1
|
Gueziri HE, Georgiopoulos M, Santaguida C, Collins DL. Ultrasound-based navigated pedicle screw insertion without intraoperative radiation: feasibility study on porcine cadavers. Spine J 2022; 22:1408-1417. [PMID: 35523390 DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2021] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Navigation systems for spinal fusion surgery rely on intraoperative computed tomography (CT) or fluoroscopy imaging. Both expose patient, surgeons and operating room staff to significant amounts of radiation. Alternative methods involving intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) imaging have recently shown promise for image-to-patient registration. Yet, the feasibility and safety of iUS navigation in spinal fusion have not been demonstrated. PURPOSE To evaluate the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in lumbar and thoracolumbar spinal fusion using a fully automated iUS navigation system. STUDY DESIGN Prospective porcine cadaver study. METHODS Five porcine cadavers were used to instrument the lumbar and thoracolumbar spine using posterior open surgery. During the procedure, iUS images were acquired and used to establish automatic registration between the anatomy and preoperative CT images. Navigation was performed with the preoperative CT using tracked instruments. The accuracy of the system was measured as the distance of manually collected points to the preoperative CT vertebral surface and compared against fiducial-based registration. A postoperative CT was acquired, and screw placements were manually verified. We report breach rates, as well as axial and sagittal screw deviations. RESULTS A total of 56 screws were inserted (5.50 mm diameter n=50, and 6.50 mm diameter n=6). Fifty-two screws were inserted safely without breach. Four screws (7.14%) presented a medial breach with an average deviation of 1.35±0.37 mm (all <2 mm). Two breaches were caused by 6.50 mm diameter screws, and two by 5.50 mm screws. For vertebrae instrumented with 5.50 mm screws, the average axial diameter of the pedicle was 9.29 mm leaving a 1.89 mm margin in the left and right pedicle. For vertebrae instrumented with 6.50 mm screws, the average axial diameter of the pedicle was 8.99 mm leaving a 1.24 mm error margin in the left and right pedicle. The average distance to the vertebral surface was 0.96 mm using iUS registration and 0.97 mm using fiducial-based registration. CONCLUSIONS We successfully implanted all pedicle screws in the thoracolumbar spine using the ultrasound-based navigation system. All breaches recorded were minor (<2 mm) and the breach rate (7.14%) was comparable to existing literature. More investigation is needed to evaluate consistency, reproducibility, and performance in surgical context. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE Intraoperative US-based navigation is feasible and practical for pedicle screw insertion in a porcine model. It might be used as a low-cost and radiation-free alternative to intraoperative CT and fluoroscopy in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houssem-Eddine Gueziri
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Miltiadis Georgiopoulos
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - D Louis Collins
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, McGill University, 3801 University St, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Patel MR, Jacob KC, Parsons AW, Chavez FA, Ribot MA, Munim MA, Vanjani NN, Pawlowski H, Prabhu MC, Singh K. Systematic Review: Applications of Intraoperative Ultrasound in Spinal Surgery. World Neurosurg 2022; 164:e45-e58. [PMID: 35259500 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to increased practicality and decreased costs and radiation, interest has risen for intraoperative ultrasound (iUS) in spinal surgery applications; however, few studies have provided a robust overview of its use in spinal surgery. We synthesize findings of existing literature on usage of iUS in navigation, pedicle screw placement, and identification of anatomy during spinal interventions. METHODS Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized in this systematic review. Studies were identified through PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases using the search string. Abstracts mentioning iUS in spine applications were included. Upon full-text review, exclusion criteria were implemented, including outdated studies or those with weak topic relevance or statistical power. Upon elimination of duplicates, multi-reviewer screening for eligibility, and citation search, 44 manuscripts were analyzed. RESULTS Navigation using iUS is safe, effective, and economical. iUS registration accuracy and success is within clinically acceptable limits for image-guided navigation (Table 2). Pedicle screw instrumentation with iUS is precise with a favorable safety profile (Table 2). Anatomical landmarks are reliably identified with iUS, and surgeons are overwhelmingly successful in neural or vascular tissue identification with iUS modalities including standard B mode, doppler, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE-US) (Table 3). iUS use in traumatic reduction of fractures properly identifies anatomical structures, intervertebral disc space, and vasculature (Table 3). CONCLUSION iUS eliminates radiation, decreases costs, and provides sufficient accuracy and reliability in identification of anatomical and neurovascular structures in various spinal surgery settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madhav R Patel
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Kevin C Jacob
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Alexander W Parsons
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Frank A Chavez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Max A Ribot
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Mohammed A Munim
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Nisheka N Vanjani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Hanna Pawlowski
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Michael C Prabhu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612
| | - Kern Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W. Harrison St. Suite #300, Chicago, IL, 60612.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gueziri HE, Santaguida C, Collins DL. The state-of-the-art in ultrasound-guided spine interventions. Med Image Anal 2020; 65:101769. [PMID: 32668375 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2020.101769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2019] [Revised: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
During the last two decades, intra-operative ultrasound (iUS) imaging has been employed for various surgical procedures of the spine, including spinal fusion and needle injections. Accurate and efficient registration of pre-operative computed tomography or magnetic resonance images with iUS images are key elements in the success of iUS-based spine navigation. While widely investigated in research, iUS-based spine navigation has not yet been established in the clinic. This is due to several factors including the lack of a standard methodology for the assessment of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability of the registration method. To address these issues, we present a systematic review of the state-of-the-art techniques for iUS-guided registration in spinal image-guided surgery (IGS). The review follows a new taxonomy based on the four steps involved in the surgical workflow that include pre-processing, registration initialization, estimation of the required patient to image transformation, and a visualization process. We provide a detailed analysis of the measurements in terms of accuracy, robustness, reliability, and usability that need to be met during the evaluation of a spinal IGS framework. Although this review is focused on spinal navigation, we expect similar evaluation criteria to be relevant for other IGS applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Houssem-Eddine Gueziri
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal (QC), Canada; McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada.
| | - Carlo Santaguida
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal (QC), Canada
| | - D Louis Collins
- McConnell Brain Imaging Center, Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Montreal (QC), Canada; McGill University, Montreal (QC), Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Ultrasound is a real-time, non-radiation-based imaging modality with an ability to acquire two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) data. Due to these capabilities, research has been carried out in order to incorporate it as an intraoperative imaging modality for various orthopedic surgery procedures. However, high levels of noise, different imaging artifacts, and bone surfaces appearing blurred with several mm in thickness have prohibited the widespread use of ultrasound as a standard of care imaging modality in orthopedics. In this chapter, we provided a detailed overview of numerous applications of 3D ultrasound in the domain of orthopedic surgery. Specifically, we discuss the advantages and disadvantages of methods proposed for segmentation and enhancement of bone ultrasound data and the successful application of these methods in clinical domain. Finally, a number of challenges are identified which need to be overcome in order for ultrasound to become a preferred imaging modality in orthopedics.
Collapse
|
5
|
A Novel Ultrasound-Based Lower Extremity Motion Tracking System. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2018; 1093:131-142. [PMID: 30306478 DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1396-7_11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Tracking joint motion of the lower extremity is important for human motion analysis. In this study, we present a novel ultrasound-based motion tracking system for measuring three-dimensional (3D) position and orientation of the femur and tibia in 3D space and quantifying tibiofemoral kinematics under dynamic conditions. As ultrasound is capable of detecting underlying bone surface noninvasively through multiple layers of soft tissues, an integration of multiple A-mode ultrasound transducers with a conventional motion tracking system provides a new approach to track the motion of bone segments during dynamic conditions. To demonstrate the technical and clinical feasibilities of this concept, an in vivo experiment was conducted. For this purpose the kinematics of healthy individuals were determined in treadmill walking conditions and stair descending tasks. The results clearly demonstrated the potential of tracking skeletal motion of the lower extremity and measuring six-degrees-of-freedom (6-DOF) tibiofemoral kinematics and related kinematic alterations caused by a variety of gait parameters. It was concluded that this prototyping system has great potential to measure human kinematics in an ambulant, non-radiative, and noninvasive manner.
Collapse
|