1
|
Jung KJ, Mandija S, Kim JH, Ryu K, Jung S, Cui C, Kim SY, Park M, van den Berg CAT, Kim DH. Improving phase-based conductivity reconstruction by means of deep learning-based denoising of B 1 + phase data for 3T MRI. Magn Reson Med 2021; 86:2084-2094. [PMID: 33949721 DOI: 10.1002/mrm.28826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Revised: 03/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To denoise B 1 + phase using a deep learning method for phase-based in vivo electrical conductivity reconstruction in a 3T MR system. METHODS For B 1 + phase deep-learning denoising, a convolutional neural network (U-net) was chosen. Training was performed on data sets from 10 healthy volunteers. Input data were the real and imaginary components of single averaged spin-echo data (SNR = 45), which was used to approximate the B 1 + phase. For label data, multiple signal-averaged spin-echo data (SNR = 128) were used. Testing was performed on in silico and in vivo data. Reconstructed conductivity maps were derived using phase-based conductivity reconstructions. Additionally, we investigated the usability of the network to various SNR levels, imaging contrasts, and anatomical sites (ie, T1 , T2 , and proton density-weighted brain images and proton density-weighted breast images. In addition, conductivity reconstructions from deep learning-based denoised data were compared with conventional image filters, which were used for data denoising in electrical properties tomography (ie, the Gaussian filtering and the Savitzky-Golay filtering). RESULTS The proposed deep learning-based denoising approach showed improvement for B 1 + phase for both in silico and in vivo experiments with reduced quantitative error measures compared with other methods. Subsequently, this resulted in an improvement of reconstructed conductivity maps from the denoised B 1 + phase with deep learning. CONCLUSION The results suggest that the proposed approach can be used as an alternative preprocessing method to denoise B 1 + maps for phase-based conductivity reconstruction without relying on image filters or signal averaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyu-Jin Jung
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Stefano Mandija
- Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostic & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jun-Hyeong Kim
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kanghyun Ryu
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.,Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Soozy Jung
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chuanjiang Cui
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soo-Yeon Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mina Park
- Department of Radiology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Cornelis A T van den Berg
- Computational Imaging Group for MR Diagnostic & Therapy, Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Radiotherapy, Division of Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Dong-Hyun Kim
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Yonsei University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leijsen R, Brink W, van den Berg C, Webb A, Remis R. Electrical Properties Tomography: A Methodological Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:176. [PMID: 33530587 PMCID: PMC7910937 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020176] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2020] [Revised: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 01/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrical properties tomography (EPT) is an imaging method that uses a magnetic resonance (MR) system to non-invasively determine the spatial distribution of the conductivity and permittivity of the imaged object. This manuscript starts by providing clear definitions about the data required for, and acquired in, EPT, followed by comprehensively formulating the physical equations underlying a large number of analytical EPT techniques. This thorough mathematical overview of EPT harmonizes several EPT techniques in a single type of formulation and gives insight into how they act on the data and what their data requirements are. Furthermore, the review describes machine learning-based algorithms. Matlab code of several differential and iterative integral methods is available upon request.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reijer Leijsen
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.L.); (W.B.); (A.W.)
| | - Wyger Brink
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.L.); (W.B.); (A.W.)
| | - Cornelis van den Berg
- Computational Imaging Group for MRI Diagnostics and Therapy, Centre for Image Sciences, University Medical Centre Utrecht, 3508GA Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Andrew Webb
- Department of Radiology, C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333ZA Leiden, The Netherlands; (R.L.); (W.B.); (A.W.)
| | - Rob Remis
- Circuits and Systems Group, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computes Science, Delft University of Technology, 2628CD Delft, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jeong H, Ntolkeras G, Alhilani M, Atefi SR, Zöllei L, Fujimoto K, Pourvaziri A, Lev MH, Grant PE, Bonmassar G. Development, validation, and pilot MRI safety study of a high-resolution, open source, whole body pediatric numerical simulation model. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0241682. [PMID: 33439896 PMCID: PMC7806143 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Numerical body models of children are used for designing medical devices, including but not limited to optical imaging, ultrasound, CT, EEG/MEG, and MRI. These models are used in many clinical and neuroscience research applications, such as radiation safety dosimetric studies and source localization. Although several such adult models have been reported, there are few reports of full-body pediatric models, and those described have several limitations. Some, for example, are either morphed from older children or do not have detailed segmentations. Here, we introduce a 29-month-old male whole-body native numerical model, "MARTIN", that includes 28 head and 86 body tissue compartments, segmented directly from the high spatial resolution MRI and CT images. An advanced auto-segmentation tool was used for the deep-brain structures, whereas 3D Slicer was used to segment the non-brain structures and to refine the segmentation for all of the tissue compartments. Our MARTIN model was developed and validated using three separate approaches, through an iterative process, as follows. First, the calculated volumes, weights, and dimensions of selected structures were adjusted and confirmed to be within 6% of the literature values for the 2-3-year-old age-range. Second, all structural segmentations were adjusted and confirmed by two experienced, sub-specialty certified neuro-radiologists, also through an interactive process. Third, an additional validation was performed with a Bloch simulator to create synthetic MR image from our MARTIN model and compare the image contrast of the resulting synthetic image with that of the original MRI data; this resulted in a "structural resemblance" index of 0.97. Finally, we used our model to perform pilot MRI safety simulations of an Active Implantable Medical Device (AIMD) using a commercially available software platform (Sim4Life), incorporating the latest International Standards Organization guidelines. This model will be made available on the Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging website.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbae Jeong
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Georgios Ntolkeras
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Michel Alhilani
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Charing Cross Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Seyed Reza Atefi
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Lilla Zöllei
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Kyoko Fujimoto
- Center for Devices and Radiological Health, U. S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, United States of America
| | - Ali Pourvaziri
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Michael H. Lev
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - P. Ellen Grant
- Fetal-Neonatal Neuroimaging and Developmental Science Center, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Giorgio Bonmassar
- Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|