Design and Preliminary Assessment of a Passive Elastic Leg Exoskeleton for Resistive Gait Rehabilitation

Can a passive unilateral hip exosuit diminish walking asymmetry? A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Asymmetric walking gait impairs activities of daily living in neurological patient populations, increases their fall risk, and leads to comorbidities. Accessible, long-term rehabilitation methods are needed to help neurological patients restore symmetrical walking patterns. This study aimed to determine if a passive unilateral hip exosuit can modify an induced asymmetric walking gait pattern. We hypothesized that a passive hip exosuit would diminish initial- and post-split-belt treadmill walking after-effects in healthy young adults.

METHODS

We divided 15 healthy young adults evenly between three experimental groups that each completed a baseline trial, an adaptation period with different interventions for each group, and a post-adaptation trial. To isolate the contribution of the exosuit we compared a group adapting to the exosuit and split-belt treadmill (Exo-Sb) to groups adapting to exosuit-only (Exo-only) and split-belt only (Sb-only) conditions. The independent variables step length, stance time, and swing time symmetry were analyzed across five timepoints (baseline, early- and late adaptation, and early- and late post-adaptation) using a 3 × 5 mixed ANOVA.

RESULTS

We found significant interaction and time effects on step length, stance time and swing time symmetry. Sb-only produced increased step length asymmetry at early adaptation compared to baseline (p < 0.0001) and an after-effect with increased asymmetry at early post-adaptation compared to baseline (p < 0.0001). Exo-only increased step length asymmetry (in the opposite direction as Sb-only) at early adaptation compared to baseline (p = 0.0392) but did not influence the participants sufficiently to result in a post-effect. Exo-Sb produced similar changes in step length asymmetry in the same direction as Sb-only (p = 0.0014). However, in contrast to Sb-only there was no significant after-effect between early post-adaptation and baseline (p = 0.0885).

CONCLUSION

The passive exosuit successfully diminished asymmetrical step length after-effects induced by the split-belt treadmill in Exo-Sb. These results support the passive exosuit's ability to alter walking gait patterns.

Functional Resistance Training With Viscous and Elastic Devices: Does Resistance Type Acutely Affect Knee Function?

OBJECTIVE

Functional resistance training (FRT) during walking is an emerging approach for rehabilitating individuals with neuromuscular or orthopedic injuries. During FRT, wearable exoskeleton/braces can target resistance to a weakened leg joint; however, the resistive properties of the training depend on the type of resistive elements used in the device. Hence, this study was designed to examine how the biomechanical and neural effects of functional resistance training differ with viscous and elastic resistances during both treadmill and overground walking.

METHODS

Fourteen able-bodied individuals were trained on two separate sessions with two devices that provided resistance to the knee (viscous and elastic) while walking on a treadmill. We measured gait biomechanics and muscle activation during training, as well as kinematic aftereffects and changes in peripheral fatigue and neural excitability after training.

RESULTS

We found the resistance type differentially altered gait kinetics during training-elastic resistance increased knee extension during stance while viscous resistance primarily affected swing. Also, viscous resistance increased power generation while elastic resistance could increase power absorption. Both devices resulted in significant kinematic and neural aftereffects. However, overground kinematic aftereffects and neural excitability did not differ between devices.

CONCLUSION

Different resistance types can be used to alter gait biomechanics during training. While there were no resistance-specific changes in acute neural adaptation following training, it is still possible that prolonged and repeated training could produce differential effects.

SIGNIFICANCE

Resistance type alters the kinetics of functional resistance training. Prolonged and repeated training sessions on patients will be needed to further measure the effects of these devices.

Improving Ankle Muscle Recruitment via Plantar Pressure Biofeedback during Robot Resisted Gait Training in Cerebral Palsy

Neurological impairment from stroke or cerebral palsy often presents with diminished ankle plantar flexor function during the propulsive phase of gait. This deficit often results in slow, energy-expensive walking patterns that limit community mobility. Robotic gait training interventions may prove effective in improving functional outcomes, including exoskeleton resistance used to provide targeted neuromuscular recruitment. However, these interventions to date have required regular verbal cues and coaching for proper plantar flexor engagement with resistance, particularly for pediatric applications. In this validation study, we sought to address the need for automating and improving the effectiveness of facilitating user engagement with robotic resistance. Specifically, our main goal was to compare changes in plantar flexor activity between walking with plantar flexor resistance alone vs plantar flexor resistance combined with plantar pressure biofeedback in individuals with cerebral palsy. We recruited 8 ambulatory adolescents with cerebral palsy between the ages of 11-18 years old to participate in this cross-sectional feasibility study. Supporting our hypothesis, we observed a 36 ± 36% and 46 ± 39% increase in mean and peak soleus activity, respectively, between resistance plus biofeedback vs resistance alone (both p < 0.05). Compared to other biofeedback sensing modalities like assessment of muscle activity via surface electrodes, integrating the plantar pressure-based system within the wearable robotic devices minimizes barriers to clinical implementation by reducing cost, complexity, and setup time. With these positive feasibility results, our future work will explore longer-term training effects of ankle resistance combined with plantar pressure biofeedback.

Functional Resistance Training Differentially Alters Gait Kinetics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Quadriceps weakness is common after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and can alter gait mechanics. Functional resistance training (FRT) is a novel approach to retraining strength after injury, but it is unclear how it alters gait mechanics. Therefore, we tested how 3 different types of FRT devices: a knee brace resisting extension (unidirectional brace), a knee brace resisting extension and flexion (bidirectional brace), and an elastic band pulling backwards on the ankle (elastic band)-acutely alter gait kinetics in this population.

HYPOTHESIS

The type of FRT device will affect ground-reaction forces (GRFs) during and after the training. Specifically, the uni- and bidirectional braces will increase GRFs when compared with the elastic band.

STUDY DESIGN

Crossover study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

METHODS

A total of 15 individuals with ACL reconstruction received FRT with each device over 3 separate randomized sessions. During training, participants walked on a treadmill while performing a tracking task with visual feedback. Sessions contained 5 training trials (180 seconds each) with rest between. Vertical and anterior-posterior GRFs were assessed on the ACL-reconstructed leg before, during, and after training. Changes in GRFs were compared across devices using 1-dimensional statistical parametric mapping.

RESULTS

Resistance applied via bidirectional brace acutely increased gait kinetics during terminal stance/pre-swing (ie, push-off), while resistance applied via elastic band acutely increased gait kinetics during initial contact/loading (ie, braking). Both braces behaved similarly, but the unidirectional brace was less effective for increasing push-off GRFs.

CONCLUSION

FRT after ACL reconstruction can acutely alter gait kinetics during training. Devices can be applied to selectively alter gait kinetics. However, the long-term effects of FRT after ACL reconstruction with these devices are still unknown.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

FRT may be applied to alter gait kinetics of the involved limb after ACL reconstruction, depending on the device used.

Functional resistance training methods for targeting patient-specific gait deficits: A review of devices and their effects on muscle activation, neural control, and gait mechanics

BACKGROUND

Injuries to the neuromusculoskeletal system often result in weakness and gait impairments. Functional resistance training during walking-where patients walk while a device increases loading on the leg-is an emerging approach to combat these symptoms. However, there are many methods that can be used to resist the patient, which may alter the biomechanics of the training. Thus, all methods may not address patient-specific deficits.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive electronic database search to identify articles that acutely (i.e., after a single training session) examined how functional resistance training during walking alters muscle activation, gait biomechanics, and neural plasticity. Only articles that examined these effects during training or following the removal of resistance (i.e., aftereffects) were included.

FINDINGS

We found 41 studies that matched these criteria. Most studies (24) used passive devices (e.g., weighted cuffs or resistance bands) while the remainder used robotic devices. Devices varied on if they were wearable (14) or externally tethered, and the type of resistance they applied (i.e., inertial [14], elastic [8], viscous [7], or customized [12]). Notably, these methods provided device-specific changes in muscle activation, biomechanics, and spatiotemporal and kinematic aftereffects. Some evidence suggests this training results in task-specific increases in neural excitability.

INTERPRETATION

These findings suggest that careful selection of resistive strategies could help target patient-specific strength deficits and gait impairments. Also, many approaches are low-cost and feasible for clinical or in-home use. The results provide new insights for clinicians on selecting an appropriate functional resistance training strategy to target patient-specific needs.

Unilateral non-electric assistive walking device helps neurological and orthopedic patients to improve gait patterns

BACKGROUND

Pathological gait patterns are common in neurological and orthopedic patients. These put them at risk of falling and restrict their autonomy and social participation. Novel assistive walking devices are designed to actively support physiological gait patterns by means of motor guidance and mechanical support of the lower limbs.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Does a non-electric assistive walking device powered by a cam-spring mechanism (aLQ, Imasen) improve or otherwise affect pathological gait patterns in neurological and orthopedic patients?

METHODS

A three-dimensional instrumented gait analysis was conducted on a treadmill (quasar, hp cosmos) using spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic data obtained from synchronized motion capturing (Miqus M3, Qualisys), surface EMG (sEMG; Ultium, Noraxon), and pressure distribution measurements (FMD-T, Zebris). Participants with impaired walking were tested in a randomized repeated measures design (assisted/unassisted; at preferred/fast speed) and analyzed with regard to their medical condition (orthopedic or neurological group, n = 20 each).

RESULTS

In both groups, participants showed a significant increase of step length and decrease of cadence during assisted walking compared to baseline. Immediate kinematic effects included enhanced sagittal hip flexion but reduced extension. On the contrary, knee joint angles and muscle activity of M. gastrocnemius and M. rectus femoris seemed to be unaffected by the aLQ device.

SIGNIFICANCE

Participants appear to benefit from the assistive walking device regarding gait and movement patterns, which suggests that the tested device may help to improve patients' functional health status and quality of life. Activities of daily living (ADLs) that involve extensive hip flexion like stairs or curb climbing are promising applications. We propose the implementation of an invertible cam-spring that provides an additional resistance training option.

Ankle resistance with a unilateral soft exosuit increases plantarflexor effort during pushoff in unimpaired individuals

Background

Ankle-targeting resistance training for improving plantarflexion function during walking increases rehabilitation intensity, an important factor for motor recovery after stroke. However, understanding of the effects of resisting plantarflexion during stance on joint kinetics and muscle activity—key outcomes in evaluating its potential value in rehabilitation—remains limited. This initial study uses a unilateral exosuit that resists plantarflexion during mid-late stance in unimpaired individuals to test the hypotheses that when plantarflexion is resisted, individuals would (1) increase plantarflexor ankle torque and muscle activity locally at the resisted ipsilateral ankle, but (2) at higher forces, exhibit a generalized response that also uses the unresisted joints and limb. Further, we expected (3) short-term retention into gait immediately after removal of resistance.

Methods

Ten healthy young adults walked at 1.25 m s⁻¹ for four 10-min discrete bouts, each comprising baseline, exposure to active exosuit-applied resistance, and post-active sections. In each bout, a different force magnitude was applied based on individual baseline ankle torques. The peak resistance torque applied by the exosuit was 0.13 ± 0.01, 0.19 ± 0.01, 0.26 ± 0.02, and 0.32 ± 0.02 N m kg⁻¹, in the LOW, MED, HIGH, and MAX bouts, respectively.

Results

(1) Across all bouts, participants increased peak ipsilateral biological ankle torque by 0.13–0.25 N m kg⁻¹ (p < 0.001) during exosuit-applied resistance compared to corresponding baselines. Additionally, ipsilateral soleus activity during stance increased by 5.4–11.3% (p < 0.05) in all but the LOW bout. (2) In the HIGH and MAX bouts, vertical ground reaction force decreased on the ipsilateral limb while increasing on the contralateral limb (p < 0.01). Secondary analysis found that the force magnitude that maximized increases in biological ankle torque without significant changes in limb loading varied by subject. (3) Finally, peak ipsilateral plantarflexion angle increased significantly during post-exposure in the intermediate HIGH resistance bout (p < 0.05), which corresponded to the greatest average increase in soleus activity (p > 0.10).

Conclusions

Targeted resistance of ankle plantarflexion during stance by an exosuit consistently increased local ipsilateral plantarflexor effort during active resistance, but force magnitude will be an important parameter to tune for minimizing the involvement of the unresisted joints and limb during training.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12984-021-00966-5.