1
|
Haider A, Pigniczki M, Köhler MH, Fink M, Schardt M, Cichy Y, Zeh T, Haas L, Poguntke T, Jakobi M, Koch AW. Development of High-Fidelity Automotive LiDAR Sensor Model with Standardized Interfaces. SENSORS (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 22:7556. [PMID: 36236655 PMCID: PMC9572647 DOI: 10.3390/s22197556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
This work introduces a process to develop a tool-independent, high-fidelity, ray tracing-based light detection and ranging (LiDAR) model. This virtual LiDAR sensor includes accurate modeling of the scan pattern and a complete signal processing toolchain of a LiDAR sensor. It is developed as a functional mock-up unit (FMU) by using the standardized open simulation interface (OSI) 3.0.2, and functional mock-up interface (FMI) 2.0. Subsequently, it was integrated into two commercial software virtual environment frameworks to demonstrate its exchangeability. Furthermore, the accuracy of the LiDAR sensor model is validated by comparing the simulation and real measurement data on the time domain and on the point cloud level. The validation results show that the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of simulated and measured time domain signal amplitude is 1.7%. In addition, the MAPE of the number of points Npoints and mean intensity Imean values received from the virtual and real targets are 8.5% and 9.3%, respectively. To the author's knowledge, these are the smallest errors reported for the number of received points Npoints and mean intensity Imean values up until now. Moreover, the distance error derror is below the range accuracy of the actual LiDAR sensor, which is 2 cm for this use case. In addition, the proving ground measurement results are compared with the state-of-the-art LiDAR model provided by commercial software and the proposed LiDAR model to measure the presented model fidelity. The results show that the complete signal processing steps and imperfections of real LiDAR sensors need to be considered in the virtual LiDAR to obtain simulation results close to the actual sensor. Such considerable imperfections are optical losses, inherent detector effects, effects generated by the electrical amplification, and noise produced by the sunlight.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arsalan Haider
- IFM—Institute for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkersstrasse 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
- Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Marcell Pigniczki
- Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Maximilian Fink
- Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | | | - Yannik Cichy
- IPG Automotive GmbH, Bannwaldallee 60, 76185 Karlsruhe, Germany
| | - Thomas Zeh
- IFM—Institute for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkersstrasse 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
| | - Lukas Haas
- IFM—Institute for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkersstrasse 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
| | - Tim Poguntke
- IFM—Institute for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems and Connected Mobility, Kempten University of Applied Sciences, Junkersstrasse 1A, 87734 Benningen, Germany
| | - Martin Jakobi
- Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander W. Koch
- Institute for Measurement Systems and Sensor Technology, Technical University of Munich, Theresienstr. 90, 80333 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stepanas K, Williams J, Hernandez E, Ruetz F, Hines T. OHM: GPU Based Occupancy Map Generation. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2022. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2022.3196145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kazys Stepanas
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems Group (RASG), CSIRO, Pullenvale, QLD, Australia
| | - Jason Williams
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems Group (RASG), CSIRO, Pullenvale, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Fabio Ruetz
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems Group (RASG), CSIRO, Pullenvale, QLD, Australia
| | - Thomas Hines
- Robotics and Autonomous Systems Group (RASG), CSIRO, Pullenvale, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu Y, Zheng R, Liu M, Zhang S. CRMI: Confidence-Rich Mutual Information for Information-Theoretic Mapping. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2021. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2021.3093023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
5
|
Schaefer A, Luft L, Burgard W. DCT Maps: Compact Differentiable Lidar Maps Based on the Cosine Transform. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2018. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2794602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
6
|
Luft L, Schaefer A, Schubert T, Burgard W. Detecting Changes in the Environment Based on Full Posterior Distributions Over Real-Valued Grid Maps. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2018. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2018.2797317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
|