Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms

Improving lesion volume measurements on digital mammograms

Lesion volume is an important predictor for prognosis in breast cancer. However, it is currently impossible to compute lesion volumes accurately from digital mammography data, which is the most popular and readily available imaging modality for breast cancer. We make a step towards a more accurate lesion volume measurement on digital mammograms by developing a model that allows to estimate lesion volumes on processed mammogram. Processed mammograms are the images routinely used by radiologists in clinical practice as well as in breast cancer screening and are available in medical centers. Processed mammograms are obtained from raw mammograms, which are the X-ray data coming directly from the scanner, by applying certain vendor-specific non-linear transformations. At the core of our volume estimation method is a physics-based algorithm for measuring lesion volumes on raw mammograms. We subsequently extend this algorithm to processed mammograms via a deep learning image-to-image translation model that produces synthetic raw mammograms from processed mammograms in a multi-vendor setting. We assess the reliability and validity of our method using a dataset of 1778 mammograms with an annotated mass. Firstly, we investigate the correlations between lesion volumes computed from mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.93 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 - 0.93]. Secondly, we compare the resulting lesion volumes from true and synthetic raw data, with a resulting Pearson correlation of 0.998 [95%CI 0.998 - 0.998] . Finally, for a subset of 100 mammograms with a malignant mass and concurrent MRI examination available, we analyze the agreement between lesion volume on mammography and MRI, resulting in an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.81 [95%CI 0.73 - 0.87] for consistency and 0.78 [95%CI 0.66 - 0.86] for absolute agreement. In conclusion, we developed an algorithm to measure mammographic lesion volume that reached excellent reliability and good validity, when using MRI as ground truth. The algorithm may play a role in lesion characterization and breast cancer prognostication on mammograms.

Association of area- and volumetric-mammographic density and breast cancer risk in women of Asian descent: a case control study

BACKGROUND

Mammographic density (MD) has been shown to be a strong and independent risk factor for breast cancer in women of European and Asian descent. However, the majority of Asian studies to date have used BI-RADS as the scoring method and none have evaluated area and volumetric densities in the same cohort of women. This study aims to compare the association of MD measured by two automated methods with the risk of breast cancer in Asian women, and to investigate if the association is different for premenopausal and postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In this case-control study of 531 cases and 2297 controls, we evaluated the association of area-based MD measures and volumetric-based MD measures with breast cancer risk in Asian women using conditional logistic regression analysis, adjusting for relevant confounders. The corresponding association by menopausal status were assessed using unconditional logistic regression.

RESULTS

We found that both area and volume-based MD measures were associated with breast cancer risk. Strongest associations were observed for percent densities (OR (95% CI) was 2.06 (1.42-2.99) for percent dense area and 2.21 (1.44-3.39) for percent dense volume, comparing women in highest density quartile with those in the lowest quartile). The corresponding associations were significant in postmenopausal but not premenopausal women (premenopausal versus postmenopausal were 1.59 (0.95-2.67) and 1.89 (1.22-2.96) for percent dense area and 1.24 (0.70-2.22) and 1.96 (1.19-3.27) for percent dense volume). However, the odds ratios were not statistically different by menopausal status [p difference = 0.782 for percent dense area and 0.486 for percent dense volume].

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms the associations of mammographic density measured by both area and volumetric methods and breast cancer risk in Asian women. Stronger associations were observed for percent dense area and percent dense volume, and strongest effects were seen in postmenopausal individuals.

Anomaly-guided weakly supervised lesion segmentation on retinal OCT images

The availability of big data can transform the studies in biomedical research to generate greater scientific insights if expert labeling is available to facilitate supervised learning. However, data annotation can be labor-intensive and cost-prohibitive if pixel-level precision is required. Weakly supervised semantic segmentation (WSSS) with image-level labeling has emerged as a promising solution in medical imaging. However, most existing WSSS methods in the medical domain are designed for single-class segmentation per image, overlooking the complexities arising from the co-existence of multiple classes in a single image. Additionally, the multi-class WSSS methods from the natural image domain cannot produce comparable accuracy for medical images, given the challenge of substantial variation in lesion scales and occurrences. To address this issue, we propose a novel anomaly-guided mechanism (AGM) for multi-class segmentation in a single image on retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) using only image-level labels. AGM leverages the anomaly detection and self-attention approach to integrate weak abnormal signals with global contextual information into the training process. Furthermore, we include an iterative refinement stage to guide the model to focus more on the potential lesions while suppressing less relevant regions. We validate the performance of our model with two public datasets and one challenging private dataset. Experimental results show that our approach achieves a new state-of-the-art performance in WSSS for lesion segmentation on OCT images.

Utility of U-Net for the objective segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region on clinical digital mammograms

This study investigates the equivalence or compatibility between U-Net and visual segmentations of fibroglandular tissue regions by mammography experts for calculating the breast density and mean glandular dose (MGD). A total of 703 mediolateral oblique-view mammograms were used for segmentation. Two region types were set as the ground truth (determined visually): (1) one type included only the region where fibroglandular tissue was identifiable (called the 'dense region'); (2) the other type included the region where the fibroglandular tissue may have existed in the past, provided that apparent adipose-only parts, such as the retromammary space, are excluded (the 'diffuse region'). U-Net was trained to segment the fibroglandular tissue region with an adaptive moment estimation optimiser, five-fold cross-validated with 400 training and 100 validation mammograms, and tested with 203 mammograms. The breast density and MGD were calculated using the van Engeland and Dance formulas, respectively, and compared between U-Net and the ground truth with the Dice similarity coefficient and Bland-Altman analysis. Dice similarity coefficients between U-Net and the ground truth were 0.895 and 0.939 for the dense and diffuse regions, respectively. In the Bland-Altman analysis, no proportional or fixed errors were discovered in either the dense or diffuse region for breast density, whereas a slight proportional error was discovered in both regions for the MGD (the slopes of the regression lines were -0.0299 and -0.0443 for the dense and diffuse regions, respectively). Consequently, the U-Net and ground truth were deemed equivalent (interchangeable) for breast density and compatible (interchangeable following four simple arithmetic operations) for MGD. U-Net-based segmentation of the fibroglandular tissue region was satisfactory for both regions, providing reliable segmentation for breast density and MGD calculations. U-Net will be useful in developing a reliable individualised screening-mammography programme, instead of relying on the visual judgement of mammography experts.

The changing microRNA landscape by color and cloudiness: a cautionary tale for nipple aspirate fluid biomarker analysis

PURPOSE

Investigation of nipple aspirate fluid (NAF)-based microRNAs (miRNAs) as a potential screening tool for women at increased risk of developing breast cancer is the scope of our research. While aiming to identify discriminating NAF-miRNAs between women with different mammographic densities, we were confronted with an unexpected confounder: NAF sample appearance. Here we report and alert for the impact of NAF color and cloudiness on miRNA assessment.

METHODS

Seven classes of NAF colors coupled with cloudiness appearance were established. Using 173 NAF samples from 154 healthy women (19 samples were bilaterally collected), the expression of 14 target and 2 candidate endogenous control (EC) miRNAs was investigated using Taqman Advanced miRNA assays to identify significant differential expression patterns between color-cloudiness classes. Inter- and intra-individual variation of miRNA expression was analyzed using the coefficient of variation (CV).

RESULTS

We found that between the seven NAF classes, fold change miRNA expression differences ranged between 2.4 and 19.6 depending on the interrogated miRNA. Clear NAF samples exhibited higher miRNA expression levels compared to cloudy NAF samples with fold change differences ranging between 1.1 and 6.2. Inter-individual and intra-individual miRNA expression was fairly stable (CV < 15 %), but nevertheless impacted by NAF sample appearance. Within NAF classes, inter-individual variation was largest for green samples (CV 6-15 %) and smallest for bloody samples (CV 2-6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that NAF color and cloudiness influence miRNA expression and should, therefore, be systematically registered using an objective color classification system. Given that sample appearance is an inherent feature of NAF, these variables should be statistically controlled for in multivariate data analyses. This cautionary note and recommendations could be of value beyond the field of NAF-miRNAs, given that variability in sample color and cloudiness is likewise observed in liquid biopsies such as urine, cerebrospinal fluid and sputum, and could thereby influence the levels of miRNAs and other biomarkers.

Algorithms and methods for computerized analysis of mammography images in breast cancer risk assessment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The computerized analysis of mammograms for the development of quantitative biomarkers is a growing field with applications in breast cancer risk assessment. Computerized image analysis offers the possibility of using different methods and algorithms to extract additional information from screening and diagnosis images to aid in the assessment of breast cancer risk. In this work, we review the algorithms and methods for the automated, computerized analysis of mammography images for the task mentioned, and discuss the main challenges that the development and improvement of these methods face today.

METHODS

We review the recent progress in two main branches of mammography-based risk assessment: parenchymal analysis and breast density estimation, including performance indicators of most of the studies considered. Parenchymal analysis methods are divided into feature-based methods and deep learning-based methods; breast density methods are grouped into area-based, volume-based, and breast categorization methods. Additionally, we identify the challenges that these study fields currently face.

RESULTS

Parenchymal analysis using deep learning algorithms are on the rise, with some studies showing high-performance indicators, such as an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of up to 90. Methods for risk assessment using breast density report a wider variety of performance indicators; however, we can also identify that the approaches using deep learning methods yield high performance in each of the subdivisions considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Both breast density estimation and parenchymal analysis are promising tools for the task of breast cancer risk assessment; deep learning methods have shown performance comparable or superior to the other considered methods. All methods considered face challenges such as the lack of objective comparison between them and the lack of access to datasets from different populations.

Clinical Artificial Intelligence Applications: Breast Imaging

This article gives a brief overview of the development of artificial intelligence in clinical breast imaging. For multiple decades, artificial intelligence (AI) methods have been developed and translated for breast imaging tasks such as detection, diagnosis, and assessing response to therapy. As imaging modalities arise to support breast cancer screening programs and diagnostic examinations, including full-field digital mammography, breast tomosynthesis, ultrasound, and MRI, AI techniques parallel the efforts with more complex algorithms, faster computers, and larger data sets. AI methods include human-engineered radiomics algorithms and deep learning methods. Examples of these AI-supported clinical tasks are given along with commentary on the future.

[Automatic Quantification of Breast Density from Mammography Using Deep Learning]

BACKGROUND

In the field of breast screening using mammography, announcing to the examinees whether they are dense or not has not been deprecated in Japan. One of the reasons is a shortage of objectivity estimating their dense breast. Our aim is to build a system with deep learning algorithm to calculate and quantify objective breast density automatically.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Mammography images taken in our institute that were diagnosed as category 1 were collected. Each processed image was transformed into eight-bit grayscale, with the size of 2294 pixels by 1914 pixels. The "base pixel value" was calculated from the fatty area within the breast for each image. The "relative density" was calculated by dividing each pixel value by the base pixel value. Semantic segmentation algorithm was used to automatically segment the area of breast tissue within the mammography image, which was resized to 144 pixels by 120 pixels. By aggregating the relative density within the breast tissue area, the "breast density" was obtained automatically.

RESULT

From each but one mammography image, the breast density was successfully calculated automatically. By defining a dense breast as the breast density being greater than or equal to 30%, the evaluation of the dense breast was consistent with that by a computer and human (76.6%).

CONCLUSION

Deep learning provides an excellent estimation of quantification of breast density. This system could contribute to improve the efficiency of mammography screening system.

Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk

PURPOSE

To evaluate the agreement between automatic assessment software of breast density based on artificial intelligence (AI) and visual assessment by a senior and a junior radiologist, as well as the impact on the assessment of breast cancer risk (BCR) at 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 311 consecutive women (mean age, 55.6±8.5 [SD]; range: 40-74 years) without a personal history of breast cancer who underwent routine mammography between January 1, 2019 and February 28, 2019. Mammographic breast density (MBD) was independently evaluated by a junior and a senior reader on digital mammography (DM) and synthetic mammography (SM) using BI-RADS (5th edition) and by an AI software. For each MBD, BCR at 5 years was estimated per woman by the AI software. Interobserver agreement for MBD between the two readers and the AI software were evaluated by quadratic κ coefficients. Reproducibility of BCR was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Agreement for MBD assessment on DM and SM was almost perfect between senior and junior radiologists (κ=0.88 [95% CI: 0.84-0.92] and κ=0.86 [95% CI: 0.82-0.90], respectively) and substantial between the senior radiologist and AI (κ=0.79; 95% CI: 0.73-0.84). There was substantial agreement between DM and SM for the senior radiologist (κ=0.79; 95% CI: 0.74-0.84). BCR evaluation at 5 years was highly reproducible between the two radiologists on DM and SM (ICC=0.98 [95% CI: 0.97-0.98] for both), between BCR evaluation based on DM and SM evaluated by the senior (ICC=0.96; 95% CI: 0.95-0.97) or junior radiologist (ICC=0.97; 95% CI: 0.96-0.98) and between the senior radiologist and AI (ICC=0.96; 95% CI: 0.95-0.97).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study demonstrates a very good agreement for BCR evaluation based on the evaluation of MBD by a senior radiologist, junior radiologist and AI software.

Subjective Versus Quantitative Methods of Assessing Breast Density

In order to find a consistent, simple and time-efficient method of assessing mammographic breast density (MBD), different methods of assessing density comparing subjective, quantitative, semi-subjective and semi-quantitative methods were investigated. Subjective MBD of anonymized mammographic cases (n = 250) from a national breast-screening programme was rated by 49 radiologists from two countries (UK and USA) who were voluntarily recruited. Quantitatively, three measurement methods, namely VOLPARA, Hand Delineation (HD) and ImageJ (IJ) were used to calculate breast density using the same set of cases, however, for VOLPARA only mammographic cases (n = 122) with full raw digital data were included. The agreement level between methods was analysed using weighted kappa test. Agreement between UK and USA radiologists and VOLPARA varied from moderate (κw = 0.589) to substantial (κw = 0.639), respectively. The levels of agreement between USA, UK radiologists, VOLPARA with IJ were substantial (κw = 0.752, 0.768, 0.603), and with HD the levels of agreement varied from moderate to substantial (κw = 0.632, 0.680, 0.597), respectively. This study found that there is variability between subjective and objective MBD assessment methods, internationally. These results will add to the evidence base, emphasising the need for consistent, simple and time-efficient MBD assessment methods. Additionally, the quickest method to assess density is the subjective assessment, followed by VOLPARA, which is compatible with a busy clinical setting. Moreover, the use of a more limited two-scale system improves agreement levels and could help minimise any potential country bias.

Cadmium and volumetric mammographic density: A cross-sectional study in Polish women

INTRODUCTION

Cadmium (Cd) is a heavy metal, which is widespread in the environment and has been hypothesized to be a metalloestrogen and a breast cancer risk factor. Mammographic density (MD) reflects the composition of the breast and was proposed to be used as a surrogate marker for breast cancer. The aim of our study was to investigate association between cadmium concentration in urine and mammographic density.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study included 517 women aged 40-60 years who underwent screening mammography in Łódź, Poland. Data were collected through personal interviews and anthropometric measurements. Spot morning urine samples were obtained. The examination of the breasts included both craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique views. Raw data ("for processing") generated by the digital mammography system were analysed using Volpara Imaging Software, The volumetric breast density(%) and fibrograndular tissue volume(cm3) were determined. Cadmium concentration in urine was analysed using the standard ICP-MS method.

RESULTS

After adjusting for key confounders including age, BMI, family breast cancer, mammographic device, season of the year of mammography, and age at menarche, an inverse association of Cd and volumetric breast density was found, which was attenuated after further adjustment for smoking. Associations of Cd with dense volume were null.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that Cd is not positively associated with breast density, a strong marker of breast cancer risk, when examined in a cross-sectional fashion.

Morphological Area Gradient: System-independent Dense Tissue Segmentation in Mammography Images

Breast density has been identified as one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. However, the development of reliable and reproducible methods for the automatic dense tissue segmentation has been an important challenge. Due to the complexity of the acquisition process of mammography images, current approaches need to be calibrated for specific mammographic systems or require access to raw mammograms. In this work, we introduce the Morphological Area Gradient (MAG) as a generic measure for mammography images. MAG is generic in the sense that it does not need calibration or access to raw mammograms. At the core of MAG is the derivative of the area of segmented tissue with respect to the pixel intensity. We have found that the high-density regions can be automatically segmented by minimizing the MAG of a mammogram. To verify the performance of MAG, we collected 566 full-field digital mammograms using two different medical devices and a human expert manually annotated the high-density regions in each image. The proposed MAG method yields a median absolute error of 7.6% and a Dices similarity coefficient of 0.83, which are superior to other clinically validated state-of-the-art algorithms.

Supplemental MRI Screening for Women with Extremely Dense Breast Tissue

BACKGROUND

Extremely dense breast tissue is a risk factor for breast cancer and limits the detection of cancer with mammography. Data are needed on the use of supplemental magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve early detection and reduce interval breast cancers in such patients.

METHODS

In this multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in the Netherlands, we assigned 40,373 women between the ages of 50 and 75 years with extremely dense breast tissue and normal results on screening mammography to a group that was invited to undergo supplemental MRI or to a group that received mammography screening only. The groups were assigned in a 1:4 ratio, with 8061 in the MRI-invitation group and 32,312 in the mammography-only group. The primary outcome was the between-group difference in the incidence of interval cancers during a 2-year screening period.

RESULTS

The interval-cancer rate was 2.5 per 1000 screenings in the MRI-invitation group and 5.0 per 1000 screenings in the mammography-only group, for a difference of 2.5 per 1000 screenings (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 3.7; P<0.001). Of the women who were invited to undergo MRI, 59% accepted the invitation. Of the 20 interval cancers that were diagnosed in the MRI-invitation group, 4 were diagnosed in the women who actually underwent MRI (0.8 per 1000 screenings) and 16 in those who did not accept the invitation (4.9 per 1000 screenings). The MRI cancer-detection rate among the women who actually underwent MRI screening was 16.5 per 1000 screenings (95% CI, 13.3 to 20.5). The positive predictive value was 17.4% (95% CI, 14.2 to 21.2) for recall for additional testing and 26.3% (95% CI, 21.7 to 31.6) for biopsy. The false positive rate was 79.8 per 1000 screenings. Among the women who underwent MRI, 0.1% had either an adverse event or a serious adverse event during or immediately after the screening.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of supplemental MRI screening in women with extremely dense breast tissue and normal results on mammography resulted in the diagnosis of significantly fewer interval cancers than mammography alone during a 2-year screening period. (Funded by the University Medical Center Utrecht and others; DENSE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01315015.).

Radiographic predictors determined with an objective assessment tool for neonatal patients with necrotizing enterocolitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to develop and validate a computational tool to assist radiological decisions on necrotizing enterocolitis.

METHODOLOGY

Patients that exhibited clinical signs and radiographic evidence of Bell's stage 2 or higher were included in the study, resulting in 64 exams. The tool was used to classify localized bowel wall thickening and intestinal pneumatosis using full-width at half-maximum measurements and texture analyses based on wavelet energy decomposition. Radiological findings of suspicious bowel wall thickening and intestinal pneumatosis loops were confirmed by both patient surgery and histopathological analysis. Two experienced radiologists selected an involved bowel and a normal bowel in the same radiography. The full-width at half-maximum and wavelet-based texture feature were then calculated and compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Specificity, sensibility, positive and negative predictive values were calculated.

RESULTS

The full-width at half-maximum results were significantly different between normal and distended loops (median of 10.30 and 15.13, respectively). Horizontal, vertical, and diagonal wavelet energy measurements were evaluated at eight levels of decomposition. Levels 7 and 8 in the horizontal direction presented significant differences. For level 7, median was 0.034 and 0.088 for normal and intestinal pneumatosis groups, respectively, and for level 8 median was 0.19 and 0.34, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed tool could detect differences in radiographic findings of bowel wall thickening and IP that are difficult to diagnose, demonstrating the its potential in clinical routine. The tool that was developed in the present study may help physicians to investigate suspicious bowel loops, thereby considerably improving diagnosis and clinical decisions.

Quantitative Volumetric K-Means Cluster Segmentation of Fibroglandular Tissue and Skin in Breast MRI

Mammographic breast density (MBD) is the most commonly used method to assess the volume of fibroglandular tissue (FGT). However, MRI could provide a clinically feasible and more accurate alternative. There were three aims in this study: (1) to evaluate a clinically feasible method to quantify FGT with MRI, (2) to assess the inter-rater agreement of MRI-based volumetric measurements and (3) to compare them to measurements acquired using digital mammography and 3D tomosynthesis. This retrospective study examined 72 women (mean age 52.4 ± 12.3 years) with 105 disease-free breasts undergoing diagnostic 3.0-T breast MRI and either digital mammography or tomosynthesis. Two observers analyzed MRI images for breast and FGT volumes and FGT-% from T1-weighted images (0.7-, 2.0-, and 4.0-mm-thick slices) using K-means clustering, data from histogram, and active contour algorithms. Reference values were obtained with Quantra software. Inter-rater agreement for MRI measurements made with 2-mm-thick slices was excellent: for FGT-%, r = 0.994 (95% CI 0.990-0.997); for breast volume, r = 0.985 (95% CI 0.934-0.994); and for FGT volume, r = 0.979 (95% CI 0.958-0.989). MRI-based FGT-% correlated strongly with MBD in mammography (r = 0.819-0.904, P < 0.001) and moderately to high with MBD in tomosynthesis (r = 0.630-0.738, P < 0.001). K-means clustering-based assessments of the proportion of the fibroglandular tissue in the breast at MRI are highly reproducible. In the future, quantitative assessment of FGT-% to complement visual estimation of FGT should be performed on a more regular basis as it provides a component which can be incorporated into the individual's breast cancer risk stratification.

Digital Mammography versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Impact of Breast Density on Diagnostic Performance in Population-based Screening

BackgroundPrevious studies comparing digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to digital mammography (DM) have shown conflicting results regarding breast density and diagnostic performance.PurposeTo compare true-positive and false-positive interpretations in DM versus DBT according to volumetric density, age, and mammographic findings.Materials and MethodsFrom November 2010 to December 2012, 24 301 women aged 50-69 years (mean age, 59.1 years ± 5.7) were prospectively included in the Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial. Participants received same-compression DM and DBT with independent double reading for both DM and DM plus DBT reading modes. Eight experienced radiologists rated the images by using a five-point scale for probability of malignancy. Participants were followed up for 2 years to assess for interval cancers. Breast density was assessed by using automatic volumetric software (scale, 1-4). Differences in true-positive rates, false-positive rates, and mammographic findings were assessed by using confidence intervals (Newcombe paired method) and P values (McNemar and χ² tests).ResultsThe true-positive rate of DBT was higher than that of DM for density groups (range, 12%-24%; P < .001 for density scores of 2 and 3, and P > .05 for density scores of 1 and 4) and age groups (range, 15%-35%; P < .05 for all age groups), mainly due to the higher number of spiculated masses and architectural distortions found at DBT (P < .001 for density scores of 2 and 3; P < .05 for women aged 55-69 years). The false-positive rate was lower for DBT than for DM in all age groups (range, -0.6% to -1.2%; P < .01) and density groups (range, -0.7 to -1.0%; P < .005) owing to fewer asymmetric densities (P ≤ .001), except for extremely dense breasts (0.1%, P = .82).ConclusionDigital breast tomosynthesis enabled the detection of more cancers in all density and age groups compared with digital mammography, especially cancers classified as spiculated masses and architectural distortions. The improvement in cancer detection rate showed a positive correlation with age. With use of digital breast tomosynthesis, false-positive findings were lower due to fewer asymmetric densities, except in extremely dense breasts.© RSNA, 2019Online supplemental material is available for this article.See also the editorial by Fuchsjäger and Adelsmayr in this issue.

Volumetric breast density measurement for personalized screening: accuracy, reproducibility, consistency, and agreement with visual assessment

Assessment of breast density at the point of mammographic examination could lead to optimized breast cancer screening pathways. The onsite breast density information may offer guidance of when to recommend supplemental imaging for women in a screening program. A software application (Insight BD, Siemens Healthcare GmbH) for fast onsite quantification of volumetric breast density is evaluated. The accuracy of the method is assessed using breast tissue equivalent phantom experiments resulting in a mean absolute error of 3.84%. Reproducibility of measurement results is analyzed using 8427 exams in total, comparing for each exam (if available) the densities determined from left and right views, from cranio-caudal and medio-lateral oblique views, from full-field digital mammograms (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) data and from two subsequent exams of the same breast. Pearson correlation coefficients of 0.937, 0.926, 0.950, and 0.995 are obtained. Consistency of the results is demonstrated by evaluating the dependency of the breast density on women's age. Furthermore, the agreement between breast density categories computed by the software with those determined visually by 32 radiologists is shown by an overall percentage agreement of 69.5% for FFDM and by 64.6% for DBT data. These results demonstrate that the software delivers accurate, reproducible, and consistent measurements that agree well with the visual assessment of breast density by radiologists.

Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications

Judgement, as one of the core tenets of medicine, relies upon the integration of multilayered data with nuanced decision making. Cancer offers a unique context for medical decisions given not only its variegated forms with evolution of disease but also the need to take into account the individual condition of patients, their ability to receive treatment, and their responses to treatment. Challenges remain in the accurate detection, characterization, and monitoring of cancers despite improved technologies. Radiographic assessment of disease most commonly relies upon visual evaluations, the interpretations of which may be augmented by advanced computational analyses. In particular, artificial intelligence (AI) promises to make great strides in the qualitative interpretation of cancer imaging by expert clinicians, including volumetric delineation of tumors over time, extrapolation of the tumor genotype and biological course from its radiographic phenotype, prediction of clinical outcome, and assessment of the impact of disease and treatment on adjacent organs. AI may automate processes in the initial interpretation of images and shift the clinical workflow of radiographic detection, management decisions on whether or not to administer an intervention, and subsequent observation to a yet to be envisioned paradigm. Here, the authors review the current state of AI as applied to medical imaging of cancer and describe advances in 4 tumor types (lung, brain, breast, and prostate) to illustrate how common clinical problems are being addressed. Although most studies evaluating AI applications in oncology to date have not been vigorously validated for reproducibility and generalizability, the results do highlight increasingly concerted efforts in pushing AI technology to clinical use and to impact future directions in cancer care.

Derived mammographic masking measures based on simulated lesions predict the risk of interval cancer after controlling for known risk factors: a case-case analysis

PURPOSE

Women with radiographically dense or texturally complex breasts are at increased risk for interval cancer, defined as cancers diagnosed after a normal screening examination. The purpose of this study was to create masking measures and apply them to identify interval risk in a population of women who experienced either screen-detected or interval cancers after controlling for breast density.

METHODS

We examined full-field digital screening mammograms acquired from 2006 to 2015. Examinations associated with 182 interval cancers were matched to 173 screen-detected cancers on age, race, exam date and time since last imaging examination. Local Image Quality Factor (IQF) values were calculated and used to create IQF maps that represented mammographic masking. We used various statistics to define global masking measures of these maps. Association of these masking measures with interval cancer vs screen-detected cancer was estimated using conditional logistic regression in a univariate and adjusted model for Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) density. Receiver operator curves were calculated in each case to compare specificity vs sensitivity, and area under those curves were generated. Proportion of screen-detected cancer was estimated for stratifications of IQF features.

RESULTS

Several masking features showed significant association with interval compared to screen-detected cancers after adjusting for BI-RADS density (up to P = 2.52E-6), and the 10th percentile of the IQF value (P = 1.72E-3) showed the strongest improvement in the area under the receiver operator curve, increasing from 0.65 using only BI-RADS density to 0.69. The highest masking group had a 32% proportion of screen-detected cancers while the low masking group had a 69% proportion.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that computer vision methods using model observers may improve quantifying the probability of breast cancer detection beyond using breast density alone.

Multimodality Imaging of Breast Parenchymal Density and Correlation with Risk Assessment

Purpose of Review

Breast density, or the amount of fibroglandular tissue in the breast, has become a recognized and independent marker for breast cancer risk. Public awareness of breast density as a possible risk factor for breast cancer has resulted in legislation for risk stratification purposes in many US states. This review will provide a comprehensive overview of the currently available imaging modalities for qualitative and quantitative breast density assessment and the current evidence on breast density and breast cancer risk assessment.

Recent Findings

To date, breast density assessment is mainly performed with mammography and to some extent with magnetic resonance imaging. Data indicate that computerized, quantitative techniques in comparison with subjective visual estimations are characterized by higher reproducibility and robustness.

Summary

Breast density reduces the sensitivity of mammography due to a masking effect and is also a recognized independent risk factor for breast cancer. Standardized breast density assessment using automated volumetric quantitative methods has the potential to be used for risk prediction and stratification and in determining the best screening plan for each woman.

Density and tailored breast cancer screening: practice and prediction - an overview

Mammography, as the primary screening modality, has facilitated a substantial decrease in breast cancer-related mortality in the general population. However, the sensitivity of mammography for breast cancer detection is decreased in women with higher breast densities, which is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. With increasing public awareness of the implications of a high breast density, there is an increasing demand for supplemental screening in these patients. Yet, improvements in breast cancer detection with supplemental screening methods come at the expense of increased false-positives, recall rates, patient anxiety, and costs. Therefore, breast cancer screening practice must change from a general one-size-fits-all approach to a more personalized, risk-based one that is tailored to the individual woman’s risk, personal beliefs, and preferences, while accounting for cost, potential harm, and benefits.

This overview will provide an overview of the available breast density assessment modalities, the current breast density screening recommendations for women at average risk of breast cancer, and supplemental methods for breast cancer screening. In addition, we will provide a look at the possibilities for a risk-adapted breast cancer screening.

Prediction of glandularity and breast radiation dose from mammography results in Japanese women

Glandularity has a marked impact on the incidence of breast cancer and the missed lesion rate of mammography. The aim of this study was to develop a novel model for predicting glandularity and patient radiation dose using physical factors that are easily determined prior to mammography. Data regarding glandularity and mean glandular dose were obtained from 331 mammograms. A stepwise multiple regression analysis model was developed to predict glandularity using age, compressed breast thickness and body mass index (BMI), while a model to predict mean glandular dose was created using quantified glandularity, age, compressed breast thickness, height and body weight. The most significant factor for predicting glandularity was age, the influence of which was 1.8 times that of BMI. The most significant factor for predicting mean glandular dose was compressed breast thickness, the influence of which was 1.4 times that of glandularity, 3.5 times that of age and 6.1 times that of height. Both models were statistically significant (both p < 0.0001). Easily determined physical factors were able to explain 42.8% of the total variance in glandularity and 62.4% of the variance in mean glandular dose. Graphical abstract Validation results of the above prediction model made using physical factors in Japanese women. The plotted points of actual vs. prediction glandularity shown in a are distributed in the vicinity of the diagonal line, and the residual plot for predicted glandularity shows an almost random distribution as shown in b. These distributions indicate the appropriateness of the prediction model.

Reproducing two-dimensional mammograms with three-dimensional printed phantoms

Mammography is currently the standard imaging modality used to screen women for breast abnormalities, and, as a result, it is a tool of great importance for the early detection of breast cancer. Physical phantoms are commonly used as surrogates of breast tissue to evaluate some aspects of the performance of mammography systems. However, most phantoms do not reproduce the anatomic heterogeneity of real breasts. New fabrication technologies, such as three-dimensional (3-D) printing, have created the opportunity to build more complex, anatomically realistic breast phantoms that could potentially assist in the evaluation of mammography systems. The reproducibility and relative low cost of 3-D printed objects might also enable the development of collections of representative patient models that could be used to assess the effect of anatomical variability on system performance, hence making bench testing studies a step closer to clinical trials. The primary objective of this work is to present a simple, easily reproducible methodology to design and print 3-D objects that replicate the attenuation profile observed in real two-dimensional mammograms. The secondary objective is to evaluate the capabilities and limitations of the competing 3-D printing technologies and characterize the x-ray properties of the different materials they use. Printable phantoms can be created using the open-source code introduced, which processes a raw mammography image to estimate the amount of x-ray attenuation at each pixel, and outputs a triangle mesh object that encodes the observed attenuation map. The conversion from the observed pixel gray value to a column of printed material with equivalent attenuation requires certain assumptions and knowledge of multiple imaging system parameters, such as x-ray energy spectrum, source-to-object distance, compressed breast thickness, and average breast material attenuation. To validate the proposed methodology, x-ray projections of printed phantoms were acquired with a clinical mammography system. The quality of the printing process was evaluated by comparing the mammograms of the printed phantoms and the original mammograms used to create the phantoms. The structural similarity index and the root-mean-square error were used as objective metrics to compare the two images. A detailed description of the software, a characterization of the printed materials using x-ray spectroscopy, and an evaluation of the realism of the sample printed phantoms are presented.

Feasibility of estimating volumetric breast density from mammographic x-ray spectra using a cadmium telluride photon-counting detector

PURPOSE

Mammographic density of glandular breast tissue has a masking effect that can reduce lesion detection accuracy and is also a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Therefore, accurate quantitative estimation of breast density is clinically important. In this study, we investigate experimentally the feasibility of quantifying volumetric breast density with spectral mammography using a CdTe-based photon-counting detector.

METHODS

To demonstrate proof-of-principle, this study was carried out using the single pixel Amptek XR-100T-CdTe detector. The total number of x rays recorded by the detector from a single pencil-beam projection through 50%/50% of adipose/glandular mass fraction-equivalent phantoms was measured. Material decomposition assuming two, four, and eight energy bins was then applied to characterize the inspected phantom into adipose and glandular using log-likelihood estimation, taking into account the polychromatic source, the detector response function, and the energy-dependent attenuation.

RESULTS

Measurement tests were carried out for different doses, kVp settings, and different breast sizes. For dose of 1 mGy and above, the percent relative root mean square (RMS) errors of the estimated breast density was measured below 7% for all three phantom studies. It was also observed that some decrease in RMS errors was achieved using eight energy bins. For 3 and 4 cm thick phantoms, performance at 40 and 45 kVp showed similar performance. However, it was observed that 45 kVp showed better performance for a phantom thickness of 6 cm at low dose levels due to increased statistical variation at lower photon count levels with 40 kVp.

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study suggest that photon-counting spectral mammography systems using CdTe detectors have the potential to be used for accurate quantification of volumetric breast density on a pixel-to-pixel basis, with an RMS error of less than 7%.

Common genetic variation and novel loci associated with volumetric mammographic density

BACKGROUND

Mammographic density (MD) is a strong and heritable intermediate phenotype of breast cancer, but much of its genetic variation remains unexplained.

METHODS

We conducted a genetic association study of volumetric MD in a Swedish mammography screening cohort (n = 9498) to identify novel MD loci. Associations with volumetric MD phenotypes (percent dense volume, absolute dense volume, and absolute nondense volume) were estimated using linear regression adjusting for age, body mass index, menopausal status, and six principal components. We also estimated the proportion of MD variance explained by additive contributions from single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP-based heritability [h²_SNP]) in 4948 participants of the cohort.

RESULTS

In total, three novel MD loci were identified (at P < 5 × 10^- 8): one for percent dense volume (HABP2) and two for the absolute dense volume (INHBB, LINC01483). INHBB is an established locus for ER-negative breast cancer, and HABP2 and LINC01483 represent putative new breast cancer susceptibility loci, because both loci were associated with breast cancer in available meta-analysis data including 122,977 breast cancer cases and 105,974 control subjects (P < 0.05). h²_SNP (SE) estimates for percent dense, absolute dense, and nondense volume were 0.29 (0.07), 0.31 (0.07), and 0.25 (0.07), respectively. Corresponding ratios of h²_SNP to previously observed narrow-sense h² estimates in the same cohort were 0.46, 0.72, and 0.41, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide new insights into the genetic basis of MD and biological mechanisms linking MD to breast cancer risk. Apart from identifying three novel loci, we demonstrate that at least 25% of the MD variance is explained by common genetic variation with h²_SNP/h² ratios varying between dense and nondense MD components.

Multimodal Breast Parenchymal Patterns Correlation Using a Patient-Specific Biomechanical Model

In this paper, we aim to produce a realistic 2-D projection of the breast parenchymal distribution from a 3-D breast magnetic resonance image (MRI). To evaluate the accuracy of our simulation, we compare our results with the local breast density (i.e., density map) obtained from the complementary full-field digital mammogram. To achieve this goal, we have developed a fully automatic framework, which registers MRI volumes to X-ray mammograms using a subject-specific biomechanical model of the breast. The optimization step modifies the position, orientation, and elastic parameters of the breast model to perform the alignment between the images. When the model reaches an optimal solution, the MRI glandular tissue is projected and compared with the one obtained from the corresponding mammograms. To reduce the loss of information during the ray-casting, we introduce a new approach that avoids resampling the MRI volume. In the results, we focus our efforts on evaluating the agreement of the distributions of glandular tissue, the degree of structural similarity, and the correlation between the real and synthetic density maps. Our approach obtained a high-structural agreement regardless the glandularity of the breast, whilst the similarity of the glandular tissue distributions and correlation between both images increase in denser breasts. Furthermore, the synthetic images show continuity with respect to large structures in the density maps.

Automated mammographic breast density estimation using a fully convolutional network

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to develop a fully automated algorithm for mammographic breast density estimation using deep learning.

METHOD

Our algorithm used a fully convolutional network, which is a deep learning framework for image segmentation, to segment both the breast and the dense fibroglandular areas on mammographic images. Using the segmented breast and dense areas, our algorithm computed the breast percent density (PD), which is the faction of dense area in a breast. Our dataset included full-field digital screening mammograms of 604 women, which included 1208 mediolateral oblique (MLO) and 1208 craniocaudal (CC) views. We allocated 455, 58, and 91 of 604 women and their exams into training, testing, and validation datasets, respectively. We established ground truth for the breast and the dense fibroglandular areas via manual segmentation and segmentation using a simple thresholding based on BI-RADS density assessments by radiologists, respectively. Using the mammograms and ground truth, we fine-tuned a pretrained deep learning network to train the network to segment both the breast and the fibroglandular areas. Using the validation dataset, we evaluated the performance of the proposed algorithm against radiologists' BI-RADS density assessments. Specifically, we conducted a correlation analysis between a BI-RADS density assessment of a given breast and its corresponding PD estimate by the proposed algorithm. In addition, we evaluated our algorithm in terms of its ability to classify the BI-RADS density using PD estimates, and its ability to provide consistent PD estimates for the left and the right breast and the MLO and CC views of the same women. To show the effectiveness of our algorithm, we compared the performance of our algorithm against a state of the art algorithm, laboratory for individualized breast radiodensity assessment (LIBRA).

RESULT

The PD estimated by our algorithm correlated well with BI-RADS density ratings by radiologists. Pearson's rho values of our algorithm for CC view, MLO view, and CC-MLO-averaged were 0.81, 0.79, and 0.85, respectively, while those of LIBRA were 0.58, 0.71, and 0.69, respectively. For CC view and CC-MLO averaged cases, the difference in rho values between the proposed algorithm and LIBRA showed statistical significance (P < 0.006). In addition, our algorithm provided reliable PD estimates for the left and the right breast (Pearson's ρ > 0.87) and for the MLO and CC views (Pearson's ρ = 0.76). However, LIBRA showed a lower Pearson's rho value (0.66) for both the left and right breasts for the CC view. In addition, our algorithm showed an excellent ability to separate each sub BI-RADS breast density class (statistically significant, p-values = 0.0001 or less); only one comparison pair, density 1 and density 2 in the CC view, was not statistically significant (P = 0.54). However, LIBRA failed to separate breasts in density 1 and 2 for both the CC and MLO views (P > 0.64).

CONCLUSION

We have developed a new deep learning based algorithm for breast density segmentation and estimation. We showed that the proposed algorithm correlated well with BI-RADS density assessments by radiologists and outperformed an existing state of the art algorithm.

Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

Advances in both imaging and computers have synergistically led to a rapid rise in the potential use of artificial intelligence in various radiological imaging tasks, such as risk assessment, detection, diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response, as well as in multi-omics disease discovery. A brief overview of the field is given here, allowing the reader to recognize the terminology, the various subfields, and components of machine learning, as well as the clinical potential. Radiomics, an expansion of computer-aided diagnosis, has been defined as the conversion of images to minable data. The ultimate benefit of quantitative radiomics is to (1) yield predictive image-based phenotypes of disease for precision medicine or (2) yield quantitative image-based phenotypes for data mining with other -omics for discovery (ie, imaging genomics). For deep learning in radiology to succeed, note that well-annotated large data sets are needed since deep networks are complex, computer software and hardware are evolving constantly, and subtle differences in disease states are more difficult to perceive than differences in everyday objects. In the future, machine learning in radiology is expected to have a substantial clinical impact with imaging examinations being routinely obtained in clinical practice, providing an opportunity to improve decision support in medical image interpretation. The term of note is decision support, indicating that computers will augment human decision making, making it more effective and efficient. The clinical impact of having computers in the routine clinical practice may allow radiologists to further integrate their knowledge with their clinical colleagues in other medical specialties and allow for precision medicine.

Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density

Background Breast radiologists of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program subjectively classified mammographic density using a three-point scale between 1996 and 2012 and changed into the fourth edition of the BI-RADS classification since 2013. In 2015, an automated volumetric breast density assessment software was installed at two screening units. Purpose To compare volumetric breast density measurements from the automated method with two subjective methods: the three-point scale and the BI-RADS density classification. Material and Methods Information on subjective and automated density assessment was obtained from screening examinations of 3635 women recalled for further assessment due to positive screening mammography between 2007 and 2015. The score of the three-point scale (I = fatty; II = medium dense; III = dense) was available for 2310 women. The BI-RADS density score was provided for 1325 women. Mean volumetric breast density was estimated for each category of the subjective classifications. The automated software assigned volumetric breast density to four categories. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was assessed using weighted kappa (k_w). Results Mean volumetric breast density was 4.5%, 7.5%, and 13.4% for categories I, II, and III of the three-point scale, respectively, and 4.4%, 7.5%, 9.9%, and 13.9% for the BI-RADS density categories, respectively ( P for trend < 0.001 for both subjective classifications). The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was k_w = 0.5 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mean values of volumetric breast density increased with increasing density category of the subjective classifications. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was moderate.

[Low-dose digital breast tomosynthsis imaging via noise correlation based penalized weighted least-squares algorithm]

OBJECTIVE

To achieve low-dose digital breast tomosynthsis (DBT) projection recovery using penalized weighted least square algorithm incorporating accurate modeling of the variance of the projection data and noise correlation in the flat panel detector.

METHODS

Models were established for the quantal noise and electronic noise in the DBT system to construct the penalized weighted least squares algorithm based on noise correlation for projection data restoration. The filter back projection algorithm was then used for DBT image reconstruction.

RESULTS

The reconstruction results of the ACR phantom data at different dose levels showed a good performance of the proposed method in noise suppression and detail preservation. CNRs and LSNRs of the reconstructed images from the restored projections were increased by about 3.6 times compared to those of reconstructed images from the original projections.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed method can significantly reduce noise and improve the quality of DBT images.

Deciphering the Breast Density Inform Law Movement: Implications for Practice

Although dense breast tissue is a normal and routine finding on screening mammography, dense breast tissue is associated with an independent increased risk for breast cancer. It is well known that screening mammography has a decreased sensitivity for cancer detection in women with dense breasts. Over the past decade, there has been increased interest generated among patients, physicians, and legislators regarding how best to screen dense-breasted women culminating in 2009 with the passage of a breast density notification law in Connecticut. Since that time, over half the United States has passed similar notification laws. Despite this, controversy remains as to the optimal supplemental screening modality to complement mammography as each imaging modality (digital breast tomosynthesis, whole breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, contrast-enhanced mammography, and molecular breast imaging) has variable benefits and limitations.

Automatic outer and inner breast tissue segmentation using multi-parametric MRI images of breast tumor patients

The objectives of the study were to develop a framework for automatic outer and inner breast tissue segmentation using multi-parametric MRI images of the breast tumor patients; and to perform breast density and tumor tissue analysis. MRI of the breast was performed on 30 patients at 3T-MRI. T₁, T₂ and PD-weighted(W) images, with and without fat saturation(WWFS), and dynamic-contrast-enhanced(DCE)-MRI data were acquired. The proposed automatic segmentation approach was performed in two steps. In step-1, outer segmentation of breast tissue from rest of body parts was performed on structural images (T₂-W/T₁-W/PD-W without fat saturation images) using automatic landmarks detection technique based on operations like profile screening, Otsu thresholding, morphological operations and empirical observation. In step-2, inner segmentation of breast tissue into fibro-glandular(FG), fatty and tumor tissue was performed. For validation of breast tissue segmentation, manual segmentation was carried out by two radiologists and similarity coefficients(Dice and Jaccard) were computed for outer as well as inner tissues. FG density and tumor volume were also computed and analyzed. The proposed outer and inner segmentation approach worked well for all the subjects and was validated by two radiologists. The average Dice and Jaccard coefficients value for outer segmentation using T₂-W images, obtained by two radiologists, were 0.977 and 0.951 respectively. These coefficient values for FG tissue were 0.915 and 0.875 respectively whereas for tumor tissue, values were 0.968 and 0.95 respectively. The volume of segmented tumor ranged over 2.1 cm3–7.08 cm³. The proposed approach provided automatic outer and inner breast tissue segmentation, which enables automatic calculations of breast tissue density and tumor volume. This is a complete framework for outer and inner breast segmentation method for all structural images.

Automated Volumetric Mammographic Breast Density Measurements May Underestimate Percent Breast Density for High-density Breasts

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate discrepancy in breast composition measurements obtained from mammograms using two commercially available software methods for systematic trends in overestimation or underestimation compared to magnetic resonance-derived measurements.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant retrospective study was performed to calculate percent breast density (PBD) by quantifying fibroglandular volume and total breast volume derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation and mammograms using two commercially available software programs (Volpara and Quantra). Consecutive screening MRI exams from a 6-month period with negative or benign findings were used. The most recent mammogram within 9 months was used to derive mean density values from "for processing" images at the per breast level. Bland-Altman statistical analyses were performed to determine the mean discrepancy and the limits of agreement.

RESULTS

A total of 110 women with 220 breasts met the study criteria. Overall, PBD was not different between MRI (mean 10%, range 1%-41%) and Volpara (mean 10%, range 3%-29%); a small but significant difference was present in the discrepancy between MRI and Quantra (4.0%, 95% CI: 2.9 to 5.0, P < 0.001). Discrepancy was highest at higher breast densities, with Volpara slightly underestimating and Quantra slightly overestimating PBD compared to MRI. The mean discrepancy for both Volpara and Quantra for total breast volume was not significantly different from MRI (p = 0.89, 0.35, respectively). Volpara tended to underestimate, whereas Quantra tended to overestimate fibroglandular volume, with the highest discrepancy at higher breast volumes.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Volpara and Quantra tend to underestimate PBD, which is most pronounced at higher densities. PBD can be accurately measured using automated volumetric software programs, but values should not be used interchangeably between vendors.

Breast density quantification using structured-light-based diffuse optical tomography simulations

We present the feasibility of structured-light-based diffuse optical tomography (DOT) to quantify the breast density with an extensive simulation study. This study is performed on multiple numerical breast phantoms built from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. These phantoms represent realistic tissue morphologies and are given typical breast optical properties. First, synthetic data are simulated at five wavelengths using our structured-light-based DOT forward problem. Afterwards, the inverse problem is solved to obtain the absorption images and subsequently the chromophore concentration maps. Parameters, such as segmented volumes and mean concentrations, are extracted from these maps and used in a regression model to estimate the percent breast densities. These estimations are correlated with the true values from MRI, r=0.97, showing that our new technique is promising in measuring breast density.

Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to compare the breast density estimates from two algorithms on full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) and to analyze the clinical implications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We selected 561 FFDM and DBT examinations from patients without breast pathologies. Two versions of a commercial software (Quantra 2D and Quantra 3D) calculated the volumetric breast density automatically in FFDM and DBT, respectively. Other parameters such as area breast density and total breast volume were evaluated. We compared the results from both algorithms using the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric test and the Spearman's rank coefficient for data correlation analysis. Mean glandular dose (MGD) was calculated following the methodology proposed by Dance et al.

RESULTS

Measurements with both algorithms are well correlated (r ≥ 0.77). However, there are statistically significant differences between the medians (P < 0.05) of most parameters. The volumetric and area breast density median values from FFDM are, respectively, 8% and 77% higher than DBT estimations. Both algorithms classify 35% and 55% of breasts into BIRADS (Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System) b and c categories, respectively. There are no significant differences between the MGD calculated using the breast density from each algorithm. DBT delivers higher MGD than FFDM, with a lower difference (5%) for breasts in the BIRADS d category. MGD is, on average, 6% higher than values obtained with the breast glandularity proposed by Dance et al.

CONCLUSIONS

Breast density measurements from both algorithms lead to equivalent BIRADS classification and MGD values, hence showing no difference in clinical outcomes. The median MGD values of FFDM and DBT examinations are similar for dense breasts (BIRADS d category).

Ultrasound Tomography Evaluation of Breast Density: A Comparison With Noncontrast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasound tomography (UST) is an emerging whole-breast 3-dimensional imaging technique that obtains quantitative tomograms of speed of sound of the entire breast. The imaged parameter is the speed of sound which is used as a surrogate measure of density at each voxel and holds promise as a method to evaluate breast density without ionizing radiation. This study evaluated the technique of UST and compared whole-breast volume averaged speed of sound (VASS) with MR percent water content from noncontrast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three healthy female volunteers (median age, 40 years; range, 29-59 years) underwent bilateral breast UST and MRI using a 2-point Dixon technique. Reproducibility of VASS was evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. Volume averaged speed of sound and MR percent water were evaluated and compared using Pearson correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation VASS measurement was 1463 ± 29 m s (range, 1434-1542 m s). There was high similarity between right (1464 ± 30 m s) and left (1462 ± 28 m s) breasts (P = 0.113) (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.98). Mean MR percent water content was 35.7% ± 14.7% (range, 13.2%-75.3%), with small but significant differences between right and left breasts (36.3% ± 14.9% and 35.1% ± 14.7%, respectively; P = 0.004). There was a very strong correlation between VASS and MR percent water density (r = 0.96, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound tomography holds promise as a reliable and reproducible 3-dimensional technique to provide a surrogate measure of breast density and correlates strongly with MR percent water content.

Qualitative Versus Quantitative Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: Applications for the US and Abroad

Mammographic breast density (MBD) has been proven to be an important risk factor for breast cancer and an important determinant of mammographic screening performance. The measurement of density has changed dramatically since its inception. Initial qualitative measurement methods have been found to have limited consistency between readers, and in regards to breast cancer risk. Following the introduction of full-field digital mammography, more sophisticated measurement methodology is now possible. Automated computer-based density measurements can provide consistent, reproducible, and objective results. In this review paper, we describe various methods currently available to assess MBD, and provide a discussion on the clinical utility of such methods for breast cancer screening.

Local breast density assessment using reacquired mammographic images

PURPOSE

The aim of this paper is to evaluate the spatial glandular volumetric tissue distribution as well as the density measures provided by Volpara™ using a dataset composed of repeated pairs of mammograms, where each pair was acquired in a short time frame and in a slightly changed position of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 99 pairs of repeatedly acquired full-field digital mammograms from 99 different patients. The commercial software Volpara™ Density Maps (Volpara Solutions, Wellington, New Zealand) is used to estimate both the global and the local glandular tissue distribution in each image. The global measures provided by Volpara™, such as breast volume, volume of glandular tissue, and volumetric breast density are compared between the two acquisitions. The evaluation of the local glandular information is performed using histogram similarity metrics, such as intersection and correlation, and local measures, such as statistics from the difference image and local gradient correlation measures.

RESULTS

Global measures showed a high correlation (breast volume R=0.99, volume of glandular tissue R=0.94, and volumetric breast density R=0.96) regardless the anode/filter material. Similarly, histogram intersection and correlation metric showed that, for each pair, the images share a high degree of information. Regarding the local distribution of glandular tissue, small changes in the angle of view do not yield significant differences in the glandular pattern, whilst changes in the breast thickness between both acquisition affect the spatial parenchymal distribution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that Volpara™ Density Maps is reliable in estimating the local glandular tissue distribution and can be used for its assessment and follow-up. Volpara™ Density Maps is robust to small variations of the acquisition angle and to the beam energy, although divergences arise due to different breast compression conditions.