Grouping Multi-Label Classification

Anatomical airway labeling is crucial for precisely identifying airways displaying symptoms such as constriction, increased wall thickness, and modified branching patterns, facilitating the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary ailments. This study introduces an innovative airway labeling methodology, BranchLabelNet, which accounts for the fractal nature of airways and inherent hierarchical branch nomenclature. In developing this methodology, branch-related parameters, including position vectors, generation levels, branch lengths, areas, perimeters, and more, are extracted from a dataset of 1000 chest computed tomography (CT) images. To effectively manage this intricate branch data, we employ an n-ary tree structure that captures the complicated relationships within the airway tree. Subsequently, we employ a divide-and-group deep learning approach for multi-label classification, streamlining the anatomical airway branch labeling process. Additionally, we address the challenge of class imbalance in the dataset by incorporating the Tomek Links algorithm to maintain model reliability and accuracy. Our proposed airway labeling method provides robust branch designations and achieves an impressive average classification accuracy of 95.94% across fivefold cross-validation. This approach is adaptable for addressing similar complexities in general multi-label classification problems within biomedical systems.

Geodesic Atlas-Based Labeling of Anatomical Trees: Application and Evaluation on Airways Extracted From CT

We present a fast and robust atlas-based algorithm for labeling airway trees, using geodesic distances in a geometric tree-space. Possible branch label configurations for an unlabeled airway tree are evaluated using distances to a training set of labeled airway trees. In tree-space, airway tree topology and geometry change continuously, giving a natural automatic handling of anatomical differences and noise. A hierarchical approach makes the algorithm efficient, assigning labels from the trachea and downwards. Only the airway centerline tree is used, which is relatively unaffected by pathology. The algorithm is evaluated on 80 segmented airway trees from 40 subjects at two time points, labeled by three medical experts each, testing accuracy, reproducibility and robustness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The accuracy of the algorithm is statistically similar to that of the experts and not significantly correlated with COPD severity. The reproducibility of the algorithm is significantly better than that of the experts, and negatively correlated with COPD severity. Evaluation of the algorithm on a longitudinal set of 8724 trees from a lung cancer screening trial shows that the algorithm can be used in large scale studies with high reproducibility, and that the negative correlation of reproducibility with COPD severity can be explained by missing branches, for instance due to segmentation problems in COPD patients. We conclude that the algorithm is robust to COPD severity given equally complete airway trees, and comparable in performance to that of experts in pulmonary medicine, emphasizing the suitability of the labeling algorithm for clinical use.