The deep hip muscles are unlikely to contribute to hip stability in the sagittal plane during walking: a stiffness approach

Joint contact forces during semi-recumbent seated cycling

Semi-recumbent cycling performed from a wheelchair is a popular rehabilitation exercise following spinal cord injury (SCI) and is often paired with functional electrical stimulation. However, biomechanical assessment of this cycling modality is lacking, even in unimpaired populations, hindering the development of personalised and safe rehabilitation programs for those with SCI. This study developed a computational pipeline to determine lower limb kinematics, kinetics, and joint contact forces (JCF) in 11 unimpaired participants during voluntary semi-recumbent cycling using a rehabilitation ergometer. Two cadences (40 and 60 revolutions per minute) and three crank powers (15 W, 30 W, and 45 W) were assessed. A rigid body model of a rehabilitation ergometer was combined with a calibrated electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model to determine JCF at the hip, knee, and ankle. Joint excursions remained consistent across all cadence and powers, but joint moments and JCF differed between 40 and 60 revolutions per minute, with peak JCF force significantly greater at 40 compared to 60 revolutions per minute for all crank powers. Poor correlations were found between mean crank power and peak JCF across all joints. This study provides foundation data and computational methods to enable further evaluation and optimisation of semi-recumbent cycling for application in rehabilitation after SCI and other neurological disorders.

Hip Contact Forces During Sprinting in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

PURPOSE

Sprinting often provokes hip pain in individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Asphericity of the femoral head-neck junction (cam morphology) characteristic of FAIS can increase the risk of anterior-superior acetabular cartilage damage. This study aimed to 1) compare hip contact forces (magnitude and direction) during sprinting between individuals with FAIS, asymptomatic cam morphology (CAM), and controls without cam morphology, and 2) identify the phases of sprinting with high levels of anteriorly directed hip contact forces.

METHODS

Forty-six recreationally active individuals with comparable levels of physical activity were divided into three groups (FAIS, 14; CAM, 15; control, 17) based on their history of hip/groin pain, results of clinical impingement tests, and presence of cam morphology (alpha angle >55°). Three-dimensional marker trajectories, ground reaction forces, and electromyograms from 12 lower-limb muscles were recorded during 10-m overground sprinting trials. A linearly scaled electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model was used to calculate hip contact force magnitude (resultant, anterior-posterior, inferior-superior, medio-lateral) and angle (sagittal and frontal planes). Between-group comparisons were made using two-sample t -tests via statistical parametric mapping ( P < 0.05).

RESULTS

No significant differences in magnitude or direction of hip contact forces were observed between FAIS and CAM or between FAIS and control groups during any phase of the sprint cycle. The highest anteriorly directed hip contact forces were observed during the initial swing phase of the sprint cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Hip contact forces during sprinting do not differentiate recreationally active individuals with FAIS from asymptomatic individuals with and without cam morphology. Hip loading during early swing, where peak anterior loading occurs, may be a potential mechanism for cartilage damage during sprinting-related sports in individuals with FAIS and/or asymptomatic cam morphology.

Video-driven simulation of lower limb mechanical loading during aquatic exercises

Understanding the mechanical demands of an exercise on the musculoskeletal system is crucial to prescribe effective training or therapeutic interventions. Yet, that knowledge is currently limited in water, mostly because of the difficulty in evaluating external resistance. Here I reconcile recent advances in 3D markerless pose and mesh estimation, biomechanical simulations, and hydrodynamic modeling, to predict lower limb mechanical loading during aquatic exercises. Simulations are driven exclusively from a single video. Fluid forces were estimated within 12.5±4.1% of the peak forces determined through computational fluid dynamics analyses, at a speed three orders of magnitude greater. In silico hip and knee resultant joint forces agreed reasonably well with in vivo instrumented implant recordings (R²=0.74) downloaded from the OrthoLoad database, both in magnitude (RMSE =251±125 N) and direction (cosine similarity = 0.92±0.09). Hip flexors, glutes, adductors, and hamstrings were the main contributors to hip joint compressive forces (40.4±12.7%, 25.6±9.7%, 14.2±4.8%, 13.0±8.2%, respectively), while knee compressive forces were mostly produced by the gastrocnemius (39.1±15.9%) and vasti (29.4±13.7%). Unlike dry-land locomotion, non-hip- and non-knee-spanning muscles provided little to no offloading effect via dynamic coupling. This noninvasive method has the potential to standardize the reporting of exercise intensity, inform the design of rehabilitation protocols and improve their reproducibility.