Optimal Classification of Respiratory Patterns From Manual Analyses Using Expectation-Maximization

Automatic unsupervised respiratory analysis of infant respiratory inductance plethysmography signals

Infants are at risk for potentially life-threatening postoperative apnea (POA). We developed an Automated Unsupervised Respiratory Event Analysis (AUREA) to classify breathing patterns obtained with dual belt respiratory inductance plethysmography and a reference using Expectation Maximization (EM). This work describes AUREA and evaluates its performance. AUREA computes six metrics and inputs them into a series of four binary k-means classifiers. Breathing patterns were characterized by normalized variance, nonperiodic power, instantaneous frequency and phase. Signals were classified sample by sample into one of 5 patterns: pause (PAU), movement (MVT), synchronous (SYB) and asynchronous (ASB) breathing, and unknown (UNK). MVT and UNK were combined as UNKNOWN. Twenty-one preprocessed records obtained from infants at risk for POA were analyzed. Performance was evaluated with a confusion matrix, overall accuracy, and pattern specific precision, recall, and F-score. Segments of identical patterns were evaluated for fragmentation and pattern matching with the EM reference. PAU exhibited very low normalized variance. MVT had high normalized nonperiodic power and low frequency. SYB and ASB had a median frequency of respectively, 0.76Hz and 0.71Hz, and a mode for phase of 4^o and 100^o. Overall accuracy was 0.80. AUREA confused patterns most often with UNKNOWN (25.5%). The pattern specific F-score was highest for SYB (0.88) and lowest for PAU (0.60). PAU had high precision (0.78) and low recall (0.49). Fragmentation was evident in pattern events <2s. In 75% of the EM pattern events >2s, 50% of the samples classified by AUREA had identical patterns. Frequency and phase for SYB and ASB were consistent with published values for synchronous and asynchronous breathing in infants. The low normalized variance in PAU, was consistent with published scoring rules for pediatric apnea. These findings support the use of AUREA to classify breathing patterns and warrant a future evaluation of clinically relevant respiratory events.