Utility of Transcranial Doppler in Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review of Cerebral Physiologic Metrics

Since its creation in the 1980s, transcranial Doppler (TCD) has provided a method of non-invasively monitoring cerebral physiology and has become an invaluable tool in neurocritical care. In this narrative review, we examine the role TCD has in the management of the moderate and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patient. We examine the principles of TCD and the ways in which it has been applied to gain insight into cerebral physiology following TBI, as well as explore the clinical evidence supporting these applications. Its usefulness as a tool to non-invasively determine intracranial pressure, detect post-traumatic vasospasm, predict patient outcome, and assess the state of cerebral autoregulation are all explored.

Impacts of a Pressure Challenge on Cerebral Critical Closing Pressure and Effective Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

INTRODUCTION

Cerebral critical closing pressure (CrCP) comprises intracranial pressure (ICP) and arteriolar wall tension (WT). It is the arterial blood pressure (ABP) at which small vessels close and circulation stops. We hypothesized that the increase in WT secondary to a systemic hypertensive challenge would lead to an increase in CrCP and that the "effective" cerebral perfusion pressure (CPPeff; calculated as ABP - CrCP) would give more complete information than the "conventional" cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP; calculated as ABP - ICP).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare CrCP, CPP, and CPPeff changes during a hypertensive challenge in patients with a severe traumatic brain injury.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on ABP, ICP, and cerebral blood flow velocity, measured by transcranial Doppler ultrasound, were acquired simultaneously for 30 min both basally and during a hypertensive challenge. An impedance-based CrCP model was used.

RESULTS

The following values are expressed as median (interquartile range). There were 11 patients, aged 29 (14) years. CPP increased from 73 (17) to 102 (26) mmHg (P ≤ 0.001). ICP did not change. CrCP changed from 23 (11) to 27 (10) mmHg (P ≤ 0.001). WT increased from 7 (5) to 11 (7) mmHg (P ˂ 0.005). CPPeff changed less than CPP.

CONCLUSION

The CPP change was greater than the CPPeff change, mainly because CrCP increased simultaneously with the WT increase as a result of the autoregulatory response. CPPeff provides information about the real driving force generating blood movement.