A hybrid classifier fusion approach for motor unit potential classification during EMG signal decomposition

Cross Comparison of Motor Unit Potential Features Used in EMG Signal Decomposition

Feature extraction is an important step of resolving an electromyographic (EMG) signal into its component motor unit potential trains, commonly known as EMG decomposition. Until now, different features have been used to represent motor unit potentials (MUPs) and improve decomposition processing time and accuracy, but a major limitation is that no systematic comparison of these features exists. In an EMG decomposition system, like any pattern recognition system, the features used for representing MUPs play an important role in the overall performance of the system. A cross comparison of the feature extraction methods used in EMG signal decomposition can assist in choosing the best features for representing MUPs and ultimately may improve EMG decomposition results. This paper presents a survey and cross comparison of these feature extraction methods. Decomposability index, classification accuracy of a -nearest neighbors classifier, and class-feature mutual information were employed for evaluating the discriminative power of various feature extraction techniques commonly used in the literature including time domain, morphological, frequency domain, and discrete wavelets. In terms of data, 45 simulated and 82 real EMG signals were used. Results showed that among time domain features, the first derivative of time samples exhibit the best separability. For morphological features, slope analysis provided the most discriminative power. Discrete Fourier transform coefficients offered the best separability among frequency domain features. However, neither morphological nor frequency domain techniques outperformed time domain features. The detail 4 coefficients in a discrete wavelets decomposition exceeded in evaluation measures when compared with other feature extraction techniques. Using principal component analysis slightly improved the results, but it is time consuming. Overall, considering computation time and discriminative ability, the first derivative of time samples might be efficient in representing MUPs in EMG decomposition and there is no need for sophisticated feature extraction methods.

Comparative Analysis of Wavelet-based Feature Extraction for Intramuscular EMG Signal Decomposition

BACKGROUND

Electromyographic (EMG) signal decomposition is the process by which an EMG signal is decomposed into its constituent motor unit potential trains (MUPTs). A major step in EMG decomposition is feature extraction in which each detected motor unit potential (MUP) is represented by a feature vector. As with any other pattern recognition system, feature extraction has a significant impact on the performance of a decomposition system. EMG decomposition has been studied well and several systems were proposed, but feature extraction step has not been investigated in detail.

OBJECTIVE

Several EMG signals were generated using a physiologically-based EMG signal simulation algorithm. For each signal, the firing patterns of motor units (MUs) provided by the simulator were used to extract MUPs of each MU. For feature extraction, different wavelet families including Daubechies (db), Symlets, Coiflets, bi-orthogonal, reverse bi-orthogonal and discrete Meyer were investigated. Moreover, the possibility of reducing the dimensionality of MUP feature vector is explored in this work. The MUPs represented using wavelet-domain features are transformed into a new coordinate system using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The features were evaluated regarding their capability in discriminating MUPs of individual MUs.

RESULTS

Extensive studies on different mother wavelet functions revealed that db2, coif1, sym5, bior2.2, bior4.4, and rbior2.2 are the best ones in differentiating MUPs of different MUs. The best results were achieved at the 4th detail coefficient. Overall, rbior2.2 outperformed all wavelet functions studied; nevertheless for EMG signals composed of more than 12 MUPTs, syms5 wavelet function is the best function. Applying PCA slightly enhanced the results.