Hybrid Predictive Model for Lifting by Integrating Skeletal Motion Prediction with an OpenSim Musculoskeletal Model

Study on Static Biomechanical Model of Whole Body Based on Virtual Human

Material handling tasks often lead to skeletal injury of workers. The whole-body static biomechanical modeling method based on virtual humans is the theoretical basis for analyzing the human factor index in the lifting process. This paper focuses on the study of humans' body static biomechanical model for virtual human ergonomics analysis: First, the whole-body static biomechanical model is constructed, which calculates the biomechanical data such as force and moment, average strength, and maximum hand load at human joints. Secondly, the prototype model test system is developed, and the real experiment environment is set up with the inertial motion capture system. Finally, the model reliability verification experiment and application simulation experiment are designed. The comparison results with the industrial ergonomic software show that the model is consistent with the output of the industrial ergonomic software, which proves the reliability of the model. The simulation results show that under the same load, the maximum joint load and the maximum hand load are strongly related to the working posture, and the working posture should be adjusted to adapt to the load. Upright or bent legs have less influence on the maximum load capacity of the hand. Lower hand load capacity is due to forearm extension, and the upper arm extension greatly reduces the load capacity of the hand. Compared with a one-handed load, the two-handed load has a greater load capacity.

Estimation of lower back muscle force in a lifting task using wearable IMUs

Low back pain is commonly reported in occupational settings due to factors such as heavy lifting and poor ergonomic practices, often resulting in significant healthcare expenses and lowered productivity. Assessment tools for human motion and ergonomic risk at the workplace are still limited. Therefore, this study aimed to assess lower back muscle and joint reaction forces in laboratory conditions using wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) during weight lifting, a frequently high-risk workplace task. Ten able-bodied participants were instructed to lift a 28 lbs. box while surface electromyography sensors, IMUs, and a camera-based motion capture system recorded their muscle activity and body motion. The data recorded by IMUs and motion capture system were used to estimate lower back muscle and joint reaction forces via musculoskeletal modeling. Lower back muscle patterns matched well with electromyography recordings. The normalized mean absolute differences between muscle forces estimated based on measurements of IMUs and cameras were less than 25 %, and the statistical parametric mapping results indicated no significant difference between the forces estimated by both systems. However, abrupt changes in motion, such as lifting initiation, led to significant differences (p < 0.05) between the muscle forces. Furthermore, the maximum L5-S1 joint reaction force estimated using IMU data was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than those estimated by cameras during weight lifting and lowering. The study showed how kinematic errors from IMUs propagated through the musculoskeletal model and affected the estimations of muscle forces and joint reaction forces. Our findings showed the potential of IMUs for in-field ergonomic risk evaluations.

Multi-phase optimisation model predicts manual lifting motions with less reliance on experiment-based posture data

Optimisation-based predictive models are widely-used to explore the lifting strategies. Existing models incorporated empirical subject-specific posture constraints to improve the prediction accuracy. However, over-reliance on these constraints limits the application of predictive models. This paper proposed a multi-phase optimisation method (MPOM) for two-dimensional sagittally symmetric semi-squat lifting prediction, which decomposes the complete lifting task into three phases-the initial posture, the final posture, and the dynamic lifting phase. The first two phases are predicted with force- and stability-related strategies, and the last phase is predicted with a smoothing-related objective. Box-lifting motions of different box initial heights were collected for validation. The results show that MPOM has better or similar accuracy than the traditional single-phase optimisation (SPOM) of minimum muscular utilisation ratio, and MPOM reduces the reliance on experimental data. MPOM offers the opportunity to improve accuracy at the expense of efforts to determine appropriate weightings in the posture prediction phases. Practitioner summary: Lifting optimisation models are useful to predict and explore the human motion strategies. Existing models rely on empirical subject-specific posture constraints, which limit their applications. A multi-phase model for lifting motion prediction was constructed. This model could accurately predict 2D lifting motions with less reliance on these constraints.

A Method of Predicting Posture-related Pain Using Biomechanical Parameters for Patients with Lumbar Spinal Disc Herniation

Lumbar spinal disc herniation is a disease in which the protruding nucleus pulposus presses on the nerve due to actions that place loads on the disc, causing pain in the lower back and lower limbs. About 80% of treatments of disc herniation are conservative treatments, and although it is necessary to live with pain for a long time, there have been no studies that clearly define the relationship between pain and biomechanical parameters. In this study, we proposed a method of identifying biomechanical parameters that predict posture-related pain in patients with lumbar spinal disc herniation. The pain values were quantitatively evaluated by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and the biomechanical parameters were analyzed by OpenSim. Lasso regression was performed to narrow down the biomechanical parameters that were related to pain and derive the mathematical model of the relationship. Therefore, many of the parameters of the obtained mathematical model were related to the lumbar spine and were consistent with areas that be related to lumbar spinal disc herniation.

Hybrid musculoskeletal model-based 3D asymmetric lifting prediction and comparison with symmetric lifting

In this study, a 3D asymmetric lifting motion is predicted by using a hybrid predictive model to prevent potential musculoskeletal lower back injuries for asymmetric lifting tasks. The hybrid model has two modules: a skeletal module and an OpenSim musculoskeletal module. The skeletal module consists of a dynamic joint strength based 40 degrees of freedom spatial skeletal model. The skeletal module can predict the lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of pressure (COP) trajectory using an inverse dynamics-based motion optimization method. The musculoskeletal module consists of a 324-muscle-actuated full-body lumbar spine model. Based on the predicted kinematics, GRFs and COP data from the skeletal module, the musculoskeletal module estimates muscle activations using static optimization and joint reaction forces through the joint reaction analysis tool in OpenSim. The predicted asymmetric motion and GRFs are validated with experimental data. Muscle activation results between the simulated and experimental EMG are also compared to validate the model. Finally, the shear and compression spine loads are compared to NIOSH recommended limits. The differences between asymmetric and symmetric liftings are also compared.

Optimization-based biomechanical lifting models for manual material handling: A comprehensive review

Lifting is a main task for manual material handling (MMH), and it is also associated with lower back pain. There are many studies in the literature on predicting lifting strategies, optimizing lifting motions, and reducing lower back injury risks. This survey focuses on optimization-based biomechanical lifting models for MMH. The models can be classified as two-dimensional and three-dimensional models, as well as skeletal and musculoskeletal models. The optimization formulations for lifting simulations with various cost functions and constraints are reviewed. The corresponding equations of motion and sensitivity analysis are briefly summarized. Different optimization algorithms are utilized to solve the lifting optimization problem, such as sequential quadratic programming, genetic algorithm, and particle swarm optimization. Finally, the applications of the optimization-based lifting models to digital human modeling which refers to modeling and simulation of humans in a virtual environment, back injury prevention, and ergonomic safety design are summarized.

OpenColab project: OpenSim in Google colaboratory to explore biomechanics on the web

OpenSim is an open-source biomechanical package with a variety of applications. It is available for many users with bindings in MATLAB, Python, and Java via its application programming interfaces (APIs). Although the developers described well the OpenSim installation on different operating systems (Windows, Mac, and Linux), it is time-consuming and complex since each operating system requires a different configuration. This project aims to demystify the development of neuro-musculoskeletal modeling in OpenSim with zero configuration on any operating system for installation (thus cross-platform), easy to share models while accessing free graphical processing units (GPUs) on a web-based platform of Google Colab. To achieve this, OpenColab was developed where OpenSim source code was used to build a Conda package that can be installed on the Google Colab with only one block of code in less than 7 min. To use OpenColab, one requires a connection to the internet and a Gmail account. Moreover, OpenColab accesses vast libraries of machine learning methods available within free Google products, e.g. TensorFlow. Next, we performed an inverse problem in biomechanics and compared OpenColab results with OpenSim graphical user interface (GUI) for validation. The outcomes of OpenColab and GUI matched well (r≥0.82). OpenColab takes advantage of the zero-configuration of cloud-based platforms, accesses GPUs, and enables users to share and reproduce modeling approaches for further validation, innovative online training, and research applications. Step-by-step installation processes and examples are available at: https://simtk.org/projects/opencolab.