Drug Selection via Joint Push and Learning to Rank

Trust me if you can: a survey on reliability and interpretability of machine learning approaches for drug sensitivity prediction in cancer

With the ever-increasing number of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, mitigating risks associated with their use has become one of the most urgent scientific and societal issues. To this end, the European Union passed the EU AI Act, proposing solution strategies that can be summarized under the umbrella term trustworthiness. In anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction, machine learning (ML) methods are developed for application in medical decision support systems, which require an extraordinary level of trustworthiness. This review offers an overview of the ML landscape of methods for anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction, including a brief introduction to the four major ML realms (supervised, unsupervised, semi-supervised, and reinforcement learning). In particular, we address the question to what extent trustworthiness-related properties, more specifically, interpretability and reliability, have been incorporated into anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction methods over the previous decade. In total, we analyzed 36 papers with approaches for anti-cancer drug sensitivity prediction. Our results indicate that the need for reliability has hardly been addressed so far. Interpretability, on the other hand, has often been considered for model development. However, the concept is rather used intuitively, lacking clear definitions. Thus, we propose an easily extensible taxonomy for interpretability, unifying all prevalent connotations explicitly or implicitly used within the field.

Improving Anticancer Drug Selection and Prioritization via Neural Learning to Rank

Personalized cancer treatment requires a thorough understanding of complex interactions between drugs and cancer cell lines in varying genetic and molecular contexts. To address this, high-throughput screening has been used to generate large-scale drug response data, facilitating data-driven computational models. Such models can capture complex drug-cell line interactions across various contexts in a fully data-driven manner. However, accurately prioritizing the most effective drugs for each cell line still remains a significant challenge. To address this, we developed multiple neural ranking approaches that leverage large-scale drug response data across multiple cell lines from diverse cancer types. Unlike existing approaches that primarily utilize regression and classification techniques for drug response prediction, we formulated the objective of drug selection and prioritization as a drug ranking problem. In this work, we proposed multiple pairwise and listwise neural ranking methods that learn latent representations of drugs and cell lines and then use those representations to score drugs in each cell line via a learnable scoring function. Specifically, we developed neural pairwise and listwise ranking methods, Pair-PushC and List-One on top of the existing methods, pLETORg and ListNet, respectively. Additionally, we proposed a novel listwise ranking method, List-All, that focuses on all the effective drugs instead of the top effective drug, unlike List-One. We also provide an exhaustive empirical evaluation with state-of-the-art regression and ranking baselines on large-scale data sets across multiple experimental settings. Our results demonstrate that our proposed ranking methods mostly outperform the best baselines with significant improvements of as much as 25.6% in terms of selecting truly effective drugs within the top 20 predicted drugs (i.e., hit@20) across 50% test cell lines. Furthermore, our analyses suggest that the learned latent spaces from our proposed methods demonstrate informative clustering structures and capture relevant underlying biological features. Moreover, our comprehensive evaluation provides a thorough and objective comparison of the performance of different methods (including our proposed ones).

Machine Learning for Pharmacogenomics and Personalized Medicine: A Ranking Model for Drug Sensitivity Prediction

It is infeasible to test many different chemotherapy drugs on actual patients in large clinical trials, which motivates computational methods with the ability to learn and exploit associations between drug effectiveness and patient characteristics. This work proposes a machine learning approach to infer robust predictors of drug responses from patient genomic information. Rather than predicting the exact drug response on a given cell line, we introduce an elastic-net regression methodology to compare a drug-cell line pair against an alternative pair. Using predicted pairwise comparisons we rank the effectiveness of different drugs on the same cell line. A total of 173 cell lines and 100 drug responses were used in various settings for training and testing the proposed models. By comparing our approach against twelve baseline methods, we demonstrate that it outperforms the state-of-the-art methods in the literature. In contrast to most other methods, the algorithm is able to maintain its high performance even when we use a large number of drugs and few cell lines.

Application of learning to rank in bioinformatics tasks

Over the past decades, learning to rank (LTR) algorithms have been gradually applied to bioinformatics. Such methods have shown significant advantages in multiple research tasks in this field. Therefore, it is necessary to summarize and discuss the application of these algorithms so that these algorithms are convenient and contribute to bioinformatics. In this paper, the characteristics of LTR algorithms and their strengths over other types of algorithms are analyzed based on the application of multiple perspectives in bioinformatics. Finally, the paper further discusses the shortcomings of the LTR algorithms, the methods and means to better use the algorithms and some open problems that currently exist.

Cognitive biomarker prioritization in Alzheimer's Disease using brain morphometric data

BACKGROUND

Cognitive assessments represent the most common clinical routine for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Given a large number of cognitive assessment tools and time-limited office visits, it is important to determine a proper set of cognitive tests for different subjects. Most current studies create guidelines of cognitive test selection for a targeted population, but they are not customized for each individual subject. In this manuscript, we develop a machine learning paradigm enabling personalized cognitive assessments prioritization.

METHOD

We adapt a newly developed learning-to-rank approach [Formula: see text] to implement our paradigm. This method learns the latent scoring function that pushes the most effective cognitive assessments onto the top of the prioritization list. We also extend [Formula: see text] to better separate the most effective cognitive assessments and the less effective ones.

RESULTS

Our empirical study on the ADNI data shows that the proposed paradigm outperforms the state-of-the-art baselines on identifying and prioritizing individual-specific cognitive biomarkers. We conduct experiments in cross validation and level-out validation settings. In the two settings, our paradigm significantly outperforms the best baselines with improvement as much as 22.1% and 19.7%, respectively, on prioritizing cognitive features.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed paradigm achieves superior performance on prioritizing cognitive biomarkers. The cognitive biomarkers prioritized on top have great potentials to facilitate personalized diagnosis, disease subtyping, and ultimately precision medicine in AD.

Dual-Layer Strengthened Collaborative Topic Regression Modeling for Predicting Drug Sensitivity

An effective way to facilitate the development of modern oncology precision medicine is the systematical analysis of the known drug sensitivities that have emerged in recent years. Meanwhile, the screening of drug response in cancer cell lines provides an estimable genomic and pharmacological data towards high accuracy prediction. Existing works primarily utilize genomic or functional genomic features to classify or regress the drug response. Here in this work, by the migration and extension of the conventional merchandise recommendation methods, we introduce an innovation model on accurate drug sensitivity prediction by using dual-layer strengthened collaborative topic regression (DS-CTR), which incorporates not only the graphic model to jointly learn drugs and cell lines feature from pharmacogenomics data but also drug and cell line similarity network model to strengthen the correlation of the prediction results. Using Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer project (GDSC) as benchmark datasets, the 5-fold cross-validation experiment demonstrates that DS-CTR model significantly improves drug response prediction performance compared with four categories of state-of-the-art algorithms as for both Receiver Operator Curve (ROC) and the Area Under Receiver Operator Curve (AUC). By uncovering the unknown cell-drug associations with advanced literature evidences, our novel model DS-CTR is validated and supported. The model also provides the possibility to make the discovery of new anti-cancer therapeutics in the preclinical trials cheaper and faster.

Prioritization of Cognitive Assessments in Alzheimer's Disease via Learning to Rank using Brain Morphometric Data

We propose an innovative machine learning paradigm enabling precision medicine for prioritizing cognitive assessments according to their relevance to Alzheimer's disease at the individual patient level. The paradigm tailors the cognitive biomarker discovery and cognitive assessment selection process to the brain morphometric characteristics of each individual patient. We implement this paradigm using a newly developed learning-to-rank method PLTR. Our empirical study on the ADNI data yields promising results to identify and prioritize individual-specific cognitive biomarkers as well as cognitive assessment tasks based on the individual's structural MRI data. The resulting top ranked cognitive biomarkers and assessment tasks have the potential to aid personalized diagnosis and disease subtyping.