Prediction of Individual Knee Kinematics From an MRI Representation of the Articular Surfaces

The foot and ankle complex as a four degrees-of-freedom system: Kinematic coupling among the foot bones

Seventy-eight parameters are theoretically needed to describe the relative position and orientation of all the 14 bones in the foot and ankle with respect to a reference bone (foot posture). However, articular contacts and soft tissues introduce kinematic coupling, reducing the number of the foot degrees-of-freedom (DOF). This study aims at providing quantification and definition of these couplings. The foot posture was measured in vitro through a series of computed tomography scans, spanning the whole range of foot dorsi/plantar flexion and pronation/supination, also considering the effect of weightbearing. The envelope of foot postures was investigated by means of principal component analysis. The foot and ankle motion were well described with four principal sets of kinematic couplings, that is, synergies. One synergy covers the independent motion of the ankle, while three synergies describe the foot motion. The first foot synergy shows all the bones rotating approximatively about a common axis, mapping the foot abduction/adduction about the Chopart joint. The second foot synergy results in a spherical motion, whose center is located between lateral cuneiform and navicular bone, mapping the foot pronation/supination. The third foot synergy maps the opening of the foot arches during the load acceptance. The foot and ankle complex can thus be described as a four DOF system, whose motion is the result of the linear combination of four synergies. Significance: Synergies reveal the contribution of each bone to the three-dimensional foot posture, providing a compact representation of the motion of the foot and ankle complex, improving the comprehension of its physiology.

Modeling Musculoskeletal Dynamics during Gait: Evaluating the Best Personalization Strategy through Model Anatomical Consistency

No consensus exists on how to model human articulations within MSK models for the analysis of gait dynamics. We propose a method to evaluate joint models and we apply it to three models with different levels of personalization. The method evaluates the joint model’s adherence to the MSK hypothesis of negligible joint work by quantifying ligament and cartilage deformations resulting from joint motion; to be anatomically consistent, these deformations should be minimum. The contrary would require considerable external work to move the joint, violating a strong working hypothesis and raising concerns about the credibility of the MSK outputs. Gait analysis and medical resonance imaging (MRI) from ten participants were combined to build lower limb subject-specific MSK models. MRI-reconstructed anatomy enabled three levels of personalization using different ankle joint models, in which motion corresponded to different ligament elongation and cartilage co-penetration. To estimate the impact of anatomical inconsistency in MSK outputs, joint internal forces resulting from tissue deformations were computed for each joint model and MSK simulations were performed ignoring or considering their contribution. The three models differed considerably for maximum ligament elongation and cartilage co-penetration (between 5.94 and 50.69% and between −0.53 and −5.36 mm, respectively). However, the model dynamic output from the gait simulations were similar. When accounting for the internal forces associated with tissue deformation, outputs changed considerably, the higher the personalization level the smaller the changes. Anatomical consistency provides a solid method to compare different joint models. Results suggest that consistency grows with personalization, which should be tailored according to the research question. A high level of anatomical consistency is recommended when individual specificity and the behavior of articular structures is under investigation.